06 October 2022

Australia Post offering next level of surveillance to authorities


As we should know, Australia is part of the top tier surveillance nations, that being in the 5eyes.

As such the latest technology is used to surveil the inhabitants of the colony.

Tower triangulation, Assisted GPS and just plain ol' GPS are used to obtain the location of the subject's phone.

The above technologies have limited capacity indoors, depending on the conditions.

So, with the advent of a certain global situation, WiFi and Bluetooth scanning has been implemented to track the serfs.

As time goes on, one of the aims of the authorities is to amass more and more information on the plebs.

As if the introduction of WiFi and Bluetooth scanning was not enough, enter a new era of indoor surveillance via WiFi, called beamforming.


Briefly,

Beamforming will pinpoint your position more accurately, therefore allowing authorities a more precise location of your phone, even if you're on the throne surfing the interwebs.

At the moment, this technology is used within the router for WiFi, but nationwide rollout to towers is also a reality.

This will help authorities tracking people at protests, gatherings or even lawful constituents directing their public servant to 'serve' them they way they are supposed to.

We do not recommend taking mobile phones, either smart or dumb (i.e. feature) to gatherings where one may not want to be tracked or identified at.

Basically, unless 'mandatory' (which may not be out of the question in the police state of Victoria) for your specific conditions, leave your phone at home.

04 October 2022

Did Victoria's CHO Brett Sutton have the authority to act on an alleged health incident?


Victoria, Australia was known as the most draconian place on planet Earth when it came to restrictions, with zero real gain against an alleged disease.

Today, according to government figures, it's those who have been double or triple stabbed that are causing the high case numbers, where it's literally a pandemic of the 'vaccinated'.

In July 2020, we've shown you that the test for the alleged disease CANNOT be fully validated, nor is it NATA accredited.


You can read more about this in the following link:
COVID test useless: “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic"

The authorities (corporations and the medical profession) have conned and forced people to partake in a TRAIL drug, or more specifically, as stated by the federal health minister Greg Hunt, "The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial",  see link:



It was 'advertised' as a vaccine, BUT it does not confer immunity as seen in a court case from within the Supreme Court of the United States on 4th of November 2021, see link:

Courts, in general are not allowing many cases through against the authorities, where those that do get through, more often than not, the corrupt judiciary rules against the applicant.

This is one case that the registrars did allow through, but to this date (almost 5 months) there has been no ruling.

- Did Sutton factually have any authority to act?

- Was the law enacted lawfully (as opposed to legally) with regards to the new conditions?

- Is ANY Court a lawfully constituted court under the 'Queen of Australia'?

- Were your human rights violated by Australia's police forces?


- Were the new Acts in force compliant with the SARC (Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee)?

If so, the correct paperwork must be provided.

The case against Victoria's Department of Health and Human Services.

See submission to VCAT filed on the 10th of May 2022:




See interview with the applicant himself, Spiros Kalotihos:


Australia's Anglo-Masonic legal business is corrupt to its founding core, where we shall see the results in this case.

03 October 2022

Exposed: CityLink sends fines to sheriff’s office despite being paid




CityLink, together with the Sheriff’s Office Victoria is in involved in a multimillion dollar fraud against motorists.

We’ve obtained information from various sources that confirms that even though fines have been paid to CityLink for alleged infringements, CityLink then palms them off as unpaid to the Sheriff’s Office of Victoria for alleged debt collection.

MANY people are afraid of the people in the blue uniform, as they intimidate and harass the alleged debtor into producing a payment.

This has been going on for decades, technically since 1995.

In 1995, the Melbourne City Link Act was brought into circulation, unlawfully.

Therefore any alleged fine within the boundaries of the said Act is issued unlawfully.

‘Persons’ effected by the fraud should seek legal advice in order to pursue a class action.

29 September 2022

What your privacy settings on your smart phone should look like

The authorities/corporations want/need you to use smart phones for all internet related activities, as they collect the data you generate.

The problem there for you or rather your privacy is that this is not the best choice, as the smart phone is a device the leaks data many times a minute 24/7 compared to a personal computer not running Windows or a Macintosh. 

The leaks a even worse with closed source proprietary apps, where your face data, environment recognition, what's on your phone, contacts, voice data and photos are all accessed by the apps.

As a result, if you are truly concerned about your privacy, then you should not use Google (Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, etc) or Apple smart phones, but rather a 'de-Googled' one.

This will help keep your data on your phone, unless of course you install the various social media, games and government apps most people install.



The Advanced Privacy menu is only available on 'de-Googled' phones (Sony, Samsung, Nokia, OnePlus, etc) where an iPhone cannot be 'de-googled' as it does not run Android, but Apple's iOS.

27 September 2022

Australia’s largest criminal organisations will now obtain your Optus data, gov decides?


At law, Australia is a colony where (penal) colony mentality of the authorities is practised across the land, e.g. the Andrews government in Victoria proposal to fine Victorian for enjoying nature too much, that being diverting from a track or VLAD law in Queensland.


Australia is not a democratic place but rather a totalitarian state.

In light of the recent Optus data breach, the (colonial) government has decided how to keep your data safe by giving it to banking and financial services institutions to allegedly help combat identity theft.

What they're planning to do is very concerning.

- Your data will be given to multinationals, to multinationals that you may not have wanted to have your private and confidential data.

- The government has also expanded that attack surface on your private and confidential data, by giving it to others, INSTEAD of containing that data.

It’s akin to an action of giving up your guns to criminals, so that they can keep you safe, which is also what happened in Victoria after an ‘incident’ in Tasmania, but that’s another story.

Banks and financial services are one of Australia’s largest while collar criminals, as exposed by the ‘Royal Commission’, where nothing of relevance for the victims has been enacted, where the Commission in reality was a farce.

Remembering it’s not a matter of IF but WHEN those institutions will be breached, and more importantly will they be diligent in reporting the breach as soon as they are aware, as required by law?

Another off-kilter action by the wise MPs (Monkeys in Parliament) in the colony of Australia.

26 September 2022

How much battery does your phone use overnight?

Mobile phones have been giving away data to authorities since their inception, as they were never designed to be ‘secure’ in the use case for the ‘general population’ or at the ‘consumer’ level, as shown in the communications protocols.

Along come smart phones, where data collection is taken to the next level, where now there are two levels of data collection.

The first level of data collection comes from the baseband modem which contains a proprietary closed source backdoor designed by the manufacturers, not dissimilar from Intel’s ME (Management Engine) within personal computers.

The next level of data collection is at the application layer where much more data is generated nowadays by the ‘product’, i.e. you.

As time goes on smart phones get larger meaning their screen size and as a consequence the battery size, yet the phone only lasts a day or so, where anything more is a big deal.

Apple and Google’s Android loaded smart phones send data back to home base many times a minute and in Apple’s case even when the phone is off.

To make matter’s worse Google’s Pixel series of phones now monitor your speech 24/7 with Google’s  new A.I. Tensor processor.

Since 2020 a new level of data collection which goes on 24/7 occurred which locates the subject more accurately called WiFi and Bluetooth Scanning in both Apple and Google’s smartphone operating systems.


Smart phone manufacturers, e.g. LG, Motorola, Nokia,  Samsung, Sony etc (except for Huawei) load their phones up with a baseline version of Android called AOSP (Android Open Source Project), then they inject it with Google’s spyware additives.

For quite some time now in order to mitigate the spying on your phone software developers have created methods to install the baseline version of Android without the all the Google ‘goodies’.

As shown in the screenshot above, a ‘de-Googled’ phone used 2% battery in an 8hr period overnight, or approx 0.25% battery loss per hour.

Should you choose to use a de-Googled phone then AOSP developers from e foundationLineageOS, GrapheneOS or CalyxOS are a few you could research if it’s right for you.

The blanket data hoovering has nothing to do with terrorism (where that is the 'advertised' excuse) but rather part of the Nanny State agenda.

24 September 2022

Disable Intel ME thanks to the NSA


Corporations lie to you, they lie to you every single day, period.

It's all in the language they use.

What's more important, is that no one really cares until you take it to court, and even then.

Over the years, Intel's "Management Engine" has been discussed to death, about it's "backdoor" capability to be exploited by others.

Intel refuted those backdoor accusations, saying, “Intel does not put backdoors in its products nor do our products give Intel control or access to computing systems without the explicit permission of the end user. In short, Intel does not participate in efforts to decrease security in technology.”

So, let's put emphasis on the word "backdoor", where we can use the words, feature or portal or let's even thrown in a few TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) like AMT (Advanced Management Tool) or an an IMF (Integrated Management Feature).

quie simply put, Intel got caught out in with their propriatary architecture and still continued to provide false information (i.e. lie).

Intel is a term used by government 'defence' (or more accurately offence) personnel to that described intelligence gathering.

What most important with this whole fiasco is that a government 'intel' organisation requires their computer to have the ME (Management Engine) disabled.

Therefore the government does not want the government to spy on itself, which makes perfecrt sence.

See the following:

As Positive Technologies researchers Mark Ermolov and Maxim Goryachy poked into the firmware, they discovered an undocumented HAP field. HAP, which stands for the High Assurance Platform (pdf) program, was developed by the NSA. The framework was for the “development of the ‘next generation’ of secure computing platforms.”

The researchers discovered an undocumented field called “reserve-hap” and that HAP could be set to “1” for true. Apparently, the NSA wanted to ensure the agency could close off any possible security risk by disabling Intel ME. The researchers wrote, “We believe that this mechanism is designed to meet a typical requirement of government agencies, which want to reduce the possibility of side-channel leaks.”

When told about the research, Intel told Positive Technologies:

In response to requests from customers with specialized requirements, we sometimes explore the modification or disabling of certain features. In this case, the modifications were made at the request of equipment manufacturers in support of their customer’s evaluation of the U.S. government’s “High Assurance Platform” program. These modifications underwent a limited validation cycle and are not an officially supported configuration.

If you want to disable Intel ME, you should first read the in-depth technical explanation about the researchers finding “an undocumented PCH strap that can be used to switch on a special mode disabling the main Intel ME functionality at an early stage.” Positive Technologies also made its Intel ME 11.x firmware image unpacker utility available on GitHub. Use at your own risk; the methods to disable Intel ME were described as “risky and may damage or destroy your computer.”

Source: CSO Australia.

These actions of spying on the general population is deliberate by design part of the Nanny State agenda.

23 September 2022

Optus data breach logged with OAIC after public revelation, with falsified figures?

One of the prerequisites is that corporations conducting business in Australia must inform the OAIC (Office of the Australian Information Commissioner) once a data breach has occurred.

Some CEO's chose not to inform the OAIC, where this information will be made public, in order not to lose customer's i.e. profits as a result of poor security pracitices of their corporation's I.T. infrastructure.

Some CEO's choose to wait for a ransom notice in order to pay it, hoping the problem will go away, where the outside world will be none the wiser.

These practices fall under the unconsionable conduct, which is against the law.

But at the end of the day no one (i.e. corpoation's CEO's) cares until it's taken to court.

Optus' data breach was reported by news.com.au after 2pm on Thurdsay 22/09/2022:


The Office of the Information Commissioner published Optus' data breach at approx 10pm on 22/09/2022.

When did the data breach factually occur?

When did Optus decide to infom the OAIC?

Optus has not conducted business 'honourably' in Australia, where it has been fined on occassions for false advertising.

"Profit's before People", right?

In any event, when the story broke out Optus claimed that 9 million people were affected, as seen in the  screen shot below:


Then the story was modified approximately 3 hours later


where the claim is that 7 million people:


Another Optus 'false advertising' claim?

One of the greatest problems Australians face with regards to the privacy and security of their data when dealing with corporations is that in order to save on costs, the corporations 'outsource' their I.T. services where the administration is sub par, lacking in the required skill-set to keep the data on the servers and the bad guys out.

As the saying goes: "If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys", behind the keyboards.

Once the data is out of your control you cannot catergoriaclly state that there are no victims, where the authorities or the corpoations involved, may not even know or even report to the victims or even public for quite some time of the magnitude the criminal actions of identity theft has occured from that particular data breach.

21 September 2022

Windows 10 v Linux memory usage and privacy concerns

A personal computer installed with a current version of Windows 10, together with all the associated drivers for the personal computer to operate normally, i.e. video, audio, network, chipset etc consumes a certain amount of RAM, as indicated in the screenshot below:


The amount of RAM used by the Windows operating system is 3.2GB.

A current version of a Linux distribution that is installed on the same hardware, where all the functionality of the installed hardware is functional to the same level of the Windows equivalent yields completely differrent results, as shown in the screen capture below:


The baseline for the Linux installation is 1.4GB or 200MB less than half of what Windows requires!

What's more important is that security and privacy are at a totally differrent level to that of Microsoft's embedded spyware within its operating system.

The best way to stop Microsoft from spying on you via its Windows operating system is quite simply not to use it.

If privacy is a concern to you then products from Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft and others like ByteDance (TikTok) and government health realted apps, which are not 'mandatory' should be avoided.

See more information:


within: https://clario.co/blog/which-company-uses-most-data/

19 September 2022

Windows 10 Processes Threads Handles too high!


Microsoft's Window 10 operating system from the 'factory' or OOBE (Out Of Box Experience) is plain and simple spyware which stifle's your computer's performance.

One can mitigate Microsoft's data hoovering, but ultimtely in order to stop Windows from keylogging your keyboard moves and other things one does on a PC is to not use it, period.

Depending on your hardware a 'normal' Windows 10 installation, after the operating system 'settling down' after ~10minutes may have ~120 processes, 1150 threads and 40,000 handles which is a lot of work for something that is not doing anything beneficial for the user.

While there is no silver bullet to Microsoft's telemetry, while you're using its products. there are a few good utilities that get rid of bloatware and minimise the data collection.

Some products that can be used are DISM++, W10Privacy, O&OS10, WPD in conjunction with a good hosts file (anything from 300kB - 4500kB) which lists Microsoft's telemetry servers and other nasty data gathering sources.

From a fresh installation of Windows together with the implementation of the listed and unlisted tools one should be able to cut the Processes, Threads and Handles by half where during that process one can install a distribution of Linux, learn the basics and not have to deal with Microsoft's data hoovering from the 'factory'. 

Windows 8.1 has less bloat and [maybe less embedded] spyware, where a lockdown of the operating system should yield the results of Processes, Thread and Handles to be in the magnitude of 33, 460, 10630 respectively.