Google’s false information about 'protecting' its community.

Corporations lie to their stakeholders, users and the general population every single day.

Google has recently been lying on a global scale and there is zero repercussions.

There are a few ways into interact on the internet which can be summed up as either an active user or a passive one.

Let’s start with the passive example first.

A person can be the recipient of a TikTok/Instagram/YouTube link where it can be opened up in a web browser such as Brave/FireFox/Chromium without that person having to log in that corporation’s platform.

At that point in time that person cannot interact with the poster or community by writing a comment or even give a thumbs up to whatever was shown, where that person is also known as a ‘lurker’.

Since no interaction can be made, that person cannot allegedly be a danger to the community, as the community is not aware that the person even exists.

Now, if a person is logged in to TikTok/Facebook/YouTube then that person can post content that may not be safe for work, or even exercising one’s right to (alleged) ‘free speech’ by criticising a government’s new agenda or the passing of an unlawfully enacted law.

Those comments may then have to be moderated in order to allegedly ‘protect’ that online community.

So now Google (via Youtube) claims that when you are lurking on their platform, you could be a bot, implying that you could hurt the community, and when you log in “this helps protect our community”.

Quite simply put, no it does not! That is a blatant lie.

When will people wake up to the lies and deception by corporations.

It’s NOT about protecting their ‘community’ but rather surveillance capitalism, keeping in mind that Google is one of the world’s largest advertising data harvesting corporations, where they need to you log in to their platform so that they can sell you (the product) to others.

Who is "our community"? The people working for Google or the people using their platforms?

In the same vein as the above question, see link:

What is the first job of a government?

Surveillance Capitalism: How ICE uses phone and internet data to identify and track people

Since Australia, is part of the Five Eyes global surveillance network, whatever online 'tools' the United States uses, Australia also has the ability to use them.

 

Also, keep in mind that Australia is a totalitarian régime.

 

MANY people believe that their data goes to just 'advertisers' but many of these shell corporations for governments to use.

 

See article:
 

 

People listen to clergy and faith leaders call for accountability at the site where Renee Good was killed by an ICE agent in Minneapolis on Jan. 8.

 

What acting ICE Director Todd Lyons called the “largest immigration enforcement operation ever” continues to unfold in Minnesota. And we are learning about the tools federal law enforcement agents use to track the people they're trying to arrest, as well as protesters.

ICE recently purchased two programs called Tangles and Webloc, which are used to track the cell phone activity of entire neighborhoods and monitor people over social media and through internet data, according to reporting by 404 Media. 404 Media journalist Joseph Cox joined MPR News host Nina Moini with insight on those tools and how they’re used to track people.

The following has been edited for length and clarity. Use the audio player above to listen to the full conversation. 

People are curious about how much surveillance is going on in society in general these days — and that includes ICE. Let’s start with one of the tools ICE is using: Tangles.

Tangles is a social media monitoring tool. We've seen that before, where companies will scrape sites like Twitter or Bluesky and then make that information much more accessible to the authorities.

What's different here is that Tangles is in combination with the tool call Webloc, the other tool we'll speak about in a minute. But it sort of gives an all-in-one solution for following people online. When it comes to their social media activity, ICE officials can add them to a watch list so they will be alerted whenever this person posts.

They are able to use AI to build some sort of sentiment analysis about what they're posting as well. The idea is that whenever somebody posts something online that ICE is interested in, the officials are going to see it.

How does the program obtain the location data from the phones in the first place? For example, what if you're a person who turns your location off?

 If you turn your location off, that is actually probably a very, very good thing to do if you are trying to get around this sort of surveillance. It does not get the data from the telecoms. It doesn't get it from AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, that sort of thing. It actually gets it, weirdly, through the online advertising ecosystem.

So whenever that little advert loads in your app, in Candy Crush or whatever, you'll see an advert there in the background. There's all of this tech going on where different companies are trying to get that advertisement in front of you.

There are also spy companies essentially harvesting that data, including phone location data. They then sell access to that to the government. It's basically a side product of the advertising ecosystem we see every day. But of course, somebody who is browsing the internet or just using an app has no idea that this is happening in the background.

What about this other program that ICE is using, Webloc? How does it work?

Webloc obtains information likely that same way — the location data — and it allows a user, in this case ICE, to search a map-style interface for phones and, by extension, people they might be interested in.

You log into the interface, you draw a circle or rectangle around a place of interest, maybe an ICE facility, maybe somewhere where a protest is happening. It then shows all of the location data and phones it has for that location, and the user is able to then track the phones to other places. So maybe this phone went over here and it stayed here overnight. Well, that's probably where the person slept. That is probably where the person lives. You track the phone to another location during the day after a protest. Well, maybe that's where this person works. So it allows users of this program to figure out probably who these people are and where else they're going after the fact.

And of course, that could be useful for ICE in many different contexts. The Wall Street Journal years ago, reported ICE was already using this sort of location data to catch immigrants and Customs and Border Protection was using it to monitor the U.S.-Mexico border as well.

 What do you know about how these tools are being used so far here in Minnesota?

That is, unfortunately, the one thing we really don't know. And of course, I would love to have more information on that. All we know is that this tool was bought for millions of dollars. I obtained the information about how it works, but we don't know what exactly they're using it for.

Now, what I would do again is point to that earlier Wall Street Journal reporting where this has been used to catch people that ICE wishes to catch, and it has been used by other parts of DHS to monitor the border. The only thing I would add on there is that, at least in marketing material, the company behind this technology has sort of floated the idea of using it to monitor Black Lives Matter protests as well. So First Amendment protected activity has come up explicitly in the marketing material for this technology.

How have you found that these types of tools are typically used? Is it about mass deportation efforts or is it about tracking protesters?

What I would say is that from everything I've learned, from looking at material from this company others and speaking to government officials as well, these sorts of tools for ICE and other agencies are really good for looking at movements of people or groups of people.

It can actually be quite difficult for ICE to focus on a particular phone and, by extension, the person. They almost have to be lucky that the target is included in that particular data set. But if you see a big group of phones moving to a certain location or away from it, that is probably how this technology is best going to be used.

A U.S. government official told me this data is definitely not as useful as the stuff you would get from AT&T, but that would require a warrant, whereas this data, crucially, they don't need a warrant to use it because they're simply buying it from a government contractor.

What can people concerned about being tracked do about this? Do they have any legal protection? How can people better control whether they're being tracked?

Yeah, you're right about the legal protection. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be much around this sort of data at all. On a more technical level, it is simply being more aware of the things you're installing on your phone. Maybe you downloaded a flashlight app and it's requesting location data. Well, does it really need that permission that's requested on my phone? Maybe you can deny that, maybe you can delete that app.

And of course, getting some sort of ad blocker potentially could help. But as I said earlier, I think turning off location services is probably the more solid and robust way to combat this, if you wish to do so.

But no, there isn't really a legal protection. It's more a technical protection that you have to do yourself as an individual phone user.

Source:mprnews.org 

Corrupt Victorian government’s unlawful cash grab

The colony’s governments, both state and federal are highly corrupt, where this corruption is masked by their brethren in the judiciary.

 

They act with impunity and in many instances, their alleged (debt) collection is unlawful.

Information from a source has been obtained, on the condition of anonymity, that the government of Victoria has embarked on an unlawful, (alleged) debt collection campaign against their unsuspecting victims, that being the ‘public’ in order to recoup the over $6 billion deficit the people in government have created.

Various ‘revenue raising’ businesses, like Victoria police, Fines Victoria, Sheriff’s Office Victoria, State Revenue Office et al are all unlawfully trying to extort funds from the general population.

The people within the judicature are also in on this multi-billion dollar fraud, as they enable it.

The context of the word ‘unlawful’ is the be understood as, that there is no lawfully enacted instrument that allows action against the person named.

This is particularly true when it comes to warrants for Victoria Police or the so called ‘Sheriff’s Office Victoria’.

Will there be a court matter that the general population will be made aware of by the mainstream media’s ‘court reporters’?

Most definitely not, as this goes against the narrative by the ‘faceless men’.

The plebs MUST be kept in the dark, period.

It’s all a “bread and circuses” clown show.

The Plan is to Make the Internet Worse. Forever!

Enshittification*.

Google along with others are changing the internet for the worse for the general population.

“Everything becomes a printer” is the most accurate summary of the last decade: 

subscriptions + anti-repair as the new business model.

You will own nothing, and not be happy?

The world is designed for the benefit of corporations and not the 'consumers'.

* See definition:

https://phys.org/news/2026-01-stages-enshittification-academic-publishing.pdf

Australia to use phone monitoring tool like ICE in the US?

Australians are no longer in a democracy but rather under a socialist state.

In many instances you don't have a 'right' to 'free speech', but rather you have to ask for permission to protest.

Image: U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement

Briefly,

404 Media has obtained material that explains how Tangles and Webloc, two surveillance systems ICE (Immigration & Customs Enforcement) recently purchased, work. 

Webloc can track phones without a warrant and follow their owners home or to their employer.

A social media and phone surveillance system ICE bought access to is designed to monitor a city neighbourhood or block for mobile phones, track the movements of those devices and their owners over time, and follow them from their places of work to home or other locations, according to material that describes how the system works obtained by 404 Media. 

Commercial location data, in this case acquired from hundreds of millions of phones via a company called Penlink, can be queried without a warrant, according to an internal ICE legal analysis shared with 404 Media. 

The purchase comes squarely during ICE’s mass deportation effort and continued crackdown on protected speech, alarming civil liberties experts and raising questions on what exactly ICE will use the surveillance system for. 

This is a very dangerous tool in the hands of an out-of-control agency.

At the end of the day the surveillance on the general population is going to get worse and worse with ZERO oversight.

What's worse, is the people are accepting this.

Royal Commission into ‘antisemitism’ another deliberately misguided farce?

Historically, royal commissions in this colony are a compromised ‘money for mates’ rort of taxpayer funds.

The corruption of the colony's Anglo-Masonic legal system goes above the comprehension of the ‘average Joe’, exactly the way the system wants it to be.

Edward I

The previous royal commission into the banking and financial services institutions was a deliberately useless farce, where approx 10,000 signatories to it never obtained a remedy.

The Wood Royal Commission on paedophilia, totally useless to the victims of paedophiles in positions of power.

Will the (alleged) ‘royal commission into antisemitism’ ask the fundamental question of why is there a perception/sentiment of antisemitism or is it really anti-Zionism?

Protests in Melbourne

The so called commission will not entertain why is Australia importing Islamic fundamentalists that later carry out heinous actions or incite hate or violence, because it's acceptable if it's against Buddhist, Hindus or Christians?

See article from 2014: 

Adelaide-based Sheikh Sharif Hussein free to preach race hate

The so called commission will not entertain the fact that the Sajid Akram was a 'Person of Interest' and should have not been given the right to reside in Australia, where others have been denied entry of exercising their ‘free speech’ right in this colony.

The so called commission will not entertain the fact that Sajid Akram should have not been given a gun licence by the 'authorities'.

Will the commission obtain evidence that in the 1200’s the Jews were plunging the English population into poverty through a practice called usury, that being making loans that are seen as unfairly enriching the lender?

Will the commission obtain evidence that condemning taking advantage of others' misfortunes, was brought in under a law in 1275 called ‘Statute of the Jewry’ by Edward I of England?

Usury is still practised today and will be well into the future.

Will the so called royal commission look into the history why the Jews were kicked out of Egypt or Spain?

Will the so called royal commission look into the actions of modern day Israel against other nations and the correlation against Zionism?

See video: of the title: Rabbi EXPOSES Israel in Bondi Beach Attacks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xEiKpYX5_E

Keeping in mind that the matter of antisemitism vs anti-Zionism has already been before the Federal Court of Australia in 2025, under Wertheim v Haddad. Where the following was stated:

Will the so called commission do a deep dive into Zionism?

So, the royal commission will be into 'antisemitism' and not into the 'Bondi Beach Massacre', where the people will be blamed for (alleged) antisemitism, but an inquiry into the Bondi Beach massacre will pin the blame on the authorities at a fair few levels.

See also: 

Bondi massacre, the government to blame

Bondi massacre, the government to blame

Briefly:

Quite simply put, the Bondi Beach shooting on 14th of December 2025 could have been avoided, where the federal government is negligent in its actions, or inaction.

Over the last few decades the Australian government, has been importing all sorts of trash from all over the planet into this colony, meaning other nations low quality, low value humans, under whatever label.

MANY of these humans do not contribute to society in a positive manner, but rather leech from it, or have the only intention to commit crime for a living.

Sajid Akram, pictured above, should have never been let into the colony, nor should he have ever been given a gun licence, where this is the so called ‘failure of government’.

The Australian government, over the years, has had many different policies in place with regards to importing corporate fodder into Australia.

The racists in government implemented the ‘White Australia policy’ from the beginning of federation until the 1970s.

The policy now is to flood Australia with low quality immigrants, turning a blind eye to their criminal history from their place of origin.

What is worse, for the greater good od society,  is that it’s quite clear that the courts ‘support’ these criminals, letting them back out on the streets, as the system requires repeat offenders in order for it to prosper.

There are other aspects to the actions of the father Sajid Akram and son Naveed Akram combo, which are outside the scope of this article.

New anti-smoking drug a ‘Fizzer’?

The sole purpose that corporations exist for is not to create a product or service but rather to generate profit for the owners/stakeholders from this product or service.

In a fair few instances health of the consumers is not on the cards, with food-like products from corporations like McDonald's, Wendy's, Donut King, et al.

A global 'big pharma' giant has recently put together a drug that allegedly stops people from smoking.

So what they need to do now is to spruik their 'wares' to medical practitioners, where kickbacks are given for every prescription handed out the patient 'customer'/consumer.

That's all very nice, BUT the problem is that a confidential industry insider stated that the drug doesn't work, where the company that produced it, knows that.

Sounds familiar?

A few years ago the same corporation put out a drug that was forced or maybe 'enticed' onto the people, where it did not confer immunity therefore it was falsely labelled as a 'vaccine'.

Naturally it would a good idea to seek a professional medial opinion on this drug from a medical practitioner that has no vested interest in the product.

Creating apps like Signal or WhatsApp could be 'hostile activity,' claims UK watchdog

It's the latest blow to encryption in the UK

---

• Encrypted messaging developers may be considered hostile actors in the UK
• An independent review of national security law warns of overreach
• Encryption repeatedly targeted by UK lawmakers

---

Developers of apps that use end-to-end encryption to protect private communications could be considered hostile actors in the UK.

That is the stark warning from Jonathan Hall KC, the government’s Independent Reviewer of State Threats Legislation and Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, in a new report on national security laws.

In his independent review of the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act and the newly implemented National Security Act, Hall KC highlights the incredibly broad scope of powers granted to authorities.

He warns that developers of apps like Signal and WhatsApp could technically fall within the legal definition of "hostile activity" simply because their technology "make[s] it more difficult for UK security and intelligence agencies to monitor communications."

He writes: "It is a reasonable assumption that this would be in the interests of a foreign state even if though the foreign state has never contemplated this potential advantage."

The report also notes that journalists "carrying confidential information" or material "personally embarrassing to the Prime Minister on the eve of important treaty negotiations" could face similar scrutiny.

While it remains to be seen how this report will influence future amendments, it comes at a time of increasing pressure from lawmakers against encryption.

Encryption under siege

While the report’s strong wording may come as a shock, it doesn't exist in a vacuum. Encrypted apps are increasingly in the crosshairs of UK lawmakers, with several pieces of legislation targeting the technology.

Most notably, Apple was served with a technical capability notice under the Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) demanding it weaken the encryption protecting iCloud data. That legal standoff led the tech giant to disable its Advanced Data Protection instead of creating a backdoor.

The Online Safety Act is already well known for its controversial age verification requirements. However, its most contentious provisions have yet to be fully implemented, and experts fear these could undermine encryption even further.

On Monday, Parliament debated the Act following a petition calling for its repeal. Instead of rolling back the law, however, MPs pushed for stricter enforcement. During the discussion, lawmakers specifically called for a review of other encrypted tools, like the best VPNs.

The potential risks of the Act's tougher stance on encryption were only briefly mentioned during the discussion, suggesting a stark disconnect between MPs and security experts.

Olivier Crépin-Leblond, of the Internet Society, told TechRadar he was disappointed by the outcome of the debate. "When it came to Client Side Scanning (CSS), most felt this could be one of the 'easy technological fixes' that could help law enforcement greatly, especially when they showed their frustration at Facebook rolling end-to-end encryption," he said.

"It's clearly not understood that any such software could fall prey to hackers."

It is clear that for many lawmakers, encryption is viewed primarily as an obstacle to law enforcement. This stands in sharp contrast to the view of digital rights experts, who stress that the technology is vital for protecting privacy and security in an online landscape where cyberattacks are rising.

"The government signposts end-to-end encryption as a threat, but what they fail to consider is that breaking it would be a threat to our national security too," Jemimah Steinfeld, CEO of Index on Censorship, told TechRadar.

She also added that this ignores encryption's vital role for dissidents, journalists, and domestic abuse victims, "not to mention the general population who should be afforded basic privacy."

With the battle lines drawn, we can expect a challenging year ahead for services like Signal and WhatsApp. Both companies have previously pledged to leave the UK market rather than compromise their users' privacy and security.

Source:techradar

The actions of a global 'Nanny State' agenda, nothing to do with 'child safety'.

Bondi Massacre: The question no one is asking?

Briefly,

Australia’s mainstream media playbook is controlled by a few people, where all the stories follow the same line.

See: 

Who REALLY Writes Australia's News? (The truth About AAP)

There’s only a few that dare to venture outside of the ‘approved’ narrative.

The narrative now, after this (deliberate?) 'failure of government', is all about more stringent gun controls, and anti-Semitism and now anti-Zionism or anti an ideology like Communism.

After the Port Arthur incident, stringent gun control came to Australia, but it didn’t curb gun crime. 

The ‘real’ criminals still had guns.

Australia’s authorities are inherently corrupt, where their corrupt actions have devastating effects on the general population.

One action of the corrupt government is that it knowingly import terrorists, for example the ones that (allegedly) committed the mass shooting in Bondi  on the 14th of December 2025.

That’s one example on the extreme side.

Another example is that the federal government deliberately imports low quality humans from all over the world as (alleged) ‘refugees’ that once they are here, they commit criminal actions against the good population of Australia, where the machete attacks in Victoria are a prime example.

This ‘problem’ is not going away anytime soon, where in fact it’s  going to get worse, for the people, and 'better' for the legal system, as they’ll have plenty of new ‘customers’ as that’s what it’s all about.

So, why is Australia importing terrorists?

Australia’s corrupt Anglo-Masonic legal system needs to feed off criminals, where the federal government supplies the fodder as it's good for business.

Australia isn't a "lucky country", it's a colony run by low quality people, to put it very nicely.