So here's a headline that should raise alarm bells to those
who are worth their mettle, where those whose lives revolve around beer and
footy can move on.
The question posed by the ABC was "Is it time to hand
democracy back to the people?"
It may seem for clarification purposes that some people in
government must (officially) answer just two simple questions:
1). If the people do not have democracy in their control who
has it?
2). On what specific date did the people lose control of
their democracy?
Let's do some 'simple' research to try to piece this puzzle
together.
When you do a simple 'your favourite search engine' search
on the terms Australia and democracy, then the Parliament of Australia website
will inform Australians that they live in a parliamentary democracy, albeit
under a constitutional monarchy.
Source: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Work_of_the_Parliament/Forming_and_Governing_a_Nation/parl
In the above illustration there is something that is 'hidden in plain
sight' called 'The Constitution'.
Many people may not be aware of this law's longer name that
being the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), where it would
be recommend to use the original document, paying attention to the details
within it.
Some people will say that the constitution is dead, or it
does not exist or maybe that it's not in circulation lawfully, and only a few
parliamentarians have been made aware of this 118 year old document law, where they got
the boot under Section 44.
For those who have trouble comprehending 'The Constitution'
there is a place of business called the High Court of Australia that helps them
interpret this law.
If we are mentioning The Constitution, then it is mandatory
to mention its sidekick, a legal document that is used in the High Court of Australia
often referred to as the 'Quick and Garran' or more inconveniently as 'The
annotated constitution of the Australian Commonwealth' by John Quick LL.D and
Robert Randolph Garran M.A. A scan or the original would be the preferred
document to have.
If your person has some legal conundrums where you take it
to legal experts on a question of law, and these people vaguely recall the
existence of The Constitution where they are not familiar with its sidekick, the 'Quick and
Garran' then it would be wise to pack up your paperwork and leave promptly with
your hand in pocket guarding your wallet fiercely.
Very briefly
according to 'The Constitution' the people are the highest authority of this
land.
So once again:
1). If the people do not have democracy in their control who
has it?
2). On what specific date did the people lose control of
their democracy?
3 comments:
Good luck trying to get our constitution respected, or enforced by Australian politicians (aka criminals) as they have OUR money to stop/delay any and all court challenges, and they know which high court judge to go to to get the interpretation they want.
They have been doing it for decades, including changing our constitution without the peoples voice, it is called creating a 'Act'...which they do in every situation where the constitution cannot be interpreted to suit their criminal desires
Very true Phillip...every word. Id like to imagine that the Australian people could concentrate for just a moment and take stock of what consecutive Govts have done blatently unlawfully and infact treasonously but it would seem that as long as I wait they appear determined to simply accept their plight. Trouble is there's not a lot left that can be taken from us in regards to freedoms and granted rights as so many have already been "enacted" away. Still I have hope that sooner or later one of these tag team prome ministers will go just too far and start a fire in the peoples belly that wont be extinguished. Living in hope as always.
The new style of State and federal governments are like foreign ships in dry dock, they changed everything in order to get us to leave the real Australia and sold us a fake Australia appearing as: AUSTRALIA and not in proper English as: "Australia". Ask any English teacher or professor if all uppercase text is English! and you will get the answer: "No its not English" meaning it is something foreign. If you are on the electoral roll of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, or the STATE OF QUEENSLAND etc., you are the trustee to a UNITED STATES registered organization and no longer and "Australian", you are an "AUSTRALIAN"!!! and that is how you lost your ability to be protected by the Constitution of the "people" because a citizen of a foreign corporate organization registered in the USSEC is not a national of Australia! ... When a prim minister takes his oath, his oath is to the "people" not to persons! and if you check your birth certificate, you have one name and if you assume any other name, you will be deemed lost and you will be salvaged by the foreign banking cartel calling itself: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA witch translate back into proper English as: "Commonwealth. Of. Australia" and not as" "Commonwealth Of Australia" ... that's is the science behind the greatest foreign banking criminal fraud of all time! ... the foreign private bank has deceived the national people to surrender their sovereignty to a fraud criminal gang of corporate criminals dressed in suits and ties... So there it is, the science behind a grammatical fraud... Lucky for the criminals the masses don't know the difference between "Smith" and "SMITH" ...
Post a Comment