Covid 'vaccine' withdrawn - AstraZeneca

The AstraZeneca drug is erroneously or rather deliberately falsely advertised as a vaccine, which it is not, as it does not confer immunity.

So, now this drug can no longer be used in the European Union.

Will the colony called Australia follow?

See article:

In any event the authorities have lied about the death rates from the jab, and are much more than officially claimed.

'Big Pharma' knew that their product was dangerous to humans, but governments and corporations still pushed it on the serf population.

The best place to read about the internal documents that prove that these corporations knew about the dangers is through whistleblowers and data leaks.

Actions by governments and corporations in this matter, i.e. 'forcing' the drug on people, are criminal in nature.

Google's LIES about 'your' Google account!

Google, like MANY other corporations lie to its users, or ‘products’ they make money from.

You may have heard the term if it’s free you’re the product, with reference to Information Technology services.

Another fact that people should know is that Google works closely with the FiveEyes global surveillance network, and as a result are given MANY discounts by the governments involved, including China.

The internet has changed now, where the modus operandi is to obtain your ‘person’s’ identity under various guises, false flags, or just plain and simple deception.

Google wants you phone number and home address, where it falsely claims by doing so, it will be to your benefit, where you will “get the most out of your Google account”.

As you should know an ‘account’ is something that (financial) transfers occur on.

Does Google tell you how much it made from the information in ‘your’ account?

Let’s make that a law, for transparency reasons? Will the governments do that for the people?

There is ZERO benefit for you to give Goggle your home address, where it’s only for Google’s benefit, same goes for the phone number.

Molly’s Law, gender based law not necessary?

Molly Ticehurst, 28, was found dead in a Forbes home early on April 22. (Supplied: Gofundme)

The media, and government, have jumped on the fact that one woman died in the hands of her abusive partner, using her as the excuse to put in new law, not focusing on the factual failure of the judiciary.

Women have been dying in the hands of their abusive partners for quite some time in Australia, where in reality nothing has been done about it for decades, irrespective of what the (alleged) statistics may show today, hence creating an alleged urgency.

In the Northern Territory or Western Australia, there have been MANY deaths of Indigenous Australians for decades, but there's no outcry or new 'law', is there?

So why the change now?

What is the real agenda behind the new move?

Because, we currently do have a legal system that is equipped to handle ‘criminal’ activity such as abuse, but the real problem lies within the judiciary.

Not only in the case of abusive spouses, but also criminal activities by teenagers, magistrates and judges are complacent, and let out the offenders, where realistically they should be incarcerated (maybe the judges too?), and not let out into the community.

The real ‘failure of government’ is on the judge that let out that criminal that was on bail or temporarily incarcerated, for the purpose of being a repeat ‘customer’ for the legal business, being a 'win' for the courts and legal business from a financial perspective.

Remembering that courts act for the benefit of their 'stakeholders', that being banks and financial institutions like BlackRock or Vanguard.

The Courts function under the modus operandi to:

"Develop, maintain, and enhance key relationships with internal and external stakeholders to influence decision making processes and outcomes critical to the success of MCV, including court staff and judiciary,  Court Services Victoria, and other Victorian government departments."

See document originating from the Magistrates' Court of Victoria withing the article:

• Courts acting under dictation owned by financial services institutions

Noting that the Court must operate solely in The Crown in Right of the State (e.g. Victoria).

Victoria Police lose Supreme Court defence for reprimanding officer for refusing Covid-19 jab

Australia's mainstream media was very quick to inform the general population of how Victoria Police officers have been reprimanded/stood down for not participating in the Covid-19 jab, whereas the judiciary was exempt.

Well what about the follow up? As there is a followup!

On the 13th of March, there was a court hearing, in not just any court, but the Supreme Court of Victoria.

No 'court reporters' on such a monumental matter? All is silent on the western front!

The jab has maimed many, in a life shortening venture by the government and health authorities, where Peter Simon Shearer was successful against the charges laid against him, that being an alleged breach of discipline for failing to comply with vaccination* requirements for the Victoria Police manual.

See SHEARER v CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF POLICE [2024] VSC 181

as filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria: 

* Please note that the Covid-19 'jab' cannot be legally referred to as a vaccine, as it does not confer immunity.

See related articles:

- 'Vaccine' or trail drug?

- Colony’s police forces immune from social distancing ‘rules’ (& COVID-19)?

- Australian Product Information COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca

- The Covid-19 injections do not confer immunity, & therefore do not meet the definition of a vaccine.

‘Judged’ by a retired out of touch fossil judiciary?

‘Mums & Dads’ taxpayers and those seeking ‘justice’ or rather a remedy within a place of business called a ‘Court’ are getting scammed by those in government, period.

Over the past few years, business has been booming for the legal profession and places of business called the courts, coincidentally as a result of a high immigration rate of low quality, dishonourable persons into the colony, but that topic alone is beyond the scope of this post.

So what do the people in government do? Why act illegally, of course? Remembering that it’s all ’legal’ until you get caught, and even then if you’re on of the ones that are protected by the ‘brotherhood’, there’s nothing to fear.

The people in government dust off the fossils that have retired from the judiciary, to bring them behind the bench, at a cost to the taxpayers of $2,000 per day within the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria.

MANY people that ‘judge’ others in an official capacity be it judges, magistrates or judicial registrars can be out of touch with the real world, as most live in a bubble or in their ivory towers.

Retirement can vary from 65 to 70 or 75 years of age, depending on the jurisdiction and the state/territory.’

Would employers in the ‘real world’ take retirees out of their retired life to come back to being an electrician, plumber or engineer?

The fact is that not only are taxpayers being ripped off, but also those that are accused of crimes may not be getting a ‘fair hearing’ unbeknown to them.

Wouldn't it be in your best interest to be the recipient of a fair hearing?

See links:

https://www.justice.vic.gov.au/judicial-officer-salaries

https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/senate/legal_and_constitutional_affairs/completed_inquiries/2008-10/judicial_system/report/c04

The BEST way to rebel against an oppressive government? China's youth "Let it Rot" (Bai lan)

Mutiny In China - Youth is giving up on life "Let it Rot", CCP worried

Governments truly do not care about the general population/serfs, especially the ones that officially flourish on slave labour, dictatorships like China or Nth Korea as an example, where it is seen that life is cheap, quite literally.

All governments are about is their 'economy', GDP and other metrics that define how hard the slaves work.

The Chinese dictator Xi Jinping, single-handedly destroyed his nation's economy with controversial actions and policies.

The Chinese youth were astute enough to act en masse, against the policies that are aimed at them, their health and well-being and their future.

On a side-note, a chart from 2016 that shows the most unaffordable home prices of 17 cities, Australian cities occupy 3 positions indicating that Australia is also under a similar (deliberate) 'failure of government'.

The Australian government is already showing signs of China's 9-9-6 (9am-9pm, 6 days a week) work policy, with the extension of twilight work hours in Melbourne.

Government slave-driving for the 'economy' - Melbourne city retailers encouraged to adopt Twilight Trade

It's a pity Chairman Dan (Andrews) didn't see this while in office.

Meta also censors this video on its Facebook asset, meaning it censors documentaries exposing corrupt governments and the truth.

The Chinese government, welded apartment complexes' exit doors, not allowing people to get food, breaching the Human Rights of residents BUT the world did nothing about it. 

Apple is another global corporation that supports China's slave labour policy, in fact Apple banks on it.

See 2hr documentary:

ANY chance of the Australian youth waking up? NOPE!

The tyrants in Australia's governments are safe for quite some time.

Meta’s fascist ways – “YOUR PAPERS, please!”

The online world is under a fascist state that would make Mussolini proud.

