At the moment in the I.T. industry, biometric (face, fingerprint)
unlocking of your smartphone is touted being most secure, but unfortunately
this may not be the case under many circumstances.
The brand new (on Australian shelves) Samsung Galaxy S10 has
the face unlock feature built into the phone, where unfortunately for the
'consumer' the unlocking feature is not so secure as shown in the link below:
Some people (excluding the footy bogans) may have noticed
that the authorities are ramping up the police state policy in this colony we
call Australia.
In a deliberate misinformation campaign, only a handful of
police 'mishappenings' are ever reported by the mainstream media, where the
victims of police criminal activity are not in control of their actions or have had their
smartphone confiscated in order not to record criminal activity committed by
the police.
It's at this point in time where your face id or fingerprint
scanning feature of your phone becomes a liability rather than an asset, where
when one is (quite often) incapacitated, either being illegally beset upon by
eight officers, or just plain vanilla
knocked out, one's phone can be easily unlocked.
Another 'plus' for
biometric id is the 'free' (well technically, corporate slave sponsored) data
it generates which is then taken to further enhance government public scanning
programs.
Pattern, picture of PIN unlock is still considered more
secure especially with any interaction with Australia's law enforcement (which
can go pear shaped very quickly through no fault of your own), unless of course the officers
involved are practicing Roman Catholics of yesteryear, where a 'little' torture
goes a long way, like the judicial system did back in the day.
No comments:
Post a Comment