Australia’s COVID app does not work

We were against the use of the Australian Government’s Coronavirus app from the beginning.

We informed the general population not to install it for various reasons.

The government went on an aggressive propaganda campaign on the radio and tv media that you must use the app when you leave home.

The government informed you that there were over 5 million downloads of the app, where even if you delete that app after it’s download without using it, the download is still counted.

The government told you that the source code for the app was available for your perusal, but that was not true.

At the end of the day the app was a huge government fail, an indication of gross government incompetence.

So, how much did that government fail cost the ‘mums and dads’ taxpayers?

In any event those who allegedly contracted the virus while using the government app should sue the Australian Government for its incompetence.

See article in relation to the above screen capture:

https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/melbourne-man-claims-covidsafe-tracking-app-failed-to-notify-him-about-close-contact-with-positive-case/news-story/9b3b13bf1a9a284fc765c724c3885c9d

Con artists will try to extort your driver’s licence information

There are all sorts of scams going on at the best of times, let alone when the general population is vulnerable.

During these unprecedented* and uncertain* times the uneducated masses are more susceptible to being conned than during 'normal' (whatever that may be) times.

In Victoria, the Daniel Michael Andrews government has enacted its version of the Nazi style containment area call the 'steel ring' (well, the Vic gov can't even build a tunnel properly let alone a brick wall), where travellers are told that they must show their licence.

There is no legal obligation to do so, if the driver is over 26 years of age, as stated within a law called the Road Safety Act 1986 under Section 19:

(8)     A person under the age of 26 years who holds a driver licence must have the licence in his or her possession at all times while driving or in charge of a motor vehicle.

Penalty applying to this subsection: 5 penalty units.

See: http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/vic/consol_act/rsa1986125/s19.html

So, there is no legal obligation for a person over the age of 26 years to show his/her driver licence while driving or in charge of a motor vehicle.

It’s amazing that the mainstream media will not tell you this fundamental law, yet on other topics they have made reference to law.

  

* - The term unprecedented times is a false term as the precedent was already set in Australia with regards to a reaction to a viral outbreak, that being the Spanish Flu in 1919, where the follow up term uncertain times is also false as a question can be posed that being was the Spanish Flu dealt with.

Fake info tech websites littering the internet

(an alleged author of an article in the spotlight)

Over the past few years there has been a dramatic increase in websites that appear to have technical information contained within them, but the information is misleading, false or deliberately inaccurate leading to other click bait websites.

So how do you spot these websites?

You can use your favourite search engine on a specific topic, where the resulting highly ranked allegedly tech website contains inaccurate information with a dubious author allegedly taking responsibility for the article.

For the purpose of this exercise, a topic within the smartphone community could be how to use secret codes that are used to obtain all sorts of information from your smartphone, where the result of such as search is shown within the screen capture below:

We then go to the highest ranking website, that being the one at the top of the list, as shown below:

Notice that the website‘s link contains a date, suggesting or even stating that the article was written/posted on the 21^st of March 2018, whereas the date that the alleged author wrote that article appears to be on the 19^th of February 2020.

Least but not least, that tech piece is apparently written by the person in the screen capture at the top of this post, where we will call it out to be fake.

No doubt that the picture is of a real man, but whether it's of 'Rohail', where most likely it could have been data mined, and what is stated is the real deal is highly doubtful.

Most of the so called codes that the author allegedly wrote do not work, where we would classify this information as false.

Australia's COVID-19 tests a farce?

See information as stated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US based), updated on 30th of June 2020:

From the link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/serology-overview.html

Class action for false Coronavirus claim lockdown?

How can one trust any government with regards to any alleged cases of Coronavirus, when it illegally locks up people claiming they have the so called virus, when not one single person from the locked up pool has actually tested positive.

It’s a joke right?

Well, it’s a joke where the poor usually pay for it at the end of the day.

Victorian Premier has gone on a Nazi style rage against the people under the Coronavirus excuse.

The so called claims that virus ‘hotspots’ exist in Victoria can be easily called out to be false, given the fact that the towers residents cases are at zero, where it’s an excuse to take the policies of the police state to a new level, under whatever falsely enacted law the government may claim the actions to be legal under.

By the very figures that government gave out, Australia has now approximately 1/10^th of the of people allegedly suffering from the Coronavirus than it did a couple of weeks ago.

The above figures as reported on the 20th of June 2020, where the figures 10 days later are shown below:

So why the Dystopian agenda?

No 'hotspot' in Malvern where Andrews lives?

In any event there should be a class action lawsuit against the government regarding the Coronavirus lockdown and incarceration of people in their own homes, as already a few laws have been broken.

Realistically premier Dan Andrews should be removed from office, but as we know the ‘brotherhood’ looks after its own, where it is doubtful that will occur.

Authorities 'supporting' paedophile rings?

It's not difficult to ascertain whether someone is for or against something, as quite simply put it comes down to one's actions.

MANY criminal actions by power peopleful are 'supported' by the authorities, or rather other people in positions of authority, as there is a vested interest.

To simplify matters criminal actions can be undertaken by people in positions of authority or by commoners against people in authority or the commoners.

When it comes to paedophilia, almost always the victims are the children from the commoner pool.

In the colony called Australia, there is a high number of paedophiles in the judicature, i.e. 'administration' of justice and other positions of authority, where the true extent is deliberately kept hidden, as this information would not be in the 'interest of the public', according to the authorities.

The Family Court of Australia is one such place where the 'support' of paedophilia occurs, but that is another post for another time.

While victims of paedophilia may obtain some sort of court order alleging that 'justice' has been served, this may be only true if the perpetrator was from the commoner pool rather than a figure from the authorities.

Will the true extent of Australia's paedohpiles in positions of authority ever be revealed to the general population?

It hasn't so far, so what makes one think that it ever will?

What many label an action referred to as a 'failure of government' it should be noted that it is a deliberately botched event in order for those involved to obtain person gain.

One thing is very clear in the Epstein saga, is that:

“The victims are very sceptical because there have been arrests in the past and the US government has not followed through.”

See article by news.com.au of the headline:

How Ghislaine Maxwell avoided arrest for so long in Jeffrey Epstein scandal

at: https://www.news.com.au/world/how-ghislaine-maxwell-avoided-arrest-for-so-long-in-jeffrey-epstein-scandal/news-story/a69a0541b9401c9ec7b8090a4a38cb35

Smartwatches, the next level of biometric surveillance

Those who are into the latest gadgets or fitness programs and devices will be aware that smartwatches have progressed dramatically over the past few years from a notification extension of a smartphone to a fully blown autonomous GPS cell tower and Wi-Fi enabled tracking device, you know like  the ones they put on criminal’s ankles.

To take it to the next level of surveillance, your heart rate together with your blood oxygen level and even ECG can be uploaded to a corporation’s server for governments and other corporations to exploit.

Are you really in control of data you have given away?

A few generations (in computing terms) ago, say in 2016 smartwatch data could be accessed via Bluetooth where the corresponding app was programmed in such a manner that no external data collection point was necessary in order for the app to function together with the watch.

The Android operating system version of the year also did not require a GPS location to function.

There is ZERO technical reason for a Bluetooth device to have to function together with location services.

The corporations (Apple, Google, Fitbit, Fossil, Garmin, Huawei, LG, Samsung, Withings etc) that mandate this function, are anti your privacy, and support the nanny state agenda.

Today Australian consumers are given very little choice when it comes to privacy, where retailers only stock smartwatches where the consumer MUST log into an external entity’s servers in order to be able to operate their new smartwatch, an action which is either mandated by the watch manufacturer or the smartphone operating system manufacturers, that being Apple and Google.

This action is extremely privacy invasive, where the data is easily available for misuse.

Wouldn’t it be hilarious when (as opposed to if) a life insurance company obtains your ‘fitness’ data generated from your smartwatch, where it indicates that you are a regular consumer of McDonald’s food like products which contributed to your weight gain, diabetes or heart disease where as a result your family will not obtain a payout (when you keel over) despite the fact that you payed this company handsomely for the privilege.

Will you spend an exorbitant amount of cash for corporations to have your fitness data?

MANY Aussies have and also shall do in the future.

IGNORANCE  is bliss, right,?

On a plus side for your privacy:

Programmers have created apps that are open source which connect to some smartwatches and fitness bands where the user does not have to log into a company’s server in order to obtain data from their own device.

See https://gadgetbridge.org/ and https://asteroidos.org/

Fear mongering by the mainstream media regarding case numbers?

A snapshot from an official news source, which was once ‘independent’ now under the directive of Rupert Murdoch, stated that on the 20^th of June 2020 Australia had a total of 7436 cases.

Now that sounds like a lot doesn’t it, enough to shut down an ‘economy’ (as opposed to a colony), or not?

Rounding the figure to 25 million people in Australia, that brings the figure to 0.029744% of the entire population.

Let’s also note that merely taking an elevated temperature reading does not mean that the subject has the so called virus, but rather a reading that was used to elevate the numbers.

Now this independent news source draws attention to the alleged number of active cases, that being approximately one tenth of a figure previously ‘promoted’.

So, the number of people who are allegedly sick from a flu-like virus on the 30th of June, is 722 across Australia.

Simple mathematics will indicate that 0.0288% of the population is sick where the chance of recovery is over 98%.

Does that sound like a fair call to destroy the livelihood of middle class Australia, and bring out the armed forces against the people?

While Australia is (technically) a police state colony, it’s going to get a whole lot worse regarding the so called ‘freedoms’ people (allegedly) have.

Once they’re gone they will never let you have them back.

This will be evident in more data collection, anti encryption law and restrictions of movement.

Remember 'Penal Colony Policies' started in 1788 and have never left us.

Covid app a government fraud, real intention hidden?

Briefly,

You were told (in television advertisements) that you’re downloading the government app for the purpose of the virus, but that was not the case.

They told you that it was for the health and safety of everyone, right?

Well ‘they’ lied!

The app was not about the virus, but rather ‘contact tracing’ about obtaining all your contact details that you put into your smartphone, that's part of the nanny state agenda, and NOT the virus health agenda.

Now before we see the responses along the lines that ‘they already have those details’, the response is yes and no, where it’s all about the ‘economics’ of the matter.

Apple and Google have your contact details sure, that's two different databases there and the effort required to obtain that data.

Sure the government can see who you’re calling where that information is on another database.

By downloading the app, YOU have given away all your contact’s details that you’ve put in, your location history etc into their database. You’ve collated the information they need for them at your cost (like a nice subservient government slave ought to).

Now before we hear, ‘but the source code has been made public’,  uummm not the ‘best part’ where the data is stored and how it’s manipulated. The government closed that off.

Well the excuse could be, so that the databases do not get hacked, which is a fallacy.

Remember the propaganda term: “Nothing to hide, nothing to fear”?

To those who downloaded that app, you may as well jump off a cliff when told to by the government corporation. Hahaha!

What information do you give away for free when you upload photos

MANY people do not comprehend how much information they give away for free, which then corporations make huge profits from.

Each year billions of photos from smartphones make it up to various social media platforms where the information (called EXIF data) is stored and then profited from, where not one single milli-cent (you know, one thousandth of a cent) is  given to the producer of the photo.

From the photos that you upload, even if they do not contain your face, you (personally) can be identified.

This with the addition of other data such as your device fingerprint and browser fingerprint which leads to your entire internet browsing history, locations where you’ve been including your online purchase history and much more is available to various corporations and of course overseas governments.

You give away all this information for FREE, well not for ‘free’ entirely, as it technically costs you money to give your information away that you generate.

Corporations make billions of dollars annually from the information people give away.

Is the behaviour going to stop?

Of course not!

Next (financial) year, the corporations are going to make even more money from you.

So how much information do you give away from a seemingly ‘innocent’ picture taken from your smart phone uploaded to your favourite social media platform?

Please note that if you download the above photo, in the EXIF data, under Program name, Google inserted its name.

The screen captures of the information within the photo taken above have been blacked out to preserve privacy.

 

Why are the ‘authorities’ pushing you to use smart phones in conjunction with apps?

So that you give away all this (and more) information at your cost.

The majority of Australians are using social media /news / government services platforms from their smart phone, and to make it worse with the platform’s app, which gives away more data than personal computer browser only oriented access.

So why are Aussies STILL doing this in today’s age of surveillance capitalism?

Because. the giving away of data from your mobile phone seems innocuous given the fact that there are no immediately visible consequences.

If someone gave you a black eye every time you logged into Facebook via a smartphone app, would you do it twice or keep doing it indefinitely?

Authorities/Corporations:1, Plebs:0