In recent times there has been talk of police and government corruption in Victoria.
The press has apparently brought out information pertaining to corruption, fraud and lack of integrity within government departments.
But there is an eerie silence with respect to the people at the top of the legal food chain.
The judges are untouchable when it comes to fraud, kickbacks, and perverting the cause of justice.
These people are usually high ranking Freemason's, who are to be left alone, no matter what it takes.
It is known to corpau, that the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), has three residing members that are corrupt.
It is of no use to name them individually, as they will not only be protected by the law that they create, the information obtained from the source will not only be inadmissible in any court, but also the livelihood of the individual will be at risk.
The government does not take kindly to whistle blowers, and once being identified, are under intense scrutiny, and government harassment.
Amongst politicians and others, judges belong to a group of people that are self selected.
This means that no other judge will act against any other of his colleagues, not matter how damning the evidence is.
Is is important to know that the judges NOT mentioned in this post should not only be banned from the bar but should never be employed in their field.
corpau.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 122 104 616)
Australia's Prime Minister (CEO) Tony Abbott : "Australia is Open for Business"
2 comments:
Why you don't name them, then people could know them. I have a case that one of the members was corrupted and I would be able to prove it. At the time I went every where to make a complaint against her, but no body cared, neither the MP, nor president of VCAT nor. I wrote even to the Attorney General and raised the issue but they all said that this is the Justice department and they won't be able to interfere as it is an independent body. It happened in 2004. Later on I found that someone from Heidelberg Police station also cooperating with them. I've got all the documents available. At the time I tried to publish it at the Age or Herald sun but they both refuse to publish the story. My name is Arezoo and you can email me at parvaz1965@gmail.com
I’ve never had personal experience with VCAT although I’ve heard plenty of scathing reports from colleagues. My experience with the Queensland equivalent QCAT has been even worse than those who did business with VCAT. All these kangaroo tribunals were conceived to be totally unaccountable, and in all cases they are protected by the media which rarely if ever publishes the truth about the shenanigans of kangaroo tribunals. Whilst there have been no known challenges to the constitutional legitimacy in the High Court, I’ve had advice from a highly experienced QC and a professor or law that there is no way an honorable High Court judge could rule in favour of kangaroo tribunals complying with Chapter 3 of the Australian Constitution. The lack of regard for rules of evidence alone means that kangaroo tribunals are NOT courts. Then there is the matter of decisions being made before hearings (ergo ‘kangaroo’ tribunals) and the inherent bias toward official entities / the big end of town. I’m not certain about the arrangement in other states, but in Queensland the Office of the Public Guardian and the Office of the Public Trustee are legislatively joined to QCAT in all guardianship matters, a blatant and deliberate breach of separation of powers. When combined with the immunities conferred on quasi-judges, we end up with an incestuous relationship between the parties that denies justice to victims. One particular landmark matter that reached the Court of Appeal (Maher QCA11-225) found the then Queen of QCAT Clare Endicott biased and ‘the quality of decision-making in QCAT is deplorable’. Despite this damning record, Endicott remained in the same position for another six years until the rising volume of complaints forced here demotion. Furthermore, the Queensland government ‘edited’ the official record to remove the offending comments although it could of course not get at the original transcript, many copies of which are in the public domain. Bias continues to be part of the culture in QCAT, as does complete disregard for legislation. Tribunal members constantly demonstrate their utter arrogance toward victims knowing that there is no avenue to hold them to account. Two shenanigans used since Maher to prevent victims using the appeal process are fabrication of evidence which is then held to be a matter of fact (not appealable), and scheduling internal appeals to be heard by non-judicial members (also non-appealable). Caselaw records do not show any successful appeal reaching the Court of Appeal since Maher in 2011, although only 5% of QCAT matters are published since the published ones are cherry-picked to create the impression favourable to the powers that be. For example, the third of the three landmark guardianship matters in May 2017 has been carefully hidden and only those with the right connections can access transcripts. Since then, the Queensland government has introduced the Guardianship and Administration and Other Legislation Amendment Bill in an attempt to disable the precedent set in May 2017. Basically the Bill removes the common law presumption that a person has capacity, removes any recourse to common law and international law, and provides that once a victim has been declared incompetent, no amount of professional medical evidence of capacity is sufficient for the victim to regain control of their life. More recently, the Human Rights Bill actually removes ALL rights of the victims and ensures that QCAT and its incestuous cohorts the OPG and PTQ are not required to comply with ANY human rights principles.
Post a Comment