There are at least a couple of fundamentals the average ‘Joe’ should be aware of, that being:
1). The first job of a government is to ‘look after the safety of its people’, meaning the people in the Executive, Parliament and last but definitely not least that being the Judiciary, meaning the serfs/plebs/general population are left out of the equation.
2). The corporation aggregate commonly referred to as the 'Australian Government', being part of the Five Eyes surveillance network, obtains its residents data in real-time storing it on servers for later retrieval.
This screenshot of an SMS sent out to Australian mobile phone numbers has not been intercepted by the government as fraudulent or at risk to the vulnerable.
The ‘vulnerable’ are at the best of times targeted, neglected and often dejected by those in authority.
A vulnerable man or woman may fall into this category via mental, physical, or financial difficulties.
With regards to the SMS, a website is mentioned that has zero correlation to any mentioned topic within the message.
Keeping in mind that the government has a real-time blacklist of sites that it sees not fit for Australian internet users to access or 'consume', where any access to the site is met with a generic error that notifies the user that the sites does not exist, even though in reality it does, once one changes the DNS servers.
The fact the site mentioned in the message is not flagged and allowed to go through Australian servers is a ‘deliberate’ failure of government.
Authorities are alerted IMMEDIATELY if a message from an Australian registered mobile number like 0461380 235, contains ‘key words’ which may threaten the ‘safety’ of the government’s people, as opposed to the general population.
The government is more than capable to stamp out ALL messages that contain malicious intent / fraudulent dealings against the general population, but rather chooses not to do so.
That’s how much the government ‘cares’ about you (the ‘vulnerable’).
So why would they really care about your health, with regards to a particular global event that started 4 years ago?
No comments:
Post a Comment