05 July 2019

Australian 'authorities' ripping off motorists as oil prices plunge




30 June 2019

'Illegal content' the next phase of the police state

And here is the clincher ladies and gentlemen:


It's NEVER about you but rather about them.

'Illegal content' (whatever that really means) could be causing them harm (loss of revenue) and not you.

Dangerous, harmful and fake appeal to the people's emotions where in reality it could be information that does not follow a government/corporate agenda, therefore forbidding 'free speech' thereby  adherence to a dictatorial rule.

The goal is to stamp out instantaneous uploads to social media, where they would be labelled as one of those above emotional words, as deemed by the moderators of each forum.

A scenario can arise where a private person live streams an encounter with a police officer (to keep the bastards honest if need be, for evidence in court) , which later becomes violent through no fault of the individual, and for that person's 'protection' this being live streamed to a social media forum, the moderators could very well deem this content 'dangerous', 'harmful' or even 'fake'.

What about protecting users from being bombarded with fake BS ads?

MANY so called advertisements are factually false/misleading, hang on a minute, that's right FAKE!

Where is the protection from that?

This is not just about free speech, whistle blowing or even journalism. 

These policies are in support of a full dictatorial police state against the general population.

We are entering the next phase of corporate slavery, blind subservience where the serfs MUST be silenced at all costs under ANY excuse.




29 June 2019

Innocent until proven guilty - out the door in Australia.


Human Rights activists, constitutional experts, legal beagles (yes beagles and not eagles, as these animals have their snouts up the system's arse crack it's not funny) should be outraged at this reality that's been going on in this colony for quite some time, but this is swept under the red dirt, as it's a phenomenal cash cow for all those involved, i.e. lawyers, courts and obviously the government.

Once you're accused by Australia's most powerful businesses, that tax business or the welfare business, first and foremost they deem you guilty of the alleged offence where you must pay their alleged amount otherwise they will steal those numbers from a bank account that is in your name.


Let's take a look at the millions of criminals on Australian roads.

When a person commits an road offence, e.g. an action alleged by an inanimate object, a speed or red light camera, this is classified by the lawmakers as a criminal offence and not a civil one, as seen in the state's court lists.

The degree of being first and foremost guilty is defined under strict liability or absolute liability.

Further entrapment in the con, is on the back of the police paperwork, where the unsuspecting motorist is conned into signing a form that the person 'elects' to take this matter to court.

If your person is being accused of something it is up to the accuser to initiate court proceedings and not in the hands of the defendant to do so.

This is one of the largest con jobs against the motorists of Australia, by the police and all others involved, that is being deliberately overlooked.

P.S. Yeah right...


28 June 2019

Give thieving telcos the boot, but not in Australia

Australia's telcos are rife with actions of consumer rip offs, fraud, taxpayer mismanagement where in the days before the smartphone revolution, and call logging devices, which were incidentally banned at one time, it was difficult to prove allegations against the telecommunication's monopoly but also a court that would accept such a pivotal matter.

We have known for quite some time that Australia is (deliberately) behind in imported tech available to the general population, where this policy is still current today.

Oppo, the biggest smartphone manufacturer in China, has put together a phone that can be used without the need for rip off merchants called 'telcos'.


The Trump 'administration' banned Huawei citing security issues, whereas the company is a global distributor with a huge large market share, larger than what anything the US 'produces'.

Could this be a precursor to another ban, maybe for Oppo, citing whatever excuse, where the real reason would be to protect the rorting telecommunications industry?

Anyone care to take a stab in the dark when/if the Australian serfs will get this device after its release to overseas consumers?

See text from article from 26 Jun 2019 by gsmarena of the headline:

Oppo MeshTalk can make calls and send texts with no carrier or Internet connection

While makers and carriers are talking up the benefits of 5G, Oppo is asking another question – what if there’s no cell connection, no Wi-Fi or Bluetooth? It introduced a system called MeshTalk which can send data between devices up to 3km apart.

We imagine that this is with a clear line of sight. Still, as the name suggests this is a mesh network – it can route the message through several nearby devices so it can reach its target, even if it’s too far for a direct connection.

MeshTalk uses a custom chip with enhanced sensitivity to achieve this long range communication. It’s a low-bandwidth system, but it still supports voice calls, not just text messages

It’s a low-power system too, Oppo wants to build phones that can last 72 hours in standby with MeshTalk active. This will be great in emergency situations, of course, but also just to cut down your monthly bill as you can reduce your reliance on carriers.

Oppo didn’t reveal what kind of tech is behind MeshTalk or when the first phones with it will be available on the market.

27 June 2019

Australia punishes its poor - Taxation

The corporation aggregate that is called the 'Australian Government' (a 'Human Rights' abuser - if you want to go down that track) runs this colony on a tight rope.

The people in government punish their poor, weak and vulnerable tax slave population, while rewarding the rich and powerful, basically adhering to the law of the jungle i.e. survival of the fittest.

The weak and vulnerable get audited, scrutinised, accounts garnished and a jolly rogering by the tax department:

while others 'get out of' paying any tax whatsoever:

and there's so many more from the 'brotherhood' (oops 'conspiracy theory'... lol) that the mainstream media dare not mention.


25 June 2019

Australia the police state endangering its motorists

Australia is a police state ruled in secrecy, where when 'they' (the people in government) talk about transparency, they don't mean being transparent about their corrupt business deals or their 'money for mates' tenders or jobs created for useless family members or the Queen's (of the U.K not Australia,silly) Whitlam letters, they mean transparency regarding the serfs, which even includes what they throw away.


(Imagine a picture of a see through bin, as Google will not allow the blog 'Corporate Australia' to upload photos)

There is a huge drive for zero road deaths, where the marketing campaign is called Towards Zero, where the authorities know that this figure realistically will never be achieved.

A screenshot (which which we cannot publish as Google does not allow it to be uploaded) of an article by news.com.au talks about how the Australian car industry REFUSES to publish manufacturer's quality of vehicles, something that could also effect the lives of motorists and pedestrians.

The police state's secrecy at its finest.

Edit: 19:28

As of a few hours ago we are able to post photos.

These are the photos that we were not able to post:







20 June 2019

Facebook's Whatsapp not as secure as they tell you?

Corporations tell you (the consumer) how secure their products are, first and foremost in order for you to purchase them so the corporations obtain a high ROI (Return On Investment) on the technology.

But are their products really that secure?

Do they tell you the whole story?

In the case of Samsung's new Galaxy S10's facial recognition, it can be easily bypassed with a good quality mugshot.

But Samsung did not tell you this, the 'researchers' or techies did.

SURELY the boffins at Samsung did the same test, but they would have swept that one under the lino.

So what's Facebook not telling you about Whatsapp?

(above article source: abc.net.au)

Briefly:-

That it can be hacked by Cellebrite, as stated in their documentation.

See Release Notes from May 2019 at:
https://cf-media.cellebrite.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ReleaseNotes_UFED_PA_7.18.pdf


Government players will always downplay how easily hackable software/hardware is, in order to lull the serfs into a false sense of security.

Should you really trust Mark Zuckerberg given the Cambridge Analytica scandal?

We do not recommend the use of Whatsapp, for allegedly 'secure' communication.

Why you should never use Facebook's cryptocurrency


Very briefly:

It is hard enough to trust domestic terrorists governments with your private and confidential information, where in today's day and age since they've digitised it, external sources have easier access to it.

Dodgy corporations like Facebook (Cambridge Analytical scandal, just one example) do not have the world's most trusted administration staff (i.e. cheap dodgy (slave) labour), who have the necessary police clearance to deal with your private and confidential information, e.g. Driver Licence.



Should there be a security breach, then the company would resort to coy responses with vague descriptions hidden behind terms that realistically do not mean anything tangible.

No single person should give Facebook their private and confidential data, let alone willingly digitise their corporate identification card (e.g. Driver Licence) to travel via the interwebs* to Facebook's servers where they can use this information in a way that is unknown to you.

We do not recommend the use of Facebook's cryptocurrency.

But unfortunately many people if not hundreds of millions may use this service.

* deliberately incorrect term, taken from pop culture.
.

19 June 2019

Do you really need 5G on your phone?

Currently on the Australian idiot box (tv) Telstra are showing a really great advertisement (polluting the air waves) promoting the new Samsung Galaxy S10 with the capacity for 5G speed, but do you really need this speed on your mobile phone?


But there's one small problem...

They don't tell you how much they're going to bleed you dry.

So, a quick interwebs search reveals:


On the technicality of downloading video content on your phone, a quick search will reveal that;

Super HD video needs 7 - 12Mbps (Megabits per second),
HD quality video needs 5Mbps, according to Netflix and
4K video, a quality that the S10 cannot display (3040 x 1440) needs 25Mbps.

3G or rather HSPA+ (3.5G) in Australia has a theoretical maximum speed of 21.6Mbps with a real network speed of approx 12Mbps.

With 4G, 100Mbps is not unreachable.

5G has a theoretical maximum speed of 10,000Mbps, where apparently Telstra's speed test on the S10 5G shows 1.2Gbps (Gigabits per second).

So do you really need 5G on your phone?

Well technically no, but the corporations need to push the technology so they can make maximum profit from their product.

Where by the time 5G rolls out the NBN Australian taxpayers and consumers overpaid for will be obsolete, where the agenda is for 5G wireless routers to be attached to every street corner or light post.

But the corporate slaves will be so proud of their new Samsung S10 5G, for no real reason at all.  

One fundamental thing wrong with Australia(n people)

When the authorities play up over the seas in an ex-colony:

Meanwhile in colonial Australia:


231 years and 05 months of slave mentality conditioning.