Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Constitutional Lawyers the new ‘terrorists’ according to the Australian Government?

The Australian plebs have been warned that there will be NO INSUBORDINATION!!! !!! !!!

Apparently now if you are a ‘sovereign citizen’ (which according to Australian law – an impossibility!) you are automatically branded a terrorist.

Read article of the headline:
Sovereign citizens: Terrorism assessment warns of rising threat from anti-government extremists

But could there have been an age-old enemy of the government brewing right under their noses and setup and supported by the very people in government?

Who is this old foe?

Could it be the meek, mild and very learned ‘Constitutional Lawyer’?

Let’s start educating the Aussie pleb as to what a Constitutional Lawyer is.

If you are challenging your criminal (read administrative) ‘fine’ for example for parking, in the lowest ‘court’, the Magistrates’ then you could be challenging the validity of that law or Act that you are being allegedly charged under.

When  you go up the ‘court’ ladder it’s only a couple of steps until you reach the ‘High Court of Australia’.

What is the High Court of Australia, the ‘footy fanatic’ uneducated pleb may ask?

It’s a place set up by the Australian government where people can question the law with respect to the Australian Constitution.

So what does this person called a ‘Constitutional Lawyer’ do?

This ‘person’ focuses on the law, and the various relationships of it with respect to the Australian Constitution.

Download yourself a copy of it at:

It’s actually the Ninth part of a document called An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia [9th July 1900]. It is an Act of the United Kingdom.

Some people (judicial registrars/magistrates/judges) may tell you that it is a ‘historical document’, ‘outdated’ or not relevant to today’s legislation.

BULLOCKS !!! !!! !!!

This document was pulled from the public curriculum in the 1970’s to keep people the plebs in the dark.

It’s one of the more powerful documents with relation to how the ‘authorities’ MUST behave.

The court’s are a sham, practicing in deceit, fraud and various other criminal activities.

The country’s lawyers are pulling the wool over your eyes with respect to the ‘law’, and not fully disclosing to you what’s really going on.



Inconsistency of laws
                   When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.

Ref: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s109.html 

Just ask a ‘Constitutional Lawyer’....

No comments: