A look into Corporate fraud in Australia, Stranglehold of Monopolies, Telecom's Oppression, Biased Law System, Corporate influence in politics, Industrial Relations disadvantaging workers, Outsourcing Australian Jobs, Offshore Banking, Petrochemical company domination, Invisibly Visible.
It's not what you see, it's what goes on behind the scenes. Australia, the warrantless colony.
Note: Site has more info in desktop mode or 'web version' as seen at bottom of page, when on smartphone.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 122 104 616)
Australia's Prime Minister (CEO) Tony Abbott : "Australia is Open for Business"
There is literally
no limit as to the amount of ‘misinformation’ the mainstream media is able to
get away with.
Rupert
Murdoch’s News Corporation published an article on the 1st of June
2021 at 2:22pm stating that a FOI (Freedom of Information) response from the
Australian Government’s Department of Health, under the Therapeutic Goods
Administration is “misinformation purportedly from the TGA”.
They
supplied a part of the document, but deliberately did not include the whole document
that was in their possession.
Why?
Why did you not allow your readers make up their own mind with regards to the entire document?
The
Facebook readers had their say on what they think.
Here is the
document in its entirety.
We are
aware that this is an original document factually from the TGA, where the only
changes to it are the blacked out ‘personal’ references.
Maybe this is also "misinformation purportedly from the TGA"?
See the
article from news.com.au in the following link:
The
governments of the colony called Australia rule in secrecy, denying access to
all sorts of documentation.
MANY in
government act as if they are above the law, and even if caught, since there is
no separation of powers, their brethren in the judicature have their back.
The people
are conned that they live in a democracy but the reality is more of a
corporatocracy or a fascist state.
The people
are conned that they have a choice in certain matters, but if they do not
follow a government ‘suggestion’ they are punished financially, limited in their
actions or even ejected from employment or even health services.
The people
are conned that ‘no person is above the law’ where in reality many police
personnel get away with assault, and yes that includes the assault of women.
The people
are told the age old saying that “nothing to
hide, nothing to fear” applies, to the plebs of course but not those in
government.
The people
in government seem to forget that their very existence is funded by those who
they oppress.
It is not a
privilege to obtain government documents if asked for them, but a right as we
(the people) have paid for them, where they are ‘our’ documents.
We are the stakeholders of those documents.
For example
with regards to the Melbourne lock downs of 2020, if the government has
followed the law, obtained advice based on factual evidence with regards to
procedures then there should be no need for the secrecy.
Those documents MUST be released, as this is in the interest of the 'public'.
If someone
in their court case subpoenas the documentation, and the government refuses,
then those involved would be in criminal contempt of the court.
Currently
(the previous) premier Daniel Andrews has refused to hand over the documents with
regards to the Melbourne lock downs.
ALSO, in a
court case in Melbourne the Sheriff’s Office of Victoria was subpoenaed to produce
warrants arsing from road traffic infringements which it failed to produce.
No warrants
exist arsing from traffic infringement notices, in Victoria.
The people
in government act in contempt of the law, with total disregard of how they
effect the livelihood of people, and when/if caught in (alleged) criminal
activity their brethren in the judicature support their criminal actions.
There are too many stories where the justice system business has failed the victims.
It seems that the Victorian Government is enticing / forcing / mandating persons to download an app for the purposes of contract tracing, in direct conflict with federal law.
While the federal law Section 94H of the Privacy Act 1988 or the Privacy Amendment (Public Health Contact Information) Act 2020 mentions a specific app, the purpose of that app/program is for contact tracing.
Since this information is on the government's website, and not in any 'Act' this requirement or 'suggestion' can be ignored.
There is a oppressive push for governments and corporations
to obtain more personal data under the auspice of being in the interest of
public health but this could not be further from the truth.
Before you were told that you must use a government sponsored
white elephant called the COVIDSafe app when you leave your home or enter a business/public
premises.
But there is one huge problem with that.
NO person can force you the user/customer/consumer/product to use
this program.
It is against the law.
To be more specific, against Section 94H of the Commonwealth
law called the Privacy Act 1988.
This also appears in another law, that being the Privacy Amendment
(Public Health Contact Information) Act 2020, under the same section as the
above Act.
Samsung, Xiaomi and Oppo users of Google's versions of Android prior to version 12 would have their screenshots put up on the internet.
This is not a 'bug' or an 'error' but rather a deliberate(?) attempt a obtaining information of what people are interested in, WITHOUT their knowledge or consent.
Realistically, the companies involved should be sued, en masse.
We do not recommend the use of OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer), versions of Android, which contain malicious closed source code inserted by Google.
Instead we recommend the use of Android in its purest form called AOSP (Android Open Source Project), which is open source and is scrutinised by security researchers where it does not contain any tracking or malicious code.
Some of the groups that maintain and make AOSP available are:
The Victorian government has been caught out stating false
information in relation to an exposure site.
Social media users were greeted in the early afternoon of Tuesday the 18th of
May 2021, with a message from the Victorian Department of Health that there is
a new exposure site, in the CBD of Melbourne.
They were also given instructions on what to do.
There is one HUGE problem with this.
The fact is that there is no new exposure at any site
whatsoever.
In fact there have been no alleged cases since the 7th
of May 2021, or 11 days prior according to the site that reported that there is a new case today.
They blatantly lied.
The post has been reported to the administrators of the
social media site, but we have very little faith that any posts from the
Victorian Department of Health will be stopped, as ‘we’ that taxpayers are
paying the social media site for this false information, where the site profits
from every post from the VDoH puts up.
MANY a lesser person’s posts have been banned for much less of
a so called excuse.
Technical experts have exposed the fact the Apple’s new Bluetooth
product the AirTag can be hacked and used for nefarious purposes, but it’s not
the privacy culprit it’s made out to be.
You are of zero use to corporations (e.g. Apple) if you only
purchase their product once, or even once in 10 years, using the principle ‘if
it’s ain’t broke, don’t fix it’, so they have an enormous budget set aside for
marketing, to bedazzle consumers to purchase this ½ year model update where the
in colour is purple and they must buy it in order to remain cool/tech savvy/modern.
Apple, the masters of marketing or rather deception, work on
the human emotion of desire to sell their underwhelming and lacklustre featured phones, where they have established a huge following which in the industry is
called ‘fan boys’.
Just because Apple’s advertisements talk about privacy does
not really mean that they’re truly private.
What’s worse is the logic of Apple’s fan boys where a mindset
is that gay users trust what Tim Cook says because he's gay.
One’s sexual orientation has nothing to do with the business
or policies of the corporation.
Mainstream so called tech journalists are nothing more than
flogs promoting the warez with zero in-depth analysis of the products
concerned.
Apple’s AirTag is not the culprit, in the war against you privacy,
where it’s only the half culprit, the enabler, where the iPhone/iPad is the
other half.
Why is there such an oppressive push to purchase the new
iPhone?
Newer hardware (and software) enables corporations and
governments to acquire more data, more efficiently and best of all, at your
expense.
With the new iPhone comes new software which is called
malware within the industry as it’s embedded into the phone, tracing your every
move, always turned on, where you as the ‘owner’ of the phone have zero control over that part of the phone's operation.
One of the key ingredients in this user sponsored global spy
network is the humble invention called Bluetooth.
Gone are the days where this protocol could only communicate
10 meters or 100m, where now it can go as far as 240m (line of sight) and 40m
inside.
The malware that Apple and Google have ‘baked’ into your
phone carries out the constantly on functions of Wi-Fi scanning and Bluetooth scanning
in order to trace your every move.
Your iPhone, is used constantly to log your
position, where the AirTag is the trigger then your iPhone is used to pass data on,
a total disaster for your privacy, irrespective of the claims that Apple may make with regard to encryption.
For Apple users there is no privacy solution, where if privacy
is truly your concern (which it should be) then it would be followed by the action of ‘throwing away’
your Apple device.
For Android users, there is a solution that being to ‘de-Google’
your phone, which means to install the bare bones version of Android called
AOSP, which can only be done on certain phones.
IF Apple were to claim that there is truly no concern with regards to your privacy, then show us the source code, as 'nothing to hide nothing to fear' saying applies, where the concern of 'Intellectual Property' is irrelevant.
With the use of Apple products you're enabling this 'Skynet' to exist.
See article, Flashback: a brief history of Bluetooth at:
A new release published by Italy’s Antitrust Authority calls out
Google for its “abuse of dominant position” and fined Google for €100
million on the grounds that Google excluded Enel X’s app JuicePass, an
app that helps drivers find and reserve spots at charging stations.
The case against Google is that the Authority’s investigation found
Google excluded the JuicePass app from the Android Auto Platform for
more than two years. “According to the Authority’s findings, Google did
not allow Enel X Italia to develop a version of its JuicePass app
compatible with Android Auto.
Italy’s Antitrust Authority issued a cease-and-desist order to Google
with details on how it should respond in order to “stop the abuse and
avoid the negative effects of the exclusion of Enel X Italia’s app from
Android Auto.” Google is ordered to allow Enel X Italia on the platform,
as well offer tools to other app developers who want to make apps for
Android Auto.
In Google’s defense, the reason for why JuicePass hasn’t been
approved for Android Auto is not mentioned. A spokesperson for Google
Italy told Reuters that Google “respectfully disagrees” with the
Authority’s decision. Google prioritizes safety on Android Auto and it
has strict guidelines on which apps it supports, according to the Google
spokesperson.
Meanwhile, Enel X is aware of the decision and hopes that the outcome
will grant “a level playing field with Google Apps” for JuicePass and
all recharging app developers.
As time goes by, two of the world’s largest data collection
corporations, Apple and Google obtain more and more data on you, where later
this data is used against you.
One of the key ingredients with regards to data collection
is to obtain your person’s identity.
Under the guise of security (an now allegedly heath), Google
needs to obtain your phone number which is linked to your identity in order to
collect more data under that identity.
How is Google going to do this?
By some things called:
1). Two step verification (2FV),
2). Two Factor Authentication (2FA)
To read more on this topic, see the following articles:
