eJustice coming to Australia your friendly penal colony

In Australia we have too many criminals roaming the streets where authorities cannot nab them.

The corporate media people will tell you these criminals are 'fine' dodgers, but (deliberately) neglects to tell you that fines in Australia are unlawful.

When you park your horseless carriage longer than what a statutory body tells you, you receive a fine, unlawfully. If you do not pay this fine the matter is listed as a criminal offence in a place of business/commerce/trading called a 'court'.

As a result we have millions of 'criminals' in Australia.

In a certain period in time you had to have a licence to operate a viewing device that received radio frequencies.

In another point in time you had to have a licence for transmitting radio frequencies of audio spectrum quality of no greater than 5 watts.

Fast forward a few years and the government still requires you to register your mobile telephone  / sim card before it becomes operational.

Now, with the advent of smart phones, you are required to register your apparatus via an internet email account which can be hacked.

Your contacts/calendar is no longer personal, nor private and confidential, but rather the data is now available to be abused by others.

The myth that 'your' data is secure is exactly that - a myth.

For many years now the 'authorities' have been wanting/needing/requiring your mobile phone number and email address when filling out forms.

Because there are so many people that are dodging unlawful fines, the government (read corporation conglomerate) is claiming on missing out hundreds of millions of dollars annually in (unlawful) revenue.

Any person involved in the legal industry should be able to tell the lay-person that law is fluid, and changes as society changes.

e-Justice (Electronic Justice) will be a new delivery mechanism in the near future.

In the European Union it is 'advertised' as a 

"future electronic one-stop-shop in the area of justice".

In Australia have the people the right to not go into a 'shop'?

Can you have a choice of not buying?

Will the Australian advertising slogan be:

"If you can't come to us, we know where you are anyway, so we'll deliver it to your phone"?

While technically people can come and go as they please from the continent known as Australia, once you're on it then it's a different story.

Australia, at law, is still a colony of the British empire, which is reflected by the penal colony laws implemented and not of a (true) democracy or remotely a place of 'free-men'.

The occupiers have not signed a treaty with the Indigenous people, as they have in New Zealand with the Treaty of Waitangi, hence the different standing of law in this country.

Currently, there is no mandate in any law in Australia that states that you must provide your mobile phone number or email address.

Stay tuned for eJustice to your smartphone or email address.

Australia - Alcatraz v2

Police to use new home invasive smartphone technology without warrants

It all may seem a bit 'James Bond' at times when it comes to technology released to the general population, but it really pales in comparison as to what is available to 'governments'.

With the introduction of the GSM phone came another technology that was 'conveniently' not mentioned to the general populous that being the location of the user, within an error margin of approximately 10 meters or less, via a technology that is referred to today as A-GPS (Assisted GPS), that being the location of the mobile phone via cell tower triangulation. See illustration below.

This data was available to government departments from the very inception of this technology being introduced to the masses, and was primarily used in the utility sector in Australia, as well as law enforcement later on.

People who mentioned that they knew this data was used by law enforcement, were ridiculed and scoffed at, as a 'conspiracy theorist' or watching too many James Bond films, by the police.

Phone technology progressed, where more computing power and functionality was crammed into the device with the emergence of real GPS technology also being crammed in.

This data was now being made available to the masses, where the market has embraced this surveillance technology which can be used and abused by not only authorities, but also now (private or government sector) app developers.

As usual technology and law are intertwined, and in Australia law is very different to other parts of the world, including the close neighbour of New Zealand.

The laws of Australia are different to the laws of New Zealand, where after the Treaty of Waitangi was signed, the British Crown is not an oppressive force (at war) on the Indigenous population.

What the general population should know is that Australia was started of as an 'economic' project with the invasion on the Indigenous population with a boat load of convicts.

With no treaty signed the act of war being current, Martial Law was installed on the continent now referred to as Australia since 1788.

To this day, since there is no treaty with the Indigenous population, technically a state of war is still upon this land, unbeknownst to the general populous, but well known within legal circles within government ranks.

Why would the (colonial) past be brought up where some trailer trash uneducated radio DJ (Kyle Sandliands - @kingkyle) would even comment as to move on or even 'get over it'?

From this thing called the past is where the current law stands at.

It is the fundamental basis of current actions of the 'executive' - i.e. law makers, politicians and the law enforcers the police, that effects the people on this land.


If people comprehend how they are seen by the authorities, they will then comprehend the actions of those people in power.

Now moving on to Australia's law enforcement history, which is quite dodgy to say the least.

To put it as concisely as possible, Australia's police 'force' started off as criminals, just really good behaved ones.

As mentioned previously, at law, since there still is no treaty with the Indigenous population the general populace are still technically an occupying force, occupying the role of military non-combatants.

This is further supported  by the military designations of Mr, Ms, Mrs or Miss the Australian government uses in classifying the general population, as defined their very own Style Manual Sixth Edition as described in the post:
http://corpau.blogspot.com.au/2015/08/the-true-meaning-of-title-mr-ms-mrs-or.html

At law, Australia is still a colony of the British empire, which also reflects how the authorities see their inhabitants.

At law, meaning Australian law makers classified you as a 'criminal' if you overstayed your allocated time frame in a car parking space.

At law, you are a criminal if you did not obey a traffic/road/speed signage.

At law, strict and absolute liability is enforced via Roman Curia law.

At law 'owner onus' applies implicating that you are guilty and you must prove your innocence.

So what's this 'history' crap got to do with mobile phone technology? 

Plenty.

The general populace are viewed as criminals (past present or future), and they are treated, at law as such.

This can be further enhanced by the fact that law makers are making laws that invade the privacy of the convicts allowing police to access data WITHOUT warrants without any repercussions.

At law - The police are NOT your 'friend' never were and never will be.

Naturally all this technology is for YOUR benefit.

See article from 12 Jun 2016 from news.com.au of the headline:

Your phone may soon sense everything around you

Yang Yuanqing, Lenovo CEO, reveals the Moto Z Family and Moto Mods ecosystem at Lenovo Tech World at The Masonic Auditorium on June 9, 2016 in San Francisco. Picture: Kelly Sullivan/Getty Images for Motorola Mobility.

SUPPOSE your smartphone is clever enough to grasp your physical surroundings — the room’s size, the location of doors and windows and the presence of other people. What could it do with that info?

We’re about to get our first look. This week Lenovo was to give consumers their first chance to buy a phone featuring Google’s 3-year-old Project Tango, an attempt to imbue machines with a better understanding of what’s around them.

Location tracking through GPS and cell towers tells apps where you are, but not much more. Tango uses software and sensors to track motions and size up the contours of rooms, empowering Lenovo’s new phone to map building interiors. That’s a crucial building block of a promising new frontier in “augmented reality,” or the digital projection of lifelike images and data into a real-life environment.

If Tango fulfils its promise, furniture shoppers will be able to download digital models of couches, chairs and coffee tables to see how they would look in their actual living rooms. Kids studying the Mesozoic Era would be able to place a virtual Tyrannosaurus or Velociraptor in their home or classroom — and even take selfies with one. The technology would even know when to display information about an artist or a scene depicted in a painting as you stroll through a museum.

Tango will be able to create internal maps of homes and offices on the fly. Google won’t need to build a mapping database ahead of time, as it does with Google Maps and Street View. Nonetheless, Tango could raise fresh concerns about privacy if controls aren’t stringent enough to prevent the on-the-fly maps from being shared with unauthorised apps or heisted by hackers.

At the Lenovo Tech World conference in San Francisco this week, the Chinese company was expected to announce the phone’s price and release date.

Google already has released experimental Tango devices designed for computer programmers, spurring them to build apps that will work with Lenovo’s new phone. At a conference for developers last month, Google demonstrated an app for picturing furniture in actual living rooms and for taking selfies with digital dinosaurs.

Google plans to bring Tango to other phones, but is focusing on the Lenovo partnership this year, according to Johnny Lee, a Google executive who oversaw the team that developed the technology.

Lee believes three-dimensional imagery and data — whether through the new Tango phone or another technology — will help reshape the way people interact with e-commerce, education and gaming.

Idiot 'engineers' should be sacked for approving high rise next to helipad in Melbourne

Apparently we are told that the people in power rule over the peasants with decisions that are for 'good governance'.

So how is putting the plebs lives at risk, 'good governance'.

How could you trust 'town planners' that gave the go-ahead to a high rise residential dwelling, that is a flight risk to the already established Royal Melbourne Hospital, just across the road.

These people responsible should be dismissed immediately, never to work in their field again, as it is clear that their decisions put peoples lives at risk.

Another one for the 'Failure of Governance' file, all in the name of 'big business'?

From the article of 14 Jun 2016 by abc.net.au of the headline:

Concerns Melbourne high-rise could interfere with hospital flight paths

Posted about 8 hours ago

 

 Photo: An artist's impression of The Principal on Flemington Road, North Melbourne. (Supplied)

Related Story: Hospital forced to close helipad due to nearby construction

The Victorian Government is appealing to the planning tribunal to stop a high-rise development amid concerns it could interfere with flight paths to one of the state's busiest hospitals.

Key points:

• 15-storey development was approved before new regulations were introduced to protect flight paths
• Planning Minster says Melbourne City Council 'did not give due consideration'
• Royal Melbourne Hospital helipad closed for weeks last year due to nearby construction

The Department of Health and Human Services has told the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) a 15-storey building approved for development on Flemington Road could stop helicopters from landing at the Royal Melbourne Hospital.

The Principal building will comprise 162 one, two and three-bedroom apartments and two penthouses, according to the website of property services group Olive Hume.

Sixty per cent of the dwellings have already been sold, according to the website.

Planning Minister Richard Wynne said the development was approved by Melbourne City Council before new regulations were introduced to protect hospital flight paths.

"The Melbourne City Council in this instance did not give due consideration to ensuring that the flight path was protected," he said.

"They need a clear flight path in and out of the hospitals and if you have buildings obviously that block the flight path, it's often not safe for the helicopter to weave around them."

The department has asked VCAT to reduce the height of the building.

The tribunal hearing concluded earlier this month but a decision is yet to be made.

The hospital's helipad was forced to close for weeks last year due to concerns a nearby crane on a construction site was intruding airspace.

Application for - Request of Information, by police

If you are in a situation where you would want to communicate with Australia's police force, you can get the police 'person' to fill out the following form.

This is valid in ALL states and territories of Australia, as the police are now corporate entities in their respective states and territories of Australia.

This can be a 'commercial in confidence' transaction if you so desire it to be.

The form can be downloaded from the following link:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2OWVVd2tQZFZJU0U

Dob in a drug dealer but not a corrupt cop

So apparently the herd population is told that the 'law' applies to everyone.

In reality the situation is quite the stark contrast.

The application of law in a penal colony, like Australia, is quite different than from most other 'free' countries or even republics.

As people should be aware the police is part of Australia's 'executive', i.e. working for the government, which today in reality is a corporation conglomerate.

So the 'authorities' encourage the inhabitants of a penal colony to 'dob' in a drug dealer, i.e. inform the authorities / police that someone is committing 'criminal' offences.

So what happens when the 'authorities' are committing criminal offences and they are 'dobbed' in?

Well just Queensland's Sergeant Rick Flori.

Rothschild's 25 point plan to gain and control global wealth

 

 See how many points your 'government' has enacted.

 

 

1. Use violence and terrorism rather than academic discussions.

2. Preach “Liberalism” to usurp political power.

3. Initiate class warfare.

4. Politicians must be cunning and deceptive – any moral code leaves a politician vulnerable.

5. Dismantle “existing forces of order and regulation.” Reconstruct all existing institutions.”

6. Remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it.

7. Use Mob Psychology to control the masses. “Without absolute despotism one cannot rule efficiently.”

8. Advocate the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption and all forms of vice, used systematically by “agenteurs” to corrupt the youth.

9. Seize properties by any means to secure submission and sovereignty.

10. Foment wars and control the peace conferences so that neither of the combatants gains territory placing them further in debt and therefore into our power.

11. Choose candidates for public office who will be “servile and obedient to our commands, so they may be readily used as pawns in our game.”

12. Use the Press for propaganda to control all outlets of public information, while remaining in the shadows, clear of blame.

13. Make the masses believe they had been the prey of criminals. Then restore order to appear as the saviors.

14. Create financial panics. Use hunger to control to subjugate the masses.

15. Infiltrate Freemasonry to take advantage of the Grand Orient Lodges to cloak the true nature of their work in philanthropy. Spread their atheistic-materialistic ideology amongst the "Goyim" (gentiles).

16. When the hour strikes for our sovereign lord of the entire World to be crowned, their influence will banish everything that might stand in his way.

17. Use systematic deception, high-sounding phrases and popular slogans. “The opposite of what has been promised can always be done afterwards... That is of no consequence.”

18. A Reign of Terror is the most economical way to bring about speedy subjection.

19. Masquerade as political, financial and economic advisers to carry out our mandates with Diplomacy and without fear of exposing “the secret power behind national and international affairs.”

20. Ultimate world government is the goal. It will be necessary to establish huge monopolies, so even the largest fortunes of the Goyim will depend on us to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments on the day after the great political smash.”

21. Use economic warfare. Rob the "Goyim" of their landed properties and industries with a combination of high taxes and unfair competition.

22. “Make the 'Goyim' destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest.”

23. Call it The New Order. Appoint a Dictator.

24. Fool, bemuse and corrupt the younger members of society by teaching them theories and principles we know to be false.

25 Twist national and international laws into a contradiction which first masks the law and afterwards hides it altogether. Substitute arbitration for law

 

 Source: http://www.spingola.com/before_rockefeller.htm

Hydro Tasmania asked to explain cloud seeding in catchment day before flooding

Tasmania's government-owned energy company has been asked to explain why it conducted cloud seeding over the Derwent Valley the day before flooding began this week.

Key points:

• Hydro Tasmania authorised cloud seeding, which increases rain, in a catchment hit hard by floods
• Premier seeks explanation from Hydro
• Hydro says inappropriate to comment, pending inquiries
• Search continues for Ouse farmer

The catchment flooded on Monday near Ouse in southern Tasmania, where the search continues for a missing farmer.

In the state's north, one person was killed and another remains missing.

Cloud seeding is a technique used to increase rain to bolster dams and involves the addition of a substance to suitable clouds to encourage the growth of ice crystals or raindrops.

Premier Will Hodgman said he was told Hydro Tasmania authorised cloud seeding on Sunday morning in the Upper Derwent catchment, even though heavy falls were forecast.

Mr Hodgman told 936 ABC Hobart Hydro's decision was difficult to fathom at face value but Energy Minister Matthew Groom was seeking answers.

"That's why we've sought the explanation from Hydro Tasmania as to those matters, the Minister has sought that," he said.

"It's certainly my expectation that will be provided at the earliest opportunity to respond to those matters."

Hydro Tasmania has confirmed it flew a cloud seeding flight the day huge storms approached the country's east coast.

Documents show the flight took place on Sunday morning while there were flood warnings in place in the north.

The flight seeded clouds for more than an hour and a half just north of Great Lake, one of the largest water storage dams in the state.

The flight was targeting the Upper Derwent catchment, which mainly feeds water to several hydro electric dams which lie downstream.

Farmers demand answers

Farmers in the Ouse area, like Scott Ashton-Jones, want to know why the cloud seeding went ahead while flood warnings were in place for the northern half of Tasmania.

Photo: Ouse in the Derwent River catchment was one of the hardest hit areas in this week's floods. (Audience submitted: David Bradley)

"The extent to which cloud seeding has exaggerated the flood is still to be determined of course, but the evidence from previous cloud seeding operations is that it works and therefore it will have exaggerated the flood to some extent," he said.

"The Hydro has always claimed positive results from cloud seeding."

George Mills said he could hear the flight on Sunday morning, and wondered what was going on.
"We want to understand whether the cloud seeding has helped to create this massive flood from the local rivers which we've never ever seen," he said.

"If the Hydro have had something to do with that with their cloud seeding, well we want to understand that because in the future we need to have closer information."

Hydro 'not in position' to comment

Hydro Tasmania will not answer questions about both Sunday's cloud seeding flight and its policies on using the technique when there are current flood warnings.

What is cloud seeding?

• Hydro Tasmania describes cloud seeding as a technique for increasing precipitation (eg. rain or snow) using naturally occurring clouds
• "It involves the introduction of additional particles into suitable clouds to encourage the formation and growth of ice crystals or raindrops and thus increase the amount of precipitation that will fall from the cloud"

A spokeswoman said it would be inappropriate to comment.

"At this point Hydro Tasmania is not in a position to provide more information," she said.

"Experience suggests that in the aftermath of a severe natural disaster such as this some form of government inquiry follows.

"In light of the unfortunate death of one person, and with grave fears for two people still missing, there is likely to be at least a coronial inquest."

The community of Ouse has been left devastated by the floods, which arrived with little warning in the early hours of Monday morning.

Farmers in the district have reported the loss of hundreds of sheep and cattle, and significant infrastructure losses.

