The most secure smartphone operating system?

On this planet duopolies rule, where there can also be anti-competitive behaviour or 'rigging' if one takes a deep dive into the subjects.

From supermarkets to politics to even geopolitical boundaries, consumers, constituents, citizens are realistically afforded only two choices.

In the smartphone world all the competition has been destroyed where there are only two main consumer operating systems that being Apple iOS and Google’s Android, neither of which respect your privacy or even security.

There is however one smartphone operating system which is the baseline for all Android smartphones in its most ‘purest’ form that being AOSP (Android Open Source Project) where manufacturers such as Google and Samsung later load up the operating system with their own ‘spyware’.

There are a few organisations that offer Android in its barest form, which then has privacy and security enhancements by LineageOS, /e/ foundation, GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, which run on new and older smartphones.

Cellebrite, an Israeli firm long regarded as an industry leader, is used to hack into peoples smartphones by governments within the FiveEyes global surveillance network, and also anyone else who will pay their fee, including hostile governments that abuse people's Human Rights, indicating that Israel 'supports' Human Rights abuse by those 'bad actors'.

Enter GrapheneOS, which is available on Google’s Pixel phones.

How ironic a ‘de-Googled’ Google phone.

Cellebrite are still unable to exploit locked GrapheneOS devices unless they're missing patches from 2022. A locked GrapheneOS device also automatically gets back to BFU from AFU after 18h by default.

See tables below:

"GrapheneOS is defending against these tools with generic exploit protections rather than by patching specific vulnerabilities. Until recently, it's likely that it was our generic memory corruption exploit mitigations including hardened_malloc which was successfully stopping this.

In February 2024, we added a new feature for disabling the USB-C port at a hardware level. In March 2024, we set the default mode to "Charging-only when locked, except before first unlock". In June 2024, we increased the default security level to "Charging-only when locked".

Later in June 2024, we extended our software-level USB protection, merged it into the newer hardware-level protection feature and extended the hardware-level protection to pogo pins on the Pixel Tablet. There's extremely strong protection against these USB-based attacks now.

Here's the Cellebrite Premium 7.69.5 Android Support Matrix from July 2024 for overall Android devices. Other than the Titan M2 on the Pixel 6 and later not being successfully yet to bypass brute force protection, it's largely just based on what they've had time to support."

See link: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/14344-cellebrite-premium-july-2024-documentation

If you truly value your privacy and security, then this would be reflected in your non-use of Apple or Google's Android smartphones from manufacturers like Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, et al.

Confronting TOP COVID COP outside court over 'unlawful arrest'

Victoria Police is an organisation that is corrupt to the core.

They are far from 'honourable' but rather deceptive and deceitful in their conduct, in and outside of court.

That's life in a totalitarian state.

Oaths and Affirmations of Australian leaders - Are they in Office LAWFULLY?

As all Australians should know the colony's founding document/law is the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act dated the 9th of July 1900, which came into effect on the 1st of January 1901.

Yes, that's right, 'colony's'. Australia is still a colony, See post: Australia the self governing colony

The Constitution is a document that sets the rules and regulations that people in government must follow.

It offers very little protections, per se for the people, where it's primary directives are for government.

ALL points/aspects of the constitution must be adhered to, period.

The focus is with reference to the last page of the Constitution, that being the Schedule of the Oath or Affirmation.

The Oath states the following:

I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law.

SO HELP ME GOD !

The Affirmation states the following:

I, A.B., do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law.

    (NOTE.—The name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the time being is to be substituted from time to time.)

Anthony Albanese sworn in David Huxley (27th Governor-General of the colony)

The Parliamentary Education Office states the following:

Oaths and affirmations are formal vows or promises. An oath concludes with the phrase ‘So help me God’, while an affirmation does not reference religion. Ministers are required to take an oath or affirmation on 3 occasions.

Before ministers can be sworn-in by the Governor-General, they must first be sworn-in as a member of the Federal Executive Council. Section 62 of the Australian Constitution says there must be a swearing-in but doesn’t say what the words of the oath or affirmation are. This is left up to the Governor-General, who administers the swearing-in for members of the Federal Executive Council.

After an Executive Councillor is sworn-in, they then take the oath or affirmation of office as a minister. This is not required by the Constitution or a law but by tradition it is always done. The Prime Minister decides what the oath or affirmation will be for their ministry. The Governor-General administers this to all ministers, assistant ministers and the Prime Minister.

Each minister must also be sworn-in as a member of the Australian Parliament. The words of this oath or affirmation are in the Constitution and can only be changed by the Australian people in a referendum. Section 64 of the Constitution says ministers can be sworn-in up to 3 months before they become a member of parliament. As a result, sometimes being sworn-in as a member of parliament is the last of the 3 oaths or affirmations taken.

IF "The Prime Minister decides what the oath or affirmation will be for their ministry.", then show us the lawfully generated instrument that allows for this.

In reality if the person does not swear the correct Oath or Affirmation as within the Constitution, then that person is not in office lawfully, period.

If the person is not in office lawfully, then whatever actions follow are not lawfully enacted.

 For example:

If an MP for example, Katherine Gallagher, has not sworn the Oath or Affirmation as per the Constitution, then she is not in office lawfully, and must be expelled, just like those who had dual citizenships, were expelled under Section 44.

Katherine Gallagher then pushes the Digital ID Bill through, unlawfully.

At another level, if the Bill becomes law, i.e. an Act, is it in circulation lawfully?

Did all the checks and balances occur at every single stage of the law making process?

The short answer would be: No.

See the Oaths and Affirmations of those in office within this 114 page document:

"Australia is a lucky country, run by second-rate people who share its luck." - Donald Horne 1964.

Australia’s ‘Jerry-built’ homes ‘crisis’ no one is talking about - HOME BUYER BEWARE!

To make matters worse, for the Australian people, by the government importing too many bank slaves into the colony to allegedly boost the economy, the Australian people are faced with another crisis that is deliberately not talked about by the mainstream media, and that is another aspect of the low quality homes that are being built today.

Low quality farmed timber.

Newer isn't always better, and this picture sums it up pretty well. The quality of modern lumber is simply far inferior to the quality of lumber they were using to build homes in the early and mid-20th century. Wood quality began dropping on a serious scale in the 1980s due to old-growth timber being almost completely depleted.

Most wood used today is grown very fast - not only can you visibly see the difference in quality, but the newer lumber is more prone to rotting due to a lack of heartwood. 

Slow growth wood yields much more heartwood, which is the longest lasting part of the tree, whereas sap wood (new growth wood) will rot very quickly. 

Modern lumber is also a lot more prone to termite damage as it is softer and easier to consume whereas old lumber is extremely resinous and naturally termite resistant. 

A good rule - as long as the plumbing and electric has been updated, a well-built home from the mid-20th century is a better investment and will likely outlast a newer build.

Clarification: Yes, these two pieces of lumber come from two different trees. 

The expert in the attached article is not comparing the lumber of the same tree over time. He is comparing the lumber that was commonly used to build houses 75 years ago versus the lumber commonly used to build houses today

Source:supplied

Covid fines unlawful, the documents they can’t give you!

 Off the public record.

• You live in an abusive relationship with your government.

• In this colony called Australia, people live under a totalitarian, fascist, corporatised, police state.

• Forget being people of the ‘Commonwealth’ or democracy, those days are left to a museum (i.e MOAD), but that’s another story.

See article: Democracy in Australia

The government (all three tiers, Parliament, Executive and Judiciary) is corrupt to the core.

The businesses known as the courts, are corrupt where they are ‘owned’ by banking and financial services institutions such as Goldman Sachs, The Vangaurd Group and BlackRock, being subservient to their ‘stakeholders’.

