Something dangerous has happened to Australia.
We have allowed the interests of ‘collective health’ to erase individual human rights.
It has become acceptable to imprison,
hurt, fine, intimidate, arrest, segregate, discriminate, oppress, and
financially ruin individuals – so long as it is done in the interest of
public health.
While the personal ethics of our
politicians should have prevented a situation like this from arising,
Australia has learned that there isn’t a scrap of morality within
Parliament, the courts, or the legions of human rights lawyers who show
more interest in the wellbeing of terrorists than citizens.
The founders of our political system were
smarter than this. They built-in structural protections to ensure that
every Australian would remain free from the tyrannous whims of deluded
ideologues. Contained within our Constitution are assurances of
unimpeded travel, the right to work, unrestricted access to public
services and spaces, healthcare without prejudice – along with freedom
of assembly, association and speech.
‘Emergency’ is a legal status created by
politicians – not our founders – to negate these protections. It was
designed to deal with rare occasions of chaos when cataclysmic events
played out too fast for government to handle: think asteroids,
earthquakes, an approaching fire-front, floods, plague of frogs etc.
Emergencies last for fourteen days because
that was the estimated time it would take for normal parliamentary
process to catch up. The ability to extend an emergency was not intended
to create a permanent parallel legal system in Australia.
Why? Dictators hold permanent emergency
powers. That is how Communist nations are able to chop-and-change policy
without public consultation. Democracies must ask and debate. This
makes them slower to adapt, but ultimately more stable over the
centuries. In other words, Xi Jinping is in a Porsche taking The Amalfi
Drive at 300km/h. Eventually, he’s going to meet a bus on one of those
curves.
Nearly two years of Covid is in no way an
emergency situation. Politicians have had long enough to calmly consider
their position on Covid and return society to its legal norms,
especially when we have a global example to work from. Extending
emergency powers over the states indefinitely is nothing short of
criminal behaviour by our premiers who know full well that if they were
to lift restrictions, life would return to normal.
That’s the white elephant sitting between premiers and their chief health officers in every press conference.
If they returned freedom to the people of
Australia, the fear-mongering and endless propaganda would be exposed as
a lie. When that happens, the class action suits start and possibly
criminal proceedings against those involved in violating the rights of
citizens.
Premiers instructing businesses to commit
international crimes by refusing service to the unvaccinated is only the
beginning. Once you start down the path of scapegoating innocent
citizens to cover up political errors, democracies crumble into anarchy.
What happened to inclusion and equality?
Why does the government fund heroin injecting clinics next to
pre-schools if their chief goal is public health? If the vaccines are so
successful, why is Israel a mess while Sweden opens up?
There are a million questions that
journalists could ask premiers if they weren’t so busy kneeling at their
shrine, microphones lifted in a state of click-bait worship.
Which brings us to New South Wales Chief
Health Officer Kerry Chant and her hilarious Freudian slip which is
still trending on social media.
Leave someone in front of a press gallery
for long enough and they’re bound to make a mistake. Chant did exactly
that when she decided to mention the New World Order.
“We will be looking at what contact tracing looks like in the New World Order…” said Chant.
She’s not the first to say it. Brad
Hazzard, the Minister for Health and Medical Research in New South
Wales, had a similar calamitous conference. “There’s a world pandemic.
It’s a one-in-one-hundred year event. So, you can expect that we will
have transmission from time to time, and that’s just the way it is.
We’ve got to accept that this is the New World Order.”
Claiming this was accidental word choice
makes about as much sense as health officials accidentally referring to
their mandates as ‘The Third Reich’.
In a speech on June 9 this year titled ‘A
world order that favours freedom’, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said,
“We are living in a time of great uncertainty, not seen – I believe –
since the 1930s outside of wartime. Our challenge is nothing less than
to re-enforce, renovate, and buttress a world order that favours
freedom.”
Morrison said everything except ‘Build
Back Better’ in his graphic verbal painting of a Net Zero economy
controlled by a centralised unelected bureaucracy based in Brussels
chaired by the world’s most dangerous geopolitical shark.
If your New World Order is wholly owned
and controlled by an expansionist communist dictatorship, ‘freedom’ is
not on the agenda except as bait for the dangerously naive.
New World Order sounds familiar for a
reason – it is another pet slogan of the World Economic Forum. I
understand it’s difficult to take a global bureaucracy seriously when
it’s led by a man who dresses like a galactic dictator in a 1984 remake,
but this is the architect of ‘Build Back Better’ adopted by our most
powerful leaders. A quick glance at the World Economic Forum’s partner
list should settle any questions you have about their influence.
The New World Order has two Wikipedia
pages, one listed as ‘politics’ and the other as ‘conspiracy’ – both of
these pages describe exactly the same thing; a centralised world
government forming after a significant geopolitical power shift.
In the same way that Antifa claim they
‘can’t possibly be fascist because their name means anti-fascist’,
organisations like the World Economic Forum title their policies in a
way that leaves it difficult to attack or examine them.
Picking a phrase that has been in common
usage for over a generation and applying it to a specific policy makes
it easy for those not paying attention to dismiss slip-ups like Chant’s.
The question is, what does the New World
Order mean now? In what context are Australian politicians and health
officials hearing it enough to accidentally slip it into press
conferences when talking about Covid?
Head of the World Economic Forum Klaus
Schwab wrote a Harvard Business Review piece titled, ‘Power and Policy:
The New Economic World Order’ where he detailed his belief that the
industrialised world has been going through an economic revolution. Keep
in mind, the article is written in 1994. He correctly lusts after points
out the rise of Asia, commenting, “One consequence of the new parity is
that the West can no longer hope to dictate the rules of the game.”
In this, he is only partially right. The
circumstance he prophesied has only manifested because organisations
like the World Economic Forum and the United Nations have trained
Western leaders to be weak. It was not an inevitability of trade
structures, but rather a matter of ideological infestation. The constant
infiltration of socialist rhetoric into the once free world via endless
champagne conferences has left it unable to work out what gender it is,
let alone present a strong front against the rise of Asia.
By 2018, the World Economic Forum was
publishing articles insisting that we must all work together to hasten
the rise of Asia and teach ourselves to embrace the New World Order. The
United Nations have a similar song sheet. Before Covid, they spoke of
the New World Order in the context of a green revolution and the
dismantling of old industrialised nations in favour of empowering the
third world.
Most of the propaganda coming out of the
United Nations these days talks about sustainability, mass-migration,
climate goals, and Covid as a singular item – an omini-shambles
apocalypse with only one solution: world socialism disguised as
environmentalism.
Build Back Better, The Great Reset, The
New Normal, The New World Order, Net Zero, the Fourth Industrial
Revolution are all pieces of the same puzzle. On their own, they appear
either innocuous or ridiculous, but when placed together in the context
of trillion-dollar corporate interests these ideas spell disaster for
Australia and her citizens.
We can lie to ourselves and pretend
Australia would never become a vassal state to an unelected bureaucracy,
when in reality it took less than two years to turn us into
drug-addicted dependants of the World Health Organisation and its
consortium of corporate partners. Our politicians take health orders
from Tedros Adhanom, a man who stands accused of aiding genocide and the
deliberate concealment of Cholera outbreaks to protect politicians.
What of Dr Kerry Chant and her New World Order?
Perhaps she read the white paper from
FinTech ‘Covid and the New World Order – Actionable insights from global
technology thought leaders’ detailing life in a new digitally
intrusive, socially distanced, health-oriented, and frequently
locked-down world. It is about using technology, surveillance, big data,
and artificial intelligence to manage society in the pandemic – which
could explain why she mentioned it in reply to questions regarding
contact tracing.
“The pandemic has helped crystallise our
collective realisation that the current global economic order, and our
financial markets, are not equipped to address the wider environmental
and social issues that face humanity,” said Lord Chris Holmes, speaking
of the white paper.
More frequently, we hear all levels of our
political system refer to ‘Covid Normal’ which is used interchangeably
with ‘The New Normal’. It is the idea that we can never return to our
free and innocent society. Politicians want us to accept, without
question, a future of mass government stalking – a ‘paper’s please’
society that deliberately excludes those it deems unclean.
For our own safety, we are told that our
lives belong in a network of cages with doors controlled by vaccine
passports. Treats are dropped or withheld depending on our collective
behaviour. We are presented with ‘free choices’ that have mandatory
outcomes leading us down an ever-narrowing space that’s anything but
‘safe’.
Has the world forgotten that it has
survived hundreds of pandemics over thousands of years and never once
adopted a permanent state of tyranny? After all, communism gave us Covid
– why would communism cure it?
What you stand for today, is what you’ll be remembered for tomorrow.
Alexandra Marshall is an independent writer. If you would like to support her work, shout her a coffee over at Ko-Fi.
Source: spectator.com.au
