Long forgotten, misguided directions:
See document from the federal government:
Source:
See document from the state government of Victoria:
Source:
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 122 104 616)
Australia's Prime Minister (CEO) Tony Abbott : "Australia is Open for Business"
24 February 2022
Facebook wants your other login details
The internet is a corporate battle ground for your data.
'Retail' corporations or rather the corporations that the average person sees like Amazon, Apple, Meta (nee Facebook), Google, Microsoft are all using all sorts of tricks to get YOUR data.
Say you want to do some online shopping where you see a company's products.
Corporations entice/force you to 'login' for all sorts of reasons where the primary objective is not for your online safety, but rather for data collection purposes, that being your personal details, your identity.
The use of 2FA (two factor authentication) for your 'safety' is a farce, where that is another mechanism to obtain more data about your person, but that is another separate topic outside the scope of this post.
So you're about to log into this website none the wiser.
Did this company inform you that if you login your login details will be sent to Meta/Facebook?
Maybe you do not want Mark Zuckerberg to know where you're shopping.
Maybe you do not want him to know of your 'other' email address that you use only for online shopping.
Online privacy has still a long way to go, where the authorities are deliberately dragging their feet on this matter.
In Mozilla's Firefox product, you can add a program called an 'Extension' by the name of 'Facebook Container' which isolates your data from Facebook.
If a corporation is sending your data to Facebook, then the extension's icon is next to the field that sends data to Facebook.
Another way of keeping Meta/Facebook away from your data is to use the site on a personal computer (as opposed to a smartphone + app) , where another browser is used exclusively for the 'social media' site.
A good practice to isolate the data that is being captured by corporations is to have more than one internet browser installed on your personal computer.
23 February 2022
Consumer Warning: Imported labour, unskilled and dangerous
The authorities are not doing their due diligence in checking the credentials of people coming into Australia, in turn putting Australian lives in danger.
Just let 'em in so they can participate in the 'economy', because that's all that is important.
And at this point in time you can only participate in the economy, if you've succumbed to a specific medical service.
The buffoons in government believe that the (only?) answer to economic growth is to import people en masse into this colony.
Migrants are coming into Australia with the intention to commit criminal activity, where not only the Australian Government is taking no action, but keeping it quite too.
In their home country they are falsifying their job skill set and qualifications in order to obtain employment in their newly stated field in Australia.
How do you know your doctor, or 'sparky' is legitimate?
"Trust the government" some say.
Well how's that working for you during the current so called global health situation, given the fact that the government actions now are being exposed as not only unlawful but most importantly INEFFECTIVE.
Even the mainstream media are saying this, but alas this is a digression.
For many years, prior to 2020, approximately 2,500 migrants per week were shoved into Melbourne.
This brought on many problems including the overloading of infrastructure on the roads, public transport, utilities and an important industry that being housing,
As a result of the unnatural population growth, housing became a priority, and this so called priority now can be a danger to renters/homeowners.
In order for people to quickly participate in the economy, in this case in particular focus to the housing industry, a lot of checks and balances have been deliberately overlooked.
Dodgy building companies have been formed and as a result many domestic dwellings have been built under this foundation.
Just because we have 'Australian Standards', which are quite poor, does not mean they are adhered to.
MANY city councils have overlooked the quality of the buildings in order to give them a pass so that the 'developer' (read dodgy builder) can get to the next job quickly in turn earning more cash for the city council.
Some 'engineers' also take bribes to pass a dwelling.
While the building may be under the 7 year guarantee many dodgy builders do not wish to honour this, being also quite violent in resisting repair requests.
With the influx of unskilled workers claiming to be able to work in a field that they cannot, electrical work is of particular concern where if it's done incorrectly then the residents are at risk of losing their lives as a result of a fire.
This may even effect their ability to claim insurance compensation.
The dwellings to stay away from are the ones that are purposely built as 'investment properties' that being built to rent units, flats etc.
Why is the focus of the economists/financiers on imports?
Because as a result this creates a (temporary) boom, for the housing industry which works hand in hand with the banks and financial services institutions.
The banks create 'money out of thin air' where the focus is to create debt slaves out of society.
Australia is run by banking and financial services institutions, where those in government act as agents for them.
Victoria's courts are literally run by them as well, as they are stakeholders in a corporation called Court Services Victoria.
A strong immigration policy is to bring in humans under whatever banner, that are of low value (moral and financial) to the community at large, in order for those in power to control them and most importantly entrap them into being debt slaves in order to drive wages down in Australia, which is to the benefit of the local and multinational corporations.
Australians you're standing in it.
22 February 2022
EXPOSED: 'New Australians' conned by the AEC
Sometimes it's great being a newbie and other times it's not.
In some industries a new recruit or apprentice may have been given the harmless instructions to go to the local hardware store to purchase a long wait (or rather weight).
In the "good ol' days" some pranks have even ended up in harm or injury.
Keeping in mind that the government is not immune from conning the people too.
In fact the people in government con the masses every single day, but that's another topic altogether.
What the general population do not know is how migrants are greeted by those in government.
We obtained information with regards to a fresh, brand new off the boat (plane really) load of Aussies.
A totally different experience than from a couple of generations ago.
Today, when they get their welcome pack, they are 'told' that they cannot leave, or rather that they 'must' fill out an enrollment form, from the AEC (Australian Electoral Commission).
In Australia you have the right to vote, where many are misguided that it is compulsory to vote.
The fraudulent action by those in government is that the 'New Australians' where not told that they have a choice to vote and would they consent to participating in this action.
Quite simply put this is electoral fraud committed by the AEC.
As you know nothing really happens until it's taken to court.
So, the $64,000 question is:
Do you know any hot off the press 'New Australians' that are prepared to take the AEC to court?
Just a reminder that before 1973, when imported 'ethnics' became an Aussies they became:
"a subject of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second and a citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia..."
Does this still hold true today?
If not why?
21 February 2022
How to effectively make government listen to you
The people in government really do not care about you (the serf) or even their 'constituents'.
The only 'care factor' is that their positions in office are secure with a retirement lifestyle that even the working class cannot afford.
The people in government are are allegedly in the 'public service' i.e. to serve the public, and most importantly listen to their 'constituents', but they don't.
The people in government are there to be subservient to their brethren or the 'faceless men', to serve corporate interests, where the so called 'government' of today is a corporation aggregate.
They state that:
“laws are publicly made and the community is able to participate in the law-making process”
BUT, in reality how is that working for you?
Andrews' Draconian law still went through, did it not?
With regards to the recent gatherings/walks/marches/'protests' what was achieved?
What 'remedy' was enacted as a result?
None?
Was a law rolled back?
Were the nationwide oppressive 'rules' dropped?
They are literally laughing at you in their ivory castles, behind their unscalable fences.
So with regards to the global situation that developed over the past couple of years, many people may be of the erroneous belief that the primary objective was the general population's so called 'health'.
Among other priorities, a very real focus of those in control was/is something called the economy, the economy that they so rely upon which survives from the blood sweat and tears of the corporate slaves, that being the general population.
The only thing that they're worried about with regards to your health is how much it's taking out of their 'economy', how much down time it's costing them.
Billions of dollars have been raped from the public purse of so many countries in order to enrich the people in control of the masses.
So, how do people make the government listen to them?
Well we had a template made for us in Melbourne, Australia.
But it wasn't done by 'Australians'.
Sure they may be 'naturalised', made citizens or even maybe 'subjects of Her Majesty', but in reality they were people from India, you know the people who have first hand experience in oppression from the British empire.
They had enough guts to stand up and say enough is enough.
They stopped commerce.
And the people in government listened.
P.S. The Melbourne protesters in 2021 where so close as the government called in the terrorist police, where the legality of this action is very questionable.
So close they were, that's how desperate the government got.
19 February 2022
What the police did during the Melbourne Protests – Man In The Middle attack
We have obtained information from within, with regards to what Victoria Police did during the protests in Melbourne in 2021.
When people were gearing up against government restrictions, Victoria Police went down the path of racial profiling as to who the 'trouble makers' were.
