Is your phone listening to your conversations? The video Google deleted that Facecrook doesn’t want you to see?

In the previous post, we drew attention to how Google is recording you via its product, a 'smart' speaker called Google Home.

In the comments section of that video, the author Liron Segev mentioned that he's done another similar video with regards to the 'social media' (or rather 'advertising') giant we colloquially call Facecrook.

The video has since been removed.

Approximately 3 weeks later a video on this topic was posted, where at this point in time it is unclear whether it's the same video that was once removed.

In any event, the current video mentions some fascinating results, and most importantly a tutorial on how to see what Zuck knows about your online identity where you have an 'account' within his data gathering corporation.

Please note:

- We do not recommend using 'social media' apps from your phone, where if you must then from your personal computer will be a better alternative.

- We do not recommend using 'closed source' apps, as it is not disclosed by the app manufacturer where your data goes.

- We do not recommend using Apple devices if you truly value your privacy, where a 'de-Googled' phone would be a better alternative, from 'barebones' Android (AOSP) providers like; LineageOS, /e/ foundation, GrapheneOS, CalyxOS or others.

See video:

Is your phone listening to your conversations? 🤔

 

Google Home is secretly recording you. I have proof!

Did you willing consent to Google recording you in your own home?

See Google Home terms and conditions in the following link:

https://pencamearnings.s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/google-home-terms-and-conditions.pdf

Predators in the judiciary

While one cannot technically call magistrate Rodney Higgins a paedophile, it's behaviour like this that can easily be seen as predatory, given the fact that many women or more specifically young women are ‘forced’ into relationships with older men in positions of power.

Ashleigh Petrie now cannot  confirm nor deny his actions that can be seen as predatory, nor are many other women prepared to publicly state the same as their careers and livelihood and families can be put at risk.

Quite simply put men in positions of power, force themselves on the much younger female victims for sexual favours where if the victim comes out, then she will be financially ruined, with the added bonus of a character assassination by their the media or the court.

This is not new, where this ‘problem’ has been going on for quite some time in Australia.

Vile humans of this calibre need to be removed from positions of power, but it is generally accepted that since it has not occurred, it will not occur in any immediate future as the brotherhood protects its ‘kind’.

To make matters worse he 'stole' his victim's superannuation that was allocated to her mother.

And he was in charge of your matter?

Who ‘owns’ the courts in Australia?

Why was the royal commission into banking a farce?

The people in control of Australia have turned this federated colony from a ‘Commonwealth’ to a corporatised dictatorship.

The courts are corrupt to their Anglo-Masonic core.

See link to Cracking the Canberra Code:

https://wakeup-world.com/2014/10/27/cracking-the-canberra-code/

While the serfs may have their legal skirmishes won against an authority or two, many important matters, e.g. correctly exposing the fake ‘Queen of Australia’ or exposing that banks have no lawful instrument to see through foreclosures, the (Victorian) so called sheriff having no lawful instrument (i.e. warrant) to pursue alleged debts, foreclosures seizure of property are sealed, hidden from the public the very public that funds the so called ‘justice system’ for the alleged reason of not being in the interest of the public.

Since the people have ‘agreed’ through their non-action (being consent) to be put into an alternate jurisdiction (from the ‘Commonwealth’) of solely corporate binding contracts, the courts have been compromised where the stakeholders are banking and financial services institutions.

Under the leadership of Malcolm Turnbull, Australia was officially a Goldman Sachs run business, where Turnbull was member the multinational corporation.

The Australian judicature’s stakeholders are the ‘Big Four’ under various guises, where ultimately their interests are held within the clutches of Goldman Sachs.

The claim by the ‘Australian Government’ is that there is a separation of powers within the three tiers of government (executive, government, judicature) where this is false information given the fact of the influence of the ‘brotherhood’ and the banking and financial services sector.

So, how can the victims of the banks obtain a fair and impartial hearing with regards to their grievances?

They can’t.

It doesn't exist.

See video: 'banks & their influence'

What pharmaceuticals really do

 

Modern medicine may lay claim to many cures and eradication of diseases.

From global events to alleged global events modern medicine has stepped in and saved the day.

In this day and age, specifically from 2020 with the rapid flow of information, many a layperson has come to knowledge and documentation on a specific topic, where attention has been drawn to the wheelings and dealings of governments, multinationals right down the foot soldiers, that being the doctors.

While racing car drivers give ‘full disclosure’ on their clothing as to who sponsors them , the same cannot be said for the people in the medical profession selling you a multinational's products.

Did they push a product onto you because they got it for free?

How large is the commission on the amount of a certain product they push?

Are they giving you an inferior product, from that company, where other products exist that are better but that health ‘retailer’ has not been signed up to that multinational?

The consumer is kept in the dark on that one, where there is zero sign of the government stepping in with regards to transparency, as there is no ‘benefit’ involved for the authorities.

Will the consumer obtain the deals the government has made with the multinationals in order to scrutinise them, to make sure there are no backdoor deals or illegal transactions?

After all the 'consumers' or rather the taxpayers have the legal right to know, as they're the stakeholders.

When a list of products was given to a professional in the health field, the admission that came back was quite startling that being that pharmaceuticals in general trick the body into believing that nothing is wrong, with regards to a specific ‘problem’ or more precisely a condition, where those substances make the body function as per ‘normal’.

Australians as well as many other people in the world have been given written information that we are participating in the world’s largest trial, as confirmed by Greg Hunt in an interview.

The current liquid that is peddled by various multinationals is a trial liquid, where the general population has ‘consented’ to that trail, agreeing to zero liability or accountability from the producers.

The trial liquid masks (pun intended) the symptoms of the alleged disease, with zero indication of tackling the root cause of the alleged disease.

Queen’s Birthday celebration a LIE, ‘Queen of Australia’ another LIE, House of Windsor a LIE

There is no such lawful entity as the ‘Queen of Australia’.

The people of Australia are being conned from the top to the bottom (foot soldiers) by the authorities.

For starters the so called Queen’s Birthday in 2021, occurs on the 14^th of Jun, 27 Sep, 4 Oct all over the Australia.

This does not match up to any other monarch's birthday with regards to the history of the federated colony of even before.

Queen Victoria’s birthday was on 24 May, successor Edward VII 9 Nov,  George V 3 June, Edward VIII 23 June, George V 14 Dec, Elizabeth II 21 Apr.

Of course there’s an excuse for everything, including the 3 different dates.

Quite simply, the people in government lie, they lie to you (the general population) a LOT, where one of the biggest lies is the legal one called the ‘Queen of Australia’.

The people in government know about this and to make it worse, the judiciary are perpetuating this lie, conning the 'customers' of a corrupt legal business, that is referred to as the justice 'system'.

See a concise explanation in the following seven minute video:

 

House of ‘Windsor’, meh.

Why the fake name, why not the real lineage, Guelph?

Victoria the secret police state, no sheriff no warrants

Australia, still "roamed by rascals and outlaws" (but with a twist).

Even though it’s classified as being on the ‘east’ coast, Victoria is the ‘wild wild west’ meaning it’s lawless, with one major difference that being the lawlessness is not from the citizens but rather from the authorities.

Back in the 1800’s the authorities of the non federated colony were running amok.

Forty years of martial law came to an end with the installment of the Australian Courts Act.

This did not help the ‘free range’ prisoners on the isle, where the authorities were ‘feral’ with regards to the so called law, with total disregard to the laws of England.

Thirty sever years later, the colonialists needed to be reminded of this in paper, where the Colonial Laws Validity Act was put in place.

While this may have seemed to make a difference in the immediate future, this adherence to the law is totally lacking by today’s law ‘enforcers’.

Now in this federated colony, it’s almost quite literally ‘it’s all legal, until you get caught’ scenario.

Even when caught beating the public senseless the police don't give a damn as the officers involved do not pay for any consequences personally, where they are protected by the 'brotherhood'.

MAYBE this may or may not changed in an [quite probable] up and coming matter of Nick PATTERSON v The State of Victoria & VICTORIA POLICE & Ors?

We have obtained information from the government that shows that there was no lawful appointment of a so called ‘sheriff’ of Victoria, under the well advertised persona of Brendan Facey.

A lawfully appointed sheriff of Victoria is an officer of the Supreme Court of Victoria, where the appropriate paperwork reflects this.

Mr. Brendan Facey has not been lawfully appointed as the ‘sheriff’ of Victoria.

The authorities ignoring subpoenas

To make matters worse the courts are ignoring subpoenas, not made against the serfs, but rather those in government.

With relation to road traffic infringements, the then so called ‘sheriff’ of Victoria was subpoenaed to appear in court  to testify with regards to the (alleged) warrants issued by the office he conducted business from.

Mr. Brendan Facey failed to appear in court, where the court did not follow up with the mandatory action of issuing a warrant for his arrest in order to appear in court to answer these serious allegations.

When a subpoena occurs against a member of the serf pool and the requirement is not fulfilled, the court has zero hesitation in following up with an arrest warrant.

No so in the case of the so called ‘sheriff’.

In a Melbourne court room, the legal counsel for the office of the ‘Sheriff of Victoria’ admitted that warrants do not exist with regards to Infringement Notices if they are not paid.

This occurred in a 'court of public record'.

Doesn’t the mainstream media have court reporters?

Why was this not mentioned in the ‘news’?

Isn’t this a matter in the interest of the public?

To make matters even worse or rather continue with the illegitimacy, Facey’s so called replacement Warwick Knight has not been lawfully appointed as a sheriff either that being the lawful officer officer of the Supreme Court of Victoria.

This is an unusual matter where the courts are perverting the course of justice, at the expense of the general population.

See hidden recording at 'Fines Victoria':

Fun with Fines part 1 (Official Authorised Version)

Do NOT use Facebook’s up and coming smartwatch!

The message is very simple without going into reams of data, where if you truly value your privacy and that of those around you, do not use Zuck’s new up and coming smartwatch.

Mark Zuckerberg cannot be trusted, as shown in his legal matters.

Facebook cannot be trusted, with your 'private' or personal data.

When you signed up to Facebook, did the corporation inform you in their terms and conditions that your data will be going to Cambridge Analytica?

In the terms and conditions were you informed that Palantir was involved in your data collection?

If you will use Zuck’s smartwatch, since it will have two cameras, to better spy on you, where he will have unfettered access to your private and personal surroundings, whenever he or persons in his company desire.

He will also have access to your biometric data, i.e. heart rate.

No doubt many people will purchase this new spy device.

Will these people inform others that their face/voice will be on Zuck’s database?

DON’T get ‘Zucked’!

‘Shameful’ robodebt scandal ends with $1.7bn settlement

Nothing really happens until you take the corrupt government to court.

'Shameful' doesn't really cut it, but corrupt would at least more appropriate, as the government was still trying to obtain falsely claimed debts from people after being caught out:

The ‘shameful’ robodebt chapter has come to an end. Picture: Jerad WilliamsSource:News Corp Australia

Victims of the botched robodebt scheme have won a major victory against the Australian government over the “shameful” chapter.

The automated commonwealth scheme dubbed “robodebt” matched tax and Centrelink data to claw back welfare benefits the federal government claimed had been overpaid between 2015 and 2019.

The government agreed to pay $112 million in compensation to people who it claimed owed them money based on the flawed debt recovery scheme, with a Federal Court judge approving the settlement on Friday.

“The proceeding has exposed a shameful chapter in the administration of the commonwealth social security system and a massive failure in public administration,” Federal Court Justice Bernard Murphy said in the judgment.

