The Australian
plebs have been warned that there will be NO INSUBORDINATION!!! !!! !!!
Apparently
now if you are a ‘sovereign citizen’ (which according to Australian law – an impossibility!)
you are automatically branded a terrorist.
Read article of the headline:
Sovereign citizens: Terrorism assessment warns of
rising threat from anti-government extremists
But could
there have been an age-old enemy of the government brewing right under their
noses and setup and supported by the very people in government?
Who is this
old foe?
Could it be
the meek, mild and very learned ‘Constitutional Lawyer’?
Let’s start
educating the Aussie pleb as to what a Constitutional Lawyer is.
If you are challenging
your criminal (read administrative) ‘fine’ for example for parking, in the
lowest ‘court’, the Magistrates’ then you could be challenging the validity of
that law or Act that you are being allegedly charged under.
When you go up the ‘court’ ladder it’s only a
couple of steps until you reach the ‘High Court of Australia’.
What is the
High Court of Australia, the ‘footy fanatic’ uneducated pleb may ask?
It’s a
place set up by the Australian government where people can question the law
with respect to the Australian Constitution.
So what
does this person called a ‘Constitutional Lawyer’ do?
This ‘person’
focuses on the law, and the various relationships of it with respect to the
Australian Constitution.
Download
yourself a copy of it at:
It’s
actually the Ninth part of a document called An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia [9th
July 1900]. It is an Act of the United Kingdom.
Some people (judicial registrars/magistrates/judges)
may tell you that it is a ‘historical document’, ‘outdated’ or not relevant to
today’s legislation.
BULLOCKS
!!! !!! !!!
This
document was pulled from the public curriculum in the 1970’s to keep people the
plebs in the dark.
It’s one of
the more powerful documents with relation to how the ‘authorities’ MUST behave.
The court’s
are a sham, practicing in deceit, fraud and various other criminal activities.
The country’s
lawyers are pulling the wool over your eyes with respect to the ‘law’, and not
fully disclosing to you what’s really going on.
PLEASE NOTE:
Ref: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s109.html
Just ask a ‘Constitutional Lawyer’....
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 109
Inconsistency of laws
When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the
latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the
inconsistency, be invalid.
Ref: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s109.html
Just ask a ‘Constitutional Lawyer’....
No comments:
Post a Comment