25 June 2020

No news on ex PM in court over oath & ‘Queen of Australia’?


Many average (or below average) Australians may not know that Australia’s 29th Prime Minister and ‘bankster’ Malcolm Bligh Turnbull was taken to court.


One would think that it would be the job of the mainstream media to report this, but then again what one would think to be logical or normal or even make a slither of ‘biological sense’ is not the case in the colony called Australia.

While the media may have covered the case of Clive Palmer v Turnbull, it seems that it covered up another little known matter against Turnbull.

The legal world is fully aware that there can be no (lawful) action unless the correct oath is taken.

You (the serf) may have experienced this in dealings with a JP, or even your court matter, no oath no go.

Tasmanian magistrates have issued unlawful orders as a result of not being sworn in correctly for over 30 years, causing harm, where zero class action has been taken thus far.

Although if you know what you’re looking for you will find it, where a little known case against Turnbull regarding his oath of office (note Gillard also did not swear the correct oath) and the ‘Queen of Australia did not make a mention in the eagle eye of the mainstream media.


The ‘Queen of Australia’ is the Achilles heel of the colony’s legal system, where you must ‘get it right’ in your ‘question of law’ regarding your matter.

Source: supplied

See reference to the Supreme Court of Queensland matter:

We have seen paperwork that exposes the fraud of Australia’s legal system regarding the Queen of Australia (and other 'issues'), paperwork that obtains a reaction from judicial registrars, magistrates and judges, who are aware of this fraud.

As we should be aware, but it would be asking too much, that the mainstream media should have reported the matter of the 'persons':‘ROSS-JAMES v MALCOLM BLIGH TURNBULL’, given the fact that the applicant was ridiculed, but that’s not how it goes in this colony.

The ridiculing of Ross-James would only give attention to the topic, and that’s not on the agenda of those in charge.

Just like it’s not beneficial for the Tasmanian government for the people to wake up and start a class action for the unlawful orders issued that caused many 'persons' harm.

In any event how can the serfs trust a judiciary that hides women abusers and paedophiles in its 'brotherhood'.

See screen capture from today's The Age publication:


24 June 2020

Commie Dan rolls out the army in Dictatoria (nee Victoria)


BREAKING NEWS:

Commie Dan rolls out Martial Law the army in Dictatoria (nee Victoria)


Under the false pretense of an elderly (83 year old) person dying allegedly from the novel Coronavirus, Victoria's premier Daniel Andrews has deployed 300 army personnel.

So, if you ever thought of the media's attention focusing on his personal involvement in the branch stacking fraud will occur, those days are now gone as this will be the new focus.

Don't forget this is for YOUR (the serfs) benefit / health.

Remember how the government cares for you:

"Do not overload our (the government's) health system."

Was the army 'lawfully' deployed in Victoria?

23 June 2020

People distracted from government fraud with covid lockdown

In a brilliant move with the help of the mainstream media, the criminal actions of Victoria’s premier and that of his co-workers in office has been put on the backburner where the news of Victoria’s tightening of movement restrictions are the main topic now

The blame according to the Vic government is because of families not adhering to social distancing.

Those families that stayed home and washed their hands, are to blame for an alleged spike in novel Coronavirus infections. 

"That doesn’t make biological sense."

There can be zero doubt that Mr. Andrews will not face prosecution nor any court time regarding the branch stacking fraud he is involved in, as we should know that the ‘brotherhood’ takes care of its own.



20 June 2020

The false classification of the ‘pandemic’?



According to whatever authorities, there is a classification of an alleged virus to be at a ‘pandemic’ level.

From an official mainstream media source, the current stated infection rate in Australia is at 7436 cases, with a death rate of 102.

This equates to one death in 72.9 cases.

So, let’s see how the numbers stack up against the Australian Bureau of Statistics results for a virus called influenza (maybe in combination with pneumonia).



From the link above, there is also one other statistic that the government uses and we’ll compare the novel Coronavirus to this.

DEATHS DUE TO INFLUENZA, 2017

In 2017 there were 1,255 deaths due to influenza, recording a standardised death rate of 3.9 per 100,000 persons. This is a significant increase from 2016 where 464 influenza deaths were recorded. An individual dying from influenza in 2017 was most likely to be female, aged over 75 years, have multiple co-morbidities and living in the eastern states of Australia.

According to the ABS we have 25.2 million people at the end of 2018.

According to worldometers.info, we have 25.5 million now.

Let’s just say that we have 25 million people where the official figures is that 102 died from novel Coronavirus, at the half year mark.

That means we have a death rate of 1 person per 245,098 persons 
or as the government puts it a standardised death rate of 0.408 per 100,000 persons.

It seems that the flu/pneumonia are more of a ‘pandemic’ (in Australia) than the alleged novel Coronavirus.

Note, we totally omitted the 4269 deaths for 2017 and 3336 deaths for 2016 due to influenza and pneumonia, from the above screen capture.

So, why did the 'Australian Government' really halt the nation?

Attending a protest - Privacy suggestions not always accurate

It can be difficult to obtain factual information with regards to many topics, where currently people's privacy, with regards to smartphone use should be a huge topic of concern for EVERY user.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is just one organisation that provides information about digital privacy, free speech and legal aspects of privacy being US centric.

Now whether people have (factually) had enough or there are agent provocateurs in relation to organised protests, the use of smartphones during these activities could be to your detriment.

A piece of advice given to safeguard your privacy, when attending a protest is to:
".. take a screenshot of the photo on your mobile device to remove the metadata.."


 We know for a fact that the above suggestion may not hide your metadata, as described in the above article, where the amount of data given is dependent on the operating system and its version also depending on the smartphone manufacturer's decision to include whatever data they choose within the operating system's interface which is in charge of the screenshot data.

In this experiment we took a photo which was then screen captured, were only a portion of that screen capture is published as seen in the attachment below:





The metadata contained from this screen capture above contains the following identifying fields which have been blacked out:





Remembering that ALL metadata is used to identify you/your device, the more concerning pieces of information in this screen capture are the Camera maker and Camera model, which have been blacked out for the poster's privacy.

So, it is still not a good idea to post a screen capture of a picture to upload to social media without actually stripping the EXIF data first.

There are smartphone apps available for this purpose.

15 June 2020

Cafés requiring your details lawful? Privacy guaranteed?



If the Australian Government did not obtain your private and personal information during the so called pandemic, then you are required to provide your name and number and of those with you during more relaxed times, but is this lawful and what assurances are there of privacy and ‘punishment’ if there was a breach?

Now that the apparent pandemic is on its tail end according to the authorities of many states and territories of Australia, people’s movements are met with less restrictions but there is one aspect (of many) that still does not make sense and that is more data collection.

Apparently  when you now decide to conduct business inside a café, eatery they ‘require’ your details e.g name and phone number.  

So, now let’s be very clear about this. If you are required to take an action it MUST be defined in a law i.e. an Act.

In your response to this post, can you point us to a lawfully enacted Act that states this, as we have not seen such an Act?

Secondly, what are the privacy guarantees, given the fact that we have seen people put their details on a clip board where the details of others were visible?

What are the guarantees that the business will comply with privacy law, given the fact that the above example already occurred?

- What is the punishment for the business for such a privacy breach?

- Will you be notified of this breach?
(Let’s take an educated guess, and say no)

- What financial compensation will you receive for such a breach?
(Let’s go out on a limb here, and say none)

Just another scam the people are blindly following.

13 June 2020

Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley: A Criminal with a Badge


Former Queensland police officer Chris Hurley was in court again this week.

He was found guilty on two counts of dangerous driving during a high-speed police pursuit in the suburb of Pacific Pines on the Gold Coast in May 2015.

The 49-year-old ex-senior sergeant is no stranger to the courtroom. In February this year, he pleaded guilty to assaulting a female police officer in a Gold Coast shopping centre twelve months earlier.

But Hurley’s career in the force really came to a halt in December last year, after he was found guilty of assaulting Luke Cole during a roadside arrest in November 2013, when he unjustifiably put the driver in a choke hold.

At the time of his hearing for that offence, Hurley was already suspended without pay due to a string of charges against him. He has since taken “medical retirement”.

However, if one takes a closer look at Hurley’s police career – or rather the times he’s been on the wrong side of the law – what one finds is an example of the systemic racism that pervades the Queensland police service, and on a broader scale, many other Australian institutions.

The Palm Island tragedy

On 19 November 2004, Mr Doomadgee – or Mulrunji – died in custody at Palm Island police station.
The 36-year-old Indigenous man had been arrested by sergeant Hurley for allegedly being drunk and disorderly. One hour after being taken into custody, Mr Doomadgee was dead.

During the ensuing criminal trial, Hurley claimed Mr Doomadgee had fallen, after the two had scuffled. The prosecution had alleged the sergeant kneed the detained man in the stomach, causing serious damage to his liver.

The pathologist who conducted the post-mortem compared Mr Doomadgee’s injuries to those of plane crash victims. He suffered broken ribs, a ruptured spleen and his liver was so damaged it was almost split in two across his spine.

In June 2007, Chris Hurley was acquitted by an all-white jury of the manslaughter of Cameron Doomadgee.

Less than a month after Mr Doomadgee’s death, Hurley was transferred to work on the Gold Coast.
He even received a $100,000 compensation payment after his house was burnt down during the unrest on Palm Island following the news of the autopsy results.

And therein lies the inherent racism in the system. An Indigenous man dies in custody and an officer is acquitted of manslaughter by an all-white jury, despite what seemed to be overwhelming evidence of guilt.

But now, that very same policeman’s career is in tatters after being convicted of the relatively minor assault of an Anglo Australian man.

Blatant discrimination revealed

Due to the unrest that broke out on the island, Lex Wotton, a Palm Island local, was charged with inciting a riot and sentenced to six years in prison in September 2008. He served 19 months before being released on parole.

In 2014, Mr Wotton launched a class action against the Queensland government over the racially discriminatory way it handled the death of Mr Doomadgee, as well as the subsequent unrest on the island.

According to Wotton’s lawyers, the police had contravened section 9(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 by conducting themselves differently during the unrest because they were dealing with an Aboriginal community.

In December last year, the Federal Court found that Queensland police had indeed acted with unlawful discrimination when failing to suspend Sergeant Hurley after Mr Doomadgee’s death.

The court also found there was a “disproportionate show of force” by police on the protesting Aboriginal community.

“Paternalism and racism”

But it didn’t stop there. The Palaszczuk Government, along with Queensland police, decided to file an appeal against the landmark Federal Court decision, as they claimed there was not enough evidence to support it.

Central Queensland University professor Gracelyn Smallwood launched a successful campaign against the government’s appeal in February. Her online petition garnered close to 18,000 signatures and led politicians to drop the appeal.

As for the example of Hurley’s career, Ms Smallwood said it reveals the “paternalism and racism” that’s inherent not only in the Australian criminal justice system, but throughout the whole of Australian society.

“It was so blatant and open what happened to our brother on Palm Island,” the professor told Sydney Criminal Lawyers®. And Hurley “got a smack on the hand and then a promotion.”
She added that our nation has “a long way to go in terms of justice.”

Discrimination at every level

“There is no doubt that Australia is still a very racist country,” the Birrigubba elder said. “We’re three percent of the population and we’re fourteen times more likely to be locked up in prison.”

Indeed, the 2016 Census figures reveal that there were 649,171 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the country, which accounts for just 2.8 percent of the population. However, in June 2016, there were 10,596 Indigenous prisoners in Australia, which is 27 percent of the adult prisoner population.

“And a lot of our people are not there for very violent crimes,” Ms Smallwood continued. “They’re there for the unresolved grief, loss and trauma of colonisation.”

The professor of nursing and midwifery also pointed out that when it came to the Howard government implementing “special measures” in remote Aboriginal communities during the initial stages of the Northern Territory Intervention, the Racial Discrimination Act actually had to be suspended.

Ms Smallwood also questioned the reasoning behind the alcohol management plan that was implemented as part of the Intervention. After two years of the emergency measures, it was found that alcohol-related crime had risen by 34 percent, and this was thought to be because possession had become illegal.

“People, like myself, warned the government that prohibition has never worked anywhere in the world,” Ms Smallwood said over the phone from Palm Island. “Why would it work on communities that are suffering all the dysfunctions of… colonisation?”

Justice on the horizon

Despite all that has occurred, Ms Smallwood believes change is coming. Proof of this is that the majority of people who signed her petition against the state government’s attempt to overturn the Federal Court ruling that authorities had acted with extreme racism were non-Indigenous.

For the professor, it’s all about recounting the truth of what has occurred on our continent.

“Once the true history of this country is told, we can reconcile. I’m very optimistic that will happen.” In relation the success of the campaign, Ms Smallwood remarked, “So that was a great outcome. But we’ve got to keep speaking out.”

Source: sydneycriminallawyers.com.au

10 June 2020

This is just one reason you cannot trust the police

(Please note, that The Age publication did not provide a picture of Mr. Samuel Miller, but rather a generic photo pertaining to Victoria Police as seen below. Photo Source: Bendigo Advertiser) 

From a roadside 'interview' prior to the issuing of an 'Infringement Notice' to a Supreme Court matter, 'you' (a member of the serf population) cannot trust the police.

Roadside interviews include 'entrapment' and false information provided by the interviewing officer.

Your only response to any question outside of providing your details must be 'no comment' irrespective of your urge to respond to ridiculous questions presented to you.

Depending on the court matter, police do tamper with evidence, present false statements and even tamper with witnesses.

You can literally never trust any police officer's alleged occurrence of events presented as so called 'evidence'.

See just one example that made it to the public news media, as described by The Age publication from 27 May 2020 of the headline:

Cop forged victims' statements so he didn't have to waste his time

A Victorian policeman who faked documents to end criminal investigations he didn't think were worth his time has been ordered to do community work.

Samuel James Miller, 36, faked documents from victims of crime claiming they wanted to withdraw their complaints, including a 14-year-old assault victim.



Samuel Miller has been suspended without pay and will now be sacked by Victoria Police. Credit:Leanne Pickett
The Bendigo detective senior constable claimed he believed the three victims were unco-operative, and he was frustrated by that.

He believed Victoria Police's process for ending investigations was cumbersome and he was saving time.

Miller was caught after creating a false statement, claiming an assault and aggravated burglary victim signed a document asking to withdraw her complaint.

When interviewed he said it was the only time it had happened, that he didn't believe the investigation was worthy of his time and he wanted to rid it from his workload.

But an internal investigation found two other cases, including where he had faked a statement from a 14-year-old boy who was assaulted.

He recorded in the investigation file that the teen had recanted his statement and that the incident was "most likely a disputed drug transaction".

Miller, who joined Victoria Police in 2006, has been suspended without pay and will now be sacked.
County Court Judge Phillip Coish on Wednesday ordered Miller complete 100 hours of unpaid community work.

AAP