A look into Corporate fraud in Australia, Stranglehold of Monopolies, Telecom's Oppression, Biased Law System, Corporate influence in politics, Industrial Relations disadvantaging workers, Outsourcing Australian Jobs, Offshore Banking, Petrochemical company domination, Invisibly Visible.
It's not what you see, it's what goes on behind the scenes. Australia, the warrantless colony.
Note: Site has more info in desktop mode or 'web version' as seen at bottom of page, when on smartphone.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 122 104 616)
Australia's Prime Minister (CEO) Tony Abbott : "Australia is Open for Business"
Now that the rape of several women within the walls of
federal parliament has come out into the ‘public news media’, the authorities
are scrambling for cover and removing all references to Bruce Lehrmann,
together with denying knowledge of any action or reports of rape.
The CEO of the ‘Australian Government’ Mr. Scott John Morrison,
knew of the ‘alleged’ rape and so did many other people, but they chose to
sweep this under the parliament’s carpets.
The Australian authorities have an excellent track record in
protecting rapists and sex offenders within positions of authority, much to the
detriment of the general population.
Watch now as the cover-ups and lies spill into the public
domain.
The worldwide push for corporations to obtain more data from
people via the use of smartphones and more importantly apps is overwhelmingly
oppressive without any shame and in the process deceitful.
Due to the so called ‘news’ ban in Australia for data
collection Goliaths Facebook and Google, other corporations have jumped on the
bandwagon in deceiving users.
One of the least personal data generating ways one can view
the so called ‘news’ publications is via a web browser on a personal computer,
which is attached to a VPN or via an anonymising web browser.
Governments and corporations do not want you to conduct ‘business’
on the internet in this manner, so they lie, deceive, entice or ‘force’ you to
use apps on a smartphone.
Rupert Murdoch’s corporation stated that there are ‘only’ 4
ways to obtain content from it, as shown in screen capture below.
This is false information.
What was (deliberately) not mentioned is the fact the
content can also be viewed within a web browser on a smartphone or personal
computer.
Using an app on your smartphone gives the corporation more
access to your private and personal data, irrespective of what
permissions/switches you may think you have disabled.
The
study for Digital Content Next found much of the data Google collects
from Android-enabled devices happens when the user is not interacting
with Google products. (Illustration/Pamela Saxon)
Google may not know whether you’ve been bad or good but it knows when
you’re sleeping and when you’re awake. If you use an Android device
with the Chrome browser running, the tech giant knows whether you are
traveling by foot or car, where you shop, how often you use your
Starbucks app and when you’ve made a doctor’s appointment.
Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor of Engineering Douglas C. Schmidt
studied Google’s data collection practices under a “day in the life”
scenario of an Android phone user. The 55-page study, commissioned by
Digital Content Next, a trade group representing digital publishers,
also detailed data mining over a 24-hour period from an idle Android
phone with Chrome running in the background.
The stationary smartphone running Google’s Android operating system
and Chrome sent data to the company’s servers an average of 14 times an
hour, 24 hours a day.
“These products are able to collect user data through a variety of
techniques that may not be easily graspable by a general user,” Schmidt
concluded in the paper, released in August 2018. “A major part of
Google’s data collection occurs while a user is not directly engaged
with any of its products.”
Mounting privacy concerns
The study comes amid growing scrutiny of how Google collects data,
including lawsuits by consumers who claim the company misled them over
its practices when they used their devices in “incognito” mode and
attempted to turn off their location history settings.
Also escalating is a larger debate about digital privacy and
consideration in Washington D.C. of stricter privacy regulation, a step
the European Union took in May 2018. Facebook, too, is under pressure
for a range of practices, including how it gathers data even when people
aren’t using the social media network – through third-party websites
that have Facebook “like” and “share” buttons.
“The national conversation about personal data collection by various
companies is intensifying, with Americans beginning to understand who’s
invested in knowing their online behaviors,” Schmidt said. “As more
information becomes available about which companies are monitoring our
online behavior and for what purpose, laws and regulations will need to
keep up.”
After the study’s release, Google questioned its credibility.
“This report is commissioned by a professional lobbyist group, and
written by a witness for Oracle in their ongoing copyright litigation
with Google. So, it’s no surprise that it contains wildly misleading
information,” the company said in a statement.
“In May of 2016 I was a witness for the Oracle vs. Google ‘Fair Use
Copyright,’ trial (which had nothing to do with Google’s data collection
practices), but have not been involved with this case since then,”
Schmidt replied. “Moreover, Google has not been able to identify any
specific aspects of my report’s methods or conclusions as erroneous.”
Phoning home – often
Schmidt studied data gathering from all Google platforms and products,
such as Android mobile devices, the Chrome browser, YouTube and Google
Photos, plus the company’s publishing and advertising services, such as
DoubleClick and AdWords.
In the study’s scenario, a researcher created a new Google account as
“Jane” and carried a factory-reset Android mobile phone with a new SIM
card throughout a normal day. While riding the subway to work, she
searched for cold medicine and later scheduled a doctor’s appointment.
From the appointment confirmation email, Google created a calendar
event.
She searched for a new lunch spot, took Uber home from work, used
Google Play and Google Home for music and watched videos on YouTube.
The gray “pings” represent passive data collection during a typical day of an Android phone user. (Illustration/Pamela Saxon)
In all those instances Jane was actively engaged with Google
products. The study distinguishes active data collection and “passive
data collection,” which occurs when the user is not using Google
products directly.
Surprisingly, Schmidt wrote, “Google collected or inferred over
two-thirds of the information through passive means. At the end of the
day, Google identified user interests with remarkable accuracy.”
What qualifies as passive data? With Chrome running and location
enabled, an Android phone is “pinged” throughout the day by other
wireless networks, hot spots, cell towers and Bluetooth beacons. During a
short 15-minute walk around a residential neighborhood, for example,
Jane’s phone sent nine location requests to Google. The requests
collected 100 unique identifiers from public and private Wi-Fi access
points.
“Android phones can also use information from the Bluetooth beacons
registered with Google’s Proximity Beacon feature,” Schmidt said. “These
beacons not only provide user’s geolocation coordinates, but could also
pinpoint exact floor levels in buildings.”
Even when a consumer does not use Google Maps, Google Search, Gmail
or YouTube, the company’s publisher and ad products collect data as she
visits web pages, uses apps and clicks ads. The number of passive data
collection events was twice that of active ones.
Comparing iPhone data
The study also compared data collection from an idle Android phone
running Chrome with an idle iPhone running Apple’s operating system and
the Safari browser. Google did not collect user location information
during the 24-hour time frame. The Android phone communicated with
Google twice as often as the iPhone did.
“I found that an idle Android phone running the Chrome browser sends
back to Google nearly 50 times as many data requests per hour as an idle
iOS phone running Safari,” Schmidt said. “I also found that idle
Android devices communicate with Google nearly 10 times more frequently
as Apple devices communicate with Apple servers. These results highlight
the fact that Android and Chrome platforms are critical vehicles for
Google’s passive data collection.”
Schmidt found Google has the ability to identify specific users by
combining “user-anonymous” advertiser data with its own collected data.
The study could not determine whether the company takes such steps to
link de-anonymized data when a user logs into Gmail or other Google
services. In its statement, Google said it does not connect the data
sources or identify users.
Not using Google’s devices or services does limit data collection,
but the company’s dominant advertising network and tight integration of
the Android platform, Chrome browser and other products makes it nearly
impossible to block Google from collecting some data, the study said.
“Overall, I found that a major part of Google’s data collection
occurs while a user is not directly engaged with any of its products,”
said Schmidt. “The magnitude of Google’s data collection is significant,
especially on Android mobile devices, arguably the most popular
personal accessory now carried 24/7 by more than 2 billion people.”
The study, “Google’s Data Collection,” was made available to the public at Schmidt’s request. Visit Digital Content Next to download the report.
Sources used in the study
Google’s My Activity and Takeout tools, which describe information collected during use of Google’s user-facing products
Data intercepted as it is sent to Google server domains while Google or third-party products are used
Google’s privacy policies, both general and product-specific
Other third-party research that has examined Google’s data collection efforts
The people in the government of Victoria have lied about the
origin of an alleged COVID-19 ‘case’, which was also responsible for a ‘snap’
lockdown, where the mainstream media perpetuated this lie.
Daniel Michael Andrews stated on national television that
apparently someone allegedly with the disease or rather (technically) allegedly with the SARS-CoV-2
virus was at a venue at 426 Sydney Road Coburg on the night of February the 6th
2021.
Upon ‘fact checking’ this address many people would resort
to Google’s street view where it would show an Asian cuisine by the name of Big
Belly, as being operational.
Well here’s the problem, the business has not been operational
for quite some time and definitely not on the night Daniel Andrews stated.
The doors were shut and there was no business conducted at
the premises.
Sydney Road has a few suburbs under its belt where some have
even stated that the eatery was Penny Black, but the problem there it the Penny
Black is in Brunswick and not under the street address of 426, but rather 420.
The government has lied on many occasions with regards to
the so called pandemic and this latest news is not any different.
People who have been financially disadvantaged by this
latest lockdown should seek legal advice in order to sue Daniel Michael Andrews and the state of Victoria.
On Friday the 12th of February 2021, Daniel
Michael Andrews announced that Victoria would be in a stage 4 lockdown state
for 5 days, as a result of a failure of government with regards to the so
called hotel quarantine at Melbourne Airport.
Even though people have shown screen captures from the dhhs
website stating that the lockdown will not be lifted on Wednesday the 17th
of February, Daniel Andrews has dismissed this ‘rumour’.
We have obtained information, from a reliable source that
the lockdown will last three weeks or into the first week of March.
This will be dependent on the so called ‘cases’ in the
community.
Remembering that the current premier, Daniel Andrews was in
charge of the health portfolio where he stopped testing in order to obtain zero
cases during the swine flu.
Please note that the diagnosis that gives the ‘cases’
scenario is inaccurately carried out, something the mainstream deliberately neglects
to inform the people.
See video by Dr. Sam Bailey of the title COVID-19: Behind the PCR Curtain:
Edit:
We've since learned that Andrew's advisory team recommended to him that the snap lockdown be lifted from Wed 17-Feb-2021 &23:59, as initially it was officially stated, despite the fact that the lockdown was to continue past Wednesday.
The mainstream media’s so called ‘journalists’ have gone on
a propaganda spree totally omitting the root cause of the so called problem, ALL Victorians are facing as of Friday the 12th of Feb 23:59.
The government of Victoria is in charge of the so called
hotel ‘quarantine’ where allegedly the (UK) virus has escaped from an area the
people in government are in charge of.
Quite simply put this means that the people in government
are responsible for the failure to contain the virus within the boundaries of
the Holiday Inn, Tullamarine Airport.
The people in government are responsible for the alleged UK
strain entering Australia.
As usual where ANY ‘failure of government’ occurs the people
pay the penalty.
So how does the government ascertain that someone has the
virus?
With something called a PCR test.
BUT there is an issue with that.
See video of the title The Truth About PCR Tests by Dr. Sam
Bailey:
Victorians are locked down, meanwhile the tennis continues.
Victoria, allegedly the 'Gold Standard' but for who?
When you download TOR products (Browser, VPN client) for privacy purposes you are flagged by the
government, and treated first and foremost as a criminal.
You are on their watch list.
Another way to protect your privacy is to obtain a VPN only
product from service providers worldwide.
On February the 1st 2021, first day of the third week
of Biden’s administration, VPN traffic in the United States became suddenly
throttled, where ALL traffic has gone through something called ‘deep packet inspection’ on the fly.
In layman’s terms the US has implemented its version of
China’s intranet.
Such a worldwide significant event, that was not covered by
Rupert Murdoch’s technology ‘gurus’?
Who would have thought?
For more details of what occurred, see video of the title; Live - A secret privacy war happening right now!, and Q&A (1hr 33m)
Australia’s real estate industry is dodgy as and they’re
thick as thieves where some action has been made to curtail their criminal activity.
Despite a royal commission into banking it is still an industry that
has had no major shakeup where criminal activity is still rife.
People are blissfully unaware that banks operate on usury,
where once upon a time this was banned under a law called the ‘Statute of the
Jewry ‘ by King Edward I.
Another action that has escaped the eagle eye of the
authorities is the way doctors conduct business.
Doctors have been getting away with (financial) murder for
quite some time with zero action of ‘protection’ by the authorities that care
so much for the ‘consumers’ of health otherwise known as patients.
A sick patent walks into the clinic to obtain help from the
doctor, where the consultation fee of say $300 is prepaid. After waiting for
the doctor for approx 15 minutes, the patient is seen where even before taking
a seat in front of the doctor, the doctor looks at a piece of paper and states
that he cannot help the patient stating that the patient has to go elsewhere
while saying goodbye promptly.
In another example a patient is seen by the doctor, where
the doctor stated that the results are old ones, which he cannot go by, again
charging the patient in the magnitude of $300.
One health care ‘consumer’ had the pleasure of sitting in
front of the doctor for approximately 5 minutes to obtain a piece of paper to
go elsewhere for tests all for the measly sum of the $300 fee, only to return
to the same doctor for an explanation of the results for a further fee, without
telling the consumer that another fee is to be charged, whereas in the past the
initial consulting fee included the results.
The above examples are not isolated ones, where many consumers
are being harmed by doctors and their so called ‘practices’.
Are you being ripped off?
Take action, remembering that silence is acquiescence.
