Australia's legal system is corrupt to the core, where in reality it should be razed to the ground, but as we know that will never happen
There is no separation of powers where lowest common denominators like belonging to the brotherhood take precedence.
MANY decisions by magistrates/judicial registrars are contrary to the law, unbeknown to the victim or rather accused or defendant, where a legal representative more often than not stays silence, as that person is first and foremost an 'officer of the court'.
Australia is a legal 'basket case', where the High Court of Australia is just one example.
One would think that the High Court of Australia was established in 1901 under Section 71 of the Constitution, which is true.
But 'that' High Court died 78 years later.
The High Court of Australia we have today, was born in 1979, via it's Act.
It's not the same court as the one enacted in 1901, where people trying to obtain a remedy from the court will fail and do so.
The Australian Government of yesteryear may have been a 'Commonwealth' with departments, today it is a corporation aggregate, where a different set of 'rules' apply.
Does the general public know how many 'constitutional arguments' are rejected by this court every week?
A few years ago the figure was 70, and now with all the unlawful actions of those in government over the past couple of years, 100?
The royal commission into the banking and financial services is another example of a farce.
What the general population may or may not know is that there were over 10,000 applicants involved in the complaint.
How many of them obtained a remedy?
Not one!
Court Services Victoria (ABN:63 392 984 660) is the institution where the judiciary obtains their paychecks from.
Naysayers may say that there's nothing wrong with that, as it's still a 'state government statute authority', right?
Sure.
But only if it were true or rather no other parties had a financial interest in it.
A list of stakeholders contains the names of banks and financial institutions that partake financially in Court Services Victoria.
Therefore quite simply put the judiciary is working for the banks (and financial services institutions).
Therefore ANY judgement/order pertaining to legal action regarding a bank or financial institution in Victoria is not done without bias or independently without undue influence.
We are aware of court cases that involve banks that do not get through or the defendant loses in a judgement against the bank as the judge is on the payroll of the banks.
Sure you may win your traffic violation, or even the unlawful Covid fine, but on matters of more importance you not only will lose, but in other instances the court case will not exist in the records, as many have been hidden from the public record deemed not in the 'interest of the public'.
The judiciary is corrupt, it hides court cases from you.
How can you trust someone who hides something from you?
In any event doesn't the saying they want you to abide by hold true to them?
"Nothing to hide, nothing to fear", right?
EVERY court matter is in the 'interest of the public' as it involves the 'public'.
No comments:
Post a Comment