Why you are an idiot

So you go to court and you are about to get a jolly rogering!

If you get someone to 're' present you, you are considered a ward of the state, a mute, unable to speak.

If you go on your own to present yourself before the 'judge'....


"......But 'your honour' I am only an idiot*....." 

So, let's have a look at the etymology of  the word 'idiot'.

You may be aware of the laws being made by people in the mid 1800's and 1900's, like for example the Victorian Constitution 1855, or the Australian Constitution 1901.

Armed with a legal dictionary or three, e.g. Ballentines / Black's / Bouvier's Law dictionaries may only give you one side of the story.

Therefore it is a good idea is to know the meaning to everyday words used of the period in question.

So, let's look at the word IDIOT as defined in Webster's Dictionary of 1880 (of interest is definition number 1).

*Idiot - 1. A man in private station, as distinguished from holding public office; a person in private life (see illustration above).


Some others DEFINITELY are a perfect fit to the other descriptions, but we'll put that aside for the moment.

The entire dictionary (300MB) can be downloaded from the link below :

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2TGJTbVg5dEFyb0U

Dodgy government employs dodgy people in city councils - Salim Mehajer

• What sort of government allows people in office that can make decision for personal gain to the detriment of the general populous?

Why the government of a penal colony, of course!

• How can you trust a government that does not act immediately in situations that show 'conflict of interest' arising from the actions of people in office?

You can't!

• Is this action [ of hiring 'dodgy' people] representative of government action on a wiser scale.

You can bet your 'Constitution' it is!

And this scum wants to be the Prime Minister of Australia.

We already have enough treasonous bastards without having to deal with another piece of garbage in office.

Australia's government a real criminal force against the people?

You can read the article from 13 July 2016 by news.com.au of the headline:

The dramatic downfall of the Salim and Aysha Mehajer love story

Is the Salim and Aysha Mehajer fairytale life over?

IT’S the fairytale romance that looks to have turned into a nightmare. 

Barely 12 months after controversial former deputy mayor Salim Mehajer married his sweetheart Aysha, the relationship could all but come to an end this week.

NSW Police, acting for Mrs Mehajer — going by her maiden name Aysha Learmonth — lodged an application for an apprehended violence order (AVO) on Monday against her husband. This morning the AVO was extended until next month which means they will not be together for their first wedding anniversary on August 15.

Neither Mr Mehajer or his wife Aysha were at the Downing Centre Local Court when the matter was mentioned.

Mr Mehajer agreed to the standard orders — which say he must not harass, assault, menace or stalk her — contained in the AVO, but indicated he wanted to vary or challenge orders that prevents him going within 50m of her home and/or work and must not approach her.

The only contact between the couple is to be via her lawyers.

Mr Mehajer has always insisted the dream is still alive when it came to he and his wife. Yesterday, he told news.com.au “only death will do us apart”. But, increasingly, it seems like wishful thinking.

But for the first time, Mr Mehajer conceded his wife had moved out of their marital home in Lidcombe, western Sydney although he claimed he saw her “every day”.

The Daily Telegraph reported that Mrs Mehajer had indeed recently met her husband but the reason was not to reconcile, but to seek an amicable split — a request he is said to have ignored.

A marriage that looks like it will end with a miserable whimper in a dreary Sydney court started with a lavish, glittering bang one sunny afternoon last August.

Four helicopters, a jet, a sea plane and a motorcade of luxury sports cars and motorcycles greeted bemused residents in the western Sydney suburb of Lidcombe as they found themselves hemmed in by the extravagant outdoor ceremony which saw Aysha and Salim tie the knot.

Former Auburn deputy mayor Salim Mehajer and his bride Aysha on their lavish wedding day in Lidcombe which involved helicopters, supercars, and dancing drummers and closed off a whole street. Picture: Toby ZernaSource:News Corp Australia

DIAMONDS AND PEARLS

On her big day, clad in a 22kg extravaganza of French lace and Swarovski pearls and diamonds, and with a beaming groom doting on her, she easily outshone any flashy motor.

The spectacle would catapult the couple to national stardom, while sharpening the crosshairs of the Auburn councillor’s critics.

He was the successful Sydney property developer, his apartments rising in the commuter belt east of Parramatta. She was the Wollongong beauty therapist, originally called April, who fell for the charms of the man dubbed “the councillor of conspicuous consumption”.

 Aysha Mehajer’s stunning wedding dress. Picture: Instagram nektariaSource:Instagram

‘I DON’T RECOGNISE HER’

The transformation, from blond haired April, to dark-haired beauty with chiselled looks, was miraculous.

So convincing was her metamorphosis that three months before the wedding, she was proclaimed Miss Personality Miss Lebanon Australia.

“I don’t recognise her but I think mostly anyone who knew her back then wouldn’t recognise her now,” Tracey Rovere, former principal of the Illawarra College of Beauty Therapy, who trained “April”, told the Daily Telegraph.

“Her hair was straight and red and then, for graduation night, she surprised us all by going and getting this amazing spray tan that concealed her freckles and had her hair lightened to strawberry blonde. She had this total Cinderella moment.”

Salim Mehajer and Aysha, before they married. Source: SuppliedSource:Supplied

HAPPY

A pre-wedding video provided the cheesiest moment of the couple’s celebrations.

It saw Mr Mehajer re-creating the first moment he laid eyes on his now wife.

There’s romance, drama, self-aggrandisement, even some guns, and finally Mr Right gets down on one knee as he presents Aysha with the ring she’s being waiting for.

After the last piece of confetti fell on the otherwise sleepy Sydney street, Mrs Mehajer fell into what, initially at least, seemed like a happy existence. She hung out with her husband’s stunning and sculptured sisters and even helped do a bit of fundraising, drawing the crowds at a local Macca’s for McHappy Day.

Happy times: Salim Mehajer joined wife Aysha at McDonalds Lidcombe to help raise money for McHappy day. Picture: Mark EvansSource:News Corp Australia

PRIME MINISTERIAL PLANS

When her husband, a few months later, graciously offered his services to the nation as a future prime minister, a serene Mrs Mehajer stood majestically behind him.

By November, the partnership went from the romantic to the business as Mrs Mehajer became director of several of her husband’s companies.

But storm clouds were brewing. Mr Mehajer was under increasing scrutiny for his business dealings and decisions made by Auburn councillors during his tenure as deputy mayor.

In February, Mrs Mehajer dramatically went into bat for her husband, pleading for his political life so he could build a multimillion-dollar block of units.

She wrote to Local Government Minister Paul Toole, asking him not to sack Auburn Council which would strip Mr Mehajer of his mayoral robes.

Mr Toole had singled out a decision made by the council to sell a council-owned car park in Lidcombe to the Mehajers, upon which its company — Sydney Constructions and Developments (SCD) — hoped to build an apartment block. If the council was sacked, the sale would be unlikely to go ahead.

“SCD is prepared to do all the things to protect its rights which arise under existing contract, including if the Minister interferes with those contracts,” she wrote ominously.

The Government wasn’t impressed and not only sacked the council but then disbanded it altogether, amalgamating it out of existence. The sale of the car park evaporated.

Salim Mehajer reportedly got a tattoo of his wife Aysha. Picture: SuppliedSource:Instagram

NO SHOW AT BIRTHDAY PARTY 

As Mr Mehajer’s political career and business plans began to unravel it was followed soon after by, seemingly, his relationship as well.

In April, he held an extravagant 30th birthday party for his wife which included shelling out $50,000 for US musicians Tyga and Omarion to attend.

The rappers took happy snaps on the mini-mansion’s illuminated spiral staircase and posed with a birthday cake.

The only thing missing? The birthday girl.

In fact, she hadn’t been seen for weeks.

Salim Mehajer posed with rappers Tyga and Omarion — but where was his wife? Picture: Instagram.Source:Supplied

WHO IS HOODA?

Soon afterwards, a romantic video emerged of Mr Mehajer — but it featured another woman.

The video, essentially a flip book of images, showed Mr Mehajer and a woman identified as “Hooda” embracing and, in some images, kissing.

Hooda bared a striking resemblance to Mr Mehajer’s wife.

“God sent me an angel” is daubed across one image of the couple. “I be his bonnie, he be my clyde [sic]”, is written across another.

A date of November 2014 crops up a number of times. If Mr Mehajer and Hooda were indeed an item then it would have been when he was already betrothed to his bride-to-be.

Later in the same month, Mr Mehajer was forced to furiously deny that his marriage was on the rocks despite reports he went to a house his wife was staying in and was found “yelling” and “screaming” while trying to knock the door in.

Mr Mehajer allegedly went to the house, in Wollongong, and demanded the keys to a Mercedes car his wife had been using, reported the Daily Telegraph. She was said to have escaped to the Gold Coast.

Salim Mehajer pictured leaving his house in Lidcombe. His wife Aysha applied for an apprehended violence order against him, on the eve of their one year anniversary. Picture: Adam YipSource:News Corp Australia

‘OUR LOVE IS TOO GREAT’

As the rumours cranked up, Mr Mehajer took to social media uploading pictures of he and his wife in happier times.

“Our love is too great to destroy,” said one post following the alleged incident in Wollongong.

On the weekend, Mr Mehajer uploaded a picture of him looking adoringly at his wife with the caption “You put the smile on my face, the sparky in my eyes and the Love in my heart.”

He insisted to news.com.au the image was recent but the two have not been spotted together for months.

Despite Mr Mehajer’s protestations to the contrary, the fairytale that began on a Sydney street looks to be fading fast.

Penal Colony Policies - Police Ombudsman's office to be abolished

Many people living on this continent may be blissfully unaware of the real state of 'law' in Australia.

Many Australians are ignorant of a document that protects them where it is spelled out how government must behave.

The document is called the 'Australian Constitution'.

Have you heard of it?

Get yourself a downloadable version containing the lawful seal of the 'Commonwealth of Australia'. Teach it to your children.


https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2blVRSkVidDRiTU0

This document was taken out of the education curriculum in the early 1970's so that the children of the herd populace would not know how the government must behave.

Some people may say that it's 'outdated' or not current any more as it's from 1901.

You may even go to a barrister with regards to your criminal (parking fine) matter, and he/she may say to you that they have not seen one, or even use it as it's not valid anymore.

Well they obviously are not aware of a place called the High Court of Australia, which deals with matters in accordance with the Australian Constitution.

You should seek another legal alternative to that person who has told you of their legal incompetence.

If you want to research law, and do it properly (not just from your ergonomic chair in front of a PC) you may discover that Australia is still a penal colony of the British empire.

When you write certain questions to government departments, even though they state that they will respond within 7 day, they do not.

When you write certain questions that require the government department to show paperwork regarding the validity of a law, they may not respond for a month, three months or even a year.

To the dismay of some people, laws concerning their 'rights' are being eroded away with every new government action.

Many people may find it confronting to learn that they are 'governed' by fear and extortion (hence they shy away from addressing it), and that the common phrase "democracy" which is so widely used by politicians is a farce.

In a penal colony you do not need to oversee the 'wardens'.

Here is an example of this in action.

See article from 6 July 2016 by abc.net.au of the headline:

Police Ombudsman's office to be abolished under South Australia Government plan

The South Australian Government is moving to abolish the Police Ombudsman's office in line with a recommendation from the state's anti-corruption watchdog.

Last year Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) commissioner Bruce Lander published a report with 29 recommendations to improve the currently complex police complaints system.

At the time, Mr Lander said some of his recommendations, particularly the oversight of police conduct might be seen as "controversial" but the system must be "robust but fair".

He recommended that the Police Commissioner have "primary responsibility for the assessment and resolution of complaints and reports about police", with oversight by the Office of Public Integrity (OPI).

Attorney-General John Rau said the Government had plans to introduce three bills in line with the recommendations.

They include plans to put the police complaints system under the wing of the ICAC, but SA Police would be first in line to fix the problem.

The Government also plans to repeal the Whistleblowers Protection Act, and replace it with the Public Interest Disclosure Bill.

Mr Rau said the bills were broadly based on commission Lander's recommendations.

"In his annual report and following his own consideration of how to deal with complaints raised against police and the operation of the Whistleblowers' Protection Act, Mr Lander made several recommendations to fine-tune and clarify how ICAC operates," Mr Rau said.

Aussies eagerly sell their purchase info for only 0.25% of their total spending

It's is absolute brilliant tactics from the minds of corporate geniuses to offer their (serf) corporate slaves a reward, like akin to when you give a dog a 'treat' (very little monetary outlay) for subservience, for information that is (theoretically) private and confidential between you and your bank.

Some people on social media may say that 'we' (the people) will be forced into a cashless society, but from what we see it's already in full swing with full support of the herd populace.

One example where people 'sell' their private and confidential information to corporations for (little) gain is in the form of 'frequent flyer' points or flybuys.

The companies that acquire your private information then sell it to other companies for 'research' and statistical purposes.