Bureau had flood warnings in place

The Bureau of Meteorology has confirmed flood warnings were in place for regions of Tasmania when the flight took place.

"The first media release alerting the Tasmanian community to likely impacts of the event was issued on Friday 3 June," a weather bureau spokesperson said.

Photo: Dozens of sheep and cattle have been washed away throughout the state. (ABC News: Edith Bevin)

 

"Detailed updates have been provided directly to the local media throughout the event."

The spokesperson said the first flood watch for Tasmania was issued at midday on Friday, with warnings following on Saturday.

"The first flood warnings were issued on Saturday afternoon: six to 12 hours before significant rain began to fall across northern Tasmania," they said.

The first minor flood warning for the Ouse and Derwent rivers was issued at 10:36pm on Sunday, after the cloud seeding flight took place.

The next day, unprecedented rainfall resulted in major flood warnings for seven Tasmanian rivers, including the Derwent and Ouse.

abc.net.au 10 Jun 2016

Before you donate to the Salvation Army

Currently on Australian television there is a lot of advertising time devoted to the Salvation Army's Red Shield appeal.

When one is involved in the finance industry one would also be aware of the name Rothschild, which (apparently) originated from a Jewish family living in Germany in the 16th Century that changed it's name to Rothschild (from the German translation Rot - Red, schild - Shield) after the coat of arms emblem that appeared over their house.

The Rothschild name rose to fame from Mayer Amschel who started the namesake banking dynasty.

There are a fair few dodgy deals done to secure the wealth of the Rotschilds, according to pop culture / historians.

One other aspect of charities (that the masses may not be aware of), in Australia is that they are a tax haven, with (deliberately?) less than accurate book keeping, where the Australian government has taken zero action against these companies.

Charities can easily spend 85% of taxpayers monies on 'administration' before even 'one red cent' makes to the actual recipients.

High CEO wages, company cars, 'money for mates' dodgy deals are all part of a normal business day without any government intervention whatsoever.

Why would a honest [people in] government take no action, unless maybe it (they) was also involved in this 'scam'.

What makes matter worse is that the Salvation Army was (and still is?) involved in sexual abuse against children.

Would you really want to give your hard earned cash to a company involved in child sexual abuse, that survives very well from government funds, where only the 'beneficiaries' receive a small portion ?

Can you change the corporate media's glorifying of ex-PM's?

When it comes to accidentally misleading or deliberately false reporting of information the corporate media could be king?

Forget the 'conspiracy theorists' or others with 'tin foil hats', who may have obtained information  that is contrary to 'mainstream' politics, they're just rubbished or their character is assassinated by the government sponsored lap dogs.

One may even read a small and insignificant line 'the conspiracy theorists were right and we were wrong' somewhere?

Let's put this in perspective to the (treasonous) heads of Australian politics.

Recently (21 October 2014) the corporate media glorified how Gough Whitlam was such a great person.

ANY senior law researcher or (truthful) constitutional lawyer should be able to tell you that anyone holding office in parliament should be charge for treason.

ONE of the most unlawful acts carried out by Whitlam was the introduction of a fictitious entity called the 'Queen of Australia'.

Don't take 'our' word for it, just ask the corporate media, their research is impeccable!  

Bet you the corporate media will not tell you that (scum bag) Rob Hulls unlawfully removed grand jury from our courts.

So before the old hawke (see illustration below) becomes prey to the grim reaper, any person from the masses care to share the treasonous actions of the (womaniser/cheater/drunk/all round 'mug') ex-PM (Robert 'Bob' Hawke)?

You can put your information in the comments section.

As usual, only spam is moderated.

How the police support criminals

The actions of police may seem to baffle the herd populace's most brilliant minds.

 One example of this is when a member of the herd traveled in their automobile at a velocity of  5km/h greater than advertised, got caught, by Victoria Police, their matter was listed as a 'criminal' matter in court and did not get away with it. Conversely,  another person who travelled on that same stretch of road at 100km/h over, got caught, and got away with it.

To anyone involved in the legal business, including police cadets,  one of the basic principles learnt  is that in order to obtain a successful conviction all the evidence presented must be obtained within the specifications of the current laws (read Acts).

Please note that the police apparently act in "the interest of public safety"  meaning carry out actions that keep the public safe.

To the uninitiated Victoria Police has very strong ties to the brotherhood.

As members of the brotherhood will know their members have various levels of knowledge and skills that are reflected in the role and ultimately the club they belong to.

The bottom feeders/foot soldiers may only be involved in a task that the club is tasked to do, completely unaware of the activities and contents of policies their higher up brethren carry out.

Do  dodgy organisations need to advertise that they help special people in order to cover up some other activities that are 'morally' / legally wrong?

A person who has stated that they wish to remain anonymous, for fear of reprisals, was at a brotherhood meeting, where various heads of state were present, including Victoria Police.

During this meeting various topics were covered including crime.

It was stated that the crime level needs to be at a particular rate in order to keep the masses fearful and under control.

As the general populous should know, the 'crime rate' is administered by a branch of the executive called the police, who the government (today, a corporation conglomerate) administers.

There are certain crimes that the police will not follow up and there are certain people that the police are not allowed to investigate, despite the high criminal activities of those people/organisations.

The police also work alongside with criminals like in the very public matter of notorious drug king pin Carl Williams.

What many people may not be aware of that the police also support certain criminals, and allow them to continue to commit criminal activities.

This (supportive) action may occur on various fronts, where police are given the order from the brotherhood, not to pursue criminal charges, or where police officers themselves directly associate with the criminals for personal gains.

In the latter example if the details were made public, the police would be supported by the brotherhood and exonerated from any wrongdoing.

On example of letting the criminal go, for whatever reason, is to 'botch' an investigation where the evidence collected, and the matter brought before the court is not according to the law, which means all charges are dropped against that person in relation to their criminal activity.

What a logical reaction would be is that the police officers involved should be ejected from the police force, as they are incompetent, putting the general populous at risk, but instead they are kept in the 'force' to allow other criminals to roam free as directed by their superiors.

Also note that Australian police 'force' started off literally as a criminal organisation, i.e. an organisation made up of criminals or rather convicts, just really really good behaved ones.

It may seem that it is not the criminals that are the real danger to society but rather the people who administer them.

The illustration below of the headline Mitchel beats rap (HeraldSun Sat, 28 May 2016) is just one example of how police let (supported) criminals get away with it.

 or you can read the article from the same publication of the headline:

Toby Mitchell’s bid for early freedom in drug possession case

May 27, 2016 1:30pm

Wayne Flower Herald Sun

Toby Mitchell outside court during a previous hearing. Picture: Hamish Blair

DRUG trafficking charges against underworld figure Toby Mitchell have been dropped following a bungled Federal Police investigation. 

Agents swooped on Mitchell’s Docklands apartment on September 25 last year, confiscating almost 500 grams of methamphetamine and cocaine from his hire car.

Tests later found the purity of the drug ice to be 259 grams and the cocaine 127 grams.

Police had believed Mitchell was part of a wider criminal operation that allegedly imported four airmail packages from the Netherlands containing 32 kilograms of MDMA worth about $8 million.

MORE: MITCHELL ADMITS POSSESSING DRUGS BEFORE COURT HEARING

Mitchell, 41, today pleaded guilty in the County Court to two charges of possessing a drug of dependence, possessing an illegal baton and possessing the drugs while on bail.

Mitchell has been in jail since his arrest, spending most of his time in isolation.

But the once feared bikie strongman could be released early after being granted permission to be assessed for a community correction order.

Mitchell had been free from jail a little over two months and was on bail after bashing a cyclist when police came knocking.

Toby Mitchell with his lawyer outside court in September. Picture: Jay Town

His barrister, Peter Morrissey SC, argued it was in the community’s best interest to release Mitchell on a CCO to help with his rehabilitation.  

(Absolute garbage statement! It's in the community's  interests that this drug trafficker stays behind bars as there is no chance of rehabilitation)

He told the court Mitchell had endured a “significantly harsh regime” inside jail and had previously endured seven months of “dead time” in prison following a false allegation of extortion.

Mr Morrissey’s description of Mitchell as a “charismatic and well-liked person” raised the eyebrows of Judge Graeme Hicks.

“While you say he’s very popular, obviously he’s been shot twice,” he said. “There could be alternative views.”

Mitchell, an ex-Bandidos bikie, was gunned down outside a Brunswick gym in 2011 and again in 2013 at the clubhouse of another outlaw gang in Melton.

Prosecutor Daryl Brown argued Mitchell should be locked up for no less than two years, which would not allow the judge to free him early in a CCO.

“Two years are within range,” he said.

Mitchell will learn his fate next Friday. 3rd of June 2016