Australia is part of the five eye global spy net, where is also acts illegally against its citizens, with total impunity.
It is also a colony, where 'Penal Colony Policies' apply.
Welcome to the new Chinese communist state!
It's also becoming a warrantless state.
See video:
The above headline illustrates that the police force is rotten to its core.
It's been compromised a long time ago.
In reality, there is no 'separation of powers' given the fact that many are part of the 'brotherhood'.
See video:
Australia has descended into a fascist police state, under something called rules, as opposed to factual law, i.e. pieces of paper called Acts.
Police act under dictation which is illegal, but that does not stop them, as the old saying prevails:
"Everything is legal, until you're caught?"
See the following as described by "Mr.n0b0dy":
Good Police Does Exists! This Man Is A Honorable Police Officer Because He Serves His Community, not his ego or a forceful fascist government.
On 21/09/2021, on my way back from the protest I was approached by an Officer in an unthreatening manner after he noticed I was taking record of the situation happening in Melbourne. Upon explaining Police actions before and during protests, he agreed some Police are acting unprofessionally and directed me on how to hold those Police Officers responsible for their Negligent of Duty in two different ways.
(Note: Most Police Officers Never Mention IBAC when addressing you on how to report Police corruption, in fact they intimidate and treat their community as criminals for exercising their Lawful Rights during times of crisis).
🧛♂️The government is Not your doctor, just as your doctor Never forces vaccination/s against your Free Will🙅♂️
P.S
I wish I knew this Officer's name, so I could Thank him personally.
P.S#2
Mind the very late uploads, I am facing some problems in my personal life. Both from previous police unprofessional actions and refusing the dodgy government vaccine.
P.S#3
Let's see how many Police will keep their Uniform after they're forced to take the dodgy jab from the government, this will be interesting because 40C "Winter" is around the corner.
In the colony called Australia, the authorities have gone feral with regards to actions that are not only unconstitutional, but also against 'human rights' and also other international laws.
Now all over the colony, employers are following (alleged) mandates that have no lawful basis for their existence, and firing their employees if a medical action is not taken.
Employees have been sacked from their jobs for not following this so called 'mandate'.
If you are one of those persons, then there could be a solution provided in the following 3 minute video.
So called content creators of tech channels on social media, will tell you how great it (Windows 10) is or how fantastic its new features are, which is another point of conjecture.
NONE of these so called IT professionals delve into the operating systems internals or how it treats user's data, which at the end of the day they are doing a disservice to their viewers or 'consumers'.
Why would you listen to them in the first place?
Why would you take advice from a tech flog from the mainstream media on purchasing new phone or computer equipment without getting the FULL story?
Why not check out the forums from real tech people, with results that show what's really going on?
We do not recommend using Windows 10.
The following is article from ghacks.net may explain a bit more:
Windows 10 PC's phone home even after privacy hardening
When you install Windows 10 on a new PC or upgrade an existing version of Windows to the new operating system, you get the option to customize select preferences or use the defaults instead.
If you select to customize, you get the option to disable three pages full of features related to privacy.
While that is a good start at limiting Windows 10's hunger for data, it is nowhere near sufficient to keep the operating system from talking with Microsoft servers regularly.
A user on Voat analyzed the network traffic of Microsoft's Windows 10 operating system using a DD-WRT router and a Linux Mint laptop with remote logging and Windows 10 Enterprise installed on Virtualbox recently.
He turned off all privacy-related features during custom installation, and let the computer sit idle for eight hours straight afterwards logging network traffic.
In the eight hours Windows 10 made 5508 connection attempts.
Here is the roughly 8-hour network traffic analysis of 5508 connection attempts of an unused, base install of Windows 10 Enterprise
The top 10 sites the operating system tried to establish connections to are:
| ip_address | nslookup | port | protocol | connection_attempts | route | origin | description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94.245.121.253 | 3544 | UDP | 1619 | 94.245.64.0/18 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT | |
| 65.55.44.108 | 443 | TCP | 764 | 65.52.0.0/14 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT | |
| 65.52.108.92 | msnbot-65-52-108-92.search.msn.com | 443 | TCP | 271 | 65.52.0.0/14 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT |
| 64.4.54.254 | 443 | TCP | 242 | 64.4.0.0/18 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT-CORP-MSN-AS-BLOCK | |
| 65.55.252.43 | msnbot-65-55-252-43.search.msn.com | 443 | TCP | 189 | 65.52.0.0/14 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT |
| 65.52.108.29 | msnbot-65-52-108-29.search.msn.com | 443 | TCP | 158 | 65.52.0.0/14 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT |
| 207.46.101.29 | 80 | TCP | 107 | 207.46.0.0/16 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT-CORP-MSN-AS-BLOCK | |
| 207.46.7.252 | 80 | TCP | 96 | 207.46.0.0/16 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT-CORP-MSN-AS-BLOCK | |
| 64.4.54.253 | 443 | TCP | 83 | 64.4.0.0/18 | AS8075 | MICROSOFT-CORP-MSN-AS-BLOCK | |
| 204.79.197.200 | a-0001.a-msedge.net | 443 | TCP | 63 |
He analyzed the network traffic again after 30 hours, and posted his finding on Pastebin as a dump this time. We have uploaded the full dump to our own server, you may download it with a click on the following link: windows10-connections.txt
After 30 hours of use, Windows 10 attempted to connect to 113 non-private IP addresses.
He then decided to run a privacy tool for Windows 10, DisableWinTracking, and monitor network traffic again for a period of time to see how it affects the connections made during that time.
DisableWinTracking is not the most complete privacy tool for Windows 10, but it enables you to make several changes related to privacy to the system including disabling telemetry, services, blocking domains and IP addresses, and uninstalling applications.
After running the tool, he monitored the network traffic for another 30-hour period and noticed a drop in connection attempts (from 5508 to 2758) and a drop in unique IP addresses the operating system tried to connect to (from 95 to 30).
It is likely that tools that programs that offer more options than DisableWinTracking reduce the numbers further.
The takeaway from the test -- which requires verification -- is that Windows 10 will connect to remote sites regularly even if the operating system has been configured for privacy and the computer is idle.
It is unclear why Windows 10 makes that many connections even when idle.
Windows 10 users who don't want any of those connections to be made can use the researcher's recommended list of IP ranges to block in a firewall / router. Please note that doing so may impact functionality such as update checking and downloading as well.
As time goes on multinationals obtain more and more information from your data generating devices.
The largest user data collectors are the likes of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft.
In the world of personal computers, Microsoft's Windows operating system is by far the most popular.
Microsoft needs you to update your personal computer's Windows operating system, as with each newer version of Windows comes more data collection baked into the operating system and so called 'updates'.
Here are many settings that Microsoft turns on by default that you cannot change as a normal user which may not be beneficial to your privacy.
In the screen captures below all those settings have been turned off.
The program that makes the above possible is available from https:/wpd.app
Another privacy oriented product is O&O ShutUP 10++ from https://www.oo-software.com
This is another blow to people's privacy where corporations are 'forcing' the consumer to give up their data.
At the end of the day, it's quite simple, where you vote with your wallet, that being do not purchase privacy invading products or services.
See the following post from reddit of the headline:
Buyer beware! Some newer HP printers will NOT print a single page unless they have internet connectivity and you've linked them to an "HP Smart" account
This is some bullshit
I had an M203dw literally go up in literal smoke at a customer's site. They asked for a small black and white duplex laserjet. So I googled around and found the M209dwe. Ethernet port, duplex, laser, all sounded good
Ordered it and it arrived. Got the MAC address, loaded the DHCP reservation, set it up on the print server, and scheduled a time with the customer for install
Today was the install appointment. I unboxed, plugged it in and powered it up. Verified it had the right IP and I could get to the web UI. All good. Mapped and tried a test page.
Page failed to print. Huh. Wonder what that's about. Tried another PC, tried direct from the print server. Nope. No prints. All failed. Checked for FW update. Nothing new.
So I went back to the homepage of the web UI. And I saw a message that was so mind numbingly stupid that I couldn't believe it.
Printer Setup Incomplete Finish printer setup to enable printing. If setup is not complete, you will be unable to print very soon.
Very soon meant right now. Couldn't even print a test page.
So I went to 123.hp.com and learned after DL'ing the "HP Smart" app on a windows PC, that you CANNOT complete setup without an HP Account tied to that printer.
Which is a giant pile of bullshit. Why the actual hell should a printer have to have an account tied to it and constant internet connectivity?!
I checked with my VAR to make sure I wasn't missing the magical "IT Managed" mode. Nope. That's just how these are. Confirmed by HP's own support article.
So yeah HP can go deepthroat a chainsaw. The M477/M479 series have been great. The M400/401 series were great. But this? This is utter bullshit.
Buyer beware.
On Monday evening, CBC News received a tip that the user profiles on the app's website could be accessed by members of the public.
CBC is not sharing how to access those profiles, in order to protect users' personal information, but has verified that email addresses, names, blood types, phone numbers, birthdays, as well as photos of identification like driver's licences and passports can easily be viewed by reviewing dozens of users' profiles.
The information was not encrypted and could be viewed in plain text.
Earlier in the day, the Calgary-based company's CEO Zakir Hussein had denied the app had verification or security issues and accused those who raised concerns about it of breaking the law.
CBC called Hussein late Monday, and agreed to hold off on publishing an article on the lapse until late Tuesday morning in order to give his team time to lock down the site and protect user information.
The portpassportal.com web app was pulled offline that evening and users of the mobile app were met with "Network error" pop-up messages if they attempted to upload or modify any information.