See court document within the article:

Courts acting under dictation owned by financial services institutions

The courts are allegedly places of public record, but they have ways and means of hiding cases from the public, as part of the agenda of the secretive police state, naturally to the detriment of society.

In your documentation, if you expose the corruption of the police, government or courts, your matter will not make it to the ‘public record’ where it will be withdrawn or dismissed.

This may be seen as a ‘victory’ but it’s actually a loss, a loss for the people, as they are unaware of the details, and a cover-up of criminality by those in power.

In many states of Australia, ‘Covid’ fines have been withdrawn.

They have been withdrawn not when people started to challenge them, but more importantly when people started getting their paperwork right and asking the RIGHT questions.

A proper challenge to any alleged offence should be, first and foremost, on a basis of a ‘question of law’.

Government overflowing with people that gas-light their constituents.

In the police state of Victoria, under the leadership of ‘Chairman Dan’ (Andrews), premier of Victoria from 2014 – 2023, Covid fines were issued unlawfully, under whatever pretexts.

The problem there was that there was no lawfully enacted ‘infrastructure’ in place that would give rise for those fines to exist.

The government knew this, the police knew this and the courts knew this but they wanted to see if the serfs knew, so they gas-lighted the people.

Once again, when people started to obtain the correct knowledge, the fines were getting withdrawn.

The courts are corrupt.

The corruption begins at the registrar level.

They are the 'gatekeepers', the people who will not allow you to have the documents required for you to be successful in defending your matter.

So, apparently ‘advertisements’ were flung around everywhere that the good people of Victoria are under a ‘State of Emergency'.

SO, can the government prove this was a lawfully (as opposed to legally) issued declaration?

What medical advice was given that gave rise for this State of Emergency?

Allegedly there was a State of Disaster issued on 2/08/2020 @ 6pm.

Was this lawfully issued? Can ‘we’ have a copy of this?

MANY people obtained a ‘Covid’ fine, where the charge was as follows:

“Refuse or fail to comply with a direction or requirement made of a person in the exercise of a power under an authorisation given under Section 199 (INDIVIDUAL) Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008.”.

In the above you may have noticed that “direction or requirement made of a person” has been underlined.

Keeping in mind that the burden of proof is on the accuser, where every aspect of the accusation or charge must be proven, beyond any reasonable doubt.

Therefore, Victoria Police accuses that you have refused or failed to comply with a direction/requirement that was made of you.

NOW, first and foremost can Victoria Police PROVE that this alleged direction/requirement was given to your ‘person’?

If so, then you require proof that it was served on your person, where an ‘advertisement’ on a freeway digital sign is not legally binding.

A lawful declaration that one must work from home?

What Act have you been charged under?

Since the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008, is the alleged source, then a ‘deep dive’ can be initiated if this Act is in circulation lawfully, under something called a ‘reservation of points of law’ or a Section 72B (of the Judiciary Act 1903).

In reality there was no lawfully enacted ‘State of Emergency’ in Victoria, and the government does NOT want the serfs to know about this.

Sure there may be a piece of paper, that states it’s a ‘State of Emergency’ but was it issued lawfully?

Since Victoria Police were fining people under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008, Section 167 - Power to request information, the following is stated:

(1)     An authorised officer may request a person to provide information to the authorised officer which the authorised officer believes is necessary to investigate whether there is a risk to public health or to manage or control a risk to public health. 

(3)     A person may refuse to provide the information requested under subsection (1). 

Meaning, when they stop you, there is no need to answer ANY questions.

See documents within the article: Is the 25km rule in Victoria a valid statutory provision?

The reality is that if you ask for the documents, as shown above within the Subpoena, Form 13, the ‘gatekeepers’ will not allow you to have them, where your request WILL be denied.

See also:

• Corrupt Police Issuing (COVID) Fines Only To Be Dropped Before Court

• State of Emergency & curfew acted out illegally by Daniel Andrews?

