A look into Corporate fraud in Australia, Stranglehold of Monopolies, Telecom's Oppression, Biased Law System, Corporate influence in politics, Industrial Relations disadvantaging workers, Outsourcing Australian Jobs, Offshore Banking, Petrochemical company domination, Invisibly Visible.
It's not what you see, it's what goes on behind the scenes. Australia, the warrantless colony.
Note: Site has more info in desktop mode or 'web version' as seen at bottom of page, when on smartphone.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 122 104 616)
Australia's Prime Minister (CEO) Tony Abbott : "Australia is Open for Business"
Just one of a few class action lawsuits is being prepared as
you read this post.
From the first allegedly recorded case of the virus in
Victoria on the 25th of January 2020 to the newly actioned stage 4
restrictions, where a so called (discriminatory) directive where ‘workers’ (whatever
that means) can only purchase products to repair homes, etc from their local hardware
store, the government of Victoria has committed many unlawful actions and failures with
regards to the reaction to the matter at hand.
The people in government were even so blazé to state that it's not a matter of human rights, where in reality every action at law must be
consistent or subservient to human rights law, period.
The legal community (as opposed to ‘conspiracy theorists')
has taken notice, that the law has not been followed, nor the lawful procedure
for enacting Acts, where various class action lawsuits are in motion.
The Victorian government has a lot to answer for, where a
royal commission will not suffice or rather be next to useless, as seen in the
banking sector royal commission, so a class action is one of the ways.
We encourage all Victorians to join in the class action, where
once the infrastructure has been put in place, we will point you to it.
There are a lot of inconsistencies with regards to alleged case numbers, what's happening and what's going to happen.
As seen in screen capture below, the Victorian premier Mr. Daniel Michael Andrews signed up Victorians to Stage 4 restrictions from the 2nd day of August 2020 to the 2nd day of September 2020, which is one month or just over 4 weeks.
The mainstream media have been 'advertising' for quite some time that Victorians will be locked down for six weeks with this new restriction.
The premier of Victoria Mr. Daniel Michael Andrews has run amock with regards to law in an unprecedented move.
Well, the above sentence is not entirely true.
There has been a precedent set and it was in the 1800's.
The people in government were in a lawless state, i.e. at a level where the law did not apply to them.
The imperial government had enough and reigned them in reminding them they must follow the law, e,g. Bill of Rights 1688 (UK), etc and put in an Act called the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865.
The same holds true today, where the law applies and the entire law making process must be followed prior to making an announcement that an Act is in force.
During Victoria's alleged notification of the 'State of Emergency/Disaster' the authorities have stated that Acts of Parliament can be suspended, also giving the ability to take (people's) possessions.
Is there a need to remind the general population that taking people's possessions unlawfully is theft, and depending under which circumstances can also be classified as armed robbery.
There is no lawfully enacted legislation in Victoria that allows the Acts of Parliament to be suspended.
While the imperial government had enough of the 'shenanigans' of those in government, it seems that Victorians will gladly accept their possessions being taken unlawfully.
MANY persons in government commit illegal and/or criminal activities
where they do not get caught.
A saying that has been around for a while is that “Everything’s
legal until you get caught” .
While we cannot speak with regards to legislation in other
states, the Victorian Government has been acting ‘illegally’ with regards to
mandating (i.e. forcing you into medical treatment), that people involved in aged care be
vaccinated for the flu, which as we know will have zero effect against the
novel Coronavirus.
The illegal actions of the Victorian government with regards to the 'mandatory' vaccinating was pointed out, where correspondence was made by the Victorian government, resulting in a withdrawal of the mandate which was made public on the 22nd of July 2020.
One would think that this is ‘big news’, news that should be
covered by the mainstream media, but has not been.
All we are able to say at this point in time is that the
Victorian Government has been caught out by a team headed by a legal
professional and not ‘conspiracy
theorists’.
In response to the virus, the Government of Victoria has committed
to actions / mandates / directions etc unlawfully, but that is another post for
each action concerned.
We will state unequivocally that the up and coming ‘Stage 4’
restrictions for Victorians by the Daniel Michael Andrews government will be an
unlawful action.
As to how, once again more on that later.
Fool me once, shame on you fool me twice shame one me.
Conspiracy theorists who travel alone in their vehicles believe that an apparent global pandemic will kill them while they are travelling from point A to point B.
They even believe that their vehicle is infected after a non compliant test was made of the said vehicle.
They have even gone to the extreme, throwing away the law of the state, stating the state has no idea.
See the law that they have recklessly ignored:
In an about face, the Victorian premier Mr. Daniel Michael Andrews has given the first 'free' batch of masks to Victorian farmers, as seen below:
Prime
Minister Scott Morrison has rejected calls for federal politicians to
have their pay docked because of cancelled sittings of parliament.
The government’s secretive COVID business taskforce has been
described as something suiting “someone who’s a dictator”, with concerns
over an “opaque” policy-making process for jobs and industry.
Prime
Minister Scott Morrison announced on Monday that the National COVID-19
Coordination Commission, a hand-picked organisation of business leaders,
would be renamed to the National COVID-19 Commission (NCC) Advisory
Board.
In addition, it has undergone a “reformation as a Prime Minister’s advisory body”.
The
technical change means that the commission will now “work within
government” and give it a “new gear” as it works across the JobMaker scheme with the goal of boosting business growth.
“It
won’t be an external agency. It will work within government and can
form part of the cabinet deliberative processes,” Mr Morrison said.
The commission has been criticised for a lack of transparency in its
deliberations, amid concerns the details of its work may be difficult to
obtain under freedom of information laws.
Politicians and civil
society groups also raised concerns about potential conflicts of
interest, such as chair Nev Power’s ties to the mining industry as the
former boss of Fortescue Metals, and his recent promotion of natural gas
as a key component of Australia’s post-COVID business recovery.
Mr Morrison’s decision to rebadge the COVID commission has only deepened the concerns of independent MP Zali Steggall.
“It
is concerning that the government has decided to move to an advisory
body structure within the department rather than an independent
commission. This further entrenches the lack of accountability and
transparency around the work and advice of the NCCC,” she told The New Daily.
“Without
a clear accountability and transparency process, this is looking a lot
like a hand-picked kitchen cabinet reporting to the Prime Minister alone
on issues of national importance.”
Ms Steggall, the Member for Warringah, has previously been critical of the group’s processes.She
said she was pleased to see new commission members – such as former
Bendigo Bank director Mike Hirst and former CEO of the Regional
Australia Institute Su McCluskey – would bring experience in regional
affairs, but was disappointed there were not more members with a clean
energy background.
“Unfortunately, there still does not appear to
be any gender equity or transparency in the appointment process,” Ms
Steggall said.
“We know that this recession has hit women hardest.
There needs to be a specific focus on issues impacting women’s
employment, in particular, child care and parental leave. There is no
individual specifically tasked with this role.”
Labor senator Katy Gallagher said the change would further shield the commission’s work from scrutiny.
“It seems to me that this announcement has been all about making this
COVID commission more secretive than it already is,” she said on
Monday.
“It’s about bringing it in under the cabinet process so
that any request for information, reports or advice – actually what they
are even doing, what is their job – is going to be clouded under these
claims of cabinet in confidence.”
Senator Gallagher, chair of the
Senate’s select committee on COVID-19, has been critical of the
commission including its $5.2 million price tag, and the nearly $300,000
allowance paid to Mr Power to cover his expenses and private jet
flights from Perth to Canberra.
“This has been a very opaque organisation from the get go. It has
received more than $5 million in taxpayers funds and it is really
unclear what it has been doing,” Senator Gallagher said.
“The announcement today makes the chances of us getting any more information out even less likely”.
South Australian Senator Rex Patrick said he supported the
commission’s work, but slammed the secrecy surrounding its operations.
“If
these people are all working in a dark room, adding more people means
there’s just more in the dark room,” the Centre Alliance Senator told The New Daily.
“If the government is to recognise this as important, they have to
appreciate that the Australian public needs visibility on what they’re
doing and a mechanism to contribute.”
Senator Patrick said he
understood why certain parts of the process would remain confidential,
to promote frank discussions, but doesn’t support the wider opacity of
its work.
“It’s unnecessary for those sorts of documents to be wrapped in the cabinet confidentiality blanket,” he said.
“This might suit someone who’s a dictator and doesn’t want anybody to scrutinise them, but that’s not how democracy works.”
Senator
Patrick is also hoping to challenge the confidentiality of discussions
at the national cabinet of state and territory leaders.
Greens leader Adam Bandt was another who took aim at what he claimed was a “secret” commission.
“The
government’s new coronavirus commission is just a regular packaging of
its old plans, based on trickle-down economics,” Mr Bandt said.
“It will operate secretly. There will not be the transparency that we need.
“But
worst of all, it seems to be intent on propping up a dying fossil-fuel
industry and giving support to big business at the expense of the public
good.”
Disproportionate act, Victoria Police assaulting disability pensioner John.
“No person is above the law” is a common (propaganda?) term
used by authorities, where the serfs could swear that there was a caveat or
fine print to that, where it excluded the people in ‘government’ as seen in
many examples, excluding a few that did get caught and (allegedly) sentenced.
From the beginning of colonisation,up until a certain time police or at least Queensland police
could commit criminal actions against the serf population with impunity, zero
consequences and they knew it, because their 'brethren' in parliament set the law up that way.
They could beat the crap out of a man or even better use the
cowardly act of 4 or more thugs beating the crap out of a 65 year old ‘slightly-built
man’.
In Victoria 8 (eight) police thugs beat the living daylights
out of a woman, a woman called Corinna Horvath, where she had to obtain a remedy outside the colony, but that’s not the focus of
this article.
The court system trying to cover this abuse of a homeless
man Mr. Bruce Rowe made sure he was not successful in his claims.
It was only after the Court of Appeal, where Mr. Rowe was
able to obtain a remedy, but not from the system, but rather in a ‘private
prosecution’.
In a response the police stated:
"In fact police officers may as well stay inside a
police station and not do anything because of fear of what the law could do to
them," Mr Leavers said.”
So does that mean the police are not able to carry out their
duty of protecting the peace, preventing crime and preserving life and property, without breaking the law?
But the law applies to every person, doesn’t it?
So now what are people going to do in those instances where
police broke the law in order to obtain a conviction/charge/fine, etc?
We live in a colony (called Australia), and therefore ‘Penal
Colony Policies’ apply.
See article from 8 Mar 2011 by The Sydney Morning Herald