Their initial 'intelligence' pointed them to Melbourne's north and western regions identifying a particular 'race' (a term erroneously used, but let's just run with it anyway) or people of a particular religious following.
When the people congregated into the city, Victoria Police deployed a 'stingray' type of surveillance device.
One of the ways to circumvent this device is to remove the SIM card and the phone's battery, but since most of today's smartphones cannot realistically have the battery removed, then removal of the SIM card together with a turned off phone is the next best alternative apart from leaving it a home or putting it in a Faraday cage en-route.
So all those who protested and had their mobile phones with them, the police 'pinged' the phones and obtained the details of the registered owners of those numbers.
NOW, the question is, did Victoria Police do this action lawfully?
Was there a (lawfully, different from 'legally' issued) warrant obtained for the purpose of blanket scanning?
Or are Victoria Police above the law, under the excuse of a 'terrorist' (perceived) threat?
When the police found out that there was no single 'demographic' or area from Melbourne that the people were coming from, in the words of the informant, “they shit themselves”.
This action was not just done once, it's done at ALL protests said the source, including in Canberra in February 2022.
So those of you that go to the protests, you're on government databases, not as constituents requiring action of the people that are supposed to serve you, but as 'trouble makers'/inciters/domestic terrorists(?)/Sovereign Citizens (lol, an oxymoron).
Note: Since the Melbourne protests, Victoria Police no longer 'advertise' (e.g. via FlightRadar, etc) their helicopters that are in the air, where also the navigation lights are turned off during certain flights, therefore endangering other aircraft.
TRY taking Victoria Police over this AND being able to win, dare ya!
Australia, the new age penal colony.
See also:
https://corpau.blogspot.com/2021/09/helicopters-no-longer-visible-in-police.html
18 February 2022
Government turns off mobile data, uses sonic weapon in Canberra
During the second week of February the population of Canberra rose by approximately 200,000-250,000 'mums and dads' travellers.
When there is a congregation or gathering of people, for example at a concert or sporting event the authorities deploy portable towers or 'cell on wheels' for mobile phone users.
No such luck for the new arrivals!
Instead they were greeted with an exclamation mark within the data strength signal icon on their smartphones.
Surely the mainstream media will report this occurrence as an overload of the mobile towers.
Keeping in mind that Canberra also has 5G towers:
It's not like Canberrans were blindsided or ambushed by an angry or violent mob declaring war on the authorities at Capitol hill.
It was a well coordinated event, known to Canberrans well in advance where constituents, mums and dads brought their children to a gathering to show unity in a peaceful and respectful manner regarding a political/legal topic.
During such gatherings there are of course people with ill intent and government plants or rather inciters, where some have been exposed during the gathering, but obviously live streaming it was not possible.
So that the constituents could not live stream the event to show that it is factually peaceful and truly a family atmosphere, the authorities have switched off data from the mobile phone towers, meaning people could still call each other, which they did.
The authorities even used hidden cameras in unsuspecting places, where in this instance some eagle eyed sleuths spotted the equipment and resulted to measures ensuring their privacy, as shown in photo below.
People have also spotted a LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) being used in Canberra during that weekend.
Many have reported feeling sick or disorientated, where even some say they felt a burning sensation.
Australian police have been using LRAD for at least 7 years.
Australia is not the only nation to have turned off data on its people.
In 2011, once the authorities learned that the students were organising an event, they simply 'flicked the switch' on the internet and turned it off.
There has been much deliberate misinformation by the mainstream media on this topic, as shown in screen captures of headlines of their articles:
The 'protest' was NOT about the vaccine but rather the unlawful mandates:
'Hundreds' did not drive, it was more in the magnitude of many thousands:
The more accurate estimate is in the couple of hundred thousand:
More lies propagated by Rupert Murdoch's 'news':
See also articles on LRAD:
Remember many years ago in the 'Commonwealth of Australia' the MPs would 'meet and greet' their constituents, talk to them, where now they hide from them behind unscalable fences, why?
16 February 2022
Andrews disregard for the law with total impunity!
Victorian premier Daniel Michael Andrews has just thrown the law under a bus.
In one foul action, he defecated on the law, the law making process, a part of the Victorian Parliament called the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee and the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission.
He did all this with no outcry or legal action from within the legal community.
A total disgrace!
What's worse is that he does not want you (the serf) to know about the law.
On the 27th of July 2020, The Canberra Times reported that Andrews stated:
"Seriously, one more comment about human rights ... it's about human life. Their views have no basis in science, fact or law."
So, according Andrews there is no basis for human rights to exist at law.
Therefore, those institutions are no longer valid or operational?
Maybe there's some magical law that has been enacted that tramples human rights?
No Andrews, it's ALL about human rights!
So it's been over one and a half years since his statement has been made public and has there been any court action?
Can anyone put in the comments a reference to a Supreme Court of Victoria case that a person or persons have came out victorious against Andrews or the government of Victoria with regards to the current situation?
Or has the legal profession denied persons justice?
Did you obtain advice from an [official] 'legal practitioner' where that person mentioned that ALL Victorian law must be in compliance with human rights as defined by the Parliament of Victoria by the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee?
Have Andrews' Bills been certified to comply with human rights?
Is your lawyer (or rather 'officer of the court') or even the court denying you natural justice?
Keeping in mind that there is no 'separation of powers' where the Anglo-masonic legal system is corrupt to its core, where it even harbours sex offenders that 'judge' (a person sitting in the High Court of Australia by the name of Dyson Heydon) you.
How do you know that the person judging your matter is not a sex offender or paedophile, yet to be caught?
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6851881/seriously-one-more-comment-about-human-rights/
https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/sarc/
15 February 2022
Scott Morrison (and state premiers) broke the law, so sue 'em!
The colony's Prime Minister, Scott Morrison broke the law, where he must be sued.
What happens when you (the serf) break the law?
If someone from the serf pool breaks the law and that action is made 'public' for example social media, or in the news, then the appropriate police force (federal/state) moves in to charge that person.
Well, the 'lovable' #ScottyFromMarketing broke the law and the police, the AFP (Australian Federal Police) in this case stood by idly.
It seems that they're enabling his criminal actions.
So what are they?
Civil conscription, AGAINST the Constitution, or more specifically Section 51 (xxxiiiA).
Note:
an injection or inoculation is a 'medical service',
civil conscription is telling the population what to do,
Doctor – patient relationship CANNOT be interfered with, period even by government,
IF consent is forced or withdrawn then it's assault (that being a criminal offence).
The general practitioner's case states that the government cannot provide ANY legal or practical compulsion (i.e. law (Act), directive, 'rule') for you to accept a medical procedure.
This means the Commonwealth CANNOT write any law to impose immunisation/vaccination upon the people of Australia.
What about the states?
Well, Western Australia states that it can do the opposite, i.e. make a law that states that people MUST succumb to a particular medical procedure.
According to the Constitution, Section 109 is in force.
Therefore ANY law that the state produces which is inconsistent with federal law is INVALID, and must be ignored.
Take note of Clause 5 of the Constitution:
Please note that the implementation of the Commonwealth tracing app and the various state named tracing apps, where a person is compelled to use them is an unlawful directive.
Breach of the Privacy Act, Section 94H, as well as other protections in Australia's consumer law come to mind.
Another part of Victorian law that must be adhered to is human rights, under the SARC (Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee), where all the checks and balances must take place.
"The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 provides that the Committee must consider any Bill introduced into Parliament and must report to the Parliament whether the Bill is incompatible with Human Rights."
See:
https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/sarc/
See video:
See:
Melbourne University Law Review (approximately 30 pages):
Mendelson, Danuta --- "Devaluation of a Constitutional Guarantee: The History of Section 51(xxiiiA) of the Commonwealth Constitution" [1999] MelbULawRw 14; (1999) 23(2) Melbourne University Law Review 308
http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbULawRw/1999/14.html
See also:
Medical law reporter:
Constitutional limits on Federal Legislation Practically Compelling Medical Employment:
Wong v Commonwealth; Selim v Professional Services Review Committee.
13 February 2022
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)