Let's take a look at what Coles (at the moment owned Wesfarmers) are doing today.

According to the current brochure (see attached illustration),

this is what Coles is offering for your private and 'confidential' information:

• For every $2 spent in Australia (and $1 overseas), 1 point is accumulated in 'flybuys'.

• When you redeem 2,000 flybuys ( $4,000 worth of spending in Australia) you save $10 instantly.

So when you spend $4,000 and 'redeem' it at Coles, you get a WHOPPING $10 deducted from your grocery bill.

That's a HUGE 0.25% saving, or you're selling you private info for only 0.25% of you total expenditure.

If you shop at other places than Coles you could be better off financially.

But we hear a cry from the back of the room - 'We get to travel to L.A. for free', from one of the herd populace.

We say "Good for you"..... "you're missing the point".

Sydney siege botched by government now they need your help (we smell a rat).

So let's get this straight.

• The corporation conglomerate commonly referred to as the 'government' employs learned people.

• When communication with the government, you are 'wrong' they are right, and how dare you question our authority.

• With regards to law, the government does everything correctly and by the 'book' (whichever one that is).

We have obtained numerous letters where the response from the government is condescending with regards question of law.

So here's the deal.

The government is responsible for the murder of two innocent victims during the Martin Place, Sydney siege due to incompetence.

The Australian government has blood on it's hands with regards to the murders of Tori Johnson, 34 and Katrina Dawson 38 at the Lindt Chocolate Cafe in Martin Place, Sydney from the 15th of December 2014.

So here's what they want you to believe.

They want 'you' (the general populous, the 'serfs' - read slaves) to tell the almighty government where they went wrong.

Therefore they (indirectly) admitted they 'stuffed up', i.e. now liable for a law suit on behalf of the victim's families.

Here's what really happens to people who expose corruption and inadequacies of the government.

Have you ever heard of Sergeant Rick Flori from Brisbane?

He exposed criminal actions of the Australian government in the hands of the police, and how they bashed a handcuffed man.

Now he, Sgt. Rick Flori, is a criminal and has to defend himself.

Make now mistake with regards to the legal status of this country.

Australia still is a penal colony of the British empire, and therefore penal colony rules still apply.

It's is NOT a 'democracy' as falsely stated by various sources.

The government does not really need your help.

It wants to know what you know to shut you up in case yo make the details of their botched handling of the Martin Place siege public.

Read the article from 13 May 2016 by news.com.au of the headline:

Sydney siege inquest: Information sought on whether defence force could have handled it better

A hostage escapes the Lindt cafe during the Sydney siege. Picture: Chris McKeen

ARMY experts who have spoken to media about the police handling of the Lindt Cafe siege have been urged to “come forward” to help end the speculation and “simmering debate” that has hung over the police response.

The extraordinary request was made on Friday morning at the Sydney siege inquest by counsel assisting the coroner Jeremy Gormly SC.

He said questions over the ability of the Australian Defence Force to better handle the Lindt Cafe siege was an “ongoing and simmering debate”.

The inquest is looking at the way police responded to the siege in December 2014, when gunman Man Haron Monis took 18 people hostage at the Martin Pl cafe.

He killed cafe manager Tori Johnson which caused police to storm the cafe and end the siege. Katrina Dawson was struck by fragments of police bullets and died soon after.

Mr Gormly raised reports in The Australian, and other media, where unnamed sources told of a supposedly widely held view within the ADF of serious doubts about the police capability to cope with an event like the Lindt Cafe siege.

He said the reports were at odds with information given to the inquest by NSW Police and ADF — but offered the sources or anyone else who had proof of the claims to come forward and assist the inquest.

“If there are witnesses in support [of these views] that can provide value to investigation ... I invite them to come forward,” he said.

The Australian articles raised a series of issues the ADF allegedly had with the police handling of the siege, including the weapons and ammunition police used and a refusal from NSW Police to co-operate with their federal colleagues on the day of the siege.

The inquest has previously heard police rejected an offer from the army to use a mock up of the cafe that had built to trial tactics.

Police prepare to enter the Lindt cafe shortly before the siege comes to an end.Source:Supplied

In particular, was a claim the bullets used by police were more likely to “shatter” if they struck marble surfaces like the ones found throughout the cafe.

Mr Gormly said there was “no evidence” of that in statements already tendered — but if the claims were true then they would be “useful and relevant” to the inquest.

The source of the claims was obviously someone, or several people, who had experience at the highest levels of the ADF, he said.

However, Ian Freckelton QC, representing NSW Police, said the views of “shadowy figures” who have given unnamed quotes to media did not necessarily give them “value in a courtroom”.

He said the persons involved had already had plenty of time to contribute to the inquest.

“They have chosen not to do so.”

There was no proof at all the sources had any “expert knowledge” at all, he said.

But Mr Gormly said the subject wasn’t one that could be dismissed because the details came from “an anonymous source”.

The barrister acting for the family of Mr Johnson, Gabrielle Bashir SC, said any army evidence was highly relevant and was interested in the possible “covert entry to the cafe”.

Philip Boulton SC, acting for the family of hostage Katrina Dawson who was also killed, said it was a concern that no army witnesses were expected to be called to the inquest.

Defence force officers were present at police headquarters on the night of siege. Counsel for the Commonwealth, James Renwick, SC, told the inquest: “We could only act if we were asked. We weren’t asked, and for good reason.”

Under Australian law, the only way the defence force could have become involved was if NSW Police had declared it beyond their capability.

The siege inquest has heard at no stage did that occur.

The inquest continues.

What happens if you don't vote - AEC reveals all - (we say BS)

Here is more government propaganda from the greatest BS artists in the country.

Don't look to the corporate media for a 'solution' now will you...

The corporate media will not tell you that the $20 fine is UNLAWFUL.

The corporate media will not tell you that a 'legitimate' reason for not voting is for religious reasons.

The corporate media will not tell you:
- show me the document where I signed by my own hand in my normal signature that states that I have 'enrolled' on the electoral roll.

A spokesperson from the AEC stated that "We live in a damn good democracy, in Australia"

 - That is absolute rubbish / false / misleading information.
Australia NEVER was a 'democracy'.
It's a penal colony / corporatocracy / fascist or police state, take your pick.

In the so called democracy of the United States of America, you have a choice whether you want to vote or not.

How can a place be called a 'democracy' if your freedom of choice has been taken away?

Notice how the corporate media did not mention the name of the alleged 'spokesperson' from the AEC.

The corporate media will not tell you that the AEC (Australian Electoral Commission) is committing electoral fraud.

The corporate media tells you that Australians are 'citizens' (a totally different standing in law) rather than 'subjects of the Queen' (the Queen as in the U.K. monarch and NOT the 'Queen of Australia' - an unlawful/illegal entity).

You can read the article from 2 July 2016 from news.com.au of the headline:

What happens if you don’t vote this Federal Election?

Don’t want to vote today? Prepare to cop a $20 fine.

VOTERS uninspired by the Federal Election could elect to opt-out of the vote and instead cop a $20 fine.

It comes as the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) sent a strict warning to voters who choose not to engage in the polling booths, despite already being enrolled, telling news.com.au they could face court time if they fail to show.

A spokesperson for the AEC told news.com.au non-voters would be issued a ‘non-voter notice’ for failing to meet their legal requirement, which will provide you with two options.

1. To pay a $20 fine or ...

2. Provide a valid reason why you haven’t cast a vote.

“If somebody says they didn’t feel like it, it’s not a valid reason,” a spokesperson for AEC told news.com.au.

If you provide a valid reason instead of paying the $20 fine, it will be judged by an AEC official as to whether they believe your excuse is legitimate.

You could expect to find out if you evaded the fine in the “vicinity of a month or two”.

“If, within the time period specified on the notice, you fail to reply, cannot provide a valid and sufficient reason or decline to pay the $20 penalty, then the matter may be referred to a court,” its website reads.

“If the matter is dealt with in court and you are found guilty, you may be fined up to $180 plus court costs and a criminal conviction may be recorded against you.”

But an AEC spokesperson was baffled by the idea of not voting, telling news.com.au: “Above and beyond, the question is why wouldn't you vote? It’s kind of fun seeing the atmosphere.

“But aside from social element, you are having your say. We live in a damn good democracy,
in Australia you have very easy access to your vote, you get to have a say about who represents you, I don’t know why people would fight to not vote.”

The AEC denied rumours claiming citizens get off lightly if they don’t vote, explaining “we go and compare a list of electors, we compare that to list of other polling booths and see who has been crossed off and hasn’t.

“It’s a manual process to see who has voted or who hasn't.”

There is good news for those not enrolled to vote; the AEC said it was “out of the question” for them to vote.

“If you rock up and try to vote we won’t find you on the list of electors,” they said.

- Polling booths are open from 8am-6pm.

— Go to aec.gov.au to find your nearest poling place or call 132326 (open all day tomorrow from 7).

U.S. government caught red handed in September 11 'terror' attacks by official photographer?

When it comes to blowing the whistle on criminal actions of people in government, those people are protected by literally an army.

Instead of investigating any alleged criminals actions and later prosecuting those 'criminals', the 'police' are out to 'get' (charge/imprison/murder) the person who exposed the purported criminal activities.


When the 'government' wants you for exposing their criminal activities, they don't want to 'just talk to you', they want to crucify you.

Many people have stated on public record that 'September 11' was an inside job, meaning it was orchestrated by the United States government.

Official reports state that  WTC building 7 collapsed as a result of WTC 1 & 2 being hit by an airplane.

In an initial interview with Larry Silverstein, he states that they had to "pull it", meaning demolish the building.

See video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I

Killing people on your behalf is not difficult for a government to do...

See article from 1 Jul 2016 from new.com.au of the headline:

What an official September 11 photographer filmed and why he says it cost him his freedom

HOURS after planes flew into the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, Kurt Sonnenfeld was given unrestricted access to ground zero.

Sonnenfeld was working for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, an organisation tied to the US Department of Homeland Security and charged with co-ordinating first response to disasters.

Armed with camera gear, the 39-year-old was asked to film everything he saw. His documented evidence was supposed to form part of a report about what happened, but he never handed back the footage.

His life began to unravel spectacularly in the following months and years, culminating in the death of his wife.

She was found dead on a couch in the Denver home the pair shared with a bullet wound to the back of the head.

Fifteen years later, the now-54-year-old is on the run in Argentina. The US government wants him back in the country. Officially, they say he’s wanted over the murder of his wife, but he believes it’s something far more sinister.

He says they want to silence him over what he saw beneath World Trade Center 6, evidence he is convinced paints the Bush Administration as big players in the deadliest attack on American soil.

Kurt Sonnenfeld, right, holds a camera at ground zero in September 2001. Picture: Michael Rieger/APSource:AP

‘I CAN’T BELIEVE SHE SHOT HERSELF’

As police descended on Sonnenfeld’s doorstep, they heard him utter the words “I can’t believe she shot herself”.

When they gained access to the couple’s home on New Year’s Eve in 2002, it was obvious that Sonnenfeld had been drinking.

He had blood on his hands and alcohol on his breath, police told GQ. They said in an upstairs room they found Nancy in red underwear, still breathing, but barely.

They rushed her to hospital with part of the bullet still protruding from the back of her skull. She died, aged 36, the following morning.

A cryptic note was discovered in the couple’s bedroom. It appeared to be a suicide note. On it, Nancy had written: “What indeed is finally beautiful except death and love. Kurt, please get help.” The word love had been crossed out.

Nancy’s fingerprints were on the gun but Sonnenfeld was taken in for questioning. He was charged with murder and was due to appear in court in June 2002, but the charges were dropped.

He fled because of a feeling it wouldn’t be the last time police came asking questions. His instincts were spot on. In 2003, a year and a half after his charges were dropped, a judge signed a new warrant for his arrest. When police went looking, they realised he was gone.

Sonnenfeld met and married a woman in Argentina shortly after arriving. The pair have two girls.

The US Government has tried to extradite the former FEMA staffer unsuccessfully. Part of the reason for that is Argentina’s strict opposition to the death penalty. Sonnenfeld could face execution in the state of Colorado if found guilty of Nancy’s murder.

The south tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Picture: Gulnara Samoilova/APSource:Supplied

WHAT DID SONNENFELD SEE?

Sporting bleached blond hair, Sonnenfeld wove his way through the rubble of Manhattan’s downtown financial district.

He shot hours of footage but never handed it in. Of particular interest was what he found beneath World Trade Center 6. He says inside the building he came across a vault that had been cleared of its contents before the planes struck.

In a documentary filmed in Argentina, Sonnenfeld said the discovery is proof that America knew the attacks were coming, at the very least.

“One thing I’m certain of is that agencies of intelligence of the United States of America knew what was going to happen and at least let it happen,” he said.

“Not only did they know it was going to happen, but they in fact collaborated.”

