Magistrate's orders unlawful, sack the POS

This is the state of the colony's legal system:

If you've been handed out an order by this POS where your 'person' has been harmed, i.e. suffered a financial loss, you should sue him AND the 'State Government of Victoria'.

Dodgy Samsung promotes falsified benchmarks

Samsung is 'promoting' owners of their Galaxy devices to falsify benchmark scores by paying them $10 for their efforts.

Now is that the action of an honest corporation?

See further details at:

https://www.sammobile.com/news/samsung-10-dollars-galaxy-s4-manipulating-benchmarks/

Thug's wife escapes conviction despite being over 5 times alcohol limit

The colony we call Austalia is rife with money for mates jobs and criminal actions by those in 'power', where it's not what you know it's who you know.

Emma Walters, the wife of John Setka blew .282 or approx 5.6 times over the legal limit.

Magistrate Therese McCarthy did not record a conviction despite the fact that Walters had a relevant prior offence, something the serfs get 'hammered' (pun intended) for.

This so called judgement would go against community expectations, right?

You know how your local police deplore drink driving, yet the prosecution did not protest the lack of conviction?

It seems that they (the magistrate and police) were in it together, sweeping the matter under the carpet wanting it to just fade away.

Maybe if you're a piss head and a danger to the community when behind the wheel, you'd want the 'honourable' Therese McCarthy to help you out?

See link: Sack Magistrate Therese McCarthy, bring justice for Jalal Yassine and his family

See reference to Therese McCarthy within the Vicbar being unavailable to the 'public':
https://www.vicbar.com.au/news-events/welcome-her-honour-magistrate-therese-mccarthy


See full details within the following article:

Upon entering (the police state of) Australia you must provide your passwords or you will be put in prison for 5 years.

What better person to be in charge of the 'gates' in or out of Australia than an ex copper, Peter Dutton.

See article from 27 Sep 2018 by the Daily Mail of the headline:

Now the police want your passwords – and you could be fined $60,000 or put in prison for five years if you refuse

© Provided by Associated Newspapers Limited Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton said encryption hurt national security and hid crime



People could face up to five years' in jail if they do not give their laptop password or mobile phone PIN to the authorities under proposed changes to the law.

Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton introduced the new laws to the Parliament, saying they are needed to help police and spies catch criminals who are hiding behind encryption technology.

But civil libertarians say the changes go too far.

'The bill is a draconian measure to grant law enforcement authorities unacceptable surveillance powers that invade Australians' civil rights,' said Liberal Democrats Senator David Leyonhjelm in an emailed statement to Daily Mail Australia.

'It appears that people who are not even suspected of committing a crime can face a fine of up to $50,000 and up to five years' imprisonment for declining to provide a password to their smartphone, computer or other electronic devices.' 

The penalty unit fine is actually more than $50,000 asthe value of a penalty unit has recently been increased to $210.

Anybody who refuses to help the authorities crack a computer system when ordered will face up to five years jail. 

If the crime being investigated is terrorism, the penalty for non-compliance is increased to 10 years' jail or $126,000.

If Parliament passes the bill, tech companies will have to help authorities crack the encryption on users devices when told to help - or face up to $10 million in fines.

If anybody at the company tells anybody that they have been told to do it, they will face up to five years' in jail.

This will give authorities access to your protected online information in the event of an investigation.

Under the legislation, foreign countries can also ask Australia's Attorney General for police to access data in your computer to help them investigate law-breaking overseas. 

For the bill to become law, it has to pass through three readings in the federal Parliament. It is now on its second reading. 

More than 14,000 submissions of concern about the Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018 have been received.

Submissions are open until October 19 so there is still time for you to have your say.

As the Australian Government grapples with new technology challenging law enforcement and national security, lawmakers have passed increasingly tough legislation affecting individual rights over the past five years.

Some in the community have become concerned about the risk of the authorities having too much power.

'This is another extension of powers which goes well beyond what is reasonable and necessary in a democracy,' said NSW Council of Civil Liberties vice-president Lesley Lynch.

There is also reportedly a potential conflict between Australia's legislation and tough new data privacy laws passed in Europe.

A 46-year-old British software developer had his password-protected laptop and phone seized by Australian Border Force (ABF) officers earlier this year as he travelled through Sydney Airport.

The ABF would not say whether any files had been copied, but did inspect his devices.

Nathan Hague told The Guardian he believed the ABF had cracked his laptop password and inspected his files.

He said this potentially compromises his business, putting it in breach of Europe's tough new GDPR data privacy laws and he would have to give privacy breach notifications to his clients.

 Source: https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/now-the-police-want-your-passwords-%e2%80%93-and-you-could-be-fined-dollar60000-or-put-in-prison-for-five-years-if-you-refuse/ar-BBNBzP6

Legislation slips quietly through when the herd population is being distracted

The 'administration' in charge of the colony we call Australia, governs in secret with penal colony policies turning into law, that is for the benefit of corporations.

ANY resistance from the tax slaves is met with force from the men and women in uniform who are subservient to a corporation aggregate.

The herd population (i.e. dumb 'Australians') are 'entertained' with this:

As long as there is an endless supply of beer and electricity to keep the footy going, the administration is laughing at the herd they control.

The 'administration' need not to worry, as the herd in Australia will do what it's only programmed to do, that being exist at the lowest level of need, as described in Maslow's 'Hierarchy of Needs',

that being: eating, sleeping shitting and rooting.

Family violence victim sues police for botching case

If you have been harmed by police you must sue.

Source: The Age

Australian Government Branding Design Guidelines

It's all in black and white, how to use brand name and logo:


Source:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1g3NStU8hZKigTyVjjK2gooEF8znMLhEV

Australia's NBN the joke of the IT world

The Australian Government's national internet project under the NBN (National Broadband Network) label is a (deliberate) failure at the expense of the hard working Australian tax payers.

As each year goes by Australia's internet speed rating pummels, no thatnks to the NBN.

What's even worse (for the 'consumers') is that when it's finally rolled out across the entire country, it's going to be sub par and obselete, where the corporation aggregate call the 'Austalian Government' will sell off the tax payer's asset (or in this case a liability).

Hip Hip hooray for the imbeciles in charge of the colony we call Australia.

Just as long as plenty of people get 'money for mates' jobs in the associated projects while ripping off the Australian 'tax slaves' in the mean time.

The Australian Government punishes its poor and it's deliberate by design

So, first things first, you should know that Australia was colonised as an 'economic project'  and they got it up and running pretty quickly making it one of the most prosperous places on the planet in its early years.

While China did recently note that the country was once roamed by "rascals and outlaws" what China neglected to mention is that most of them made it into positions of power.

The 'authorities' decided to start off Australia's police force with criminals, which should tell you a lot already.

The people in government were running a mockery, where the imperial government had enough and in 1865 installed the Colonial Laws Validity Act.

The serfs should also know that the Australian capital was designed by a 'brother' for the 'brotherhood'.

Australia was never meant to be a 'peasants paradise' and this is reflected in the law that the brotherhood installs on the people, tax slaves or more recently categorised 'consumers'.

Today,

"... system is aided by a tax system that rewards people the more houses and units they own."

See article from Friday the 13th of September 2019, by news.com.au of the headline:

Wealth in Australia is now determined by how many assets you own

Wealth in Australia was once determined by the type of job you worked and how much money you made. Now experts say there’s a new measure.

An Australian’s wealth was once determined by their employment status, the type of job they had and how much money they made.

But in 2019, there’s a new five-tier measure of wealth based on how many assets you own, according to a team of University of Sydney researchers.

Social scientists Professor Lisa Adkins, Associate Professor Melinda Cooper and Professor Martijn Konings argue that simply having a job and earning a salary are no longer adequate measures of determining class.

“In the present era, where mid-size homes in large Western cities often appreciate by far more in a given year than it is possible for middle-class wage-earners to save from wages, such a continued focus on employment as the main determinant of class is increasingly untenable,” said Prof Adkins.

According to Dr Cooper and Prof Konings, there is now a five-tier asset-based class system in the developed world.

The top ranking is the “investor” group — those who don’t necessarily have an ordinary working wage but “live off the income generated from portfolios of assets through to non-asset owning classes”.

It noted that in Sydney, just under 50 per cent of all apartments were owned by investors — and the statistic is often higher in central areas of the city.

The second highest group are those who own their home outright. The third highest are those who hold a mortgage.

The bottom two categories are called “churners” who have no housing assets. The fourth category are renters who don’t own any properties or have a mortgage. They can be wage renters or welfare renters.

The homeless sit at the bottom rung of the ladder, with no income from assets, wages or the state.

The researchers largely focused on Sydney, the nation’s most expensive capital city for housing, where they found wealth is increasingly denied by those who own property versus those who will forever be priced out of the housing market.

This system is aided by a tax system that rewards people the more houses and units they own.

“While requiring further empirical verification, we believe that our proposed five-point asset-based class scheme will go some way in explaining how the current structural mutation of capital is central to the production of a new social structure of class,” the report stated.

“In short, we see our scheme as providing a long-overdue sociological translation of the implications of growing asset-based wealth inequalities.”

NEVER Consent to a Pat Down, Car Search or Strip Search

Legal advice as contained within the pdf: