They call themselves 'honourable', but they are far from it.
'Persons' in this corporation aggregrate called the government (either state or federal) are not serving the people, but rather themselves and corporations.
To put it quite bluntly, they're nothing more than corporate whores.
Their corruption goes beyond the comprehension of Joe Average.
When or if you expose them, they dobule down on gaslighting you.
If you ask for documents (under FOI) that reveal the true scale of their corruption, you are met with an unpenetrable wall of secrecy and denied the documents that you are legally entitled to.
The Oath of Office by Peter Craig Dutton is covered in this post.
For a person to 'assume' office under the 'Commonwealth of Australia', the following oath must be recited:
"I, (e.g. Peter Craig Dutton) do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law, SO HELP ME GOD!"
as mandated by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act or as commonly referred to as the 'Constitution', as seen in the SCHEDULE from a copy of the original document below:
Just another government clown show:
In the above video it can be seen and heard that Mr. Peter Craig Dutton is sworn in by Governor General of Australia Sir Peter John Cosgrove on the 27th day of August 2018.
The following conversation occurs:
Cosgrove:
"Mister Dutton, I now invite you to take and subscribe the oath of office as Minister for Home Affairs."
Dutton:
"I Peter Craig Dutton do swear that I will well and truly serve the people of Australia, in the office of Minister for Home Affairs and that I will be faithful and bear truly allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second the 'Queen of Australia'* so help me God."
According to the website (gg.gov.au), the Governor-General's office is under the jurisdiction of the 'Commonwealth of Australia' as seen in the screen capture below:
THEREFORE the Oath MUST be taken from the Constitution and not the one recited to then G-G Cosgrove.
Therefore Dutton is not in office lawfully, period.
The corruption of those in government is then taken to the next level.
On 20 April 2020, an FOI request was submitted to the Department of Home Affairs under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act). The applicant sought access to documentation showing that Minister Peter Dutton made and subscribed to the Oath or Affirmation of Allegiance as required by Section 42 of the Australian Constitution.
The specific request was for:
-
A copy of the signed oath or affirmation by Peter Dutton, as per the Schedule in the Constitution.
-
If that document could not be found, any undertaking made by Mr Dutton before assuming his position in Parliament.
-
If neither of the above could be provided, an explanation as to why the oath or affirmation was not made in accordance with the Constitution.
2. Response and Department’s Actions
-
The Department of Home Affairs initially tried to respond informally, providing:
-
An overview of the swearing-in process for Members of Parliament.
-
A link to the Hansard record from 2 July 2019 confirming Mr Dutton and other members swore the oath or affirmation on that date.
-
A link to further info on the Parliament’s website about the procedure: Swearing-in process.
-
-
The applicant was not satisfied with the informal response and requested the matter proceed through formal FOI procedures.
3. Department’s Formal Decision
-
The Department refused the request under Section 24A of the FOI Act, which allows refusal when a document does not exist or cannot be found after a reasonable search.
-
The key points of their decision:
-
The requested document is not an “official document of a Minister” as defined under the FOI Act.
-
The Oath or Affirmation of Allegiance made under Section 42 of the Constitution is a parliamentary function, not related to the Department of Home Affairs' operations.
-
Such documents would fall under the Department of the House of Representatives, which is exempt from the FOI Act under section 68A of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999.
-
Thus, the Department has no access or authority over such records and cannot transfer the request to a relevant body that is subject to FOI.
-
4. Outcome
-
The Department concluded that the requested document:
-
Does not exist within the Department’s records.
-
Is not a document held by or related to the affairs of the Department of Home Affairs.
-
-
The request was formally refused on those grounds.
See response to the FOI:
Source: https://constitutionwatch.com.au/where-is-peter-duttons-oath-of-allegiance/
* - There is no lawfully enacted entity called the 'Queen of Australia'!
See documents within these posts:
- Information Request to establish the Lawful Effect of the Parliament of Australia under the Queen of Australia.
- If the Queens role in the Constitution is entrenched who is the Queen of Australia?
- Has there been legal transfer of the Prerogative power of Assent to the Queen of Australia? FOI-15-094
- Separation of Powers, Australia Act, Validity of the Queen of Australia ~ FOI-15-129
- Is there power to create the Queen of Australia as a Corporation Sole?
- Is the Queen of Australia Sovereign for the purposes of the Commonwealth Constitution?
Victorian courts are fully aware of this fact, and the County Court of Victoria contains the evidence, since 2018, that there is no lawfully enacted 'Queen of Australia'.
No comments:
Post a Comment