For those of you who are not familiar with fascism, here is a brief description as documented within  Wikipedia:

Fascism (FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and/or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

Meta’s asset, Facebook now requires its users or data generating slaves to supply government issued ‘papers’ or ID in order to use this data hoovering platform.

As part of the new world order policy of digital identity/age verification, it has nothing to do with safety or alleged prevention of exploitation material, but rather tying your online personality to your ‘legal person’.

Meta cannot be trusted with ANY user identifiable data, where it is to your detriment to provide this 'data advertising' corporation with your 'private and confidential' records.

Meta also works with the Five Eyes global surveillance network, again to your detriment.

One way to minimise data gathering is to use a Personal Computer with a privacy focused browser through a VPN or other means or masking your IP address.

This does not sit well with Meta, as this method does not associate the online persona to a (smartphone) device, which has unique identifiers such as IMEI/IMSI and device serial number, which then can be tied to your 'legal person'.

The 'device' that Meta wants you to use is your smartphone which has a Google or Apple ID enabled also tied in with your mobile provider.

IF you do not log in via a smartphone, Meta will then falsely claim that someone has been trying to hack into your account

'LUCKY' you didn't provide any of your real 'private and confidential' data, aye?

Then you have to go through the steps

to give Meta

your government(?) issued photo id, which is a powerful piece of information

where they then can do whatever they like with it.

What will be the consequences for Meta, when they get hacked?

Negligible, obviously?

Other benefits of using the Meta app on your smartphone is that Meta obtains your entire contacts list together with your phone and SMS history together with other pieces of information such as location which again is used against you.

See also: The Doctrine of Fascism (1932) by Benito Mussolini

Make no mistake about it; Meta's assets work against you and your privacy!

Why did Zuckerberg have tape over his laptop's camera?

"Nothing to hide, nothing to fear" right?

Immigration Restriction Act 1901

This Act, known as the Immigration Restriction Act, was passed by the Australian Parliament in 1901. It is headed ‘An Act to place certain restrictions on Immigration and to provide for the removal from the Commonwealth of prohibited Immigrants’.

The Immigration Restriction Act 1901 is a landmark document of the first parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. The six Australian colonies were governed by separate parliaments until Federation in 1901, when the Australian Government was formed.

This Act was a key part of a package of legislation designed to restrict the immigration and settlement of non-European people in Australia. The package also included:

• the Pacific Islander Labourers Act 1901, which restricted the entry of Pacific Islanders to Australia
• section 15 of the Post and Telegraph Act 1901, which required that ships carrying Australian mail use only white labour.

Dictation test

Section 3(a) of the Immigration Restriction Act 1901 defined ‘prohibited immigrants’ as those who fail to pass a dictation test of 50 words in a European language. This test became the key means of restricting immigration to Australia for over 50 years.

See scans of the original document:

Government slave-driving for the 'economy' - Melbourne city retailers encouraged to adopt Twilight Trade

City of Melbourne traders should respond to changing consumer behaviour by extending core trading hours, creating a link between the daytime and night-time economy a new report by leading peak body Australian Retailers Association (ARA) has found.

Commissioned by the City of Melbourne and Victorian Government, the ARA report recommends widespread adoption of twilight trading hours in Melbourne CBD.

ARA CEO Paul Zahra said a shift in pedestrian foot traffic creates a compelling case for change to encourage more retailers to trade after 5.00pm.

“We know that global shopping destinations seamlessly weave retail into the fabric of the city, with vibrant retail offerings and trading hours that allow customers to shop when they want to shop,” said Mr Zahra.

“This report confirms there is more unmet consumer demand in Melbourne city after 5pm than before 10am which reflects a shift in pedestrian foot traffic in recent years.

“While we know that some of our larger members have already responded positively to this change in consumer behaviour, the report also confirms that not all retailers have embraced this opportunity and are potentially missing out on sales.

“To realise the full potential of this time of the day, we need to a co-ordinated approach that actively encourages more retailers to trade in line with other global cities – 10am to 7pm Sunday to Wednesday and 10am to 9pm Thursday to Saturday.

“From our research, we see strong levels of support for Twilight Trade, but we also see some reluctance for individual retailers to extend hours in isolation.

“That is why we have done this research – to give retailers some confidence about extending their core trading hours. And that’s why we are taking a leadership role in convincing more retailers to come on board.

“We also know how weekends and time with friends and family is important. So being able to spend time to go from shopping to dinner to seeing a show or movie and then perhaps onto a bar or club means that the whole city needs to be open for business.”

City of Melbourne Lord Mayor Sally Capp AO said Melbourne’s twilight economy is significant.

“Melbourne’s twilight economy is booming – with foot traffic increasing in the city by up to 35 per cent after 6pm, as Melburnians clock off and make the most of our world-class retail, food and entertainment.
“We’re encouraging city retailers to take full advantage of this change in consumer behaviour – shifting their opening hours to reflect when city visitors want to shop

“We’ll continue to support businesses with the latest data to embrace the city’s new rhythm, boost the local economy and improve the visitor experience,” said the Lord Mayor.

Centre Manager at Melbourne Central, Denis Ryan, said twilight trading hours align with the changing lifestyle patterns and evolving needs of shoppers and retailers.

“Melbourne boasts a dynamic and vibrant nightlife, and with Melbourne Central at the heart of the city, our retailers play a critical role in activating a core retail offering at times that are most convenient for shoppers, residents, office workers, students and tourists.

“We endorse a collaborative approach that supports the local business community and amplifies the city’s ability to provide a thriving retail and experiential precinct where people can come together for longer periods, which ultimately leads to economic benefit and community development.”

The ARA will run a series of information sessions through April 2024 to talk to retailers about the case for change and encourage more retailers to adopt twilight trading hours.

The ARA’s report, along with more information for consumers and businesses, is available at retail.org.au/twilight-trade.

Banned debt collection practices in Victoria

Certain debt collection practices are banned in Victoria. These include: 

• entering or threatening to enter a private residence without lawful authority
• using any threat, deception or misrepresentation to obtain consent to enter a private residence
• refusing to leave a private residence or workplace when asked to do so
• exposing or threatening to expose a person or a member of that person’s family to ridicule or intimidation
• using a document that looks like an official document but is not
• impersonating a government employee or agent
• attempting or threatening to possess any property to which you are not entitled. For example, when collecting a debt, you must not say you are going to seize a home or other property that you cannot legally take
• disclosing or threatening to disclose debt information, without the debtor’s consent, to any person who does not have a legitimate interest in the information
• making a false or misleading representation regarding the nature or extent of a debt, or the consequences of not paying a debt. For example: 
  • falsely representing that a debt is a fine or other penalty imposed by law, or that a person has committed an offence
  • threatening to make a false or misleading credit report.
• contacting a person by a method that they have asked not to be used, unless there is no other means available. For example, you must not contact a debtor at their workplace when they have asked to be contacted only at home, or contact them directly when they have asked that all communications be handled by their lawyer or financial counsellor
• contacting a person about a debt after they have advised in writing that no further communication should be made about that debt. This applies unless you: 
  • contact the debtor through an action issued by a court or VCAT
  • are threatening the debtor with court or VCAT action that the creditor intends to take
  • are communicating with the person to comply with a requirement under the National Credit Code. For more information, visit Credit - ASIC.
• communicating with a person under 18 about a debt, if the person is not the debtor
• demanding payment of a debt from someone without having a reasonable belief that they are the debtor. For example, demanding payment from every ‘J Smith’ who resides in a suburb in an attempt to collect a debt owed by John Smith
• communicating with a person in a manner that is unreasonable in its frequency, nature or content. 

For information on appropriate hours and frequency of contact, visit Debt collection guideline: for collectors and creditors - ACCC.

Updated: 13 Oct 2023

Source: https://www.consumer.vic.gov.au/licensing-and-registration/debt-collectors/banned-debt-collection-practices