A member of the freemasons boasted how his belonging to the 'brotherhood' helped him ‘win’ a case against the other party who was not a member of the freemasons.
The brother then stated that it was already decided in the ‘lodge’ that he was to win a claim against the other party.
The method in which it was to be achieved was in the manner that a letter of the court date was NOT sent to the other party, as a result the attending party ‘wins’ by default.
This is not an isolated incident, as confirmed by the source, and is widely practiced from the lowest traffic infringement to the higher level of corporate law suits.
The mass media conveniently ommits any references to masonry, and its external influences.
No comments:
Post a Comment