The colony called New Zealand to hunt down 'hesitant' people

As stated by Chris Hipkins in an interview:

"I can't say that we're not gonna to have some hesitant people or some people that just haven't come forward that we don't have to go out and find next year."

So is this a totalitarian state policy to force people into something that they allegedly had a choice in, before?

How are you going to do this?

Hunt them down, handcuff them and forcefully take action? 

The rise of the 'Nartsi' state, under whatever pretext the dictators in government conjure up. 

Scam website: "commonlaw.earth" Do NOT PROVIDE personal information!

There are plenty of scams on the internet going around nowadays, like debt forgiveness sites, and now 'common law' sites.

The people who put together this information have very little comprehension of the topic they are spruiking.

Apparently this week's fad in the legal realm is to obtain a live birth record, to apparently obtain some sort of standing in 'common law'?

Well, apparently this site is the one to go to.

We do not recommend persons to put in their 'private & confidential' information into a 'random' website, where you do not have any clue where your data is going where maybe at some later point in time the data could be used to obtain fraudulently generated documents.

If you genuinely must obtain your live birth record, the appropriate registry in the Australian state or territory can supply you with one for a small administrative fee.

This so called 'certificate' that you can print out, can be put up on the wall of your Water Closet in case of emergency:

Can the 'Commonwealth' government force people into 'injections'?

Can the 'Australian Government' or rather the 'Commonwealth of Australia' force its people to submit to an injection for whatever the purposes outlined in the Commonwealth Law Report below?

Source: G&B Lawyers.

NEVER trust police: Denial of access to documents

Australia's state police forces are subservient to the federal government's authoritarian style ruling with a total lack of transparency.

Each state of this colony is ramping up its police numbers in order to beat the masses into a locked up, martial law state, under the current alleged health excuse.

Forget 'innocent' until proven guilty.

According to the law, in Australia you are guilty until proven otherwise, under strict liability and absolute liability, where your alleged traffic offence is under the criminal banner and not a civil listing.

So, the lawmakers already see you (the serf) as a criminal from the get go.

With this type of governance over the people, the police are not allowing you to obtain information (under FOI or subpoena) that would prove your not guilty status with regards to your alleged criminal action on the colony's highways and byways.

The best part about it for them, is that they'll lie to you in order for you to not obtain the information you require to prove your innocence.

They will lie to you that the information you seek is not relevant to your case, where in reality it is.

They will lie to you that the information you sought under the subpoena is copyrighted, but a subpoena is exempt from copyright.

What is most important but not comprehended by many is that information that you require is technically 'yours'.

You are a stakeholder, a part owner, you have a financial interest in that information.

You (or rather the taxes coming from your wages/salary/ goods and services you participated in) funded that actions of people that created that document, where you have a right, and not 'privilege' to it.

The people in government deceive you in all sorts of ways, and most importantly they're good at it. 

The declining quality of 'journalism' in Australia.

The so called quality of journalism over the past few decades has been on the decline where it's difficult to say where rock bottom is.

Ever since the US broadcaster CBS has figured out that money can be made from 'news' with the invention of 60 minutes, the oligarchial controllers of information dissemination have been on a government sponsored propaganda spree.

Now fast forward to the corporatisation of the World Wide Web, or the internet as we know it today and so called news agencies are nothing more than corporate whores selling a government sponsored agenda for whoever is in office.

From 'tech' flogs that are paid to promote privacy breaching smartphones / services, to so called alleged journalists like James Metthey in the meme above.

Australia's official 'state' sponsored mouthpiece is the ABC.

The unofficial state sponsored news agency is of course Rupert Murdoch's news.com.au.

That's the way life goes in the colony we call Australia.

Police intimidation: Give us your phone number & IMEI

When you're in captivity in the colony called Australia, the local constabulary may ask for your phone number and IMEI for the purpose of intimidation, as in reality they do not need this from you, as they are more than capable to obtain information WITHOUT warrants or any reasonable grounds whatsoever.

The serfs in Victoria have been given too many freedoms of movement and association with each other, something which is against the policies of the Andrews government which aligns itself with the CCP.

With this in mind on the first day of his return from a recovery period from an injury, Daniel Andrews  put out advertisements to recruit 3000 more police officers.

While that state's Nazi style police force may have your papers and even phone and IMEI numbers you can still communicate with confidence that your communications with the other party are not only secure but NOT logged with the telecommunications corporations where the police have access to the databases.

How to communicate securely from your smartphone.

As 'rocket scientist' Hakan Ayik, would attest you will not communicate securely when someone gives you a smartphone loaded up with an allegedly private communications app in this case AN0M.

Briefly:

The best way would be to use a (mainstream) smartphone that can be 'de-Googled' where there are approximately two dozen manufacturer's phones that can have Google's 'spyware' removed.

Communications apps that are open source should only be used as they are peer reviewed and have a long history of being secure, such as Telegram, Signal, etc.

IF a de-Googled phone cannot be used, your smartphone should be reset, where all non 'factory' apps are removed, and if you must install some apps, then their equivalent ones from an open source store like f-droid.org should be used.

With all this in mind your smartphone's baseband modem can be hacked at carrier level where the player can have unfettered access to your device.

A 'de-Googled' smartphone is a phone where the 'factory' (LG, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung Sony, etc) installed Google modified version of Android is removed and a base version called AOSP is installed.

Therefore naturally, Apple phones cannot be 'de-Googled'.

We do not recommend Apple devices for communication purposes.

A linux personal  computer/laptop can also have some of the secure communications apps, like Signal installed on it, which would offer another mode of communication without involving an IMEI or cell phone tower logging in.

Using another smartphone which does not have a SIM card in it, using only a Wi-Fi connection with the secure open source communications app of your choice is another option to consider, where your old phone number can be used for authentication purposes of the app.

Using a VPN is also strongly recommended.

There are many resources and tutorials available on this topic, where we recommend a trusted technical resource Rob Braxman at:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYVU6rModlGxvJbszCclGGw

How many deaths in Australia from ...

In Australia, or more specifically Victoria, with the 4 lock ups the people endured, we are aware of the disproportionate response to an alleged global situation.

The government of South Australia has stated that there have been 4 deaths from the disease that has been named with a 19 as the suffix.

So, in the WHOLE of Australia, the people in government tell you that there have been 4 deaths, to the time of this post.

Pay attention to the question the reporter asks:

You are told you MUST partake in a mandatory action of being injected with a trial drug, if you're in a specific field of work, yet they say that it's 'voluntary'.

You are told you MUST partake in a mandatory action of being injected with a trial drug, if you want to fly on a plane, yet airlines say they won't accept you because of the risks that you'll die onboard.

You are told you MUST partake in a mandatory action of being injected with a trial drug, yet insurance companies will not pay out with regards to damages sustained from that action.

You are told you MUST partake in a mandatory action of being injected with a trial drug, if you want things to get back to 'normal', but that will NOT be the case.

You are told you MUST partake in a mandatory action of being injected with a trial drug, if you want to travel within the boundaries of this colony, but they WILL stop you and put you into a detention facility for a period of time.

You are told you MUST partake in a mandatory action of being injected with a trial drug, because of the expiry date on the substance, where the profits go down the gurgler if it's not used.

You are told you MUST partake in a mandatory action of being injected with a trial drug, because you're part of the world's largest experiment, where your life is cheap.

Australia, the model modern penal colony.

You should sack/sue your doctor if...

The medical profession in Australia has escaped scrutiny or is it that the mainstream media has not reported any law suits against doctors or rather quacks and charlatans.

As we should know since last year the medical profession or rather 'big ph@rma' has made it into the spotlight where terms have made into the below average Joe's vocabulary that otherwise would have not.

While there has been much misinformation and inconsistencies from the mouths of people in government, Australians have been given a rare glimpse of what's happening, but you do have to do a bit of digging.

Greg Hunt, Australia's current Minister for Health, has publicly stated that we are participating in the world's largest trial, with reference to a substance that is being rolled out to the Australian population from various manufacturers.

See interview:

https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-with-david-speers-on-abc-insiders-on-the-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

Also, the trial is at phase III.

Since the uptake is not up to the liking of business (as opposed to health) leaders, people are being enticed/conned/bribed in all sorts of ways.

Now to make it easy for the manufacturers to sell their wares, your local General Practitioners are able to administer this liquid, having in mind that a 'random' in a hall was doing the same not that long ago.

Apparently the government also indemnifies the person administering the liquid from any damages or ill effects.

So, all you have to ask that person is whether that liquid is a trial drug or what they're advertising it as.

If the answer is that of the 'advertised' function which is still a few years away, then you should seek another doctor or sue this one for misinformation.

Australian Government and Uni's involved in Wuhan lab 'bioweapon'

EXPOSED!

Australia's CSIRO and some Universities have been involved in the research that has produced the bioweapon from the Wuhan laboratory.

- The CSIRO lied before the Senate estimates committee.

- University of QLD worked with the Wuhan Institute at least until Aug. 2020.

- CCP has more influence in our universities than the Australian people have.

- CSIRO working on 'gain of function', an outlawed action under the Obama administration, which Fauci reinstituted under the Trump administration.

STILL believe the bat origin fairy tale?

See comments by Bronwyn Bishop, former Speaker of the House, within video:

EXPOSED! Australian governments locking up people under false pretences

Briefly!

In a response to a question on how many cycles are used to determine if someone has the alleged disease, the NSW Health Department stated the number of cycles being 40.

The link in the above description is the following:

https://www.pathology.health.nsw.gov.au/covid-19-info/covid-19-testing-information

A quick screen capture from an apparently official global source on the topic, that governments swear by, states that the standard recommendation for the detection of the disease should be in the range of 25-30.

See reference to the above screen capture:

https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/sars-cov-2-antigen-detecting-rapid-diagnostic-test-implementation-proposals

The European Parliament even posed the question:

Within the link:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-001810_EN.html

In summary, the NSW government has gone above the threshold in testing, yielding false positives and therefore unlawfully locking up Australians as have other states.

So, who is going to get sued for this?