Hussein said Tuesday morning that the breach only lasted for minutes, and repeated that claim when CBC pointed out it had reviewed the personal information for more than an hour — and it's unknown how long the information was exposed before that tip was received.
"Someone that's out there is trying to destroy us here, and we're trying to build something good for people," he said.
"There's holes, and what I'm realizing is I think there are some things that we need to fix here. And you know, we're trying to play catch-up, I guess, and trying to figure out where these holes are."
The CEO said data has been pulled from the server and his developers are investigating. He said he believes only those who were awaiting verification were affected, a claim CBC was unable to verify.
Hussein has said Portpass has more than 650,000 registered users across Canada.
Cybersecurity analyst Ritesh Kotak said he was shocked but not surprised to hear users' information was exposed.
"These were exactly the privacy and security concerns I've previously raised when it comes to using third-party apps," Kotak said. "You've gotta ask yourself, 'Where's the data housed? Who has access to it? Is it encrypted?'… If this gets out to the wrong individuals it opens them up to fraud, identity theft and a whole other world of potential issues."
Earlier on Tuesday morning, Hussein spoke with 630 CHED Radio and said the servers were turned off to perform a security audit. He did not mention during that interview that users' personal information had been exposed.
The Calgary Sports and Entertainment Corporation (CSEC), which owns the NHL's Calgary Flames, had recommended the Calgary-based app as a way for ticket holders to prove their COVID-19 vaccination status to enter the Scotiabank Saddledome arena.
CSEC said Monday in an emailed statement, before the security lapse was discovered, that it's aware of concerns raised about the app and is working with the app's developer. CBC has reached out to CSEC for further comment. On Tuesday, after this article was published, CSEC pulled the recommendation for the app from the Flames' website.
"It seems like these were some really basic things that were missed. I question why the Calgary Flames in the first place said go ahead and use this app … you gotta do your homework," Kotak said.
Sharon Polsky, president of the Privacy and Access Council of Canada, said those who fear their information may have been compromised can notify the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. She said the company should have to answer some hard questions about how long the information was accessible and how many users' saw their data exposed.
"Will they conduct a forensic audit? Will they bring in a third-party independent auditor, not just somebody from within their company, to look it over and say, 'Yeah, we had a problem?'" Polsky said.
Hussein said his company will notify the offices of the federal and Alberta privacy commissioners.
The Alberta privacy commissioner's office said in an emailed statement that it has not yet received a report, and said it is contacting Portpass to remind it that if "there is a real risk of significant harm to affected individuals" an incident must be reported to the commissioner and individuals must be notified.
The federal privacy commissioner also said it has not yet received a report, and said it has contacted Portpass to seek further information in order to determine next steps, and that it is in communication with its provincial counterpart.
On Sunday, Conrad Yeung, a local web developer, had questioned on social media whether the app was accurately verifying vaccination information and CBC News had contacted the company to ask for a response.
Shortly after CBC contacted the company on Sunday, the app began to experience technical difficulties, but Hussein said the crash was due to an influx of users headed to that night's hockey game, overloading the server.
Alberta currently does not have an official proof-of-vaccination app, and the province's PDF vaccine record has been criticized for being easy to edit.
Kristi, one Portpass user, said she was scared to learn her personal information may be compromised. CBC News agreed not to use her last name in case her information was among those exposed.
She said she only downloaded a private app because the government hasn't yet made one available — a delay that frustrates her.
"It was like a kick in the gut when I got the CBC News alert … I don't know if my information is out there," she said.
Yeung had tested the Portpass app by uploading a photo of an actor as an ID photo, and editing a fake vaccination record to display the actor's name that the app verified as legitimate.
However, earlier on Monday, Hussein had denied that the app validated Yeung's false information, despite it appearing to do so, because he said the fake picture would be a giveaway.
"That's not true. We saw it on the back end and we were watching it.… So even if that user showed up, he wouldn't be able to utilize that picture because that's not him. So you wouldn't be able to get in. Secondly, that QR code, if someone scanned it, it would show that picture again," he said at the time.
Hussein had also said security concerns Yeung had raised about the app were false, and suggested he may contact authorities over his social media posts. He said he wished Yeung and others publicly posting concerns instead had privately reached out to the company.
"Instead he did that maliced behaviour. That, you know, that's not nice," he said.
Yeung said earlier on Monday he had no ill-will toward the company but simply wanted to raise the issues he spotted.
"I was trying to warn, I guess, the general public based on the vulnerabilities that I saw. Because at the end of the day, it's personal information people are submitting," he said.
See clip:
Key words: Long term, intergenerational effects, provisional approval, no information on the duration of protection, unknown prevention of transmission because it's a TRIAL.
See original source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVhj4B34IO0
See another resource:
https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/vaccine-passports-and-compensation/
Should You Disable Windows 10 Telemetry?