The scheme wrongly hounded more than 443,000 people for $1.7m in welfare debts most never owed after the government switched to the flawed system.

Labor’s Bill Shorten slammed the scheme. Picture: NCA NewsWire / David CroslingSource:News Corp Australia

Since the start of the legal action the government promised to refund $751m of “invalid” debts people paid and drop claims for hundreds of millions more.

Justice Murphy said the group of Australians who found themselves in need of government supports included many who were marginalised or vulnerable and could be ill-equipped to understand or challenge the debts.

Melbourne nurse Felicity Button was one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit and had $11,500 taken from her account to pay off a debt she never owed.

The 33-year-old mum couldn’t pay for her daughter’s antibiotics after the money was taken out of her account in 2017.

“It was horrendous,” Ms Button said.

The nurse rang the debt collection agency and begged them to give her back the money so she could buy her daughter’s medicine and have fuel for her car.

“I honestly didn’t see a light at the end of the tunnel,” she said.

Ms Button received youth allowance while she was studying and working casually in 2016 and believed she was wrongly hounded for the funds. She is relieved the long legal battle is finally over.

“It’s sad that it took five years and actually quite embarrassing that it took five years,” the nurse said.

Those responsible for the scheme should have known that income averaging based on data from the tax office was an “unreliable basis” in which to raise and recover any debts, Justice Murphy said.

Liberal Minister Linda Reynolds apologised for parts of the program. Picture: APH via NCA NewsWireSource:Supplied

“Given a choice between a stuff-up, even a massive one, and a conspiracy, one should usually choose a stuff-up,” he said.

He said the government should have ensured it had a proper legal basis to raise and recover any social security debts.

It caused financial hardship, distress and anxiety to a “great many vulnerable people” and resulted in a “huge waste of public money”, Justice Murphy said.

But the government did not admit liability as part of the settlement but agreed the scheme was unlawful.

The opposition’s government services spokesman Bill Shorten slammed the scheme that targeted people who were marginalised and vulnerable.

“I have met with families who believe that the pursuit of the unlawful debt against a loved family member triggered them to take their own life,” Mr Shorten said outside the Federal Court in Melbourne.

He called for a royal commission into the scheme and for those who were responsible to be held to account.

Peter Gordon said it was a ‘rough form’ of justice for some involved in the class action against the federal government. Picture: NCA NewsWire / David CroslingSource:News Corp Australia

“No senior public servant has lost their job, no minister has lost their job.”

The founder of the legal firm who took on the lawsuit, Peter Gordon, said those wrongly labelled cheats and who contemplated suicide might feel the settlement was a “rough form of justice”.

He said it was a win for his clients, and Gordon Legal would begin allocating compensation that could range from hundreds of dollars to thousands per person.

Amounts would depend on what was wrongfully taken from people and the length of time the government had the cash, Mr Gordon said.

Despite the settlement getting the court’s approval, hundreds of people involved in the class action objected to it. Those objectors will be able to opt out and bring their own individual claims against the government.

Treasurer Josh Frydenburg said income averaging had been adopted under former Labor prime minister Paul Keating and rejected calls for a royal commission.

“When it comes to recovering debts, it’s a very difficult situation. This process of income averaging had been adopted by previous governments of both political persuasions,” he told reporters on Friday.

It comes as Government Services Minister Linda Reynolds apologised for how the program was administered.

“Clearly, this has been a very difficult process for all involved and we apologise for the way aspects of this program were administered,” she said.

Source:news.com.au

David Martin lists the criminal actions of government, video deleted.

Dr. David Martin was interviewed in a video where he mentions the sections of law that the government where he resides, has broken in relation to an alleged global issue.

This section of the video, the last 28 minutes was cut from the original full video called Planet Lockdown, and uploaded to YouTube.

After only a couple of hours Google removed this video.

Why?

See what Google removed :

Source:

https://odysee.com/@xipnios:7/Dr.-David-Martin---Laws-Violated--Planet-Lockdown-(21-01-14):8