• No 'State of Emergency' for Victoria, government lies

• Six weeks lock down but Andrews signed Victorians up for four

• Do Covid Infringements issued in Victoria meet the Prescribed Details?

That’s life in a corrupt colony.

Victoria Police: Public is number one enemy

VicPol uniforms were blue, now they're the same colour as 1930s German government 'enforcers',

 deliberate by design.

Well, here is an uncomfortable truth ALL three tiers (Executive, Judiciary and Parliament) don't want you, the plebs/serfs/herd/commoners/general population to know.

First and foremost, the people in government are supposed to represent the people (you know: 'Whereas the people of...") , which today they do not, but rather work for the best interests of corporations instead of the people.

INSTEAD, according to the government, the stinky serfs are first and foremost the number one enemy of the 'state'.

This is strongly instilled in the colony's police forces or the 'brotherhood' which now employs women, as described by ex Victorian police officer Krystle Mitchell.

The foundations of the colony's (see post: Australia the self governing colony) police force are quite wobbly, as the police force was not made up of 'honourable' people, but rather criminals.

What an EXCELLENT choice, but cui bono?

Each state of the colony, has a high portion of policy enforcers committing criminal acts, where only a small portion make it to the knowledge of the commoners, as reported by the 'investigative' journalists within the mainstream media.

See video:

Three BIG lies exposed

Governments and the mainstream media, lie to the people every single day.

Some lies may be harmless, others are deliberately detrimental and designed to influence society for whatever agenda is at play.

Here are just some of the lies perpetuated by government and media.

Antisemitism is a very polar topic subject to heightened emotions, where the ‘technicality’ is a bit more simple where ignorance is the major concern.

What is referred to as the masses or the heard population are people that are (deliberately) ignorant of the world they live in  with respect to politics at domestic or global level as an example.

When these people congregate or gather towards a common belief, they may vent their frustrations against a ‘minority’ that has nothing to do with their displeasure of an action.

In this example their erroneous belief is that the ‘jews’ may be responsible for an action, where the reality is quite different.

Enter, Zionism.

According to Wikipedia, Zionism is an ethno-cultural nationalist movement that emerged in Europe in the late 19th century and aimed for the establishment of a Jewish state through the colonization of a land outside of Europe.

That may have been the case in the late 19^th Century, but the roots are much deeper to the times of Christ and earlier, where it has expanded and today it’s a global movement, encompassing global domination across many different disciplines focusing on control via financial transactions.

So when the heard directs their energy towards the ‘jews’ they should be focusing on the global elite, and/or the Zionists.

Homophobia is another deliberately falsified phrase flung around indiscriminately.

In all of the three main Abrahamic religious beliefs, homosexuality is a definite no-no.

In most of the world’s alleged democratic societies, religious beliefs cannot be discriminated against, yet they are when it comes to homosexuality.

If a devout Christian, Jew or Muslim openly/publicly denounces homosexuality, there is an attack on that person, citing a false narrative, homophobia.

According to John Hopkins Medicine, “ a phobia is an uncontrollable, irrational, and lasting fear of a certain object, situation, or activity. This fear can be so overwhelming that a person may go to great lengths to avoid the source of this fear. One response can be a panic attack. This is a sudden, intense fear that lasts for several minutes. It happens when there is no real danger.”

Therefore if one is a homophobe, one is scared or fearful of homosexuals in the same calibre as one is of arachnids as described in arachnophobia.

How many people are truly scared of homoesexuals like they are of scorpion or spiders?

Racism is another deliberately off the mark description.

First and foremost, every man woman or child on this planet is part of something called the ‘Human race’.

This is irrespective of one’s skin tone.

There is no such thing as ‘race’. To even speak of the notion of race is misguided. There is no scientific or biological foundation for the idea of race. Scientists that have mapped the human genome have found there is no basis in the genetic code for race. Race is a social construct.

See document:

People are not racist but rather nationalistic.

Source:supplied.

Australian Government’s website security appalling

The buffoons in government are sleeping on the job, siphoning taxpayer dollars to keep their extended lunches afloat or just have ‘outsourced’ low quality I.T. workforce.

When visiting websites, a quintessential part of internet security is a protocol called https, where data travels encrypted as opposed to non encrypted via http.

HTTPS is not new, where it’s been around for a while.

In 2016, a campaign by the Electronic Frontier Foundation with the support of web browser developers led to the protocol becoming more prevalent, where today you wouldn’t want to exchange information with a non https site.

It’s not a matter that the website is ‘just’ a weather site, it’s a matter that your data is being exposed, where a malicious actor could obtain other information in order to compromise your security on your device.

The alleged whole point of fining ‘speeding’ drivers, e.g. 63km/h in a 60km/h zone is that you could kill someone.

Another government failure at the expense of the people.

The false public image of Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

The people in authority would have the serfs think that they are all about equality and non discrimination, but the reality is far from their so called ‘advertising’, especially within the ‘brotherhood’ community.

First and foremost homosexuality is against all the Abrahamic religious beliefs, that being Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

One of the biggest lies perpetuated by governments and the mainstream media is this label called ‘homophobia’.

When one doesn’t agree with homosexuality, as it goes against one’s religious beliefs one is falsely labelled as homophobic.

It would be safe to say that no one is technically fearful or frightened of homosexuals, as a ‘phobias’ are “typically result in a rapid onset of fear and are usually present for more than six months.” as mentioned in Wikipedia.

Conversely MANY people are suffer from arachnophobia, meaning scared or frightened of spiders and other arachnids such as scorpions and ticks.

Homosexuality in politics is taboo, while in the entertainment industry it is acceptable.

It was widely known in the entertainment industry that Graham Kennedy was a homosexual, but they still portrayed him as not being one by giving him a female friend for show.

In politics, it’s a different story, where ex PM Julia Gillard was lauded for a couple of firsts, keeping it under wraps that she was also the first homosexual female PM, where it was well known within her close political circle that she was a homosexual.

On a side note Gillard was not into office lawfully, as she did not take the Oath as required within the Constitution, see article:

Julia Gillard sworn in as Prime Minister incorrectly?

see also:

No news on ex PM in court over oath & ‘Queen of Australia’?

Now, enter Mr. Anthony Norman Albanese, where he’s as ‘camper’ as they come, but that’s a no no in the political clown show.

They hook him up with a woman, to make it more believable, that’s he’s not homosexual, where he’s got a son with an ex-wife.

His son also benefits from his father’s position, but that is beyond the scope of this article.

MANY of the colony's politicians are corrupt to the core, where it is difficult to convict them of criminal or unlawful activity even if they’re publicly ousted.

Source:supplied.

The shocking truth behind data breaches

The authorities deliberately downplay the shocking reality of data breaches, with words like ‘isolated incident’ or ‘no personal details’ or whatever other phrases to keep the victims docile.

See article: 

Government lies, MediSecure cyber attack "isolated"

As the governments, corporations and banks force oops ‘entice’ shoppers/consumers the serfs towards a cashless society, the stakes will be higher where the victims now have a lot to lose are the people and not those in control of the people.

A contributing factor to data breaches is something called ‘outsourcing’, which is all about denouncing responsibility/liability for said I.T services, like data storage.

Companies/corporations/governments then wash their hands of any incompetence, or consequences arising from data breaches.

A recent data breach at AT&T is deliberately downplayed by both the government and the company.

 

A recent article of the title, UNC5537 Targets Snowflake Customer Instances for Data Theft and Extortion outlines some major issues.

See link: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/unc5537-snowflake-data-theft-extortion

If reading is not your forte, then maybe this topic in spoken word may help: