Also noting now, that there are a fair few individuals that hold the information and skills required to prove that there is no valid law in Victoria (apart from the entrenched laws of the U.K.), which can be proven in a public forum (a place commonly referred to as a 'court'), irrespective of the outcome from an [allegedly] corrupt 'judge' or 'magistrate'.
Although the documentation pertains to Victoria, it can be assumed it's applicable to the rest of Australia, regarding the section pertaining to 'criminal' offences.
Most people may not be aware that they have a contractual obligation to a certain party, as there has not been full disclosure or even a lawfully valid contractual agreement between the two parties, but according to (Victorian) 'law' they are CRIMINALS, and treated as such by the (unlawful) 'courts'.
Forget the catch phrase "Innocent until proven guilty".
The reality is that in Australia, we are under Roman Code, where you are guilty and have to prove innocence
READ THE COURT PAPERWORK!
You are the accused. You are the defendant.
According to the Magistrates' Court of Victoria:
Source: page 23 from http://www.magistratescourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/Default/MCV%20Annual%20Report%202010-11.pdf
- The Road Safety Act (1986) is invalid,
- The Infrigements (PERIN) Court is not a valid court (read unlawful), and as a result the 'sheriff' is not chasing the 'fines',
- 'Parking' offences are unlawful,
- Council prosecution related to 'local law' offences are invalid.