The criminal actions of lawyers? - How to test if one is really working for you

So, you received a letter in the mail from the state's honest police force, that you have been 'fined' for an offence alleged by a piece of electronic equipment commonly referred to as a speed or red light camera.

Australia's fair, impartial, and 'innocent until proven guilty' legal system does not see this matter as being a 'civil' one but rather as a criminal matter, hence it being listed under the criminal section of the daily court lists.

Since you have committed a crime, there must be a victim in the case against you.

At law, you must also have the opportunity to face your accuser.

At law, you must also have a sworn statement from your accuser against you (or rather your 'person').

Since you know these basic fundamentals of law in the democratic, fair, just and honourable legal system of Australia, and you are fully aware that you did not commit any criminal office you decide to hire a lawyer in your matter.

It's not a matter that you should 'just pay' the fine as it's only a couple of hundred dollars whereas a lawyer on the day may cost you anything between $800 - $1200, plus your valuable time away from earning cash, it is a matter of principle that you did not commit any 'criminal' actions.

So while talking to your lawyer about your fine, they are thinking which chateau their spoilt little brats will be staying at in France from the funds obtained from your matter.

One question you could ask the honest lawyer would be what 'Act' are you being charged under.

If in Victoria, you could be greeted with a response resembling the Infringements Act of 2006 or the Road Safety Act from 1986.

What you may want to do is ask the lawyer to check whether that 'Act' is in force lawfully.

IF your lawyer would be really working for you, there would be paperwork presented to you with the evidence that the (e.g.) Road Safety Act 1986 has not been enacted lawfully, therefore an invalid Act.

The above example is not your only resolution to the above related matter, as there are many other points of law not discussed in this post.

Very briefly, 

should you choose to further research other points of law consider the following;

• The people in the 'Australian Government' will tell you that all laws (read Acts)  and actions of people in government are subject to a document called the 'Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act', where Queen Victoria approved its Bill on the 9th of July 1900, where the Act came into circulation on the 1st day of January 1901.

• Comprehend the difference between the U.K. Act called 'Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act'' and the 'Australian Constitution'

• Comprehend the difference between  the High Court of Australia as established in 1901 and the one today, as established by the High Court of Australia Act 1979.

• Comprehend the law making process from the initial idea to the Bill to Royal Assent to the Act coming into 'force' and the people involved in the entire process.

• Obtain the 'law' (read Act) that allows the various entities to ascertain power over your person; e.g. the Victorian Sheriff ( Sheriff Act 2009), the police (e.g. Victoria Police Act 2013), the court (Magistrates' Court Act 1989, for Victorians), etc.

•  Where does your hard earned cash go, from this so called fine.

There are many other points not mentioned here which you can put before a court of competent jurisdiction.

NOTE: DO NOT rely on official 'Australian Government' documentation as your only source of information.

Do your own research and obtain inquiries pertaining to your matter.

Problem Reaction Solution; Terrorism, joblessness going according to plan

The actions of people in government have an effect on society, an effect that is planned by those people in 'power'.

Let's have a look at two burgeoning 'issues';

1). The people in government have imported scum into the country, scum that 'terrorises' the good people of Australia.

As a result the a$$holes in government then say that police need MORE powers to search 'suspects' (your frail 95 year old great grandmother can be a 'suspect' according to 'law') WITHOUT warrants making the state of Victoria even MORE of a POLICE STATE.

As if no warrants existing from Victoria's Sheriff's Office is NOT enough !!! !!!

WHATEVER the official unemployment rate is coming from the offices of criminals in power you can be assured it's BS (i.e. under inflated).

2). The people in power import cheap slave labour (as they have done since 1788), which in turn takes jobs away from 'Australians' in effect having a detrimental effect on family and society as a whole.

Corporate scum like Telstra who lay off 1400 Australian workers only to replace them with cheap overseas labour that works for a bowl of rice per week or something similar.

The actions of the people in power are NOT by accident or without thought.

DO NOT PANIC though, everything is going according to plan.

The people in 'gov' REALLY f_cking hate their slave population !!!

Turnbull tackles encryption and OWNS it like a biatch

The untouchable sociopathic white collar criminals in this machine called the 'Australian Government' are at it again.

With every action regarding a new law, Australia's good people are being oppressed more and more with literally zero rights to privacy, where every man / woman / son / daughter who is in possession of a mobile phone is monitored by the 'authorities' (read corporation conglomerate) today under the pretext of 'terrorism'.

It would come as no surprise that the law makers in this penal colony would put a law trough that owning an encrypted device is an act of 'terrorism'.

Apparently 'terrorists' use encrypted methods of  communication between each other.

NEWSFLASH:

'Terrorists' use automobiles / highways to get to their destination.

Government solution (?):

BAN all automobiles and lock up the people under Martial Law like they did officially in the first 40 years of colonialisation of this land.

The WHOLE point of encryption is so that the a$$holes in the corporation conglomerate called the 'government' do NOT access YOUR private and confidential communication.

So let's use the "nothing to hide, nothing to fear' motto?

Give US your communications,  Turdball !!!

Why are you hiding your books,  Turdball ??? !!! ???

George Brandis another criminal in office.

Watch now, how governments will secretly work with phone manufacturers / app developers in installing 'backdoors'.

The people have already had their mobile phone's security compromised from (deliberate) security holes in the GSM communications protocols from the inception of the technology.

The 'Australian Government' REALLY hates the slave population.

read article by news.com.au  from  11 Jun 2017 of the headline;

Turnbull tackles encrypted messages

The Turnbull government will look to change laws in order to help authorities decrypt messages.

The Turnbull government is reportedly looking at changing laws to force telco and tech firms to help authorities to decrypt suspect messages.

Staff writers News Corp Australia Network

THE increased use of encrypted messaging by terrorist networks has prompted the Turnbull government to reportedly look at changing laws to force telecommunications and technology firms to help authorities decrypt suspect messages.

Fairfax Media reports that Attorney-General George Brandis said the government will not pursue the controversial “backdoor” access option by forcing firms to plant flaws in their encryption software that would allow it to be cracked by police or security agencies.

The Turnbull government to reportedly look at changing laws to force telecommunications and technology firms to help authorities decrypt suspect messages. Picture: Supplied.Source:News Corp Australia

Senator Brandis also said the mechanisms for warrant exchanges between Australian agencies and counterparts in the US and other partners were “more limited than they should be”.

In mid-2013, less than 3 per cent of counter-terrorism investigations intercepted communications that were encrypted. Today that figure was more than 40 per cent, Senator Brandis said.

How easy is it to skim your credit card?

The government of the penal colony of Australia is mandating that welfare recipients get cash taken away from them (because they spend it on what they want / desire / need), and replaced with a card where they will be told where they can only purchase their items from (corporate thuggery).

Apparently this is supposed to be for the benefit of the peasants / wards of the state / dole bludgers.

What the people in the 'Australian Government' are not telling you is how easy it is to take 'cash' (in this case numbers) from this card.



See also how Mythbusters was banned from talking about how hackable, reliable and trackable Mastercard, American Express and VISA cards are in the video below;

Who let the terrorists in, who who who who who?

Have you been effected by an imported 'human'?

Has this piece of garbage caused you harm, suffering or loss?

Well at the end of the day there is a man or 'person'  (two distinctly different entities) responsible for this.

In light of the 'terror' that happened in the Melbourne beach-side suburb of Brighton on Bay St, the machine called the 'Australian Government' imported one Yacqub Khayre from Somalia to commit violent acts against the good people of Australia.

Instead of incarcerating (imported) criminals or sending them back,  the judiciary lets this danger back out into the community (in order so that they can re-offend' - GREAT for court business), where  ultimately one entity is responsible from bringing this scum into the country.

At the end of the day Australia's immigration minister Peter Dutton is responsible for bringing in garbage / human waste / 'terrorists' into this country that ultimately commit criminal activities against the good people.

After all the first job of a government is to keep its people SAFE.

YOU failed to keep the people safe Dutton!

Call for Peter Dutton to be removed from office.

Australian regulators catch Apple misleading customers about free repairs under consumer law

You might recall the big hullabaloo that occurred last year when Apple was the subject of a class action suit in the U.S. The legal action involved an error 53 message that popped up on certain Apple iPhone models that had parts repaired by unauthorized personnel. With the error message, the affected phone was essentially bricked. The suit was eventually thrown out. In Australia, regulators there are taking Apple to court over essentially the same issue. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is accusing Apple of deliberately misleading customers. The trial begins in mid-December.

The ACCC claims that Apple had been telling iPhone owners that they were not able to get free repairs for their handsets if they first had taken them to a third party repair shop. Apple repeated that excuse to customers even when a repair made by the unauthorized shop had nothing to do with the problem that Apple wouldn't fix for free. The ACCC, trying to catch Apple in the middle of this illegal action, sent out undercover employees to each of the 13 retailers in the country that sell Apple products. This was done last June. The undercovers told Apple staff that the speakers on their iPhone stopped working after the screens were repaired by an unauthorized  third party. In each of the 13 visits, Apple incorrectly told the undercover ACCC agent that it could not repair the speaker for free under Australian consumer law; the reason given by Apple in each case was that the screen had been replaced by a repair shop other than Apple Australia or an Apple-authorized service provider.

Consumer law in Australia states that customers have the right to free repair or a replacement if a product is faulty or the quality of the device is unacceptable. Apple responded to the ACCC's claims by saying that the undercover operation failed to expose any breaches by Apple because consumer law does not exist in "hypothetical circumstances". In other words, Apple claims that because the undercovers did not have a real iPhone with a real problem, they were not given the correct information. The company went on to say that real customers with real iPhone units would have been informed of their rights under Australian consumer law.

The error 53 message affected one in 1,000 iPhone units sold by Apple or its resellers between September 2014 and February 2016. The message would show up whenever the iOS user would try to update his device to iOS 8 or iOS 9.

phonearena.com 5 Jun 2017

Victoria Police covering up their criminal actions and those of others

We have obtained documents from various sources over the years that show a high level of corruption and criminal activity within the organisation known as Victoria Police.

From deliberate inaction to apprehend known criminals who steal from the mass population to highly organised white collar crime worth tens of millions annually where that masses are the victims, Victoria Police has consistently chosen to protect the criminals involved.

At the end of the day whenever a member of the general population is a victim of criminal activity regarding injury theft or fraud one can surely not count on the highly rigged judicial system to obtain a remedy.

We have also obtained considerable information from people within the 'brotherhood' who have given information on the condition of strict anonymity, where many cases have been won or dealt with outside the courts in favour of the person who is member of the brotherhood irrespective of fault, facts or so called legalities in play.

Currently we are looking into the white collar crimes Victoria Police is 'supporting' where the cost to the victims of crime could easily amount well into the tens of millions annually.

Many people may not be aware that Australia's police force, being part of the executive, are not 'public servants' meaning they do not work for the people, but rather for the people in government protecting them and their interests where the mass population is literally the enemy of 'the force'.

Since there are many matters to document, this is a "watch this space" scenario.