'Update' to Windows 11?

VERY briefly,

So the software manufacturer tells you that you must update your operating system to Windows version 11 from whatever other version of Windows you are using.

So what are you actually updating?

A more 'modern' UI (User interface)?

Rubbish!

Arguably, one of the best user interfaces was the one within Windows 7, with the Aero/Glass look for menus, program windows etc.

Then when users 'updated' to Windows 8, Micro$oft said that the new interface was a more 'modern' approach, but in reality it was a lie.

The 'simple' theme combination was so that the newer less powerful tablets could display menus in a relatively short time frame, something that would not be possible with the Windows 7 interface.

You must have the latest version of Windows as it more secure?

Well that's very arguable point, which for the purpose of this post will not be discussed.

One reason that you 'must' update your Windows version is to generate a multi billion revenue stream for M$.

M$ can make the older versions of Windows 'secure' quite cheaply, but chooses not to.

Another reason for you to update your version of Windows is something that M$ does NOT talk about and want you (the home user) to know about is data collection or something called telemetry.

One of THE most important things (to M$) your 'updating' is M$'s telemetry on you.

With every new version of Windows, M$ embeds more data gathering programs into the operating system where they become harder to remove with each new version.

Irrespective of whether you're a corporation or a home user, the use of Windows 11 is not recommended for quite some time.

The time frame depends on when hacking and network security programmers have isolated all the telemetry actions within Windows 11 that can be counteracted or even extinguished, where a couple of years would easily not be out of the normal.

In the meantime products like WPD (Privacy dashboard for Windows), Dism++, O&OShtUp10, and a modified hosts file and firewall would be recommended to keep more of your private information from M$ servers, with regards to your non-Windows 11 PC.

Telegram is anything but secure; even Facebook is safer, says Signal founder

Telegram has earned a growing reputation for being the somewhat hippie, and as some may think, safer alternative of WhatsApp or Messenger—something on par with the Signal app, although perhaps better known. However, Telegram's reputation for offering any level of additional cybersecurity is overly exaggerated—a fact emphasized by Signal's own founder, Moxie Marlinspike, this week.

Marlinspike took to dishing out some heavy criticism on what is one of Signal's biggest competitors, by bashing the popular notion that Telegram offers anything in the way of end-to-end encryption. Messages sent through Telegram are stored on Telegram's servers in their original form, or plain text, without going any sort of encryption to protect private user data, shared Marlinspike.

He went on to say that in this regard, even Facebook's Messenger and WhatsApp offer greater privacy than Telegram. Both of these apps, run by the company now rebranded as Meta, offer at least end-to-end encryption for all text messages sent through their platforms. 

Telegram stores all the data ever sent through the app in its cloud, in a completely exposed format: texts, shared media, contacts, everything is essentially free game for anyone who cares to look.

This is a reality that's considered unacceptable even by Facebook's standards, which is known for its lack of care when it comes to personal privacy online. Even Messenger offers the minimum standard end-to-end encryption protocol for data stored on its servers. However, anyone with access to Telegram's serves has direct access to the entire database of users' unprotected data. 

As Winfuture (who first reported on this) words it, the Telegram app is essentially an open window into the servers storing all the history that ever was on the platform, rendering everything visible to the private user just as visible to the server operators on the other side, requiring zero extra effort for direct access.

The point being, if anyone such as a hacker, or even an authority that has you under suspicion, has any interest in spying on your personal messages in Telegram, they could easily do so. Moxie Marlinspike isn't the first to bring Telegram's false reputation and concerning methods of operation to light by any means, either. 

Thus, if there is any lingering trace of the stereotype of Telegram being any kind of "safe," it's best to dispel it once and for all; even Messenger will do you one better.

Source: phonearena.com

Gov. lies on who can access your 'tracing' & QR code details, exposed in secret court case

In the (penal) colony called Australia they govern in secret under a totalitarian manner with no transparency, yet they tell the plebs that they live in a democracy and “Nothing to hide, nothing to fear”, right?

The corrupt judiciary keeps court cases from you (the people), yet every single 'restricted' or sealed matter is in the interest of the public.

The scum in government lie to you, they lie to you every single day, just like the AFP (Australian Federal Police) have admitted that they do too.

See article:

https://corpau.blogspot.com/2015/05/sacked-afp-officer-we-lie-to-members-of.html

You are told that you 'must' conduct an action in commerce/business/trade by scanning in a QR code before you enter a premises, yet the ASD (Australian Signals Directorate) warns people not to scan QR codes.

See article:

https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/federal-government-agency-issues-warning-about-qr-codes/

Note: We do not recommend persons to scan QR codes, period.

A secret filing from within the Supreme Court of Victoria on the 22^nd of June 2021 was shown to the Herald Sun's subscribers but the readers were unable to download it.

Please find a downloadable copy here:

Another self serving politician 'acting' (they're ALL actors, aren't they?) premier Jacinta Allen defends the totalitarian government's actions.

They're lying to you that your details and those of others are safe and they're trying to cover up the fraud for the next five years.

For the past two years the Victorian people have been told by 'contact tracers' whoever they are that the data will only be used for 'health purposes', but again the people have been lied to.

Literally anyone with the cash or 'excuse' could obtain it.

Victoria Police have been abusing the database.

In this day and age, ANY new legislation is realistically to the detriment of the masses, where surveillance and limiting of movements is of utmost importance to the authorities.

'Andrews' new Bill only makes it easier for the average serf to become a criminal.

Another scumbag in office 'Covid commander' (whatever unlawfully enacted BS position that is), Jaroen Weimar launched legal action to keep the court case secret for the next 5 years.

Remembering: "Nothing to hide, nothing to fear".

Weimar even acknowledged that if the Department of Health was ordered to hand over people's PRIVATE information, then his team's assurances the would not share data "would not have been accurate"

Weimar is another person that should be removed from office!

Across this colony, we have courts dealing in secret MUCH to the detriment of the people.

On the topic of secrecy or rather transparency in another matter, a Victorian 'court of public record' was told the the sheriff's warrants do NOT exist, where then sheriff Brendan Facey was subpoenaed to show the warrants, but the lawyers for the Sheriff's Office Victoria stated that none existed.

This is the level of fraud and deception in Australia the people are under.

Another corrupt institution is the Department of Health.

They too want keep matters secret from you!

WorkSafe (VWA), demanded late last year that the Department of Health hand over the personal information of guests, staff and security guards at the Rydges Hotel Carlton and the Stamford Hotel Melbourne – the source of the called outbreaks that allegedly seeded Victoria’s second wave.

As the department pushed for the case to be suppressed, documents reveal that Marcus Hoyne, acting for VWA, ­argued the court should not ­assist the public being misled.

See paperwork in the Supreme Court of Victoria, Melbourne, Common Law Division, Judicial Review and appeals list:

Secretary to the Department of Health v Victorian WorkCover Authority and KELLY WILLIAMS:

He accused the department of seeking the suppression “to prevent the public from knowing the true story that information provided through contact tracing may have to be disclosed”.

People should not be misled into believing their information is confidential when it's not

Small Business Australia, whose members have been ­ordered to ensure patrons check in using the QR codes, said the revelation is “another example of why trust in the Victorian government is at an all-time low”.

“They say one thing, do another and then spend as much taxpayer money as they can in the courts in an effort to cover up their deceit,” executive ­director Bill Lang said.

“Victorians deserve a government that is truthful, does what it says it will do and operates with integrity, not a government that blatantly and actively deceives and then uses every mechanism at its disposal to hide the truth from the public.”

Victorian premier Daniel Michael Andrews is a serial liar, and as a result he must be removed from office.

Provisionally registered 'medicine' does not stop the spread!

EXPOSED! 

The mainstream media, governments and corporations lie to you about what's really going on.

The products being sold as the panacea have provisional registration being for Active immunisation to PREVENT the current disease which is the focus of the entire world.

The media and politicians keep issuing statements that it reduces spread, and mortality.

This is not what the provisional registration terms where for.

1.Failed to prevent infection.

The provisional registration was to provide evidence that it prevented disease!

source: supplied

The lies of 5G, what it really is - How your phone works - Tech Secrets

Corporations lie to you every day.

Let's modify the above statement so that there is some accountability where the inanimate monolith is taken out of the equation.

'Persons' (e.g the CEO, e.g. Mr. Tim Cook) within companies lie to you every day.

None is more true than when referring to technology that is sold to the average Joe.

The average Joe may not have the resources or technical ability to check if what Mr. Cook is stating is true.

With reference to mobile phone technology, '5G' is being thrown around as the newest and latest technology or rather set of higher (next level set of frequencies), but in reality the general population is being misled.

See video with a more detailed explanation on the generations frequencies of mobile phone communications:

Doctors in Australia corrupted by the medical board.

The medical profession in Australia has been compromised, with regards to the current so called global health situation.

It is not acting independently, but rather under dictation.

At law, acting under dictation is illegal in Australia.

Medical practitioners are told what to say, they are given a script (pardon the pun) on how to deal with different scenarios in order to entice their patient in order to become a customer (for life) of the pharmaceutical companies.

Adverse reactions, death statistics and all other data has been falsified by the authorities to give the general population false sense of security in relation to that particular medical procedure.

In reality this injection does not cure the disease, has unknown long tern and inter-generational effects, where it is pushed by governments and private corporations worldwide in one of the largest and quickest profit generating endeavours of our time.

We have cited a correspondence to a medical practitioner from the board that if that medical practitioner speaks negative (irrespective of any published side effects) of that particular 'medical procedure', that is in circulation in Australia at the moment, then that person will be brought forward before the board with a view to reprimand that person in order to cancel that person's practice.

Although in Australia this information is hard to come by with regards to the Average Joe, once this correspondence that we have cited will be 'released' to us we will publish this information in the not too distant future.

How many Australians have obtained their RT-PCR test, once they succumbed to that test?

It is inaccurate, not accredited nor certified, yet the authorities insist you being tested in that manner.

Why?

Because the result can be manipulated into whatever the desired result is a result of the cycle threshold.

The people responsible in the entire 'chain of events' regarding this are committing criminal negligence, where in the 'interest of the public' these matters must be brought before the courts and into public records.

World Economic Forum - Omicron less likely to hospitalize patients

Will Australian authorities ever acknowledge this and stop the fearmongering?

See source:

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/12/covid19-top-stories-coronavirus-pandemic-23-december/

Government to forcibly inject your child if you don't

According the the 'Queensland Government', child abuse is now legal.

With regards to today's (global) health situation, to say a particular medical procedure is voluntary is a lie.

MANY times the PM, Australia's CEO #ScottyFromMarketing Mr. Scott John Morrison stated that it's voluntary.

Apparently it's voluntary, yet corporations make it a mandate, where one cannot participate in society if one does not succumb to that particular medical procedure.

NOW, in Queensland we have a law put in place that states if you (the parent) do not subject your child to that particular 'medical procedure' then force will be used against you/your child.

Force will be used even given the fact that the government is fully aware that the fluid causes health problems, as documented by the Federal Department of Health within a 2 page document in the reference link below.

Force will be used, DESPITE the fact that long term and inter-generational effects are unknown.

See excerpt from the Child Protection Act 1999 - Sect 97

Carrying out medical examinations or treatment

97 Carrying out medical examinations or treatment

(1) This section applies if—

(a) an authorised officer or police officer—

(i) takes a child into the chief executive’s custody; and

(ii) seeks medical examination of, or treatment for, the child; or

Note—

Under section 18 (7) , an authorised officer or police officer may arrange for a child’s medical examination or treatment.

(b) a child is in the chief executive’s custody under this Act and the chief executive seeks medical examination of, or treatment for, the child; or

(c) an order for a child authorises the child’s medical examination or treatment.

Note—

Under section 28 (1) (b) a temporary assessment order may authorise the medical examination or treatment of the child. Also, under section 45 (1) (b) a court assessment order may authorise the medical examination or treatment of the child.

(2) A health practitioner may medically examine or treat the child.

(3) Subsection (2) applies even though the child’s parents have not consented to the examination or treatment.

(4) However, subsection (2) is subject to the rights the child has in relation to the examination or treatment.

(5) Also, the health practitioner may only carry out medical treatment that is reasonable in the circumstances.

(6) If this section applies because of subsection (1) (a) or (b) or because of an order mentioned in subsection (1) (c) that is an assessment order, the health practitioner must give the chief executive or police commissioner a report about the medical examination or treatment.

(7) For the purpose of deciding any liability in relation to the carrying out of the examination or treatment, the health practitioner is taken to have the consent of the child’s parents to the examination or treatment.

(8) In this section—

"treatment" includes vaccination.

Is this Act in circulation lawfully?

- Short answer, No.

Source: 

https://constitutionwatch.com.au/australian-government-makes-admission-covid-19-causes-myocarditis/

Legal remedies for all Australians (against a totalitarian state)

(18 Dec 2021, Flagstaff Gardens, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia)

What the government does not want you to know:

The Australian people are in the middle of a highly sophisticated psyop against them, under the banner of health.

During this time there has been much deceit, yet surprisingly an enormous amount of information has been disseminated via governments, and people via platforms like social media.

In the colony called Australia, people are accepting of medical apartheid, much like the people of Germany in the 1930's, all in the name of health.

There is no denying that:

- Australia's medical profession has been even more corrupted as a result of the happenings of the past couple of years,

- Australia's judiciary is a corrupt 'old school' boy's club,

yet there is still plenty of hope for the average serf.

There are plenty of remedies offered in good ol' fashioned law, where it's not taught to the new students that will eventually become lawyers, barristers or QC's.

So, what the people in government don't want you to know is something called 'human rights'.

They do not want you to know about this so much that they even 'advertise' this, as seen in the article from the 27^th of July 2020.

Now, on Saturday the 18^th of December 2021, at the Melbourne rally, a guest speaker provided some information to the audience which has been summarised, with references pointing to official government legislation.

See content within:

Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_dA8ruZjN2lFPRLW4yei62MSmIUMKGzz/view?usp=sharing

Note: For educational purposes, obtain legal consultation prior to taking any further action.

Victoria Police shooting people in the back

(Picture: source supplied)

Is this a picture the mainstream media will show you?

Or maybe it is with a lie about it being 'violent'?

Will the mainstream media mention to you that Victoria Police shoot people in the back?

A man has been shot 8 (yes eight) times in the back by the 'Public Response Team'.

We urge legal action to be taken against Victoria Police, just like it was in the matter of Corinna Horvath.

Remembering that your silence is acquiescence.

Welcome to a totalitarian state within the colony called Australia.