Application for - Request of Information, by police

If you are in a situation where you would want to communicate with Australia's police force, you can get the police 'person' to fill out the following form.

This is valid in ALL states and territories of Australia, as the police are now corporate entities in their respective states and territories of Australia.

This can be a 'commercial in confidence' transaction if you so desire it to be.

The form can be downloaded from the following link:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2OWVVd2tQZFZJU0U

Dob in a drug dealer but not a corrupt cop

So apparently the herd population is told that the 'law' applies to everyone.

In reality the situation is quite the stark contrast.

The application of law in a penal colony, like Australia, is quite different than from most other 'free' countries or even republics.

As people should be aware the police is part of Australia's 'executive', i.e. working for the government, which today in reality is a corporation conglomerate.

So the 'authorities' encourage the inhabitants of a penal colony to 'dob' in a drug dealer, i.e. inform the authorities / police that someone is committing 'criminal' offences.

So what happens when the 'authorities' are committing criminal offences and they are 'dobbed' in?

Well just Queensland's Sergeant Rick Flori.

Rothschild's 25 point plan to gain and control global wealth

 

 See how many points your 'government' has enacted.

 

 

1. Use violence and terrorism rather than academic discussions.

2. Preach “Liberalism” to usurp political power.

3. Initiate class warfare.

4. Politicians must be cunning and deceptive – any moral code leaves a politician vulnerable.

5. Dismantle “existing forces of order and regulation.” Reconstruct all existing institutions.”

6. Remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it.

7. Use Mob Psychology to control the masses. “Without absolute despotism one cannot rule efficiently.”

8. Advocate the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption and all forms of vice, used systematically by “agenteurs” to corrupt the youth.

9. Seize properties by any means to secure submission and sovereignty.

10. Foment wars and control the peace conferences so that neither of the combatants gains territory placing them further in debt and therefore into our power.

11. Choose candidates for public office who will be “servile and obedient to our commands, so they may be readily used as pawns in our game.”

12. Use the Press for propaganda to control all outlets of public information, while remaining in the shadows, clear of blame.

13. Make the masses believe they had been the prey of criminals. Then restore order to appear as the saviors.

14. Create financial panics. Use hunger to control to subjugate the masses.

15. Infiltrate Freemasonry to take advantage of the Grand Orient Lodges to cloak the true nature of their work in philanthropy. Spread their atheistic-materialistic ideology amongst the "Goyim" (gentiles).

16. When the hour strikes for our sovereign lord of the entire World to be crowned, their influence will banish everything that might stand in his way.

17. Use systematic deception, high-sounding phrases and popular slogans. “The opposite of what has been promised can always be done afterwards... That is of no consequence.”

18. A Reign of Terror is the most economical way to bring about speedy subjection.

19. Masquerade as political, financial and economic advisers to carry out our mandates with Diplomacy and without fear of exposing “the secret power behind national and international affairs.”

20. Ultimate world government is the goal. It will be necessary to establish huge monopolies, so even the largest fortunes of the Goyim will depend on us to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments on the day after the great political smash.”

21. Use economic warfare. Rob the "Goyim" of their landed properties and industries with a combination of high taxes and unfair competition.

22. “Make the 'Goyim' destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest.”

23. Call it The New Order. Appoint a Dictator.

24. Fool, bemuse and corrupt the younger members of society by teaching them theories and principles we know to be false.

25 Twist national and international laws into a contradiction which first masks the law and afterwards hides it altogether. Substitute arbitration for law

 

 Source: http://www.spingola.com/before_rockefeller.htm

Hydro Tasmania asked to explain cloud seeding in catchment day before flooding

Tasmania's government-owned energy company has been asked to explain why it conducted cloud seeding over the Derwent Valley the day before flooding began this week.

Key points:

• Hydro Tasmania authorised cloud seeding, which increases rain, in a catchment hit hard by floods
• Premier seeks explanation from Hydro
• Hydro says inappropriate to comment, pending inquiries
• Search continues for Ouse farmer

The catchment flooded on Monday near Ouse in southern Tasmania, where the search continues for a missing farmer.

In the state's north, one person was killed and another remains missing.

Cloud seeding is a technique used to increase rain to bolster dams and involves the addition of a substance to suitable clouds to encourage the growth of ice crystals or raindrops.

Premier Will Hodgman said he was told Hydro Tasmania authorised cloud seeding on Sunday morning in the Upper Derwent catchment, even though heavy falls were forecast.

Mr Hodgman told 936 ABC Hobart Hydro's decision was difficult to fathom at face value but Energy Minister Matthew Groom was seeking answers.

"That's why we've sought the explanation from Hydro Tasmania as to those matters, the Minister has sought that," he said.

"It's certainly my expectation that will be provided at the earliest opportunity to respond to those matters."

Hydro Tasmania has confirmed it flew a cloud seeding flight the day huge storms approached the country's east coast.

Documents show the flight took place on Sunday morning while there were flood warnings in place in the north.

The flight seeded clouds for more than an hour and a half just north of Great Lake, one of the largest water storage dams in the state.

The flight was targeting the Upper Derwent catchment, which mainly feeds water to several hydro electric dams which lie downstream.

Farmers demand answers

Farmers in the Ouse area, like Scott Ashton-Jones, want to know why the cloud seeding went ahead while flood warnings were in place for the northern half of Tasmania.

Photo: Ouse in the Derwent River catchment was one of the hardest hit areas in this week's floods. (Audience submitted: David Bradley)

"The extent to which cloud seeding has exaggerated the flood is still to be determined of course, but the evidence from previous cloud seeding operations is that it works and therefore it will have exaggerated the flood to some extent," he said.

"The Hydro has always claimed positive results from cloud seeding."

George Mills said he could hear the flight on Sunday morning, and wondered what was going on.
"We want to understand whether the cloud seeding has helped to create this massive flood from the local rivers which we've never ever seen," he said.

"If the Hydro have had something to do with that with their cloud seeding, well we want to understand that because in the future we need to have closer information."

Hydro 'not in position' to comment

Hydro Tasmania will not answer questions about both Sunday's cloud seeding flight and its policies on using the technique when there are current flood warnings.

What is cloud seeding?

• Hydro Tasmania describes cloud seeding as a technique for increasing precipitation (eg. rain or snow) using naturally occurring clouds
• "It involves the introduction of additional particles into suitable clouds to encourage the formation and growth of ice crystals or raindrops and thus increase the amount of precipitation that will fall from the cloud"

A spokeswoman said it would be inappropriate to comment.

"At this point Hydro Tasmania is not in a position to provide more information," she said.

"Experience suggests that in the aftermath of a severe natural disaster such as this some form of government inquiry follows.

"In light of the unfortunate death of one person, and with grave fears for two people still missing, there is likely to be at least a coronial inquest."

The community of Ouse has been left devastated by the floods, which arrived with little warning in the early hours of Monday morning.

Farmers in the district have reported the loss of hundreds of sheep and cattle, and significant infrastructure losses.

Bureau had flood warnings in place

The Bureau of Meteorology has confirmed flood warnings were in place for regions of Tasmania when the flight took place.

"The first media release alerting the Tasmanian community to likely impacts of the event was issued on Friday 3 June," a weather bureau spokesperson said.

Photo: Dozens of sheep and cattle have been washed away throughout the state. (ABC News: Edith Bevin)

 

"Detailed updates have been provided directly to the local media throughout the event."

The spokesperson said the first flood watch for Tasmania was issued at midday on Friday, with warnings following on Saturday.

"The first flood warnings were issued on Saturday afternoon: six to 12 hours before significant rain began to fall across northern Tasmania," they said.

The first minor flood warning for the Ouse and Derwent rivers was issued at 10:36pm on Sunday, after the cloud seeding flight took place.

The next day, unprecedented rainfall resulted in major flood warnings for seven Tasmanian rivers, including the Derwent and Ouse.

abc.net.au 10 Jun 2016

Before you donate to the Salvation Army

Currently on Australian television there is a lot of advertising time devoted to the Salvation Army's Red Shield appeal.

When one is involved in the finance industry one would also be aware of the name Rothschild, which (apparently) originated from a Jewish family living in Germany in the 16th Century that changed it's name to Rothschild (from the German translation Rot - Red, schild - Shield) after the coat of arms emblem that appeared over their house.

The Rothschild name rose to fame from Mayer Amschel who started the namesake banking dynasty.

There are a fair few dodgy deals done to secure the wealth of the Rotschilds, according to pop culture / historians.

One other aspect of charities (that the masses may not be aware of), in Australia is that they are a tax haven, with (deliberately?) less than accurate book keeping, where the Australian government has taken zero action against these companies.

Charities can easily spend 85% of taxpayers monies on 'administration' before even 'one red cent' makes to the actual recipients.

High CEO wages, company cars, 'money for mates' dodgy deals are all part of a normal business day without any government intervention whatsoever.

Why would a honest [people in] government take no action, unless maybe it (they) was also involved in this 'scam'.

What makes matter worse is that the Salvation Army was (and still is?) involved in sexual abuse against children.

Would you really want to give your hard earned cash to a company involved in child sexual abuse, that survives very well from government funds, where only the 'beneficiaries' receive a small portion ?

Can you change the corporate media's glorifying of ex-PM's?

When it comes to accidentally misleading or deliberately false reporting of information the corporate media could be king?

Forget the 'conspiracy theorists' or others with 'tin foil hats', who may have obtained information  that is contrary to 'mainstream' politics, they're just rubbished or their character is assassinated by the government sponsored lap dogs.

One may even read a small and insignificant line 'the conspiracy theorists were right and we were wrong' somewhere?

Let's put this in perspective to the (treasonous) heads of Australian politics.

Recently (21 October 2014) the corporate media glorified how Gough Whitlam was such a great person.

ANY senior law researcher or (truthful) constitutional lawyer should be able to tell you that anyone holding office in parliament should be charge for treason.

ONE of the most unlawful acts carried out by Whitlam was the introduction of a fictitious entity called the 'Queen of Australia'.

Don't take 'our' word for it, just ask the corporate media, their research is impeccable!  

Bet you the corporate media will not tell you that (scum bag) Rob Hulls unlawfully removed grand jury from our courts.

So before the old hawke (see illustration below) becomes prey to the grim reaper, any person from the masses care to share the treasonous actions of the (womaniser/cheater/drunk/all round 'mug') ex-PM (Robert 'Bob' Hawke)?

You can put your information in the comments section.

As usual, only spam is moderated.

How the police support criminals

The actions of police may seem to baffle the herd populace's most brilliant minds.

 One example of this is when a member of the herd traveled in their automobile at a velocity of  5km/h greater than advertised, got caught, by Victoria Police, their matter was listed as a 'criminal' matter in court and did not get away with it. Conversely,  another person who travelled on that same stretch of road at 100km/h over, got caught, and got away with it.

To anyone involved in the legal business, including police cadets,  one of the basic principles learnt  is that in order to obtain a successful conviction all the evidence presented must be obtained within the specifications of the current laws (read Acts).

Please note that the police apparently act in "the interest of public safety"  meaning carry out actions that keep the public safe.

To the uninitiated Victoria Police has very strong ties to the brotherhood.

As members of the brotherhood will know their members have various levels of knowledge and skills that are reflected in the role and ultimately the club they belong to.

The bottom feeders/foot soldiers may only be involved in a task that the club is tasked to do, completely unaware of the activities and contents of policies their higher up brethren carry out.

Do  dodgy organisations need to advertise that they help special people in order to cover up some other activities that are 'morally' / legally wrong?

A person who has stated that they wish to remain anonymous, for fear of reprisals, was at a brotherhood meeting, where various heads of state were present, including Victoria Police.

During this meeting various topics were covered including crime.

It was stated that the crime level needs to be at a particular rate in order to keep the masses fearful and under control.

As the general populous should know, the 'crime rate' is administered by a branch of the executive called the police, who the government (today, a corporation conglomerate) administers.

There are certain crimes that the police will not follow up and there are certain people that the police are not allowed to investigate, despite the high criminal activities of those people/organisations.

The police also work alongside with criminals like in the very public matter of notorious drug king pin Carl Williams.

What many people may not be aware of that the police also support certain criminals, and allow them to continue to commit criminal activities.

This (supportive) action may occur on various fronts, where police are given the order from the brotherhood, not to pursue criminal charges, or where police officers themselves directly associate with the criminals for personal gains.

In the latter example if the details were made public, the police would be supported by the brotherhood and exonerated from any wrongdoing.

On example of letting the criminal go, for whatever reason, is to 'botch' an investigation where the evidence collected, and the matter brought before the court is not according to the law, which means all charges are dropped against that person in relation to their criminal activity.

What a logical reaction would be is that the police officers involved should be ejected from the police force, as they are incompetent, putting the general populous at risk, but instead they are kept in the 'force' to allow other criminals to roam free as directed by their superiors.

Also note that Australian police 'force' started off literally as a criminal organisation, i.e. an organisation made up of criminals or rather convicts, just really really good behaved ones.

It may seem that it is not the criminals that are the real danger to society but rather the people who administer them.

The illustration below of the headline Mitchel beats rap (HeraldSun Sat, 28 May 2016) is just one example of how police let (supported) criminals get away with it.

 or you can read the article from the same publication of the headline:

Toby Mitchell’s bid for early freedom in drug possession case

May 27, 2016 1:30pm

Wayne Flower Herald Sun

Toby Mitchell outside court during a previous hearing. Picture: Hamish Blair

DRUG trafficking charges against underworld figure Toby Mitchell have been dropped following a bungled Federal Police investigation. 

Agents swooped on Mitchell’s Docklands apartment on September 25 last year, confiscating almost 500 grams of methamphetamine and cocaine from his hire car.

Tests later found the purity of the drug ice to be 259 grams and the cocaine 127 grams.

Police had believed Mitchell was part of a wider criminal operation that allegedly imported four airmail packages from the Netherlands containing 32 kilograms of MDMA worth about $8 million.

MORE: MITCHELL ADMITS POSSESSING DRUGS BEFORE COURT HEARING

Mitchell, 41, today pleaded guilty in the County Court to two charges of possessing a drug of dependence, possessing an illegal baton and possessing the drugs while on bail.

Mitchell has been in jail since his arrest, spending most of his time in isolation.

But the once feared bikie strongman could be released early after being granted permission to be assessed for a community correction order.

Mitchell had been free from jail a little over two months and was on bail after bashing a cyclist when police came knocking.

Toby Mitchell with his lawyer outside court in September. Picture: Jay Town

His barrister, Peter Morrissey SC, argued it was in the community’s best interest to release Mitchell on a CCO to help with his rehabilitation.  

(Absolute garbage statement! It's in the community's  interests that this drug trafficker stays behind bars as there is no chance of rehabilitation)

He told the court Mitchell had endured a “significantly harsh regime” inside jail and had previously endured seven months of “dead time” in prison following a false allegation of extortion.

Mr Morrissey’s description of Mitchell as a “charismatic and well-liked person” raised the eyebrows of Judge Graeme Hicks.

“While you say he’s very popular, obviously he’s been shot twice,” he said. “There could be alternative views.”

Mitchell, an ex-Bandidos bikie, was gunned down outside a Brunswick gym in 2011 and again in 2013 at the clubhouse of another outlaw gang in Melton.

Prosecutor Daryl Brown argued Mitchell should be locked up for no less than two years, which would not allow the judge to free him early in a CCO.

“Two years are within range,” he said.

Mitchell will learn his fate next Friday. 3rd of June 2016

End of the line for $75 on-the-spot myki penalty fares

On-the-spot penalty fares for public transport users caught without a valid myki are to be abolished, in an overhaul of Victoria's fare enforcement regime.

Following a review of the system, the Andrews government will give ticket inspectors the power to issue warnings instead of automatically handing out fines.

A review found the state's transport fare enforcement regime is unfair, confusing and ineffective, Photo: Rebecca Hallas.
 

In an effort to better target repeat fare evaders, and to exercise some leniency towards people who make an honest mistake or get caught out by a system glitch, the new public transport fare enforcement system will begin next year.

It will give authorised officers the discretion to issue official warning letters to commuters before handing out a full, $223 infringement notice.

The system of on-the-spot penalties, which gives passengers the choice of paying $75 and walking away without any record of the incident, will be cancelled.

A systematic fare evader could currently pay 20 on-the-spot penalty fares in a year and still pay less than a traveller with a full-fare, yearly zone one-and-two pass. Photo: Steve Lightfoot 
 

A number of improvements to myki that make it more convenient and less confusing are also planned.

These include processing online top-ups within 90 minutes, instead of 24 hours, louder beeps and anti-glare screens on myki machines, and new, faster myki readers on trams and buses.

Jacinta Allan, the Minister for Public Transport, said very few public transport users deliberately avoided paying a fare and the overhaul sought to make it easier to do this.

A new public transport fare enforcement system will begin next year.

"The system we inherited from the former Liberal government is confusing, unfair and inequitable," Ms Allan said.

"It penalises and intimidates the most vulnerable while providing an incentive to travel without a ticket."

A review found the state's transport fare enforcement regime is unfair, confusing and ineffective, in that it perversely punishes honest commuters while rewarding deliberate fare evaders.

A systematic fare evader could pay 20 on-the-spot penalty fares in a year and still cough up less than a traveller with a full-fare, yearly zone one-and-two pass.

They would also have no record kept of their serial fare dodging.

The government's review found that "the enforcement regime is not currently targeted towards high-risk fare evaders - ie those who deliberately and repeatedly cheat the system".

"Indeed, the anonymous nature of the penalty scheme prevents identification of recidivist offenders and the availability of the $75 penalty fare makes evasion more attractive to this group."

The review found commuters often feel pressured into paying on the spot, and are falsely told they have no right to complain once they have taken that option.

The system also penalises poor people who cannot afford to pay $75 on the spot, so are hit with a $223 fine and often forced to take the matter to court.

In one case noted in the report, Stephanie, a homeless woman who lived on a Newstart allowance, was fined five times in a year, including while travelling to a soup van for a meal, and ultimately dragged through a 34-month court process.

On-the-spot penalty fares were first trialled by the former Napthine government as a way to streamline enforcement and sidestep the growing number of court challenges by people who contested their fines.

Opposition public transport spokesman David Hodgett​ slammed the 90-minute processing time for topping up myki cards.

He said the system should allow for tapping on and off with mobile phones, tablets and watches.
Mr Hodgett said the government's announcement was a fine hike.

"We wouldn't be talking about this problem if people had greater flexibility in being able to pay their fares or top up their myki card," he said.

The Magistrates Court was straining under the weight of more than 40,000 challenges to myki fines when the government began its review of fare enforcement in December, with the number of successful challenges so high that it threatened to unravel the integrity of the revenue protection regime.  

This issue, first revealed in The Age, was central to the decision to review fare enforcement.

But the review also found at least one innovation brought in by Labor, the free tram zone and zone one-and-two fare cap, have made fare compliance more complex and confusing, particularly for tourists and international students.

The new system will take effect from January 1.

theage.com.au 26 May 2016

It is very doubtful whether the corporate media will ever reveal the extent of the fraud perpetuated by the Victorian government people in government.

They have names and they can be held liable, something a 'lawyer' may never tell you or even bring up in 'court'.

You can obtain a remedy to the fraud, but it has to be done on an individual basis.

'Free' public transport voucher but what's the real cost?

You roll out of bed on what ever day you decided to get up and eventually take the arduous task of 'walking the plank' to the letter box (that's another post altogether) to see what bills await you.

On this day you do not owe any 'cash' (corporate promissory notes) to the utility companies the Australian government [unlawfully] sold out from under you.

By this time you are thanking your religious faith's supreme being creator, be it called an Allah (Moon 'God'), Elohim (Hebrew 'Gods'), Jesus (a Greek scholar marketed as the son of a 'God'?), a tree 'God' or even a bovine 'God' (how blasphemous art thou Hungry Jacks/Burger King!!! !!! !!!).

Instead you find an nice little folded up piece of coloured paper that looks like the following:

Woo Hoo !!! !!! !!! 

Free travel voucher you see.

Your inner skeptic (if you have one) may say - "nothing is for free"!

You inner inquisitive instinct (if you're not part of the herd populace)  may tell you to turn the pages and see what's on the inside.

Lo and behold!!! - You see 2 (two) free travel vouchers.

Your eagle eye notices that you MUST provide your name and other personal details to obtains your two free trips.

Your internet connected fridge may tell you that this journey will be of a value of $1.95, as you are subject to a concession price.

Referencing your fridge browser to: http://ptv.vic.gov.au/tickets/metropolitan-myki-fares-2016/

What you are aware of is that this sum is deducted from your c'est que vie trust.

Bit of a bugger that the corporation conglomerate government does not tell you this - WHEN YOU ARE BORN !!! !!! !!!

Also note that all your movements are to be logged, monitored and later modified, as they are supposed to be on a penal colony.

Do not make the mistake that (in law) this is a 'free country'.

I don't trust ABS with my personal data: ex-ABS staffer

A former Bureau of Statistics insider says he will risk prosecution rather than trust the bureau with his personal data.

Former Australian Bureau of Statistics public servant Ross Hamilton says the body is no longer a trustworthy institution. Photo: Elesa Kurtz

Former ABS public servant Ross Hamilton says the bureau is no longer the trustworthy institution many Australians believe it is and he is prepared to face the full force of the law rather than participate in the 2016 census.

The Canberra resident says the ABS engaged in a dodgy process to obtain the unprecedented power to retain personal information gathered in the census to be taken in August and its promises that the data will only be held temporarily are worthless.

Since 1961, all names, addresses and other identifying information supplied in census forms have been destroyed once all the other data was saved.

But this year will be different with the ABS claiming its plan to keep the identifying data will enable "a richer and dynamic statistical picture of Australia".


Privacy activists have already warned of the dangers of retaining information, despite Chief Statistician David Kalisch insisting that names and addresses will be stored securely and separately from other census data.

Now Mr Hamilton has added his voice to the protests, writing to Mr Kalisch and demanding answers about the bureau's claims that collected data would be over-written in four years.

"If the personal identifier address data-sets are to be over-written or replaced by data-sets from the 2020 census and so on, then to claim the retention of the 2016 data as only temporary is in fact a load of rubbish as it would have become continuing, updated data-sets," Mr Hamilton said.

​The former ABS-staffer added that the bureau's hard-won reputation for excellence had taken a battering in recent years.

"Several quarters ago, the ABS had to admit that it was using inappropriate seasonality factors in its labour data, making its seasonal data frankly useless," he said.

"The ABS that I knew and worked in would not have gone down that path, producing gibberish data via use of outdated methodology.

"Something has gone seriously wrong."

"This pattern of ABS behaviour which obviously comes from the highest levels of the ABS is such that I can no longer believe the ABS may be trusted with data such as retention of household personal identifiers.

"Unless the ABS is able to provide appropriate detail which shall allay my concerns, I cannot in good conscience participate in the 2016 Census of Population and Housing. I am aware of the potential consequences and frankly would love the opportunity to set out these facts before a magistrate.

The bureau's project head for the census, Duncan Young, issued a response Mr Hamilton's position, saying 110-year-old legal safeguards were in place to prevent the sharing of census data with other government agencies.

"No identifiable, private or confidential data will be shared by the ABS with anyone," Mr Young said.
"In all modern censuses, the public have provided their names and addresses to the ABS as part of their census response, and have trusted the ABS to maintain their data securely, consistent with legislation.

"The ABS is asking for no additional information in 2016 than in previous censuses.

"Once 2016 census processing is complete, names and addresses will be separated from census data and they will never be re-combined.

"The retained names and addresses will be used to generate anonymous linkage keys that will support the integration of census data with other datasets to provide new insights.

"Names and addresses will be destroyed four years after collection, in August 2020 or earlier, once there is no longer any community benefit from their retention."

canberratimes 20 May 2016

You cannot trust any government institution with your data.

The [privacy] laws  do not apply to them.

They are unaccountable for their criminals actions.

It's all part of the penal colony rule Australian are under.