The theory is popular among truthers. It is given weight by a similar discovery on a basement door below World Trade Center 4.

According to a New York Times article, the door to a vault was still in tact but it appeared as if somebody had tried to gain entry. Behind the vault door were nearly a thousand tonnes of silver and gold.

Sonnenfeld is a conspiracy theorist and not only because of what he saw. He says he has the most trouble understanding how World Trade Center 7 collapsed despite suffering no damage.

“To me, the most suspicious thing of all is what happened to building seven at the World Trade Center,” he said.

“This building was not hit by a plane. It didn’t have any structural damage ... but, amazingly enough, building seven fell in a perfect textbook type implosion, taking only 6.5 seconds for a 47-storey building to fall completely into its own footprint.

“This to me indicates there was absolutely no resistance between the floors when the building collapsed.”

The Sonnenfeld home where Nancy Sonnenfeld’s body was found. Picture: Denver District 

Attorney's OfficeSource:Supplied

‘HE ADMITTED TO KILLING HIS WIFE’

Robert Dreyer and Damian Whitehead shared a jail cell with Kurt Sonnenfeld in the days after Nancy’s death.

They said the Denver man initially denied charges against him but later admitted to killing his wife.

In his only interview with US media since moving to Argentina, Sonnenfeld told GQ he could not be certain if he ever met the pair in jail.

“Could’ve met ‘em. I certainly didn’t make any friends,” he said.

Their testimony doesn’t help Sonnenfeld’s case. Other evidence collected at the scene also works against him.

Police say when they attended to a 911 call, they found Sonnenfeld with blood on his hands and blood spatter on his face. His defence team argued an official line that he embraced his wife after hearing the gun go off and she “coughed and sneezed” in his face.

The problem with that is Sonnenfeld told GQ it didn’t happen that way. He said he put his hands on his face moments after tending to his wife and the “spatter” was simply dried blood.

The questions will continue to come but, as long as he is in Argentina, he will never have to answer them officially.

In the documentary, he says he is ready for the harassment to stop.

“At least four times has my case been looked at by a judge and been decided in my favour yet the US government continues and continues,” Sonnenfeld said.

“What we want now is for the US government to cease what they’re doing. My wife and I now have two beautiful daughters born here in Argentina. I now consider myself Argentinian.

“Of course I miss my (family) very much. I miss the mountains of Colorado. But to me, if I had a chance to go back to the United States, I don’t believe I would.

“I prefer it here."

How to sue Microsoft for false advertising - Here Drive+ (Maps for life) app switched off?

Microsoft are in the business of taking control of your computer, where now you have little or no say what goes on with your data, programs and even when or how they are downloaded.

This breaches so many laws that it's not funny, where in Europe Microsoft know all too well the harsh reality of the courtroom verdicts.

We advise Microsoft customers who have had damages or harm as a result of the software, to seek legal advice in a class action law suit.

So here's the deal.

You purchase a piece of hardware, which comes preloaded with a Microsoft operating system, where there is no other choice or option to choose another company's operating system, as opposed to the PC market.

In some instances the phone manufacturer (deliberately) limits the features of the phone, e.g. no extra memory slot, or removable battery, in order for the user to dispose of the item, to purchase the company's new line of phones in a year or two, but that is another matter altogether.

Your purchase of the particular (smart phone) hardware may be based on the fact that there is a specific  application (or program) that you require to use for either personal or commercial purposes.

This program may be called Here Drive +, where the advertising slogan is Maps for Life.

Now a company can be sued for false advertising if the product they are advertising is misrepresented in the way the ad / product is worded according to the comprehension of the 'average Joe' you know in commoner's or lay man's language.

So, according to one commoner's comprehension of the phrase "Maps for life", is that you have maps on your phone for 'life' in this case meaning forever, for the life of your hardware, until it 'dies'.

So Microsoft decided to disable the program on the user's smart phone WITHOUT the customer's consultation/approval/choice.

There is a difference if 

• the app was not supported, with future updates, or

•  downloading a new app that states that it will no longer function on Windows 10 phone (in that case you could have the option of not downloading that app)

which is totally different from disabling the app altogether without any warning.

So,

how would you feel if you had a perfectly fine functioning version Windows  XP with Office v11 (2003), and with you computer being connected to the internet, you program Excel v11 (2003) was switched off my Microsoft?

We would feel great because we would sue Microsoft for various breaches.