Bluetooth Mesh network, the next step in surveillance independent of the Internet

Bluetooth mesh network using Bluetooth LE, ratified in December 2020.

Implemented by Amazon, in the next level of data gathering, behavioural analysis and surveillance of the masses.

See 21 minute video by privacy tech expert Rob Braxman:

EXPOSÉ OF THE MEDICAL MAFIA

See video by Glenn Floyd, posted on the 18th of July 2020:

EXPOSED: Face 'rnask' farce by Brett Sutton

(filename: Keeping up with the BS)

You got to keep up with the farce, no?

"Do as we say and not as we do", right?

Don’t wear surgical rnasks, during an alleged incident but go with cloth ones, WTF?

So, in Australia, we're told that cloth 'rnasks' are an acceptable form of defence.

One question posed:

Do anaesthetists need to wear surgical rnasks in the operating theatre? A literature review with evidence-based recommendations.

Where the answer was co-authored allegedly by Brett Sutton:

See full document:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0310057X0102900402

See Sutton's video from 11 July 2020:

within link:

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/prof-brett-suttons-mask-recommendations/video/2097e0b8198110c40c50d5631072303f

And you STILL trust the corporation aggregate (commonly referred to as 'government') that instructs you that cloth ones are sufficient?

meme time:

The letters 'rn' were substituted for a single letter that they look like, for key word scanning reasons.

Google MUST be fined for crowd sourced spying!

It seems that the Australian mainstream media under reports Google’s ’data’ crimes, giving the clear impression that the Australian Government controlled mainstream media is in bed with Google.

Being part of the five eyes data hoovering infrastructure, why wouldn’t they be?

The law allegedly applies to everyone, but Google in reality operates above the tax laws not really paying their fair share of taxes in Australia the way the serfs do, where the balance sheet is mopped up the tax slaves in Australia.

Whatever fine Google get’s they’ll just pass it on to the ‘product’ that being the users with more ad revenue, like they did with the social media news feeds fiasco not that long ago.

During its global surveillance run with the street view cars Google purposely installed Wi-Fi sniffing equipment into their cars (an action called war driving) in order to obtain people’s passwords, traffic, unique MAC addresses of the routers and most importantly their geographic location.

When caught out Google stated that was done in error, a blatant lie.

Some bright spark within Google saw that this action was too expensive, where a better solution would be to get the slaves to do Google’s not only for free but most importantly without their knowledge.

If you the serf steal $0.00001 a million times or more you most probably will get incarcerated, as a similar example saw a Victorian man being imprisoned for 8 years(?).

If Google steals 4.09KB of data (which comes at a cost) say 400 billion times, nothing happens.

Governments turn a blind eye and so does the legal profession.

Why?

Is it because that collected data is used to spy on you and not the ‘real’ criminals?

Part of the global surveillance agenda on every single person, connected or not?

Prior to Android 7 (Nougat), one could scan their immediate Wi-Fi routers via an app without having to turn on the location services (GPS) of the device.

For no technical reason whatsoever, after Nougat, Google made it mandatory for the user to switch on the location tracking services when using Wi-Fi otherwise the app would not work.

As if that wasn’t enough, after Android 9 (Pie), Google also made that same action necessary in order to use Bluetooth devices, devices that are portable by design.

As always, it’s never enough for Google, so the next phase of the global surveillance agenda was installed (on your smartphone)

In Google’s modified version of Android that makes it’s way into all phones and also used by Apple, is something called Wi-Fi (and Bluetooth) scanning.

Despite the illusion that the software ‘switch’ will turn this function off, it’s on 24/7 obtaining the signal strength of all the Wi-Fi routers your phone can see transmitting this data back to the source (Apple/Google) many times a minute.

This is done without your knowledge/consent stealing your data in the process.

The ‘best’ part about all this is that Google has been getting away with this for years and it seems that it will for many more to come.

Why does one need a 5000mAh battery that ‘only’ lasts a day?

 

(advice from a flog on a mainstream media 'news' site?)

Quite simply because of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth scanning, which cannot be turned off.

What’s the solution?

To purchase hardware that can have AOSP (Android Open Source Project), or a ‘de-Googled’ (barebones, without Google's, the carrier's or manufacturer's spyware installed) version of Android, where in most instances it quite literally doubles the battery life of the smartphone.

The global surveillance agenda is quite a nefarious one, where the narrative is controlled by the authorities to limit the movement and control the lives of the general population in a dictatorial manner.

Governments have created law solely for the benefit of chosen multinational corporations.

See article from top screen capture:

https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/18/17580694/google-android-eu-fine-antitrust

Is your phone listening to your conversations? The video Google deleted that Facecrook doesn’t want you to see?

In the previous post, we drew attention to how Google is recording you via its product, a 'smart' speaker called Google Home.

In the comments section of that video, the author Liron Segev mentioned that he's done another similar video with regards to the 'social media' (or rather 'advertising') giant we colloquially call Facecrook.

The video has since been removed.

Approximately 3 weeks later a video on this topic was posted, where at this point in time it is unclear whether it's the same video that was once removed.

In any event, the current video mentions some fascinating results, and most importantly a tutorial on how to see what Zuck knows about your online identity where you have an 'account' within his data gathering corporation.

Please note:

- We do not recommend using 'social media' apps from your phone, where if you must then from your personal computer will be a better alternative.

- We do not recommend using 'closed source' apps, as it is not disclosed by the app manufacturer where your data goes.

- We do not recommend using Apple devices if you truly value your privacy, where a 'de-Googled' phone would be a better alternative, from 'barebones' Android (AOSP) providers like; LineageOS, /e/ foundation, GrapheneOS, CalyxOS or others.

See video:

Is your phone listening to your conversations? 🤔

 

Google Home is secretly recording you. I have proof!

Did you willing consent to Google recording you in your own home?

See Google Home terms and conditions in the following link:

https://pencamearnings.s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/google-home-terms-and-conditions.pdf

Predators in the judiciary

While one cannot technically call magistrate Rodney Higgins a paedophile, it's behaviour like this that can easily be seen as predatory, given the fact that many women or more specifically young women are ‘forced’ into relationships with older men in positions of power.

Ashleigh Petrie now cannot  confirm nor deny his actions that can be seen as predatory, nor are many other women prepared to publicly state the same as their careers and livelihood and families can be put at risk.

Quite simply put men in positions of power, force themselves on the much younger female victims for sexual favours where if the victim comes out, then she will be financially ruined, with the added bonus of a character assassination by their the media or the court.

This is not new, where this ‘problem’ has been going on for quite some time in Australia.

Vile humans of this calibre need to be removed from positions of power, but it is generally accepted that since it has not occurred, it will not occur in any immediate future as the brotherhood protects its ‘kind’.

To make matters worse he 'stole' his victim's superannuation that was allocated to her mother.

And he was in charge of your matter?

Who ‘owns’ the courts in Australia?

Why was the royal commission into banking a farce?

The people in control of Australia have turned this federated colony from a ‘Commonwealth’ to a corporatised dictatorship.

The courts are corrupt to their Anglo-Masonic core.

See link to Cracking the Canberra Code:

https://wakeup-world.com/2014/10/27/cracking-the-canberra-code/

While the serfs may have their legal skirmishes won against an authority or two, many important matters, e.g. correctly exposing the fake ‘Queen of Australia’ or exposing that banks have no lawful instrument to see through foreclosures, the (Victorian) so called sheriff having no lawful instrument (i.e. warrant) to pursue alleged debts, foreclosures seizure of property are sealed, hidden from the public the very public that funds the so called ‘justice system’ for the alleged reason of not being in the interest of the public.

Since the people have ‘agreed’ through their non-action (being consent) to be put into an alternate jurisdiction (from the ‘Commonwealth’) of solely corporate binding contracts, the courts have been compromised where the stakeholders are banking and financial services institutions.

Under the leadership of Malcolm Turnbull, Australia was officially a Goldman Sachs run business, where Turnbull was member the multinational corporation.

The Australian judicature’s stakeholders are the ‘Big Four’ under various guises, where ultimately their interests are held within the clutches of Goldman Sachs.

The claim by the ‘Australian Government’ is that there is a separation of powers within the three tiers of government (executive, government, judicature) where this is false information given the fact of the influence of the ‘brotherhood’ and the banking and financial services sector.

So, how can the victims of the banks obtain a fair and impartial hearing with regards to their grievances?

They can’t.

It doesn't exist.

See video: 'banks & their influence'

What pharmaceuticals really do

 

Modern medicine may lay claim to many cures and eradication of diseases.

From global events to alleged global events modern medicine has stepped in and saved the day.

In this day and age, specifically from 2020 with the rapid flow of information, many a layperson has come to knowledge and documentation on a specific topic, where attention has been drawn to the wheelings and dealings of governments, multinationals right down the foot soldiers, that being the doctors.

While racing car drivers give ‘full disclosure’ on their clothing as to who sponsors them , the same cannot be said for the people in the medical profession selling you a multinational's products.

Did they push a product onto you because they got it for free?

How large is the commission on the amount of a certain product they push?

Are they giving you an inferior product, from that company, where other products exist that are better but that health ‘retailer’ has not been signed up to that multinational?

The consumer is kept in the dark on that one, where there is zero sign of the government stepping in with regards to transparency, as there is no ‘benefit’ involved for the authorities.

Will the consumer obtain the deals the government has made with the multinationals in order to scrutinise them, to make sure there are no backdoor deals or illegal transactions?

After all the 'consumers' or rather the taxpayers have the legal right to know, as they're the stakeholders.

When a list of products was given to a professional in the health field, the admission that came back was quite startling that being that pharmaceuticals in general trick the body into believing that nothing is wrong, with regards to a specific ‘problem’ or more precisely a condition, where those substances make the body function as per ‘normal’.

Australians as well as many other people in the world have been given written information that we are participating in the world’s largest trial, as confirmed by Greg Hunt in an interview.

The current liquid that is peddled by various multinationals is a trial liquid, where the general population has ‘consented’ to that trail, agreeing to zero liability or accountability from the producers.

The trial liquid masks (pun intended) the symptoms of the alleged disease, with zero indication of tackling the root cause of the alleged disease.

Queen’s Birthday celebration a LIE, ‘Queen of Australia’ another LIE, House of Windsor a LIE

There is no such lawful entity as the ‘Queen of Australia’.

The people of Australia are being conned from the top to the bottom (foot soldiers) by the authorities.

For starters the so called Queen’s Birthday in 2021, occurs on the 14^th of Jun, 27 Sep, 4 Oct all over the Australia.

This does not match up to any other monarch's birthday with regards to the history of the federated colony of even before.

Queen Victoria’s birthday was on 24 May, successor Edward VII 9 Nov,  George V 3 June, Edward VIII 23 June, George V 14 Dec, Elizabeth II 21 Apr.

Of course there’s an excuse for everything, including the 3 different dates.

Quite simply, the people in government lie, they lie to you (the general population) a LOT, where one of the biggest lies is the legal one called the ‘Queen of Australia’.

The people in government know about this and to make it worse, the judiciary are perpetuating this lie, conning the 'customers' of a corrupt legal business, that is referred to as the justice 'system'.

See a concise explanation in the following seven minute video:

 

House of ‘Windsor’, meh.

Why the fake name, why not the real lineage, Guelph?