09 November 2023

Apple's LIES: iPhones have been exposing your unique MAC despite Apple’s promises otherwise

“From the get-go, this feature was useless,” researcher says of feature put into iOS 14.


Three years ago, Apple introduced a privacy-enhancing feature that hid the Wi-Fi address of iPhones and iPads when they joined a network. On Wednesday, the world learned that the feature has never worked as advertised. Despite promises that this never-changing address would be hidden and replaced with a private one that was unique to each SSID, Apple devices have continued to display the real one, which in turn got broadcast to every other connected device on the network.

The problem is that a Wi-Fi media access control address—typically called a media access control address or simply a MAC—can be used to track individuals from network to network, in much the way a license plate number can be used to track a vehicle as it moves around a city. Case in point: In 2013, a researcher unveiled a proof-of-concept device that logged the MAC of all devices it came into contact with. The idea was to distribute lots of them throughout a neighborhood or city and build a profile of iPhone users, including the social media sites they visited and the many locations they visited each day.

In the decade since, HTTPS-encrypted communications have become standard, so the ability of people on the same network to monitor other people's traffic is generally not feasible. Still, a permanent MAC provides plenty of trackability, even now.

As I wrote at the time:

Enter CreepyDOL, a low-cost, distributed network of Wi-Fi sensors that stalks people as they move about neighborhoods or even entire cities. At 4.5 inches by 3.5 inches by 1.25 inches, each node is small enough to be slipped into a wall socket at the nearby gym, cafe, or break room. And with the ability for each one to share the Internet traffic it collects with every other node, the system can assemble a detailed dossier of personal data, including the schedules, e-mail addresses, personal photos, and current or past whereabouts of the person or people it monitors.

In 2020, Apple released iOS 14 with a feature that, by default, hid Wi-Fi MACs when devices connected to a network. Instead, the device displayed what Apple called a “private Wi-Fi address” that was different for each SSID. Over time, Apple has enhanced the feature, for instance, by allowing users to assign a new private Wi-Fi address for a given SSID.

On Wednesday, Apple released iOS 17.1. Among the various fixes was a patch for a vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2023-42846, which prevented the privacy feature from working. Tommy Mysk, one of the two security researchers Apple credited with discovering and reporting the vulnerability (Talal Haj Bakry was the other), told Ars that he tested all recent iOS releases and found the flaw dates back to version 14, released in September 2020.

“From the get-go, this feature was useless because of this bug,” he said. “We couldn't stop the devices from sending these discovery requests, even with a VPN. Even in the Lockdown Mode.”

When an iPhone or any other device joins a network, it triggers a multicast message that is sent to all other devices on the network. By necessity, this message must include a MAC. Beginning with iOS 14, this value was, by default, different for each SSID.

To the casual observer, the feature appeared to work as advertised. The “source” listed in the request was the private Wi-Fi address. Digging a little further, however, it became clear that the real permanent MAC was still broadcast to all other connected devices, just in a different field of the request.

Mysk published a short video showing a Mac using the Wireshark packet sniffer to monitor traffic on the local network the Mac is connected to. When an iPhone running iOS prior to version 17.1 joins, it shares its real Wi-Fi MAC on port 5353/UDP.


In fairness to Apple, the feature wasn't useless, because it did prevent passive sniffing by devices such as the above-referenced CreepyDOL. But the failure to remove the real MAC from port 5353/UDP still meant that anyone connected to a network could pull the unique identifier with no trouble.

The fallout for most iPhone and iPad users is likely to be minimal, if at all. But for people with strict privacy threat models, the failure of these devices to hide real MACs for three years could be a real problem, particularly given Apple's express promise that using the feature "helps reduce tracking of your iPhone across different Wi-Fi networks."

Apple hasn’t explained how a failure as basic as this one escaped notice for so long. The advisory the company issued Wednesday said only that the fix worked by “removing the vulnerable code.”

This post has been updated to add paragraphs 3 and 11 to provide additional context.

Source: arstechnica

07 November 2023

Adobe tells users they can get sued for using old versions of Photoshop

You bought it, you own it? Think again!

Adobe Tells Users They Can Get Sued for Using Old Versions of Photoshop


"You are no longer licensed to use the software," Adobe told them. 

Adobe is warning some owners of its Creative Cloud software applications that they’re no longer allowed to use older versions of the software. It’s yet another example of how in the modern era, you increasingly don’t actually own the things you’ve spent your hard-earned money on.

Adobe this week began sending some users of its Lightroom Classic, Photoshop, Premiere, Animate, and Media Director programs a letter warning them that they were no longer legally authorized to use the software they may have thought they owned.

“We have recently discontinued certain older versions of Creative Cloud applications and and a result, under the terms of our agreement, you are no longer licensed to use them,” Adobe said in the email. “Please be aware that should you continue to use the discontinued version(s), you may be at risk of potential claims of infringement by third parties.” Users were less than enthusiastic about the sudden restrictions.

[ ](https://twitter.com/KupoGames/status/1126905276693667841/photo/1?refsrc=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1126905276693667841&refurl=https%3A%2F%2Fappleinsider.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F05%2F13%2Fadobe-warning-of-legal-problems-if-users-keep-using-old-versions-of-creative-cloud-apps)The company didn’t inform users why they needed to discontinue use of the software, but the company’s Twitter account indicated the issue stems from “ongoing litigation.” AppleInsider, which first reported the notices, pointed to a copyright lawsuit filed last year by Dolby Labs.

In a controversial move, Adobe pivoted away from the standard software model to the cloud-based subscription model in 2013, resulting in notably higher revenues (and higher prices for customers). Dolby’s lawsuit accused Adobe of copyright violations related to how the licensing costs Adobe paid to Dolby would be calculated under this new model. In a statement to Motherboard, Adobe confirmed the letter's authenticity, but wouldn’t provide any additional detail beyond what was included in the notices. It’s yet another example of how the products we buy in the modern era can lose functionality or stop working entirely on a lark. Be it a game console that loses features with a firmware update or entertainment products that just suddenly disappear, it’s a problem that’s increasing popping up in the always online era.

Dylan Gilbert, a copyright expert with consumer group Public Knowledge, said in this instance users aren’t likely to have much in the way of legal recourse to the sudden shift. “Unless Adobe has violated the terms of its licensing agreement by this sudden discontinuance of support for an earlier software version, which is unlikely, these impacted users have to just grin and bear it,” Gilbert said. Gilbert noted that consumers now live in a world in which consumers almost never actually own anything that contains software. In this new reality, end users are forced to agree to “take it or leave it” end user license agreements (EULAs), in which the licensor can change its terms of service without notice. “Even if Adobe is fully in the right here with regard to the Dolby dispute, it has the power to force its customers to upgrade to newer more expensive versions at its whim, which illustrates the undue power and influence of EULAs over the lives of consumers,” Gilbert said. “We should be able to own the things we buy.” Activist, author, and copyright expert Cory Doctorow agreed, telling Motherboard in an email that this kind of thinking has increasingly permeated countless sectors, including DRM-based media, software as a service, and even client-server games. Both Doctorow and Gilbert noted that this kind of shifting landscape can often be particularly problematic for artists and creators, who often don’t want to risk ongoing projects by suddenly jumping to new versions of software that may contain unforeseen bugs.

“When your tools are designed to treat you as a mere tenant, rather than an owner, you're subject to the whims, machinations, and unforeseeable risks of the landlord from whom you rent,” Doctorow noted. “And your legal rights are likely defined by a ‘contract’ that you clicked through a million years ago, which says that you agree that you don't have any legal rights.” It’s a comical, lopsided arrangement that copyright experts say isn’t changing anytime soon, leaving consumers with only one real option: when possible, don’t buy products from companies with a history of pulling the carpet out from beneath your feet.

Source: vice.com




06 November 2023

How a foreign entity removed Australian parliamentary records from the internet


MANY people believe that Australians live in a democratic nation, but the reality is far from this.

People may also believe that 'free speech' is available to them on this medium called the internet.

One way of describing the reality we live in is that of a totalitarian, fascist corporatocracy both in reality and on the ether.

Parliamentary speeches are a public record, and most importantly, hansards are legal documents.

Australian parliamentary member Craig Kelly, had his recorded parliamentary speeches expunged from 'his' YouTube channel, meaning his voice on the Google's platform was removed.

See 2 hour interview with Craig Kelly within the following link:


Now that's not very 'democratic' is it?

It's more of a sinister agenda.


Good allegedly has or 'had' a motto: "Don't be evil". Is this because it has the capacity to easily be evil?

Well, Google is factually 'evil', where it lies, i.e. provides false information, deceives its users and is responsible for slowing down the internet and saturating user's bandwidth with approximately 60% advertising material.

For privacy and security Google products are not recommended, such as spyware loaded smartphones using Google's Android, such as the ones made by Samsung, Motorola, Nokia etc.


02 November 2023

12 thoughts from Propaganda (1965) by Jacques Ellul


You'll never look at news the same way again...

1. Breaking news is brainwashing you. Ellul: "To the extent that propaganda is based on current news, it cannot permit time for thought or reflection." When everything is urgent, you are forced to "remain on the surface of the event." 

2. Jacques Ellul predicted echo chambers: "Those who read the press of their group and listen to the radio of their group are constantly reinforced in their allegiance. We see before our eyes how a world of closed minds establishes itself."

3. Modern man can "never stop to reflect." He's not allowed to synthesise his information. Rather, Ellul writes: "One thought drives away another; old facts are chased by new ones."

4. Clear thought has been replaced by vague feeling: "Modern man does not think about current problems; he feels them. He reacts, but be does not understand them any more than he takes responsibility for them."

5. Ellul on how the modern man lacks a centre of gravity: "Lacking landmarks, he follows all currents." His soul is "discontinuous and fragmented." Life reduced to unconnected moments...

6. Everyone can read but not everyone can think. This makes propaganda more, not less, common. Ellul: "The vast majority of people, perhaps 90 percent, know how to read, but do not exercise their intelligence beyond this. They attribute authority and eminent value to the printed word...they are precisely on the level at which the printed word can seize and convince them without opposition."

7. Once a person is compromised...once they've acted out a lie...they are yours forever. Ellul: "He who acts in obedience to propaganda can never go back. He is now obliged to believe in that propaganda because of his past action. He is obliged to receive from it his justification and authority, without which his action will seem to him absurd or unjust, which would be intolerable."

8. Propaganda works by channelling the energies of a society's "fundamentals myths." These are the central stories operating inside the collective mind: "The myth of happiness, the myth of progress, the myth of the nation." A skilled propagandist will always borrow from, and build on, the "current beliefs and symbols" of a society.

9. Propagandists set up "psychological levers." They ensure that "certain words, signs or symbols" start provoking certain reflex actions...and then they wait. The levers can now be turned when and how needed.

10. Indirect propaganda works best. Aggressive attempts at manipulation will fail as people's defences will go up. But give a man plausible deniability, feed him convenient information, make him feel that he's "obeying reason" as he follows your command, and you have him where you want him.

11. Lonely, depressed people are the easiest victims of propaganda. Jacques Ellul: "An individual can be influenced by forces such as propaganda only when he is cut off from membership in local groups because such groups are organic and have a well-structured material, spiritual and emotional life; they are not easily penetrated by propaganda."

12. The conditions of modernity are actually the conditions of unprecedented propaganda: "The permanent uncertainty, the social mobility, the absence of sociological protection and of traditional frames of reference — all these inevitably provide propaganda with a malleable environment that can be conditioned at will. The individual left to himself is defenceless..."

31 October 2023

Google LIES! Clock won’t run unless Play services updated


Corporations lie to their customers, where their CEO’s or legal representatives also lie to the courts.

Google is not an ‘honourable’ corporation, where many of its activities are deliberately overlooked, as it also provides information to both government and no-government organisations within the Five Eyes network.

Google also (forcibly) installed spying/tracking software onto your smartphone, where there was no option to ‘opt-out’, during the global health situation, which ultimately was a futile exercise, if that was the only alleged purpose for the spyware to exist where now it should be removed as the so called threat is now gone.

To put it quite simply, Google is deceptive in its conduct with regards to its customers or rather more accurately ‘data providers’.

Google needs you to have its latest version of software updates, not for your privacy or security but rather for Google’s next iteration of spyware.



In this example of Google’s deceptive conduct, it claims that the clock within your smartphone will not ‘run’ or function if you do not update to the latest version of Google Play services.

This is a BLATANT lie, where the clock does still function and with reasonable accuracy too, where if one needs more, then synchronising with atomic clocks on a regular basis can be done as well.

Will the legal world pay attention to this 'deceptive conduct’, where a class action will be taken against Google?

It’s safe to say, NO!

If one is truly concerned about a level of privacy that is less intrusive than the spyware that is loaded onto factory smartphones available from Google, Samsung, Nokia, Motorola etc, then AOSP (Android Open Source Project) software, like e foundation, LineageOS or GrapheneOS may be available for your hardware.

27 October 2023

American Dominance Over Australia's Biggest Businesses

In Whose Interest Are Big Businesses Working?

US Investors Hold Sway Over Australia’s Largest Corporations 

Analysis of corporate ownership data reveals that US investors wield significant influence on Australian economy and politics through their ownership in Australia’s largest companies.

  • Fifteen of Australia’s largest corporations are majority owned by US investors, including Commonwealth Bank, BHP (“the Big Australian”), Wesfarmers (owner of Coles) and Woolworths.

  • All of Australia’s “big four” banks are majority US-owned.

  • Large Australian food manufacturing companies like Kraft Foods are majority owned by US investors. Until 2007, Kraft was owned by tobacco giant Altria (formerly Philip Morris).

  • The UK is the second largest foreign investor in Australia, comprising around 30 percent of foreign investment. 


Why Does This Matter? US investors' overwhelming influence in Australian business matters because it affects our democracy, financial interests, and Australia’s sovereignty. The overwhelming American influence on our biggest businesses places significant pressure on Australia’s politicians and public services, and distorts decision-making in favour of overseas interests rather than Australian interests.

Tracking foreign investment in Australia is challenging. The threshold for scrutiny of foreign investment decisions was increased from $5 million to $310 million. Under Australia's free-trade agreement with the US, the threshold for scrutiny increased to $1.3 billion for US investors.

Who are the US investors? The largest global investors are massive investment corporations that own trillions of dollars of shares and other assets. The largest is Blackrock Investments, a virtually unregulated firm that owns more wealth than Japan and Germany have in GDP.

What could be done? As a minimum transparency measure, a public register of foreign ownership should be established. Australia is one of the few advanced economies without this kind of register. This basic mechanism would be a first step into a larger public inquiry into foreign ownership, examining lobbying and other influence overseas investors have on Australia’s democracy, economy and national interest. 

Source: newhorizon.news

25 October 2023

FOI TGA Documents, including Ivermectin use & WAPOL assistance

See the following documents:


FOI 4235-01 - Publication of public submissions (1 page)



FOI 4235-02 - emails b/w Peter HUNT – John SKERRITT (6 pages) re AMCS



FOI 4235-04 - emails b/w Peter HUNT – Benjamin NOYEN (5 pages) 

re TGA responsibility


FOI 4235-09 - email b/w John SKERRITT – Tania de Jong AM (2 pages)

re meeting w health officers


FOI 4235-11 - email b/w John SKERRITT – Tania de Jong AM (2 pages)

re CHO’s names

FOI 4401 – email from & to redacted, (78 pages) re Ivermectin & WAPol



FOI 4575 email b/w redacted - John SKERRITT (239 pages) 
re: Setup of not-for-profit: "Mind Medicine Australia"

TGA FOI 4077 Batch Numbers & Dose In Series for adverse events for those jabbed


See 5 page document:


Source: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-12/foi-4077-01.pdf

24 October 2023

Microsoft Now Controls All Your Data


Screen capture of Microsoft Services Agreement:

as published on the 30th of July 2023

Where this has been put into a pdf:

See video that points to the concerns within Microsoft's latest Services agreement: