Milton William Cooper FOIA Oklahoma City Waco Texas Timothy McVeigh

See document:

Windows devices with newest CPUs are susceptible to data damage

Microsoft has warned today that Windows devices with the newest supported processors are susceptible to "data damage" on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2022.

"Windows devices that support the newest Vector Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) (VAES) instruction set might be susceptible to data damage," the company revealed today.

Devices affected by this newly acknowledged known issue use AES-XTS (AES XEX-based tweaked-codebook mode with ciphertext stealing) or AES-GCM (AES with Galois/Counter Mode) block cipher modes on new hardware.

While Microsoft mentions the data loss risks on affected systems, the company does not elaborate on what customers should expect if they're hit by this issue.

Issue fixed in May and June Windows updates

Microsoft says the issue was addressed to prevent further data damage in preview and security releases issued on May 24 and June 14, respectively.

However, these Windows updates also come with a performance hit since AES-based operations might be two times (2x) slower after installing them on affected systems running Windows Server 2022 and Windows 11 (original release).

Scenarios impacted by the performance hit might include BitLocker, Transport Layer Security (TLS) (specifically load balancers), and disk throughput (especially for enterprise customers).

"We added new code paths to the Windows 11 (original release) and Windows Server 2022 versions of SymCrypt to take advantage of VAES (vectorized AES) instructions," Microsoft said when describing the cause of the issue.

"SymCrypt is the core cryptographic library in Windows. These instructions act on Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) registers for hardware with the newest supported processors."

Workaround for the performance hit

Customers experiencing performance degradation are advised to install June 23 preview update (Windows 11, Windows Server 2022) or the July 12 security update (Windows 11, Windows Server 2022) for their OS version as a workaround.

Microsoft says these Windows updates will restore initial performance metrics once installed on affected devices.

"If this affects you, we strongly urge you to install the May 24, 2022 preview release or the June 14, 2022 security release, as soon as possible, to prevent further damage," Microsoft added.

"Performance will be restored after you install the June 23, 2022 preview release or the July 12, 2022 security release."

Comment:

h_b_s

"Data damage" the new marketing gloss over for "data loss" and "filesystem corruption". Don't be fooled. It's yet another case where Microsoft's bungled agile development practices have screwed the pooch. Their testing harnesses are entirely inadequate to support the massive legacy code bases they have to support in the time scales they need to release.

Source:bleepingcomputer.com

Digital ID parties at Dictator Dan's

Dan Andrews support teams are having a digital identification chip implanted into their bodies in order to conduct cashless transactions and celebrating this fact preemptively that it will be 'mandated' on the Victorian population after his election win in November 2022.

Information has been obtained from a source close to Andrews with regards to what he is planning after an election win.

Cashless transactions are a priority of the 'Nanny State' agenda authorities around the world are implementing on the serfs.

'Tap & Go' has been a feature of your physical (credit/debit) card for a while now, where data is only exchanged between two devices, where that data's initial journey is to the financial services institution where it gets distributed to unknown entities to you.

With the advent of the smart phone together with apps, the tap & go feature has been embedded in the phone, but now other parties can have access to data emanating from your phone.

This is great news for 'advertisers', who can be quite easily masquerading as government actors or 'NGOs' (Non Government Organisations) and corporations that support this nanny state style of commerce.

The smartphone is so large and cumbersome and is so 'last year' where you can also use a smart watch for cashless transactions.

Why use a smart watch as it is large cumbersome and so 'last month' compared to a smart ring.

What the Andrews government will do is 'promote' the use of an implanted RFID chip for those who wish to participate in the trial.

Remember the CallerID 'trial' in Victoria that became a standard?

The Australian population has also participated in another trial, as stated by the health minister Greg Hunt on the 21^st of February 2021, where now the serfs are urged to get a 'quadrella' of shots, which the judiciary is exempt from (What??? !!! ???? Don't Judicial Lives Matter too???), but that is digression.

See Hunt's statement:

“The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever, and we will have enormous amounts of data. “

within the link:

https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-with-david-speers-on-abc-insiders-on-the-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

This nanny state agenda will not come into force akin to the frog in boiling water trick.

Over time, services will be decreased for those who do not have a cashless transaction method available to them, limiting their movements and participating in the 'digital economy' (or rather society) the governments are now starting to promote heavily.

As you have seen over the past few years Victoria has a be test bed, a PsyOp as to what governments and corporations can get away with.

Your silence and participation is acquiescence.

Data breach disclosure law in Australia

The colony has taken quite some time to enact law that may protect consumers/workers/public servants with regards to the I.T world in particular that of data breaches, which have been going on for a few decades now, and the lack of reporting them.

The law is ultra quick to act with regards to gazetting speed measuring equipment which is heavily relied upon for revenue raising, under the pretext of safety.

On February 22, 2018 the Federal Government’s new Scheme for the mandatory reporting of cybersecurity breaches that result in the loss of personal data came into effect. Every private and public company with annual turnover of $3 million or more, listed or not, is now required to report a cyber breach to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) and notify affected customers as soon as they become aware of a breach.

The threshold for notification under the new Act is more onerous than most other global jurisdictions, with the test based on whether the breach “is likely to result” in serious harm to an affected individual. Mandatory reporting relieves companies from having to make judgement calls about materiality – ANY breach that ‘is likely to result in serious harm’ to an individual will be reportable. This could occur when there is unauthorised access to, disclosure or loss of customer information held by an entity. Such information includes personal details, credit reporting information, credit eligibility information, and tax file number information. Companies must report the breach within 72 hours.

On 22 February 2018, the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (the Act) was amended to introduce a mandatory data breach notification regime, the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme (NDB scheme). Australian Privacy Principle (APP) entities bound by the Act must now report specified breaches of privacy.  

Such data breaches must be notified to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC). In addition, individuals that are likely to suffer serious harm as a result of that breach must also be notified. Businesses need to act quickly to contain and address such privacy breaches, and practitioners need to be aware of the requirements and the time frames for action.

The Privacy Amendment (Notifiable Data Breaches) Act 2017 (Cth) amended the Act to bring into force the NDB scheme. The legislation introduces a set of onerous reporting obligations for those already bound by privacy obligations under the Act. The OAIC is already reporting a flurry of activity in this area. This article outlines the provisions of the NDB scheme and provides examples of how it may apply in practice.

The new data breach notification regime will apply to those already bound by the Act, including businesses with an annual turnover of $3 million or more. Such entities are called APP entities.

news.com.au behind the scenes data collection

One of the most important metrics in data collection is that of your identity or your device's identity which can then be used to identify your 'person'.

Corporations want or rather need you use apps for their online content (also classified as 'entertainment') in order to profit from you.

In the case of Rupert Murdoch's 'news' empire, a catchy phrase was coined "be on it", meaning be on the platform, as in download the app, even though using a browser will suffice.

In the above example we can see that a request is made to obtain your device identity prior to viewing a video.

You can either allow or block this.

If an app was downloaded, then this permission would be automatically granted and bother parties Google and the 'entertainment' empire would have your device identity, which would then identify you.

A recommendation would be not to download entertainment company's apps where open source apps are recommended, rather than the closed source apps that corporations hide privacy invading data grabbing code.

Puma Biotechnology data leak reveals link to Pfizer

MANY pharmaceutical corporations are deceitful during the best of times let alone during an alleged global crisis.

News media companies, some of which are called 'entertainment' (e.g. Nine Entertainment in Australia) can also be quite deceitful via omission of 'facts' or information to the public.

In a court ruling in the United States in November 2021, the drug that is used to medicate people cannot be technically called what the news media and authorities call it, as it does not confer immunity.

See link: https://constitutionwatch.com.au/the-covid-19-injections-do-not-confer-immunity-and-therefore-do-not-meet-the-definition-of-a-vaccine/

Did Australia's mainstream media inform you of this?

The corporation that is selling the drug in Australia, had to publicly disclose its 80,000 pages of documents, as ordered by a United States court.

See link: https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Did Australia's mainstream media draw attention to these documents?

Data shares are another important source of information, either by whistleblowers or other means.

On the 29th of July 2022, data from Puma Biotechnology was put online.

A quick search via your favourite search tool should show results that Puma Biotech. is not so squeaky clean, where they are involved with Pfizer who is supplying a drug to Australians.

Yet again the question is asked; Did Australia's mainstream media inform you of this?

It's quite clear that the information required for people to make up their own mind with regards to (unlawful) health directions by authorities is deliberately left out, where instead the focus is on an entertainer's buttocks.

Enough silicon to satisfy the current chip shortage by Kim K alone?

How to stop Micro$oft from collecting your data during Win 11 installation

A Big EFF YOU to Microsoft and their data collection during a Windows 11 installation.

Google is no longer a 'search engine' company nor is Meta (nee Facebook) a 'social media' platform where they are both data collection corporations that sell data to governments and non-government organisations even AI processed data (yielding results like political affiliations, beliefs, demographic, etc) under the banner of advertising Goliaths

Similarly Microsoft is no longer an operating system manufacturer but rather a data collection giant, under the banner of a software corporation.

As the Windows version increases so does the data collection on the user.

With Windows 11 there is a way to 'force' the installation without the 'mandate' for a online user account.

With Windows 10 the process is much easier, where there is an option, where it's not immediately visible in Win 11.

See tutorial by JayzTwoCents:

There are also other products that preserve your privacy within Windows.

They are:

O&O ShutUp10++ : https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10

WPD - Privacy dashboard for Windows : https://wpd.app/

W0Privacy : https://www.w10privacy.de/english-home/

LinkedIn - The West's equivalent to China's social monitoring system

Some may be told that China's Social Credit System is bad and maybe even an isolated form of surveillance on the plebs.

The monitoring, cataloguing and grading of the corporate slaves in the West has been going on for decades, even before the internet going 'commercial'.

LinkedIn is just one 'public' social media platform where its database can (and is) used for nefarious reasons.

See explanation as told by Rob Braxman (odysee link) in the video of the title: Perils of LinkedIn:

It's all part of the 'Nanny State' agenda!

Apple's con job on irreparable AirPods

Apple is a deceitful corporation, which it should be charged for something called 'profiteering', anti-competitive behaviour or any other 'criminal' act under consumer law.

With regards to repairing (battery problem/charging port) AirPods, Apple stated:

"It's more economical just to swap the case out".

Is that factually true?

See ~10min video:

Rogue T-Mobile store owner found guilty of illegally unlocking phones in $25 million fraud

"Illegally unlocking" - whatever that really means.

Your hardware, your choice.

Law made to the detriment of consumers, for the benefit of corporations.

See article:

A former T-Mobile store owner was found guilty of breaking into the wireless provider's internal system allowing the rogue businessman to unlock and unblock smartphones. The illegal activities took place from 2014 to 2019 when 44-year-old Argishti Khudaverdyan unlocked phones from T-Mobile and other carriers' networks allowing those buying the handsets to use them with other network providers.

The scheme took in $25 million in ill-gotten revenue for the defendant and his partner

This hurt mobile carriers, many of which give huge discounts or give away free phones to customers who agree to be locked into their networks for years. Khudaverdyan also unlocked phones that carriers had blocked after they were reported stolen or lost. The guilty verdict was announced by the Department of Justice in a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California. 

T-Mobile was one of the carriers that got ripped off in the scheme

The 44-year-old, Khudaverdyan, who lives in Burbank, California, was found guilty last Friday of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, three counts of wire fraud, two counts of accessing a computer to defraud and obtain value, one count of intentionally accessing a computer without authorization to obtain information, one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, five counts of money laundering, and one count of aggravated identity theft.

Prosecutors said during the trial that the scheme generated $25 million in illegally attained revenue as removing blocks on these phones allowed them to be sold on the black market. Khudaverdyan unlocked handsets that had been locked to T-Mobile, AT&T, and Sprint's networks. He and a partner co-owned Top Tier Solutions Inc., a T-Mobile store in Eagle Rock Plaza, Los Angeles.

T-Mobile terminated the contract it had with Top Tier in 2017 because of Khudaverdyan's suspicious behavior and unauthorized unlocking of phones. He advertised his illegally unlocked phones through brokers, email, and websites including "unlocks247.com." While promoting the illegally unlocked phones, Khudaverdyan advertised them as being official unlocked T-Mobile phones.

Khudaverdyan will be sentenced on October 17th and could end up with a long stretch in jail

Unlocking these phones allowed T-Mobile customers to use other carriers costing the company revenue from service contracts and equipment installment plans. To access T-Mobile's internal computer systems, Khudaverdyan tricked T-Mobile employees by using phishing emails to trick them into revealing information. These fake emails looked so much like legitimate T-Mobile correspondence that the employees passed along their sign-in credentials allowing the convicted felon to break into T-Mobile's computers.

Khudaverdyan also elicited help from overseas call centers to receive employee credentials. Armed with this information, the bad actor then called the T-Mobile IT Help Desk to reset the employees' company passwords. This gave him access to the T-Mobile systems that he used to unlock phones. More than 50 T-Mobile employees had their credentials stolen and hundreds of thousands of handsets were unlocked during the years that this scheme was active.

Sentencing will take place on October 17th and Khudaverdyan will face statutory maximum sentences of 20 years in federal prison for each wire fraud count, 20 years in federal prison for conspiracy to commit money laundering, 10 years in federal prison for each money laundering count, five years in federal prison for each count of intentionally accessing a computer without authorization to obtain information, five years in federal prison for the count of accessing a computer to defraud and obtain value, and a mandatory two years in federal prison for aggravated identity theft.

His partner and co-defendant, Alen Gharehbagloo, 43, of La Cañada Flintridge, already pleaded guilty on July 5th to to three felonies: conspiracy to commit wire fraud, accessing a protected computer with intent to defraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. He will be sentenced on December 5th.

Source:phonearena.com