EXPOSED! The ‘cases’ farce by the authorities.

In the (penal) colony called Australia, the authorities are locking people up, destroying their livelihood, based on something called ‘cases’.

The Commonwealth and the states are pushing for a minimum of a 70% rate, then saying they need an 80% rate where the ultimate (unrealistic) goal is a total v---ination rate.

There is a HUGE problem with that, as stated by Dr. Kerry Chant, Chief Health Officer of Australia’s first penal colony, that being New South Wales.

Dr. Chant stated the following:

“... the majority of the population is v@cc-nated, the cases of c0vId that you see will occur more in va--inated people, because no v@ccIne is perfect ..."

Let that sink in!!!

See video:

Investigative journalism is dead in Australia: repossessions

The so called ‘news’ outlets of the mainstream media are no longer realistically ‘news’ sources, but rather businesses that carefully curate government sponsored propaganda.

It may (or not) have taken the current global situation for people to realise this.

ANY action questioning government decisions or disenchantment is ferociously met by the msm as an anti whatever, ‘extremist’, far left or right, and in order to evoke emotion or anger within the community adjectives further supporting the falsified narrative like violent are added.

Government reaction in Australia has caused more harm than the purported source of our woes.

Loss of jobs as a result of government action caused harm to many where suicides have gone up at an alarming rate, something that is hidden from the public view.

MANY people have lost their businesses forever, while multinationals have raked in outstanding profits.

How many people have lost their homes/business as a result of government action?

Too taboo to report on?

Or is reporting on this classified as inciting, because if the people really found out the true figures they ‘may’ take it too the streets?

What’s really important in the ‘news’ is that some ‘model’ is wearing a Savage X Fenty bikini.

We are hounded every single day with (fake?) stories that there are however many ‘cases’ each day.

BUT none of the ‘news’ outlet have reported on how they are classified, more importantly what Ct (Cycle threshold) figure is used to derive these so called cases.

The NSW department of health stated in a tweet that it uses 40.

The problem there is that this figure gives false positives, where the WHO recommended 25-30, as seen in the above screen capture.

Another problem is that the current test used in Australia is inherently flawed, where because of this a US health institution is withdrawing its use from Dec 2021.

Now, the mainstream media is following the government directive of giving false information with regards to deaths, where the operative words have been changed where it’s reported that a person died ‘with’ the disease as opposed to previously ‘from’ the disease, therefore amplifying the alleged severity of the situation.

A truly pathetic state of ‘journalism’ in Australia.

Government caught falsifying CoVy deaths

How can you now trust ANY so called government statistic?

Quite simply put the government of New South Wales has been caught out falsifying deaths.

There is a considerable difference with regards to dying 'from' something as opposed to 'with'.

He died 'with' the flu, means that disease was present BUT the death was caused by something else.

He died 'from' the flu, stops right there.

Since the government is changing the cause of death, therefore the Coroner's Office is committing fraud or to be more specific a criminal action.

Therefore the people of New South Wales are locked up under false pretenses. 

See article at:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9937169/Coronavirus-Australia-NSW-Health-switches-recording-deaths-instead-Covid.html

Government can modify your posts where you are ultimately still liable?

The Australian Government has kicked it’s authoritarian state régime into full swing.

This is far from a ‘conspiracy theory’ but rather now entrenched into legislation.

So, if you post something online, the government can now “disrupt data by modifying, adding, copying or deleting in order to frustrate the commission of serious offences online”

Apparently protests in Australia are now deemed illegal, by the authorities.

Can anyone point us to a lawfully enacted Act that states this?

So now your online communications about attending a protest can be modified by persons in government, where they can write whatever they want, where you will be personally responsible?

The legislation was passed by BOTH houses.

So called ‘democracy’ is DEAD in Australia.

Remember that as time goes on, your actions/movements become more and more 'illegal'.

See the legislation at:

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r6623

Brett Johnson (41), Vic cop accused of rape, stalking on duty

Victoria Police badge (file image) - AAP

A former police officer has faced court in Melbourne charged with nearly 100 offences including rape and stalking, allegedly committed on the job.

Brett Johnson, 41, is facing 98 charges over alleged incidents that occurred while he was on duty between 2010 and 2019.

Johnson appeared virtually in Melbourne Magistrates Court on Friday, turning on his camera briefly and waving to the magistrate from inside a car.

Dozens of charges allege he abused his position as a police officer, dating back to 2010.

It is also alleged he raped and indecently assaulted a woman in Greensborough in 2013.

He is facing the same charges over alleged incidents in Pyramid Hill in May and June 2015.

Johnson allegedly also stalked a woman in 2019, persistently contacting her on the phone and visiting her at home when not on police business.

Victoria Police said on Friday that Johnson, previously a leading senior constable, had resigned from the force.

He is due back in court in November.

Source: riverineherald.com.au

Google paid off carriers, phone manufacturers and app developers to protect the Play Store

Google, concerned that the large U.S. carriers like Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T were planning to launch their own Android app storefronts to compete with the Play Store, agreed to pay off companies that have the capability to develop alternative app stores. Besides sharing revenue with some wireless providers, Google included several app developers and device makers in the scheme.

So why would Google feel threatened by these third parties? The firm was concerned that device manufacturers and carriers could pre-install a third-party Android app storefront on new devices. Unlike iOS, which is a walled garden inside a walled garden surrounded by a walled garden, Google allows Android users to sideload apps from third-party app stores. And should Google even hint at a change to this, in the current state of lawmakers' relationships with big tech, the Alphabet unit is likely to be branded anti-competitive.

Google ferociously guards its 30% cut of Play Store revenue

To prevent alternative app stores from appearing on Android phones, Google signed deals with companies such as LG and Motorola; in exchange for a cut of Play Store revenue generated by users of these companies' phones, the manufacturers promised not to preload alternative Android app stores on their devices. Of the 30% cut of in-app revenue collected by Google, 20% to 25% would be given to Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) to pay them off from competing with the Google Play Store.

Now unredacted, court documents reveled Google's plan to protect the Google Play Store

The information about these deals was discovered by Mashable after unredacted portions of court documents were released. One part of the document filed by Epic Games states that since 2019, Google has  entered into agreements with OEMs restricting them from including third-party Android app stores with their devices. In exchange, "Google agrees to share with OEMs 'monopoly profits Google earns from its Search business (and in some cases profits from the Play Store itself)."

Epic states that Google entered into these deals once it realized that the carriers and the phone manufacturers constituted a threat to what the lawsuit calls Google's monopoly. Earlier this month, court documents revealed that Google was considering the purchase of Fortnite developer Epic Games. Google reportedly considered Epic and other Android app developers to be threats to the Google Play Store.

Google considered buying Epic Games, but never approached it with an offer

As for the popular Fortnite game, Google feared that it would lose its 30% slice of the pie once Epic offered the game from its own website. As a result, the Search Giant supposedly discussed internally a plan to buy Epic. While Google did discuss a possible transaction internally, it never approached the game maker with any proposal or offer. It did hope to give Epic a special deal in return for an exclusive launch in the Play Store, a plan that did not reach fruition.

Like Apple's App Store, the Google Play Store has been under attack by lawmakers who have called out both app storefronts for anticompetitive behavior. Last month, 36 state attorneys general filed a lawsuit against the Play Store. The suit accused Google of paying off Samsung so that the latter would not compete with Google's Android app storefront. And yes, these suits are more than just a pesky pain in the butt for Google. Consider that Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes called Google's monopoly is a menace to the marketplace.

In addition, in both the House and Senate, a bill has been proposed called "The Open App Markets Act" that would allow app developers to inform consumers of cheaper in-app purchasing options, and protect the sideloading of apps (which as we've noted, Google allows and Apple doesn't). If turned into legislation, the Act would give consumers more control over their own devices, protect the privacy, security, and safety of consumers, amd prevent app stores from taking advantage of app developers.

Source: phonearena.com

Apple’s child abuse (CSAM) scanner a deliberate failure, other agenda in play

Apple will have you think that its CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) AI scanner on your phone will prevent child abuse, but the reality is very different.

It is easily defeatable.

It only works on Apple devices.

It’s an excuse for invasion of privacy for other purposes.

See the technicalities as explained by Rob Braxman within the video:

Placebo effect j@b in Australia

We’ve obtained information from a source that needs to remain unidentifiable and the workplace not to be mentioned with regards to the information that was given.

The source stated that the so called figures the Australian government is touting with regards to the production of a particular fluid are unobtainable within the facilities in Australia.

As a result, many of the viles contain something called the placebo effect or more specifically a saline solution.

The reason for this is to get people ‘hooked’ or more importantly registered to take the so called ‘cure’ at later points in time.

This goes inline with what the media are telling people that a second or third shot, maybe even fourth or annual shot forever, needs to be taken.

The reality being that many people did not obtain what they came for, that being an alleged ‘cure’, but rather a saline solution, where the alleged cure may come on the second or even third shot.

MANY reports are also surfacing that fully (two shots) j@bbed people are contracting the disease, that being as a result of the saline injection.

The deception by government with regards to this matter goes beyond the comprehension of most people.

VicPol not required to wear their masks when shooting projectiles at individuals.

Police caught on camera saying Public Health Order is bullsh*t

The corruption of Australia’s police forces goes beyond the comprehension of most people.

In today’s day and age it is almost mandatory for people to carry a hidden recording device when interacting with police, as this is the only way to catch them out.

Independent journalist Marty Focker from Melbourne catches Victoria Police with a bombshell after they take his bag, and don’t realise that the camera is still recording and audio is being picked up!

They say that they will charge him with breaching the public health order but are caught saying:

“It’s bullshit anyways it will just go to court and get withdrawn”

Then they specifically plan to do a targeted arrest on him while he is out on bail after the ridiculous arrest.

Straight off the bat, a few actions by police come to mind:

- unlawful arrest

- acting under dictation

- stalking

In any event, DO NOT TRUST POLICE!

See video: