Police remove inciting post

Trust the police?

Um, never!

Record all of your interactions with police, hidden or in plain sight!

What the peasants get accused of, the police get away with.

More often than not the police deceive the court, falsify or tamper with evidence or act illegally with regards to the accused (i.e. a member of the serf population).

MANY people are of the ill-conceived idea that in this colony, they live in a ‘democracy’ or even have something called ‘free’ speech.

People may be aware that recently the police have been door knocking for a ‘fishing’ expedition with regards to the person (allegedly) posting on social media, their opinions, mainly with regards to gatherings or protests.

It is irrelevant what the police consider inciting or even illegal, where all they are doing is getting that person to incriminate themselves.

If the police come knocking on your door with regards to an alleged post in your name or another person’s name, on social media, you are under zero obligation at law to answer ANY of their questions, where your response should be for them to leave or answered with a ‘no comment’.

If they are hand delivering a so called alleged infringement notice, you should feel very special, where you 'deal' with it, i.e. take the matter to court.

Victoria Police posted an ‘inciting’ post on social media, where they later removed it.

See screencaptures:

Were you taught this in school?:

Source:supplied.

Trust the mainstream media on a tech article?

Who you do trust when it comes to articles?

Well, according to the New South Wales police force (the first force in Australia made up entirely of criminals), the government is the one you trust, where the responses on social media suggested otherwise, but that’s another story and if you must, then:

https://www.facebook.com/nswpoliceforce/posts/10158234397146185

Samsung is aggressively advertising its new flagship Note20 Ultra 5G (that you really need or want?) where its accolade is ‘all day’ battery life.

Remember phones that had all week battery life?

Okay that may not be fair, because they were feature (or dumb) phones, but how about older smart phones that had a few days battery life?

Let’s make the excuse of larger screens, quicker processors maybe even approaching ‘supercomputer’ speeds (well according to Victorian premier Daniel Michael Andrews), but battery technology and size has also progressed to compensate for the power hungry components.

So what’s really killing your battery where you cannot get more than a day out of your $2k flagship?

Two culprits that the majority of people have, that being the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer ) software, where we’ll start with first.

Most new Android phones come loaded with Google’s version of Android being at Q for 2020, which is an update from Pie or version 9, which is an update from Oreo or version 8.

Together with the OEM’s (Samsung, Motorola, Nokia  etc) software suite preloaded on the phone, this year’s version Q has an unprecedented level of spyware built into the operating system, which the ‘consumer’ cannot get rid of.

This comes in the form of Contact Tracing and Wi-Fi Scanning, where your movements are constantly being recorded and then transmitted to overseas servers.

The problem for the consumer is that the person is not in control of their data flow and there is no way of disabling this, even with the software toggles turned off.

The other battery drainer is the Facebook app.

It's literally spyware and if you MUST use face book use your smartphone's browser instead or better still use it on a personal computer.

Apple's iOS is also a data gathering 'spyware' platform which is not discussed in this post.

With regards to the Android operating system, not all is lost though.

There are about two dozen phone manufacturers including Google, Huawei, LG, Motorola, Samsung and Sony where you can remove Google’s spyware version of Android which also includes Contract Tracing and install a bare bones Android called AOSP (Android Open Source Project) where also Wi-Fi scanning does not work.

In test results which we obtained where the smartphone was loaded with the factory operating system, compared to the AOSP version, the battery life was literally doubled, i.e. over 2 days worth of ‘normal’ use with AOSP.

Do you really need to latest self-sponsored corporate/government surveillance device?

Dan the lock down man, small business hater

The policing authorities have now publicly stated that they did not know of his lock down plan.

The health authorities have now publicly stated that they did not know of his lock down plan.

Yet the Victorian premier still enacted a lock down, unlawfully:

So, what's the deal with Dan the ‘lock down’ man?

He makes out that he’s a country boy, in line with Labor party’s social demographic?

Sure it’s not rocket science to ‘Wiki’ him, just like ex-Telstra co Solomon Trujillo, but good ol’ Sol’s wiki page has changed from the original one because it exposed his criminal activities.

What the wiki will not tell those pesky protesting plebs of Melbourne is that ‘young’ Andrews is on a  small business hate bender.

Now now, let’s  not pretend that some small ‘relief’ package will help small businesses, where a ‘failure of government’ has done a lot more destruction to small businesses than it allegedly helped.

Remember when his actions caused massive job losses, where is family member was in charge of the administration support to those people? You know a ‘money for mates’ (but in this case family) deal.

Briefly, his family had a small business in Pascoe Vale Sth, and as a result of a neighbour’s business going up in flames, literally, so did his family’s business.

This is where the ‘problem’ is, where his family’s business was under insured and as a result they suffered financially.

So, as a result of their ‘bad’ business management, they suffered financially.

But, no you can’t tell that to him, where he ‘blames’ the other party as you do.

Seen him double down on everything with regards to this fiasco?

Seen him lie through his teeth in press conferences?

Seen the falsified covid numbers/deaths?

Not fit to be any sort of ‘leader’ by a long shot!

Remember, according to Dan it’s NEVER about ‘Human Rights’ (because he breached every one of them?)

Dan, a person that no longer needs to be voted out of office, but rather removed from it.

Daniel Andrews told you about the lawsuit and unlawful lock down?

People in government tell you everything, right?

Nothing can be misconstrued and no words are misunderstood?

ANY statistic/figure is not ambiguous and easily verifiable?

Well, maybe the above may apply in a 'real' country, but not so in this colony we call Australia.

EVERY so called press conference he made was full of crap!

Say those EXACT words in parliament, Daniel Michael Andrews!

Here's the real deal (Video 7m23s):

 

State of Emergency & curfew acted out illegally by Daniel Andrews?

During this fiasco people have been made aware that people in government lie.

They lie to protect their cronies.

They lie to protect the business interests of their family members that rort taxpayer funds.

They lie with regards to the so called COVID-19 death rate.

Once the lies start to fall apart the consequences are seen.

The Chief Medical Officer bails on Andrews.

The newly appointed chief commissioner of Victoria Shane Patton (that's another 'joke' for another post) bails on Andrew as well.

So, if the law applies to ‘every person’ including the enactment of various stages of emergency/lockdown/curfew, why isn’t that adhered to?

Is the premier immune from the law?

Is he immune from the consequences of not following the law?

As usual they bail, never to be held accountable for their actions, ‘disappearing’ to other portfolios never to be hounded by the mainstream media, like the serfs are if they do something ‘wrong’ (whatever that may be at law in this prison isle).

Was the letter of the law followed by Andrews?

See reference: https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/publications/research-papers/download/36-research-papers/13962-emergency-powers-public-health-and-covid-19

No media outcry over flu deaths (8.5/day in ’18) or vaccine?

So, how’s that flu vaccine working for you?

Well, whatever the deal, did the mainstream media mention it to you that on average 8.5 people per day died in 2018?

Source: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/47E19CA15036B04BCA2577570014668B?Opendocument=

Did they say that Flu Lives Matter too?

Backtracking, it seems very trivial or as if no one cared that despite a ‘flu shot’ existing, people still died.

Why all the kerfuffle about the Coronavirus?

Isn’t the flu contagious too?

Aaahhh, but Coronavirus is deadly!

So is the flu?

Did the government restrict the people’s movements in 2018 because there were 8.5 deaths per day?

Victorians are STILL in curfew at 7 deaths, but who knows that for sure, as the figures have been falsified by the government.

One thing that the people have been made aware of during this fiasco, is that the governments (federal, territory, state) have been lying to you, so we are taking the above figure derived from the ABS at face value.

Now, Now, let’s NOT say that this is an anti-vaxxer’s post ;-) 

Remember, TRUST your government and FEAR the police (as they tell you to do).

STILL not convinced that in Australia you live in a POLICE STATE?

Victoria the ‘police state’ COVID curfew about policing and not health

A whole lot of ‘revelations’ have come out of the woodwork of late with regards to the handling of the response to the virus situation.

Doctors have come out exposing the lies in relation to the COVID response by the authorities.

Doctors have come out with regards to the falsely classified deaths in relation to the disease.

Now, the Chief Medical Officer Brett Sutton has distanced himself from the Andrews government in saying that the curfew was not his idea that being not in force under any medical advice.

To make it even worse, The Victorian premier Daniel Michael Andrews states that the curfew is for Victoria Police and not for any health reasons.

This is an ‘exercise’ in subservience in a police state and not about a reaction to a ‘health crisis’

See video

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1Esfp10vxg

What more do the people need to be shown that they have been duped?

Melb Dr. exposes government lies on Ch 9 Today show, they cut him short

The video they do not want you to see:

Melbourne doctor, Dr. Eamonn Matheison exposes government lies on the mainstream media Channel 9 Melbourne Victoria where they cut him off:

The above video was aired today, Tuesday the 8th of September 2020.

Source: supplied

Government falsifying flight data?

(Just a quick squirt from Albury to Melb, to do a grid, be back home for supper, honey)

Governments (federal, state and territory) work in mysterious ways.

Information goes missing, hansards are falsely transcribed, retroactive law put in place, or even court cases that expose criminal actions of those in government are sealed not to be released under whatever false pretences seen fit.

In this day and age of the internet connected serfs, the government must act swiftly.

A little while ago, in Egypt, the plebs were going to organise a rally against government oppression, so the government just ‘flycked the swytch’ (in a New Zealand accent with referent to their power 'black out' years ago) on those pesky plebs.

With the instalment of social media, in Australia the ‘authorities’ now have lost the ability to control narrative, where ‘Penal Colony Policies’ and Nanny State agenda comes out in full force against the masses.

So called ‘Free Speech’ or democracy has been thrown under a bus, where now the (private) police force breaks down your door under the authority of an instrument that is purported to be a warrant for posting something (an opinion/police brutality) on social media.

The so called warrants are not lawful, as shown in the AFP raids on the journalists.

During these virus times or to be more specific, under stage 4 lock down in Victoria or is it Dictatoria, flight data has been more ‘anonymous’ and more ‘inaccurate’ than o̶u̶t̶s̶i̶d̶e̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶M̶a̶r̶t̶i̶a̶l̶ ̶l̶a̶w̶ in 'normal' times.

Here are a few screen captures:

The above flight screen capture was taken on 3/09/2020 @23:00, where the flight allegedly started its journey from Wallis Rd,  Sunday Creek and finished its journey at Essendon Airport police hangar.

The above flight screen capture was taken on 5/09/2020 @13:57, and your guess as to where it started and where it's at is as good as anyone's.

The above flight screen capture was taken on 1/09/2020 @11:34, and is an example of many 'inaccurate' depictions of flight which only pertains to police flights.

What is also a more common sight is the anonymisation of flights as seen under the 'No callsign' label.

The below screen capture was taken on 6/09/2020 @ 11:29

Here's one for 'entertainment' purposes, taken on 19/08/2020 @ 12:21am.

An AgustaWestland AW139 is a quick helicopter and not a flying fossil as depicted here:

See zero flight data for Pol32 on the 17th of August 2020 at 12:13am:

Secret flights from Melbourne Airport? Taken on 25 August 2020 at 10:50am:

The commonly used government propaganda term "Nothing to hide, nothing to fear' applies to the serfs, but not to those in government, as they have 'everything' to hide.

Victoria Police screwed up on the Flemington towers lockdown

Briefly,

The cat’s out of the bag now, and it just depends on how long it will take for the general population to see the repercussions.

An article that appeared in the Fairfax publication last week mentioned how in New South Wales there was a similar situation, but the response was handled a lot better.

Conversely in Victoria or is it Dictatoria the authorities have bungled the response with regards to the housing commission residents.

People should know that many of the residents in the public housing towers were present at the BLM (Black Lives Matter) protests, but what the general population does not know is that a fair few people live in those towers who have sued Victoria Police.

So, the Fairfax paper mentioned in an article which cannot be found now, in a small sentence that Victoria Police refused to supervise the lockdown.

So the question is now whether or no this will be mentioned in a ‘court of public record’, something that is in the ‘interest of the public’, that being a systemic failure of government.

This is just one problem facing Victoria Police in the near future.

Fortunately for Victoria Police and the state government, for now,  the general population is totally unaware of the multitude of systemic failures committed against them to their detriment, where making people aware of this through a class action seeking a remedy is the only alternative.