31 January 2014

Richard Branson lashes WA shark killing

SIR Richard Branson says the West Australian government's shark culling policy will backfire, driving away tourism rather than boosting it. 
 
The British billionaire entrepreneur made the comment on breakfast radio as the state's Fisheries department was deploying baited drum lines off Perth beaches, including Cottesloe, where a large rally against the program is planned for Saturday morning.

The WA government says a spike in often-fatal shark attacks has dented tourism and leisure-based businesses, with recreational diving operators reporting a greater than 90 per cent plunge in people learning to dive.

But Sir Richard, who fights China's shark fin trade, says WA is getting a bad reputation internationally and tourists will be driven away.

"I'm sure one of the reasons he (Premier Colin Barnett) did it was because he was thinking it would encourage tourism. It's going to do quite the reverse, I think," Sir Richard told Fairfax radio on Friday.

"You're advertising a problem that doesn't exist in a major way and you're deterring people from wanting to come to Perth and your beautiful countryside around it.

"All you're going to achieve, I think, is to worry people unnecessarily."

He said it was "very sad" such a bad example was being set to the rest of the world.

"Last year, Australia was praised all over the world for creating the biggest marine reserves. This year, the world is looking at Australia - and particularly Western Australia - and wondering 'what on earth is going on?"

news.com.au 31 Jan 2014

An appalling decision by the Australian government.

Man encroaches on one of nature's more efficient predators and the 'predator' has to be killed, just like the ignorant people who swim in crocodile infested waters where there are signs to keep out of the water.

The most important aspect here raised is the 'revenue' loss from tourists.

Just another example of low life humans with total disregard for nature, but no one can 'tarnish' the reputation of a 'successful' billionaire now can they?

No comments: