08 April 2023

Police officer charged over alleged sexual related offences


A police officer has been charged over alleged sexual related offences.

In December 2022, an investigation commenced into reports of an alleged sexual offence involving a 17-year-old girl.

Following inquiries, a 27-year-old man was arrested yesterday (Thursday 6 April 2023) and taken to Singleton Police Station.

The probationary constable – attached to a command in the Northern Region – was charged with incite other to do a sexual act with them without consent and behave in offensive manner in/near public place/school.

He was granted conditional bail to appear before Singleton Local Court on Thursday 11 May 2023.


The officer’s employment status is currently under review.

Please note that the above is all the information, the colony's police force has released to the serfs.

There are plenty more abusers within the force but this is all that the general population are allowed to know about.

05 April 2023

ATAGI 2023 booster advice


Key points:

  • ATAGI advises the following groups should consider a 2023 booster dose if their last COVID-19 vaccine dose or confirmed infection (whichever is the most recent) was 6 months ago or longer, and regardless of the number of prior doses received, based on an individual risk benefit assessment with their immunisation provider. 
    • All Adults aged 18-64 years without risk factors for severe COVID-19
    • Children and adolescents aged 5-17 years who have medical comorbidities that increase their risk of severe COVID-19, or disability with significant or complex health needs.
  • ATAGI advises that a booster dose is not recommended at this time for children and adolescents aged under the age of 18 who do not have any risk factors for severe COVID-19.

See pdf:


Please also note that the pharmaceutic drug used to treat C-19 cannot be called vaccine as it does not confer immunity.

See U.S. Supreme Court case from 4th of November 2021:


Source:  https://constitutionwatch.com.au/the-covid-19-injections-do-not-confer-immunity-and-therefore-do-not-meet-the-definition-of-a-vaccine/

See Pfizer document leak:

https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

See article of the headline:

On this day 3 years ago Australia’s largest health & legal farces began

01 April 2023

AstraZeneca is no longer available as an approved COVID-19 vaccine

The Australian authorities and mainstream call the AZ drug a 'vaccine' which implies that it confers immunity, which it does not.

A US Supreme Court case in November of 2021 confirms this.

See this document and others within the link below:

On this day 3 years ago Australia’s largest health & legal farces began

In any event see reference from the federal government:



30 March 2023

Police corruption in high profile rape case

The colony’s police forces are corrupt to the core, where it’s ‘just’ a matter of catching them out but that makes no difference as the corrupt Masonic/Fabian ‘brotherhood’ in the legal system protects them.

This is just part of one story that has made it out into the public news media:


Brittany Higgins inquiry: AFP refusing to hand over full brief of evidence.

The AFP is refusing to hand over the full brief of evidence in the investigation of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation to a powerful inquiry investigating police conduct.

The Australian Federal Police is refusing to hand over the full brief of evidence in the investigation of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation to a powerful inquiry investigating police conduct.

A former judge leading the inquiry, Walter Sofronoff KC, detailed the roadblocks the inquiry was running into at a preliminary hearing today where the AFP is represented.

In an extraordinary revelation, the inquiry heard there may also be a police recording of a phone call between barrister Steve Whybrow and AFP Detective Scott Moller.

Mr Whybrow is the barrister for Bruce Lehrmann, the man previously charged in relation to the matter.

A single charge of sex without consent against Mr Lehrmann was dropped by the ACT Department of Prosecutions in December after the first trial collapsed as a result of juror misconduct.

Mr Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to the charge and has strongly denied the allegation since he was charged in August 2021.

While the AFP welcomed the inquiry and has agreed to co-operate, it has raised a number of concerns over providing some documents.

For example, it has told the inquiry that a full brief of evidence includes a large volume of unedited video and phone records that exceeds 100,000 pages.

The police have told the inquiry it would take a long time to “review the material”.

“Did anyone explain why they are reviewing it rather than handing it over?” Mr Sofronoff said.

In a statement provided following the hearing, the AFP denied it was refusing to hand over the brief, suggesting this claim was “false” before outlining why it had not handed the document over.

“The Board of Inquiry requested the AFP produce the full Brief of Evidence, and it was produced on 27 March 2023 to the extent permissible by law,” an AFP spokesperson said.

“There are statutory provisions preventing the production of certain material, including under the Telecommunications Interception Act 1979 (Cth), the Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1991 (ACT) and the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT).

“As discussed at the Directions Hearing on 30 March, the AFP is proactively producing material to assist the Board of Inquiry with its important work.”

Mr Sofronoff also mentioned — twice — during the hearing about items to be produced in relation to the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.

Brittany Higgins arrives at the ACT Supreme Court in October 2022. Picture: Martin Ollman/Getty Images

The reference could suggest that phone taps may have been involved in the investigation, however there was no further information provided over whether this was the case or who may have been targeted.

The laws set out when eligible Australian law enforcement and security agencies are permitted to obtain warrants to intercept communications, obtain warrants to access stored communications, and authorise the disclosure of data.

Senior counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC detailed a long list of subpoenas the AFP is resisting or has delayed production of documents.

However, Mr Sofronoff also noted several police officers involved in the investigation “have been very helpful”.

“There is a magnitude of work you are being asked to undertake,” Ms Longbottom said.

“It is critical that we have the timely production of documents. To date there have been issues with the timely production of documents.”

The ACT government announced the probe into the prosecution last year, stressing it would not be about recontesting Ms Higgins’ rape allegation but the conduct of criminal justice agencies.

“It is important to remember that this will not be a retrial of the case, it will focus on whether the criminal justice officials involved performed their duties with appropriate rigour, impartiality, and independence,” ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury said.

The probe will now consider whether or not the AFP, the DPP and the ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner acted in breach of their duties during the investigation.

A charge against Bruce Lehrmann was dropped by the ACT DPP in December. Picture: Gary Ramage/NCA NewsWire

The inquiry was sparked by ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold’s claim in a letter to the AFP that police had “clearly aligned with the successful defence of this matter rather than its prosecution”.

However, the circumstances of the release of the letter under freedom of information laws will also be probed by the inquiry and a subpoena has been issued to the ACT Information Commissioner to examine the processes that resulted in the letter being released.

The inquiry, with the powers of a royal commission, will hold public hearings later this month and publish relevant documents on the inquiry website.

Ms Longbottom is the Queensland barrister who recently appeared in the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide.

The junior counsel assisting is Joshua Jones, who was counsel assisting in the DNA inquiry led by Mr Sofronoff.

In his bombshell letter that led to the inquiry, Mr Drumgold wrote to ACT police chief Neil Gaughan after the collapse of the trial outlining a number of serious concerns.

“There has now been over one-and-a-half years of consistent and inappropriate interference by investigators, firstly directed towards my independence with a very clear campaign to pressure me to agree with the investigators’ desire not to charge, then during the conduct of this trial itself, and finally attempting to influence any decision on a retrial,” Mr Drumgold said.

“Then when charges resulted, the [investigators’] interests have clearly aligned with the successful defence of this matter rather than its prosecution.”

ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold. Picture: ABC News

Mr Gaughan has previously backed public inquiry into the trial of Mr Lehrmann that extends to the conduct of the prosecutor, the police and “the allegation of contempt” over Ms Higgins’ speech outside court at the conclusion of the trial.

Earlier this year, it emerged Mr Lehrmann lodged a formal complaint of professional misconduct targeting Mr Drumgold with the ACT Bar Association.

The allegations are contained in a leaked letter that was sent to the ACT Bar Association on December 9, that is likely to be captured by the subpoenas issued to date and referred to the inquiry.

“By doing so, he is bringing into disrepute his own office, the fine work and reputation of the Australian Federal Police and your members,” Mr Lehrmann wrote.

“His public behaviour continues to smear my name and the presumption of innocence that is a cornerstone of our justice system and that demands him to uphold. I am innocent of the charge pursued against me by The Director. I have always, strongly maintained my innocence.”

ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr and Attorney-General Rattenbury said the inquiry had been devised to “bring sunlight” to allegations raised.

The terms of reference include:

— Whether any police officers failed to act in accordance with their duties or acted in breach of their duties in their conduct of the investigation of the allegations of Ms Brittany Higgins concerning Mr Bruce Lehrmann.

— It will also examine their dealings with the Director of Public Prosecutions in relation to his duty to decide whether to commence, to continue and to discontinue criminal proceedings against Mr Lehrmann in relation to those allegations.

— Police dealings with the legal representatives for Mr Lehrmann before, during or after the trial in the matter of R v Lehrmann; in their provision of information to any persons in relation to the matter of R v Lehrmann.

— If any police officers so acted, their reasons and motives for their actions.

— Whether the Director of Public Prosecutions failed to act in accordance with his duties or acted in breach of his duties in making his decisions to commence, to continue and to discontinue criminal proceedings against Mr Lehrmann.

— If the Director of Public Prosecutions so acted, his reasons and motives for his actions.

— Whether the Director of Public Prosecutions failed to act in accordance with his duties or acted in breach of his duties in making his decisions to commence, to continue and to discontinue criminal proceedings against Mr Lehrmann.

— If the Director of Public Prosecutions so acted, his reasons and motives for his actions.

— The circumstances around, and decisions which led to the public release of the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions’ letter to the Chief Police Officer of ACT Policing dated 1 November 2022.

— Whether the Victims of Crime Commissioner acted in accordance with the relevant statutory framework in terms of support provided to the complainant in the matter of R v Lehrmann.

— Any matter reasonably incidental to any of the above matters.

Brittany Higgins in the Maldives with partner David Sharaz in January. Picture: brittanyhiggins/Instagram

The inquiry is also likely to consider claims that police sent prohibited material including Ms Higgins’ confidential counselling notes to the accused’s original lawyers.

Mr Gaughan outlined his own concerns in a leaked internal email that complained Mr Drumgold released private correspondence to a journalist under freedom of information laws without consulting police.

During the hearing, a lawyer acting for Mr Drumgold suggested that he might claim legal professional privilege over some documents.

“When am I going to know if your client refuses to produce a document or I should say declined to produce a document?” Mr Sofronoff asked.

A lawyer acting for Mr Drumgold said he may be prepared to consider waiving of privilege.

“Well, when is he going to consider it?” Mr Sofronoff said.

The inquiry heard the DPP’s office had already handed over 137,000 pages of documents.

Kate Richardson SC, the barrister acting for the AFP, said a document had been provided outlining the time frame that the AFP was working towards to hand over outstanding documents.

27 March 2023

The lies of the real estate industry: Michael Hutchence’s "home" for sale


One of the biggest industries in Australia, apart from government itself where a constant barrage of lies emanate from, is the real estate industry.

AS we know the government is stakeholder of this real estate industry where the bigger the lies the more profit is generated from those lies which ‘persons’ in government benefit from. 

No one, in their right mind would “bite the hand that feeds it” now would they, so it is not in the government’s modus operandi to attend to this multi-generational false advertising (an illegal action) issue.

So, ‘consumers’, customers or whatever other legal jargon the poindexters deep within government annals decide to label the tax slave serfs purchasing a limited lease on the land they have limited dominion over, the government sits idly by profiteering, from the lies spewing out of the mouths of the lowly regarded (by many, up there with with used car salespeople) realtors. 

In a recent advertisement, you were led to believe that you are going to purchase Michael Hutchence’s childhood home.

By any stretch of the imagination of a so called ‘normal’ person one would be seeing in one’s mind that one would be purchasing as a piece of land not only containing grass and trees but most importantly the house you know a kitchen, lounge room, laundry and bedroom where a young Michael would be growing up and running around in, because after all that’s what the advertisement states remembering that Optus got financially penalised many time for ‘false advertising’.

WELL, guess what?

You ain't gonna get no house which Mikey resided in!


You are going to get an abomination of a modern home, with zero ties to the original home which was torn down.

So, some internet 'guru' may point out that you were notified that the home you are purchasing is not Mikey's original one, sure that may be true.

BUT, as in the Optus case, the advertisement, on it's physical store that got you through the doors was false, just like the headline that got you into the article.

Once again it's people's ignorance, indifference, and total lack of action that will allow this type of fraud to keep continuing.

26 March 2023

Nonclinical Evaluation Report, FOI 2839 Document 6, January 2021 and comment



See 58 page report:



See also: PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL:- RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN – AUSTRALIA-SPECIFIC ANNEX

See also: Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Meeting 18, Minutes on Item 2.1

BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine


See comment video on the first document only, as they may not have been aware of the other two listed above:


24 March 2023

Former NT police officer Jared Porch pleads guilty to child abuse material offences

 


A former Northern Territory Police officer who offered money, alcohol and phone credit to men in exchange for sexually explicit videos, including of children, has pleaded guilty to a string of child abuse material charges.

Jared Kane Porch appeared before the Alice Springs Supreme Court on Wednesday, pleading guilty to 12 charges, including transmitting, soliciting, possessing or controlling child abuse material.

Other charges included six counts of using a carriage service to groom another person to make it easier to procure persons under 16 years of age to engage in sexual activity with themselves.

There were also two counts of using a carriage service to groom another person to make it easier to procure persons under 16 years of age to engage in sexual activity with another person.

The court heard the offending took place over a 16-month period, beginning on July 31, 2020, while Porch was a serving member of the Northern Territory Police Force.

Prosecutor Mary Chalmers SC said "a number" of the victims were Aboriginal children.

Porch offered to provide money, alcohol and mobile phone credit to men in exchange for explicit content, the court heard.

Details of offending revealed

After a tip-off from the United States National Centre of Missing and Exploited children, AFP officers raided Porch's Alice Springs home in November 2021, finding "a large number" of Facebook messenger chats on his devices.

According to the agreed facts of the case, Porch spoke to Aboriginal, Fijian and Papua New Guinean men via social media, either using his own name, the pseudonym "Whitie Whitie" or a fake female persona of "Paige Oakes" and sent and received child abuse material.

The court heard during some of the chats, he would request the other person to bring a child into video chats or otherwise involve them in sexual acts.

He also asked the men to meet up with "Paige" for sex, at times asking them to find or arrange children to also be present.

Court documents show Porch offered to provide money, alcohol and mobile telephone credit to the men in exchange for sexually explicit videos and photographs, or engaging in sexual acts via video chat or in person.

Porch pleaded guilty to a raft of child abuse material offences

The court heard "a number" of the men became dependent on his payments, which Porch would withhold if he was "not satisfied" with the pornographic or abusive material he had been provided.

Six-year-old child among victims

Prosecutors said 40 different people were involved in Porch's grooming and procuring offences.

On three separate occasions, following what Ms Chalmers described as "persistent efforts", Porch convinced another man to perform sexually explicit acts in the presence of his six-year-old son, in exchange for sums of money.

The court heard during a video call to Porch, the same man filmed the child while the six-year-old was naked in the shower.

Ms Chalmers asked that two images from videos of this incident be submitted as evidence, but Justice Judith Kelly declined.

"It will tend to distort the sentencing exercise ... by producing an inappropriately emotional response," Justice Kelly said.

According to the agreed facts, Porch kept a large collection of pornographic material involving Aboriginal people on a data cloud, and often traded pornography of local men and women with others.

Porch committed the offences while working as a police officer in Alice Springs and surrounding remote communities

Former police officer charged

The court heard Porch had worked as a police officer in Alice Springs and surrounding remote communities for more than 12 years.

He received several promotions during his time in the force, working at times as an Acting Senior Sergeant.

Porch resigned from the NT Police Force following his arrest in late 2021.

After he pleaded guilty to the offences, Porch's lawyers urged Justice Kelly to take into account his "excellent" work history when she ultimately hands down her sentence.

Each of his 12 charges carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.

The defence argued Porch's time in prison would be "more arduous" than most prisoners, as a former police officer and a sex offender.

His lawyers urged Justice Kelly to take into account his cooperation with police during their investigation and said Porch had shown a “willingness to seek assistance” for his mental health.

The court heard he sought psychological support in 2016, suffering from anxiety and depression, which his lawyers argued were a result of Porch’s "frustration at not being able to express his sexuality", and feelings of loneliness while working remotely.

Porch worked as a police officer in Alice Springs and surrounding communities for more than 12 years.

Claims no real action to rehabilitate

Prosecutors argued despite Porch’s attempts to seek help for his anxiety and depression, he had yet to take action to address the drivers behind his offending.

"Yes, there's expressions of guilt and shame that are reasonably common expressions in these types of matters," Ms Chalmers said.

"But there is no discussion in [his letter] that advances the situation in terms of rehabilitative prospects.

"For example, there's no engagement with the motivation behind the offending, or evidence that there's been significant efforts undertaken to address what's behind the offending."

Porch has been remanded in custody to appear in the Alice Springs Supreme Court on Friday for sentencing.

Watch how these 'penal colony policies' (deliberately) fail their victims as they so many time in the past.

This person should be strung up as an example for others in the force to behave.

MANY police 'officers' think they are above the law as a result of their 'magic' blue suit.

22 March 2023

Victoria Police recruitment

Victoria Police are on a recruitment drive in 2023 for 500 new officers in 2 years...

A percentage of officers resigned during the pandemic, as they were not comfortable in assaulting the general population based on unlawful policies.


To obtain training of the calibre shown in the illustration above, being a wife basher helps tremendously.

Some officers think that it is acceptable to assault their wife because they are police officers, where they can and do get away with this heinous crime.

Source:supplied