04 September 2021

Investigative journalism is dead in Australia: repossessions


The so called ‘news’ outlets of the mainstream media are no longer realistically ‘news’ sources, but rather businesses that carefully curate government sponsored propaganda.

It may (or not) have taken the current global situation for people to realise this.

ANY action questioning government decisions or disenchantment is ferociously met by the msm as an anti whatever, ‘extremist’, far left or right, and in order to evoke emotion or anger within the community adjectives further supporting the falsified narrative like violent are added.

Government reaction in Australia has caused more harm than the purported source of our woes.

Loss of jobs as a result of government action caused harm to many where suicides have gone up at an alarming rate, something that is hidden from the public view.

MANY people have lost their businesses forever, while multinationals have raked in outstanding profits.

How many people have lost their homes/business as a result of government action?

Too taboo to report on?

Or is reporting on this classified as inciting, because if the people really found out the true figures they ‘may’ take it too the streets?

What’s really important in the ‘news’ is that some ‘model’ is wearing a Savage X Fenty bikini.



We are hounded every single day with (fake?) stories that there are however many ‘cases’ each day.

BUT none of the ‘news’ outlet have reported on how they are classified, more importantly what Ct (Cycle threshold) figure is used to derive these so called cases.

The NSW department of health stated in a tweet that it uses 40.



The problem there is that this figure gives false positives, where the WHO recommended 25-30, as seen in the above screen capture.

Another problem is that the current test used in Australia is inherently flawed, where because of this a US health institution is withdrawing its use from Dec 2021.


Now, the mainstream media is following the government directive of giving false information with regards to deaths, where the operative words have been changed where it’s reported that a person died ‘with’ the disease as opposed to previously ‘from’ the disease, therefore amplifying the alleged severity of the situation.

A truly pathetic state of ‘journalism’ in Australia.

No comments: