Samsung’s lies on battery capacity

Corporations, or rather people in multinational corporations lie to their ‘consumers’, public or general population every single day, and they’re allowed to get away with it.

From automotive manufacturers on fuel economy to smartphone manufacturers they put out ‘optimistic’ or rather ‘deliberately inaccurate figures in relation to the performance of their devices, and the regulatory ‘industry’ is silent on this, as it’s all about consumerism.

So in this example, Samsung’s new Galaxy S25 Edge has a battery rated capacity of 3,786mAh, which apparently ‘translates’ into a marketed value of 3,900mAh.

Why not a ‘marketed’ value of 3,800mAh?

Because 3,900 sounds closer to 4,000 than 3,800?

Many may say that it’s trivial, but that is not the point, as the ‘marketing’ is quite simply put false information, irrespective of the production percentage error from battery to battery.

VicPol ‘just doin’ my job’ – NO YOU’RE NOT, re: lawful summonses

MANY police will claim ignorance or “that’s what it says here” with regards to some paperwork they possess, or even show you a spreadsheet claiming it’s a warrant, as many have done so to their unsuspecting victims.

The Victoria Police Act of 2013, is a law regarding how officers must act.

There is no if/but/I didn’t know, excuse.

Part 4 of the above mentioned Act, pertains to Police duties, powers, entitlements, protection and liability

Paying attention to:

Section 56 Execution of process and warrants

(1) A police officer has a duty to execute—

        (b) all lawful summonses, warrants, orders and directions directed to him or         her by a court or tribunal.

The key word here is “lawful”.

From the 2020’s onwards the state’s police forces have been acting unlawfully, causing bodily harm, trespass to the person, unlawful incarceration, installing horrific violence on ‘persons’ with total impunity.

NO officer has been charged with a criminal offence or had to pay out of his/her own pocket from criminal actions, and there is no 'remedy' for the victims of violence by default, where persuing a remedy is a deliberately time and energy consuming process not to mention its cost.

Australia's legal system/business is deliberately stacked against the victims of government's criminal actions.

A judge from the County Court of Victoria ruled that Victoria Police have acted in an unlawful way, against the good people of Melbourne that have gathered in order to have their say about a particular health matter in play.

Victoria Police also acted under dictation and had zero regards to their ‘unlawful’ actions, further cementing the fact that Victorians live in police state.

Now here comes another aspect that many in government want to keep a secret, and perpetuate the legal lie that tribunals, like VCAT, have some sort of judical powers when issuing orders that require the actions of Victoria Police.

To make this very clear, when VCAT issues an order that requires the actions of Victoria Police, VCAT has no judicial power to do so, meaning the actions of Victoria Police on a person are then unlawful.

See post:

VCAT acts beyond its power – unenforceable judicial decisions!

VCAT acts beyond its power – unenforceable judicial decisions!

MANY Australian authorities act beyond the scope of what they are lawfully allowed.

What is worse is they also gaslight you during this process.

Recently, approximately one year ago, Queensland’s Supreme Court ruled that the so called COVID-19 vaccine mandate for frontline workers was unlawful.

See article:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-28/covid19-vaccine-frontline-worker-mandate-supreme-court-ruling/103517798

SO during this mandate, the authorities did not check whether they had the lawfully enacted instrument for the ‘mandate’ to occur, they just forced the trial drug on frontline workers because that's what they wanted to do.

If you did not comply, your employment would be terminated.

Therefore those that did not comply were unlawfully terminated, where the corrupt Anglo-Masonic legal business did not offer a remedy for the victims of government abuse.

VCAT (Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal) as its name suggests is a tribunal.

 VCAT is enacting one the largest legal cons on the unsuspecting Victorian public.

The current, as of 23 June 2023, president of VCAT judge Edward (Ted) Winslow Woodward, pictured left, together with every single member issuing orders are complicit in this fraud causing harm to many respondents.

Will this ever come out like in the above mentioned Supreme Court case from Queensland?

Well, it’s already out since 2018, and it’s a one up better as it’s from the High Court of Australia.

Will the media pick up on this? Did they inform the general population of this from 2018?

Let’s do a quick recap on the unlawful actions of VCAT with regards to MANY orders issued by them.

First and foremost:

• The High Court's decision Burns v Corbett significantly narrowed the jurisdiction of commissions and tribunals.

• The High Court held that the Australian Constitution precludes a State tribunal from exercising federal and state jurisdiction, as tribunals are not Courts and cannot exercise judicial powers and jurisdiction.

A tribunal or Commission not being a 'court of a State' cannot adjudicate disputes involving any of the matters set out in ss 75 and 76 of the Australian Constitution, (see the sections below) even when the dispute involves the application of State legislation. The decision affects all areas of law including:

- anti-discrimination disputes,

- residential tenancy disputes,

- building and construction disputes.

A State law cannot impair or detract from the operation of a Commonwealth law by impairing the Commonwealth law’s ‘conditional and universal’ application, except to the extent that it has a ‘legal operation or practical effect within the universe of the conditional legal operation of the Commonwealth law’. Impairing or detracting from s 39(2) of the Judiciary Act is to say that the Parliament has made a complete, exhaustive and exclusive statement on federal jurisdiction: ‘It is necessarily to say that the Commonwealth Parliament has not only provided positively for the conditional investiture of federal jurisdiction in State courts but has also stipulated negatively for the non-investiture of any jurisdiction with respect to any of those matters other than in State courts.’ Gageler J noted the difficulty of finding any such ‘negative penumbra’ in the text of s 39(2), and stated that the more fundamental problem lies in finding a source of Commonwealth legislative power: namely that s 77(iii) does not allow Parliament to confer judicial power on a tribunal that is not a State court.

The Industrial Relations Tribunals and tribunals of the State such as VCAT and the Fair Work Commission all fall into the same category, 

- they fail to be courts and cannot provide you with an enforceable judicial decision.

Let's see the case file:

THEREFORE, ANY Order that is enforced by law enforcement, e.g. Victoria Police is done so unlawfully.

Tortfeasor is a term worth exploring.

Have you been harmed by VCAT?

 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 75

Original jurisdiction of High Court.

    In all matters--

  (i.)   Arising under any treaty:

  (ii.)   Affecting consuls or other representatives of other countries:

  (iii.)   In which the Commonwealth, or a person suing or being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth, is a party:

  (iv.)   Between States, or between residents of different States, or between a State and a resident of another State:

  (v.)   In which a writ of Mandamus or prohibition or an injunction is sought against an officer of the Commonwealth:

the High Court shall have original jurisdiction. 

 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 76

Additional original jurisdiction.

    The Parliament may make laws conferring original jurisdiction on the High court in any matter--

  (i.)   Arising under this Constitution, or involving its interpretation:

  (ii.)   Arising under any laws made by the Parliament:

  (iii.)   Of Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction:

  (iv.)   Relating to the same subject-matter claimed under the laws of different States. 

Merri-bek corrupt city council governed by looney left. Discounts for First Nations: Wokest Oz Council.

Australians are deliberately over-administered by so called ‘authorities’ where in many instances these authorities act beyond their limited powers.

Today’s city councils are not the lawfully enacted departments of the state as ‘municipal offices’ of the past, as required the Commonwealth Constitution.

In Victoria city councils will tell you that they have their ‘authority’ from the Local Government Act 1979.

But is this so called authority lawfully enacted?

The short answer is no.

City Councils in general are a cesspit of ‘money for mates’ jobs where many unqualified persons are in place, rorting the rate payers.

Is there a so called ‘Royal Commission’ into this?

Of course not, as this should also expose the illegitimacy of those in office in the councils, which would then be detrimental to the Victorian government as this would expose the monumental fraud perpetuated by the government on the good people of Victoria.

Corruption in City Councils is rife, where in one instance only, the whole ‘City Council’ of Brimbank was sacked.

The same action should also occur at the City Council of ‘Merri-bek’ formerly known as the City of Moreland, whose name change was not necessary not warranted, but rather imposed on the people, to keep the positions of those in office justified, as if they care about the Indigenous people.

See the pathetic lunacy by those within Merri-Bek in this short 7 minute video:

Mozilla has a "license" to all of your data from Firefox now.

This is big news in the 'browser' world.

As a result of the above notice by Mozilla, there was a bit of backlash, 

so then there was an update notice:

Mozilla then went on to explain in their notice:

Did Mozilla disclose to you that they own an advertising company called Anonym, no?

To make matters worse if someone stated that Mozilla was apolitical, they'd be lying.

See:

source: https://schedule.mozillafestival.org/session/TKUXAQ-1

Do you STILL want you use Firefox?

Apple no longer secure in the UK, Australia next?

The ‘motherland’ has ordered corporations like Apple to put backdoors into its encryption service, to obviously catch all the terrorists and also criminals on Epstein’s list, right?

Don't be silly of course not! It's to surveil the crap out of the serfs/plebs/commoners.

NOTHING to do with the global elite criminals, they stay untouched.

According to Apple, rather complying with this order and compromising it’s ADP (Advanced Data Protection), it states that it will removed it altogether.

BUT there this one fundamental problem.

Corporations and governments lie, or rather people in governments and corpoations lie to the people their 'consumers' every single day where NDAs (Non Disclosure Agreements) rule between the corporations and governments, which technically are a corporations aggregate.

Another problem is that Apple’s operating system and programs (or apps) and are closed source, therefore no one can factually check if there isn’t or wasn’t a backdoor in the operating system, or the likes of SS7 Protocol.

If you truly value your privacy and security, then Apple products are not recommended to be used, where open source programs and operating systems on personal computers and smartphones are a batter alternative.

In any event it's all about the global nanny state agenda and an attack on people's so called right to 'free speech', together with the surveillance of the masses in order to monitor then modify their behaviour.

As we all should know, Australia is part of the FiveEyes ‘Anglosphere’ global surveillance network.

Whatever the ‘bosses’ say, the subservient follows, is how it goes here in this colony.

Who are these bosses?

The likes of, but not limited to; the UN, WEF, WHO, IMF, BlackRock, Vanguard and many other 'faceless men' that the serfs are not allowed to know about.

Australians live under a police state, a regime where ‘free speech’ now lives in a museum, as of the passing of a new law in both houses.

Kim Jong-Un, we're knocking on your door, no thanks to people's silence equalling acquiescence.

How banks have deliberately compromised your account security

In certain circles, banks and financial services institutions are regarded as the world’s largest criminal organisations.

After all, they not only obtain money printed out of thin air, but also transfer this to tangible assets, where if you (the serf) were to do the same you’d be charged for fraud.

The above is what fiat currency is a described by the Australian Oxford Dictionary in 2010.

One of the worst parts about financial fraud is that governemnts worldwide 'support' this action.

In Australia, there was this farcical action called the Royal Commission into Misconduct in Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry in 2017-2019, where not one of the over 10,000 applicants received a remedy.

That is how corrupt and supportive the 'brotherhood' in the Australian government is of the criminal actions of the 'banksters'. 

The push for governments and corporations to leave behind the paper world, including physical cash, is for the cheaper administration of the plebs/serfs/commoners/corporate (nee cannon) fodder, where data aggregation is the ultimate goal.

People are sold a deliberate lie for going cashless.

Using ‘plastic’ or cards, is marketed as being secure and easier and quicker to use than cash, i.e. more convenient for the shopper/consumer.

In an earlier iteration of the card, a swipe was the method at the terminal where a magnetic strip was read by the terminal.

Sure there were problems with this as we all should comprehend that technology is not infalable.

As technology progressed, the next phase using an RFID was marketed as more secure and even quicker method as it was a 'tap and go' action, where the ‘more secure’ is a deliberate lie.

ANY so called Information Technology security expert should know that RFID is easily hackable, where those institutions that have implemented this and put it out into the consumer world would have known about this.

Sure more tech savvy people will say that this threat can be mitigated by purchasing a 'RFID wallet', but that is not the point as by default the card is less secure, when given to the customer in its original format.

See article from 2015:

RFID Credit Cards: What you don’t know WILL hurt you!

A card skimmer may not be that easy to spot at an ATM.

So why did they compromise your security?

For the sake of convenience, so that it would be even easier than before for you to go cashless.

Soon there may be no cash, no cards just access to numbers in a so called 'account' via, the next most 'secure' thing that being biometrics.

All part of the Order of the New World.

You'll own nothing and be happy (if you're brainwashed), thanks Klaus!

P.S. on the topic of 'consumers', the (Victorian) government considers 'native' Australians that are recipients of the government's health care businesses as 'consumers' as seen in the following screencapture:

The peaceful settling of Australia - Licence To Shoot Aboriginals

No Treaty right?

No 'honourable' conduct right?

What do you expect from UK pillagers and pirates?

This is what the imperial government and the Crown supported.

Let's not forget 40 years of Martial Law once they occupied this land.

A fruitful morning would be having tea and scones after a morning's culling of Aboriginals, seeing who would bring back the most skulls.

The actions of an honourable Crown Inc, and imperial government, surely not?

"Splendid show chaps".

Victoria Police leaked email from Wayne Cheesman as Patton resigns

Victoria Police are part of the judicial arm of the corrupt Anglo-Masnonic setup governent that realistically acts against the 'best interests' of the general population.

This was most evident from 2020 onwards, where the corrupt Andrews government was allowed to install Martial Law like scenario on the good people of Victoria.

Add to this Victoria Police acted under dictation (from Andrews) which is illegal and no mainstream media outlet is talking about this.

Victoria Police Commissioner Shane Patton, oversaw his 'troops on the ground' assault peaceful protesters.

Patton oversaw his troops arrest the vulnerable as they were easy targets.

Pregnant women and little old ladies were easy pickings for the coward troops.

What about a 1 on 1 with MMA fighter Nick Patterson?

Cowards don't do that, they go at least 5 on one WITH weapons!

It seems that a Victorian judge had to act in the 'correct' manner publicly slamming Victoria Police for unlawful violence.

One of  the worst parts about all this is that Patton 'decided' to leave and wasn't removed as falesly stated by the Herald Sun in today's printed article:

Patton should have been removed immediately, but that's not how the colonialists work.

Where the first job of a government is to look after the safety its people, as stated by then Speaker of the House, Bronwyn Bishop in an ABC episode of Q&A on the Magna Carta aired in 2015.

What a clown show! 

See the two page leaked email:

Source:supplied

Corrupt Victoria Police and government cover up atrocities

VICTORIA - human rights abusers.

The corporation aggregate known as the ‘State Government of Victoria’ together with Victoria Police should be in the courts and brought to the attention of the international courts for human rights abuse, just like in the case of Corinna Horvath, but this time there should be a class action lawsuit.

It is very doubtful that a class action within the colony’s corrupt legal system would actually result in a remedy, as history will attest to this.

The Victorian Government and its police force has acted in the style of 1930’s Germany, where even the police have the same colours now, as the ‘guard’ of the day did back then.

Abuser's mentality: - fear police.

The colony's police forces have the abuser's mentality that you the plebs/serfs etc should fear police as New South Wales police commisisoner Mick Fuller stated

Fuller should have been picked up on this and removed from office, but as we know that did not happen as the sociopathis in control support this kind of behaviour from their publicly sponsored 'private militia'.

Victoria Police a 1930s Germany style of action against the general population where their belief is that people should fear the police and beaten into subservience, where this attitude is reflected in actions by police from 2020 onwards.

Black the 'in' colour for 1930's Germany and now Victoria Police, coincidence?

Police Commissioner Shane Patton should have been removed from office, as theis wsa a breach of public trust, and not allowed to decide to leave his role.

So what do the 'brethen' in the corrupt government do?

They put all these people, e.g. Dan Andrews et al, in other cushy jobs.

This is how parthetic the leaders of the Victorian Govenrment are, protectionism at its finest.

The general population is now aware that Victoria police has criminals committing paeophilia, family violence and rape, where the ‘survey’ pool is very narrow and limited to a very short time span.

IF the real figures were to be revealed, then Victoria Police should not be in charge of ‘public safety’ as they are factually a danger to the community.

That is just one of the problems the police face, where the other one is of human rights abuse from 2020 onwards, not only in Victoria but throughout the other states and territories of this colony.

The State Government of Victoria and Victoria Police, ‘Human Rights’ abusers.

With the ‘blessing’ of the Police Commissioner Shane Patton, police thugs were told to arrest the vulnerable, like pregnant mothers, the elderly, meaning that these thugs acted under dictation, an action that is illegal.

Pregnan Ballarat woman Zoe Buhler unlawfully arrested 1930s Germany style. 

They committed “illegal violence” against the general population.

They also committed unlawful arrests.

WHERE can a remedy be found?

In 1996 Corinna Horvath's 'privacy' was breached by an unlawful raid, unlawfully arrested and violently beaten by Victoria Police, where no real remedy was offered to her by the corrupt Anglo-Masonic justice business, where after all it's 'just' business.

As a result of no remedy domestically, she then had to go to the United Nations Human Rights Commission, under the case file Horvath v Australia (HRC, 2014).

THEREFORE from 2014, Victoria Police are aware that they MUST follow human rights law, where if not a remedy can be found there.

For those who have been subjected to an injection against their will or without 'free consent', where "if you do not take this, you will lose your job" the following applies:

Under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

PART III

Article 7

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.

The document below is in response to the unlawul action of government and police from 2020 onwards during the so called 'unprecedented' global health crisis, but may be used on other circumstances such as:

Under Section 75 of The Constitution, “In all matters: (i) arising under any treaty”.

If the state is not co-operating in abusing your rights under the treaty's protections take your matter to

the High Court of Australia, with the view to a Human Rights Commission inquiry.

See document 'Legal Remedies for all Australians':

In any event, that's life in a (penal) colony!